Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNAM-1 Expression Marks an Alternative Program of NK Cell Maturation
Advertisements

A Novel Cancer Therapeutic Using Thrombospondin 1 in Dendritic Cells
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
by Norman Nausch, Ioanna E
Macrophages from C3-deficient mice have impaired potency to stimulate alloreactive T cells by Wuding Zhou, Hetal Patel, Ke Li, Qi Peng, Marie-Bernadette.
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Optimizing EphA2-CAR T Cells for the Adoptive Immunotherapy of Glioma
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Xinchun Chen, Yi Zeng, Gang Li, Nicolas Larmonier, Michael W
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Hydrodynamic Delivery of Human IL-15 cDNA Increases Murine Natural Killer Cell Recovery after Syngeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation  Isabel Barao, Maite.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Distinct phases in recovery of reconstituted innate cellular-mediated immunity after murine syngeneic bone marrow transplantation  Jeffery J. Auletta,
Augmentation of antitumor immune responses after adoptive transfer of bone marrow derived from donors immunized with tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 47, Issue 2, Pages e5 (August 2017)
by Kalpana Parvathaneni, and David W. Scott
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Tracking ex vivo-expanded CD4+CD25+ and CD8+CD25+ regulatory T cells after infusion to prevent donor lymphocyte infusion-induced lethal acute graft-versus-host.
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
CD40, but Not CD40L, Is Required for the Optimal Priming of T Cells and Control of Aerosol M. tuberculosis Infection  Vanja Lazarevic, Amy J Myers, Charles.
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Optimizing EphA2-CAR T Cells for the Adoptive Immunotherapy of Glioma
Skin Delivery of Clec4a Small Hairpin RNA Elicited an Effective Antitumor Response by Enhancing CD8+ Immunity In Vivo  Tzu-Yang Weng, Chia-Jung Li, Chung-Yen.
Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Serial vaccination with 32Dp210-derived whole cell vaccines in non-tumor-bearing mice stimulates robust antileukemic cytolytic activity. Serial vaccination.
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Sindbis Viral Vectors Transiently Deliver Tumor-associated Antigens to Lymph Nodes and Elicit Diversified Antitumor CD8+ T-cell Immunity  Tomer Granot,
Members of IL-1 family of cytokines favor the generation of IL-3–secreting CD4+ T cells in vitro. Members of IL-1 family of cytokines favor the generation.
Fig. 1. CAR4 and CAR8 cells demonstrate in vitro and in vivo antileukemic efficacy. CAR4 and CAR8 cells demonstrate in vitro and in vivo antileukemic efficacy.
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
A Novel Cancer Therapeutic Using Thrombospondin 1 in Dendritic Cells
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 2130-2141 (May 2018) Engineered Tumor-Targeted T Cells Mediate Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy Both Directly and through Activation of the Endogenous Immune System  Mauro P. Avanzi, Oladapo Yeku, Xinghuo Li, Dinali P. Wijewarnasuriya, Dayenne G. van Leeuwen, Kenneth Cheung, Hyebin Park, Terence J. Purdon, Anthony F. Daniyan, Matthew H. Spitzer, Renier J. Brentjens  Cell Reports  Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 2130-2141 (May 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 23, 2130-2141DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Human 1928z-hIL18 CAR T Cells Enhance Survival of CD19+ Tumor-Bearing Scid-Beige Xenograft Mice (A) Representation of the human CAR constructs. (B) In vitro cytokine secretion of IL-18, IFN-γ, and IL-2 after coculture with NALM6 tumor cells (E:T, 1:1). (C) In vitro proliferation assay with 1928z and 1928z-hIL18 CAR T cells co-cultured with NALM6 tumor cells (E:T 1:1). CAR T cells were stimulated on day 0 and day 7. (D) In vitro cytotoxicity utilizing standard 4-hr 51Cr release assay comparing 1928z and 1928z-hIL18 CAR T cells. (E) In vitro cytotoxicity over the course of 72 hr. 1928z versus 1928z-hIL18, ∗p < 0.05. (F and G) Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differential gene expression between 1928z and 1928z-hIL18 CAR T cells in vitro at day 1 (F) and day 8 after NALM6 tumor stimulation (G). (H) Survival curve comparing 1928z and 1928z-hIL18 CAR T cells in a NALM6-GFP+/Luc+-tumor bearing xenograft Scid-Beige mouse model. (I) Bioluminescence imaging comparing 1928z and 1928z-hIL18 CAR T cells in Scid-Beige mice inoculated with NALM6-GFP+/Luc+ tumor cells. Survival curves analyses were performed using Mantel-Cox test. Other analyses were determined with Student’s t test. All results were pooled from at least two independent experiments. Data in (B)–(E) represent means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for indicated comparison. ns, non-significant. Cell Reports 2018 23, 2130-2141DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Murine 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T Cells Enhance Long-Term Survival of CD19+ Tumor-Bearing Syngeneic Mice (A) Representation of murine CAR T cell constructs. (B) In vitro murine IL-18 secretion after stimulation with EL4hCD19+ tumor cells (E:T, 1:1). (C and D) Survival of EL4hCD19+ tumor-bearing mice treated on day 1 with (C) full dose (2.5 × 106) or (D) half dose (1.2 × 106) of CAR T cells/mouse. (E) Survival of mice treated with 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells in a delayed tumor model. Mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 EL4hCD19+ tumor cells on day 0 and treated with 2.5 × 106 CAR T cells on day 7. Dashed line indicates day of CAR T cell infusion. (F) Survival of mice inoculated with 1 × 106 EL4hCD19+ tumor cells on day 0, treated with 2.5 × 106 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells on day 1, and then rechallenged with 1 × 106 EL4hCD19+ tumor cells on day 40. Control untreated mice were inoculated with 1 × 106 EL4hCD19+ tumor cells on either day 0 or day 40. Data in (B) represent means ± SEM. Survival curves analyses were made using Mantel-Cox test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for indicated comparison. All results were pooled from at least two independent experiments. Cell Reports 2018 23, 2130-2141DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T Cells Display Enhanced Expansion and Persistence and Depend on Autocrine IL-18 Signaling (A) CAR T cells from peripheral blood quantified by flow cytometry. (B) Peripheral blood B cell aplasia quantified via flow cytometry. (C) Bone marrow PCR analysis of mice treated with 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells. (D) Serum cytokine quantification on day 7, comparing 19m28mz and 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells. (E) Survival of EL4hCD19+ tumor-bearing mice treated with 19mz-mIL18 or 19m28mz-mIL18. (F) Quantification of day 7 peripheral blood CAR T cell in vivo. (G) Day 7, 30, and 60 peripheral blood B cell aplasia. (H) Survival of EL4hCD19+ tumor-bearing mice treated with IL18R-KO 19m28mz-mIL18 or WT 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells. (I) Day 7 peripheral blood CAR T cell quantification. (J) Day 7 peripheral blood B cell aplasia. (K) Day 7 serum IFN-γ quantification. Survival curves comparisons were made using Mantel-Cox test. All results were pooled from at least two independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for indicated comparison. ns, non-significant. Cell Reports 2018 23, 2130-2141DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T Cells Modulate the Tumor Microenvironment and Activate Endogenous Immune Cells (A) Detection of CAR T cells in the bone marrow. (B) Statistical scaffold map of the bone marrow. Size of unsupervised clusters denotes the relative number of cells in that grouping. Nodes in red denote landmark populations, defined manually. Blue nodes reflect unsupervised clusters of cells from raw dataset. Log2 fold change of manually gated populations comparing bone marrow of mice treated with 19m28mz or 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells with statistically significant differences noted (p < 0.05). (C) Detection of endogenous CD8 non-CAR T cells and CD8 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells in the bone marrow of mice treated with 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells. (D–F) Phenotypic analysis of bone marrow endogenous cells of mice treated with 19m28mz or 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells: (D) endogenous CD8 T cells, (E) macrophages, and (F) dendritic cells. (G) Statistical Scaffold map of the bone marrow comparing the phenotype of endogenous non-CAR T cells and 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells in mice treated with 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells. Results are pooled data of two independent experiments. Adjustment by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure for multiple testing. Data in (B) and (D)–(F) represent means ± SD. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for indicated comparison. ns, non-significant. Cell Reports 2018 23, 2130-2141DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 IL-18-Secreting CAR T Cells Engage Endogenous Anti-tumor Immune Effector Cells (A) Survival curve of mice inoculated with both 1 × 106 EL4hCD19+ and 1 × 106 EL4hCD19− tumor cells and treated on D1 with 19m28mz or 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells. (B) IFN-γ ELISPOT results comparing CD3+ CAR-negative splenocytes from mice treated with 19m28mz, 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells, or naive mice after coculture with EL4hCD19+ tumor cells. (C) IFN-γ ELISPOT comparing CD3+ CAR-negative splenocytes from mice treated with 19m28mz, 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells, or naive mice after coculture with EL4hCD19+ tumor cells with/without MHC-I or MHC-II blocking antibodies. (D) IFN-γ cytokine quantification comparing CAR-negative splenocytes after 24 hr of exposure to EL4hCD19+ tumor cells (1:1 E:T ratio). (E) IFN-γ cytokine quantification comparing CAR-negative splenocytes after 24 hr of exposure to EL4hCD19− tumor cells (1:1 E:T ratio). (F) Survival of mice treated with 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells with or without macrophage depletion. (G) Survival of mice treated with 19m28mz-mIL18 CAR T cells with or without NK cell depletion. Survival curves analyses performed using Mantel-Cox test. Data in (B)–(E) represent means ± SEM. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001 for indicated comparison. ns, non-significant. All results were pooled from at least two independent experiments. Cell Reports 2018 23, 2130-2141DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.051) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions