Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (September 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
RhoD Inhibits RhoC-ROCK-Dependent Cell Contraction via PAK6
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2003)
The C2 Domain of PKCδ Is a Phosphotyrosine Binding Domain
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages e4 (July 2018)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (December 2017)
Kindlin-1 Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling
Haruko Miura, Yohei Kondo, Michiyuki Matsuda, Kazuhiro Aoki 
Volume 115, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Charlene Depry, Sohum Mehta, Ruojing Li, Jin Zhang  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Sequential Steps of CRAC Channel Activation
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e4 (February 2017)
A Ratiometric Sensor for Imaging Insulin Secretion in Single β Cells
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
Virus-Induced Abl and Fyn Kinase Signals Permit Coxsackievirus Entry through Epithelial Tight Junctions  Carolyn B. Coyne, Jeffrey M. Bergelson  Cell 
Volume 27, Issue 14, Pages e5 (July 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Disruption of the Rag-Ragulator Complex by c17orf59 Inhibits mTORC1
MELK Promotes Melanoma Growth by Stimulating the NF-κB Pathway
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (December 2015)
Yvonne Ng, Georg Ramm, Jamie A. Lopez, David E. James  Cell Metabolism 
Merlin/NF2-Lin28B-let-7 Is a Tumor-Suppressive Pathway that Is Cell-Density Dependent and Hippo Independent  Hiroki Hikasa, Yoshitaka Sekido, Akira Suzuki 
Kristýna Kotýnková, Kuan-Chung Su, Stephen C. West, Mark Petronczki 
Lysine residues in the cytoplasmic region of TfR are involved in the MARCH8-induced downregulation of TfR. Lysine residues in the cytoplasmic region of.
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages e4 (May 2019)
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e4 (March 2019)
VEGF-Induced Vascular Permeability Is Mediated by FAK
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (September 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages e4 (October 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 3312-3323.e5 (September 2018) A Tyrosine Switch on NEDD4-2 E3 Ligase Transmits GPCR Inflammatory Signaling  Neil J. Grimsey, Rachan Narala, Cara C. Rada, Sohum Mehta, Bryan S. Stephens, Irina Kufareva, John Lapek, David J. Gonzalez, Tracy M. Handel, Jin Zhang, JoAnn Trejo  Cell Reports  Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 3312-3323.e5 (September 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PAR1 Regulates NEDD4-2 Recruitment and Activation Independent of Internalization (A) Immunoblot of IP’ed PAR1 and co-associated NEDD4-2 from α-Thrombin (α-Th)-stimulated EA.hy926 cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗p < 0.05). (B) Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of PAR1 (green) and NEDD4-2 (red) in control (ctrl) or α-Th-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). PAR1 and NEDD4-2 colocalization is shown as yellow in the merged image. Insets are magnifications of boxed areas. Bars, 10 μm. (C) Percentage of overlap of PAR1 (green pixels) and NEDD4-2 (red pixels), in control (ctrl) or α-Th-stimulated cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 9) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05). (D) Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) calculated for PAR1 and NEDD4-2 colocalization in control (ctrl) or α-Th-stimulated cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 9) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05). (E) Immunoblot of ubiquitinated NEDD4-2 IP’ed from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗∗p < 0.01). (F) Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of PAR1 (green) and NEDD4-2 (red) in control (Ctrl) or α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells pretreated with DMSO or Dyngo 4a. Colocalization of PAR1 and NEDD4-2 is shown as yellow in the merged image; insets are magnifications of boxed areas. Bars, 10 μm. (G) Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) calculated for PAR1 and NEDD4-2 colocalization in α-Th-stimulated cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 9) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (H) PAR1 surface expression in DMSO (Ctrl) or Dyngo 4a-treated cells. The data (mean ± SD n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗∗p < 0.01) (I) Immunoblot of ubiquitinated PAR1 IP’ed from DMSO or Dyngo 4a-treated EA.hy926 cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05). (J) Immunoblots of cell lysates from DMSO (Ctrl) or Dyngo 4a-treated EA.hy926 cells. The data (mean ± SD n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rapid Activation of Plasma-Membrane-Associated c-Src by PAR1 (A) Immunoblots of cell lysates from EA.hy926 cells in Ctrl or PP2-treated cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). (B and C) Activation of c-Src using a pm- Kras-Src (B) or cytosolic-Src FRET (C) biosensors expressed in EA.hy926 cells incubated with α-Th and PP2. FRET ratios were normalized prior to α-Th addition (mean ± SEM, n = >8 cells). (D) Response kinetics of c-Src FRET biosensors in α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells, time to half-max (t1/2, min); the data (mean, ± SEM, n = 54 cells) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (E) Immunoblots of cell lysates from non-specific (ns) Gαq, Gα12, or Gα13 siRNA-transfected EA.hy926 cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 NEDD4-2 Auto-ubiquitination and PAR1 Ubiquitination Mediated by c-Src (A) Immunoblot of NEDD4-2 co-association with c-Src from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05). (B) Immunoblot of ubiquitinated NEDD4-2 from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells, Ctrl, or PP2 treatment. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗∗p < 0.01). (C) Immunoblot of NEDD4-2 co-association with PAR1 from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells, Ctrl, or PP2 treatment. (D) Immunoblot of ubiquitinated PAR1 from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells, Ctrl, or PP2 treated. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05). (E) Immunoblot of ubiquitinated PAR1 from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells, transfected with control, ns-, or c-Src-specific siRNA. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗∗∗p < 0.001). Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Thrombin Activation of p38 MAPK Requires c-Src (A and C) Immunoblot of cell lysates from EA.hy926 cells pretreated with Ctrl, PP2, or PP3 (A) or Ctrl and PP2 (C), prior to α-Th stimulation. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001). (B and D) Immunoblots of EA.hy926 cell lysates transfected with ns- or c-Src-specific siRNA prior to α-Th stimulation immunoblotted for p38 and ERK1/2 (B) or TAB1 (D). The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 NEDD4-2 Tyrosine Phosphorylation Required for Auto-ubiquitination (A) Immunoblot of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins from Ctrl or PP2-treated EA.hy926 cells stimulated with α-Th. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗∗∗p < 0.001). (B) Schematic representation of the NEDD4-2 domains and the two NEDD4-2 phosphopeptides identified by mass spectrometry, that showed α-Th-stimulated increase in Y485 phosphorylation. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05). (C) Immunoblot of ubiquitinated NEDD4-2 from α-Th-stimulated EA.hy926 cells, stably expressing GFP, siRNA-resistant FLAG-NEDD4-2-wild-type (WT), or Y485F mutant. The data (mean ± SD, n = 3) were analyzed by Student’s t test (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 NEDD4-2 Y485 Is Critical for Thrombin-Induced Signaling and Endothelial Barrier Permeability EA.hy926 cells expressing GFP or siRNA-resistant FLAG-NEDD4-2- wild-type or Y485F mutant, transfected with ns- or NEDD4-2 siRNA. (A) Immunoblots of lysates from Ctrl or α-Th stimulated cells. The data (mean ± SD n = 3) were analyzed by ANOVA (∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (B) Endothelial cell (EC) barrier permeability in ns siRNA-transfected Ctrl or α-Th stimulated cells. (C) EC barrier permeability in NEDD4-2 siRNA-transfected Ctrl or α-Th stimulated cells. (D) EC barrier permeability stimulated by α-Th in various cell lines relative to ns siRNA-transfected GFP cells at 20 min (mean ± SD, n = 3), analyzed by ANOVA (∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Structural Model of the 2,3-Linker Peptide NEDD4-2 Interaction with the C-lobe of the HECT Domain (A) Cartoon model showing the functionally validated “closed” auto-inhibited and “open” activated conformation of HECT domain containing E3 ubiquitin ligases. (B) A 3D structural model of the C-terminal region of the 2,3-linker peptide (dark blue) showing Y485 access to the acidic triad (D891, A892, E893) in C-lobe of the HECT domain (magenta) in the “closed” conformation of NEDD4-2, N-lobe (gray and black). In the active “open” conformation of NEDD4-2 C-lobe (green) when bound to ubiquitin (yellow) and the E2 ubiquitin ligase UbcH5B (light blue), phosphorylated Y485 is moved away. Surface view shows a structural model including the WW3 and WW4 domains in Figure S6. (C) Predicted structural translation from the “closed” (magenta) to “open” (green) conformation of the C-lobe of NEDD4-2 HECT domain. Cell Reports 2018 24, 3312-3323.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.061) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions