SLIDE I: CONTEXT Welfare and forest in Mozambique Pindanganga

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hoang Thi Ngoc Ha Vietnam PEN Workshop, 8/2008. ROLE OF FOREST & NATIONAL PARK ON POVERTY ALLEVIATION AT CAT BA ISLAND.
Advertisements

Evidence and Questions about Livelihoods and Conflict Erwin Bulte Wageningen University Tilburg University DIME Workshop, Dubai June 1, 2010.
Project ideas for Mozambique Country Context Project 1. Integrated project of electrification using low cost technologies for rural villages and biomass.
Co-benefits Initiative Zambian Experience
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
The 8-7 National Poverty Reduction Program in China: the National Strategy and its Impact Wang Sangui, Li Zhou, Ren Yanshun.
2000/2001 Household Budget Survey (HBS) Conducted by The National Bureau of Statistics.
Gender equity in water management Vasudha Pangare Director World Water Institute.
Evaluating the Impact of Food Stamps and Microfinance Evidence from Sri Lanka Dr. Iffath A. Sharif.
1 THE 5 YEAR PLAN OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Presented by: Dr. TRANG HIẾU DŨNG.
Centre for Climate Change Economics & Policy (CCCEP) Sustainability Research Institute (SRI) University of Leeds Supervisors: Prof Lindsay.
UNEP-ETB Launch Meeting Integrated Assessment of Trade Related Policies Geneva July agricultural biodiversity indicators and assessment methods.
First Results on the Quantitative Data Analysis in Madagascar.
Social Perspectives on Food Security in the Uplands of Northern Laos John B. Raintree Socioeconomics Unit LSUAFRP, NAFRI.
Agro-industry investments, smallholders and workers: evidences on household income effects from Tanzania Raoul Herrmann 1, 2, Khamaldin Mutabazi 3, Ulrike.
The use of impact indicators for the evaluation of support for investment in agricultural holdings : case study of the Rural Development Programme for.
1 Delali BK Dovie Global Environmental Change and Food Systems (GECAFS) First meeting of Vulnerability of Food Systems to GEC Research Network May.
COUNTRY PAPER FROM VIET NAM (21th ACEDAC Board Meeting 2014) MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF COOPERATIVES AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT.
III-B 1 III. AGE analysis of trade, policy reform and environment.
Policies and incentives for improving the management of miombo woodlands to meet household needs in Southern Africa.
Ministry of Communication Transport Post and Construction Department of Roads Poverty and Environmental Nexus on Road Case Study In Kaluem and Ngot Ou.
Precautionary wealth of rural households: Is it better to hold it at the barn or at the bank? Franz Gomez-Soto Claudio Gonzalez-Vega International Conference.
  What is economics?  What is Macro Economics?  Importance/Issues/Scope of Macro Economics.  Limitations/Exceptions of Macro Economics. Introduction.
Annual Review 2011 Julian Abrams PART 3: DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS COSOP IFAD Country Strategic Opportunities Programme.
Rural Poverty, Smallholders and Markets in Cambodia Raghav Gaiha, University of Delhi Based on a collaborative study with Md. Azam -sponsored by APR, IFAD.
Tourism for Marginal Groups: Tourism as a Livelihood Strategy in an Indigenous Community in Taiwan Tourism’s Advancement of Tourists’ & Residents’ Quality.
Information Needs for Sustainable Forests Management Nguyen Tuong Van Forest Sector Support Partnership 17 th of March 2010, Hanoi.
Presented by Ehouman Williams V AHOUAKAN We are thankful to Prof. YAO YAO JOSEPH and Prof. M’BAYE DIENE PRIVATE REGIONAL RETURN.
PEN STUDY MALAWI (Chimaliro and Liwonde Forests) PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Monika Singh University of British Columbia
Tricky Data Issues in the PEN Datasets
PEN in DRC Riyong Kim Bakkegaard Putting PEN to Paper March 2009
Department of Economics The University of Melbourne
Income and Livelihoods
Khaled Misbahuzzaman CIFOR, Bogor, 26 March 2009
VIET NAM Mini-PRESENTATION
PEN – China By Nick Hogarth
PEN in Uganda CIFOR, March 2009
Forest Dependency in the Brazilian and Bolivian Amazon
Payments for Environmental Services and Household Behaviour: The case of carbon in Mozambique’s Agro-forests Ravi Hegde University of British Columbia.
Environment-Poverty linkages in West Africa: Household dependence on renewable natural resources in Central Burkina Faso By Mariève Pouliot.
PEN INDIA RESEARCH Putting PEN to Paper
Prevalence of use (mean + SE) of wild resources from South African savannas (n = 14 villages; 30 – 60 hh per village) Resource % Wild spinaches
Improving Agriculture Resilience in Rural Dry Zone Communities.
PEN partner mini-presentations PEN workshop, Bogor, March
NAGARKOT… Reward for the early birds.
Presented by YOUSSOU LO PROJECT NATIONAL COORDINATOR
Poverty and Forest Dependence in Indonesia
Hazard Mitigation Planning VII
Forest dependency in the Brazilian and Bolivian Amazon
Africa RISING in the Ethiopian Highlands
A case study in Le Thuy district
Study on Forest and People in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh
Rural-urban Migration and Poverty in Kenya: is Agriculture the Answer?
Forest dependency in lowland Bolivia
ОПШТИНА КУРШУМЛИЈА.
Measurement for resilient livelihood outcomes
WELCOME TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY FACULTY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT.
Conservation by cultivation: Linkages between an endangered endemic fir (Abies guatemalensis Rehder) and peasant economies in the western highlands of.
Catholic Relief Services
FORESTRY AND POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PEN workshop 2009 PEN RQs Arild Angelsen PEN coordinator.
Index Notation Sunday, 24 February 2019.
Village Inequality in Western China
The Livelihoods Approach
Rural income and forest dependence –some evidence from Guatemala
China's Poverty Reduction Program and Audit Practice by Using KNI
Potentiality of homestead forests aspect of biodiversity conservation and socio-economic development in Bangladesh Academic skill in Forest Science ,
8 Core Steps of success: I.Step:1 : DREAM SETTING: II. Step: 2 : LIST MAKING : IV. Step: 4 : SHOW THE PLAN: III. Step: 3 : INVITATION: V. Step: 5 : FOLLOW.
Presentation transcript:

SLIDE I: CONTEXT Welfare and forest in Mozambique Pindanganga Miombo woodlands 75 km2 11 villages / 1364 hh 272 hh (20%) 6.08 members per hh Sussundenga Semi-evergreen forest 100 km2 5 villages / 1522 hh 274 hh (18%) 6.11 members per hh

SLIDE II: HOUSEHOLD INCOME SOURCES Pindanganga Sussundenga Per cap income in USD: Cash income: 122 (9.6) Sub. income: 59 (2.3) Total income: 181 (10.7) Per cap income in USD: Cash income: 92 (4.7) Sub. Income: 48 (1.5) Total income: 140 (5.3)

SLIDE III: INCOME SOURCES AND SEASONALITY PINDANGANGA SUSSUNDENGA

SLIDE IV: KEY FOREST AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCTS % SUSSUNDENGA PINDANGANGA CHARCOAL 0.14 8.87 MATS 2.27 1.33 BAMBOO 0.00 4.25 TIMBER 0.06 5.41 FUELWOOD 40.60 22.90 GRASS 6.09 5.68 POLE 8.29 3.44 MEDICIN 0.68 ANIMAL 4.61 5.19 FISH 3.23 5.11 MUSHROOM 0.41 0.16 GOLD 18.88 26.38 FOR ENV (USD) 39.17 83.11

SLIDE V: INCOME COMPOSITION AND POVERTY PINDANGANGA 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL USD 76.2 110.9 146.8 196.3 405.8 FOREST SHARE 12.9 13.2 17.6 20.0 17.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SHARE 23.2 20.5 23.7 21.5 GOLD SHARE 5.4 7.0 6.0 11.2 11.9 FOR ENV SHARE 36.1 36.4 38.1 43.6 38.6 SUSSUNDENGA 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL USD 74.3 110.3 147.9 194.7 316.9 FOREST SHARE 10.7 8.9 8.1 7.9 6.9 ENVIRONMENTAL SHARE 13.6 16.8 17.0 16.1 16.2 GOLD SHARE 0.8 3.4 4.2 5.0 6.0 FOR ENV SHARE 24.4 25.7 25.1 24.0 23.1 PINDANANGA Small-scale farmers Larger agriculturalists Diversified producers Livestock Commercial forest users Wage workers TOTAL USD 181.0 243.4 213.6 217.7 252.5 242.4 FOREST SHARE 21.2 15.2 14.7 13.4 19.7 16.5 ENVIRONMENTAL SHARE 24.1 23.7 22.4 27.6 17.9 15.6 GOLD SHARE 8.7 12.2 8.8 15.1 5.1 5.7 FOR ENV SHARE 66.0 55.0 43.0 23.0 22.0 12.0 SHARE SAMPLE 30 25 19 10 5

SLIDE VI: COPING STRATEGIES RESPONSE SUSSUNDENGA PINDANGANGA SAVINGS 55.6 45.6 AGRICULTURE 7.9 22.3 WAGEWORK 26.0 13.2 OTHER 4.9 6.0 FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT 1.0 LIVESTOCK 1.3 3.7 SOCIAL SUPPORT 2.3 2.0 REDUCTION IN CONSUMPTION 0.3 1.7 NGO & GOV SUPPORT 0.6 LOAN 0.0

SLIDE VI: STEPPING STONE OUT OF POVERTY CASH TO TOTAL INCOME  Small diversified Business Environmental users Wage workers Agriculture Forest users CASH_FOREST 13.0 3.6 2.0 5.0 15.2 CASH_ENVIRONMENT 11.0 8.8 29.6 7.4 13.2 6.2 CASH_AGRIC 12.7 11.5 7.6 17.2 22.4 9.0 CASH_LIVESTOCK 1.8 1.1 4.5 5.5 6.7 WAGE 12.0 14.7 18.4 0.3 8.0 BUSS 0.7 16.5 7.3 11.7 9.4 SUPPORT 1.6 1.9 0.9 6.3 OTHER 0.8 0.6 1.4 0.2 TOTAL (USD) 181 214 218 242 243 252 SAVINGS   + (***) IMPLEMENTS + (**) AGE OF HEAD - (**) YEARS IN VILLAGE + (+) EDUCATION

SLIDE VI: FOREST DEPENDENCE AND ROAD DISTANCE SUSSUNDENGA  dist_km forest enviro~t   1 environment 0.172 -0.2351   PINDANGANGA 0.2212 -0.2031

SLIDE VII: POLICIES AND OVERALL FINDINGS Indication that forest provide means of poverty alleviation and asset accumulation for poor and rich households. Acknowledge income diversification – forest is just one component of many income activities undertaken by households.