Outcomes Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
State of the Department ABET 2000 Update Presentation to External Review Board October 19, 2001.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Academic Assessment Accountability: Are we what we say we are? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Continual Commitment to Accreditation February 1, 2011.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Institutional Effectiveness A set of ongoing and systematic actions, processes, steps and practices that include: Planning Assessment of programs and.
Assessment Accountability: Are we doing what we say we are doing? Program Improvement: How can we be even better? External audiences: SACS.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SACSOC ACCREDITATION AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS STUDENT AFFAIRS LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 17, Allan Aycock.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
Quality Management Systems FIETA Providers Herman Letoka ETQA MANAGER.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Academic Program Review
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Committee Orientation
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Model curriculum for bs in information technology
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Orientation for New Site Visitors
Student Affairs Assessment
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Annual Reporting UWF.edu/ASPIRE Cynthia Catellier
Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment
Assessment Presentation
The Assessment Plan Composer: Meeting SACS Requirements
Jo Lynn Autry Digranes Coordinator for Assessment Updated 10/2017
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
SACSCOC Administrative Assessment Changes
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
ASSESSMENT.
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Fort Valley State University
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Foothill College Strategic Objective - Governance
2019 Curriculum Institute: Decoding Your Curriculum
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes Training

Welcome! Accreditation standards Outcomes Defined Compliance Assist Small group learning Discussion Time to work on Outcomes Make appointment for further assistance Kim’s outline

SACSCOC Section 7 Effective institutions demonstrate a commitment to the principles of continuous improvement. These principles are based on a systematic and documented process of assessing institutional performance with respect to mission in all aspects of the institution. An institutional planning and effectiveness process involves all programs, services and constituencies; is linked to the decision-making process at all levels; and provides a sound basis for budgetary decisions and resource allocations. Shifting to accreditation standards for administrative outcomes

SACSCOC Section 7.1 The institution engages in ongoing, comprehensive, and integrated research-based planning and evaluation processes that (a) focus on institutional quality and effectiveness and (b) incorporate a systematic review of institutional goals and outcomes consistent with its mission. (Institutional Planning) [CR]

SACSCOC R 7.3 The institution identifies expected outcomes of its administrative support services and demonstrates the extent to which the outcomes are achieved. (Administrative effectiveness)

SACSCOC Section 8 Section 8: Student Achievement Student learning and student success are at the core of the mission of all institutions of higher learning. Effective institutions focus on the design and improvement of educational experiences to enhance student learning and support student learning outcomes for its educational programs. To meet the goals of educational programs, an institution provides appropriate academic and student services to support student success.

SACSCOC R 8.1 The institution identifies, evaluates, and publishes goals and outcomes for student achievement appropriate to the institution’s mission, the nature of the students it serves, and the kinds of programs offered. The institution uses multiple measures to document student success. (Student achievement) [CR] (Section 8.1)

SACSCOC Section 8.2 The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of seeking improvement based on analysis of the results in the areas below: a. student learning outcomes for each of its educational programs. (Student outcomes: educational programs) b. student learning outcomes for collegiate-level general education competencies of its undergraduate degree programs. (Student outcomes: general education) c. academic and student services that support student success. (Student outcomes: academic and student services)

Outcomes Strategic actions planned and executed to improve the institution Expressed as an expected result of an action, course, program, or other experience. Separated into different types of outcomes. All outcomes must be entered, assessed, and documented annually for the institution to demonstrate continuous improvement – and it will help us actually improve!

Types of Outcomes Outcomes (sometimes also called unit objectives) are divided into 3 types at Northeast State: 1. Student Learning (PSLO) 2. Student Success (APO) 3. Everything else (Administrative)

Administrative Outcomes a.k.a. Unit Objectives Any outcomes that do not measure student learning or student success for a specific academic program fall into this category. Administrative Outcomes should normally change every year as improvements are made Examples: Curriculum reform Policy/Procedure development Equipment/Facility work Grant writing Faculty/Professional development Initiating/Improving/Phasing out services Accreditation review years Academic Audits

Reflect on Administrative Outcomes Where should we modernize our service? What should we stop doing? Are we communicating clearly with students, internal or external customers? Has technology changed expectations of customers? Are our current vendor(s) competitive in the market? How can we make our service/program more consistent? Are we serving everyone equally? Can we partner with another unit to make customer experience better? Handoff to John for next slide

Administrative Unit Objectives Logging into Compliance Assist Navigating to your Dashboard Strategic Planning Tabs Old Unit Objective Form (2017-2018 to be completed) New Unit Objective Form (2018-2019 to be planned) Small Group Learning (which reviews how to write unit objectives) John’s outline

Reflect on Student Learning Why measure student learning at the major and concentration level? How many times should an outcome be measured? Why measure general education? How many statements are required to adequately capture expected learning outcomes? Where should PSLOs be visible?