Ancestral Interactions of Ribosomal RNA and Ribosomal Proteins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Crystal Structure of Activated HutP
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Calcium Regulation of Myosin-I Tension Sensing
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Binding the Mammalian High Mobility Group Protein AT-hook 2 to AT-Rich Deoxyoligonucleotides: Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation  Suzanne Joynt, Victor Morillo,
A Molecular Model for Lithium’s Bioactive Form
Allosteric Activation of DegS, a Stress Sensor PDZ Protease
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Hiromasa Tanaka, Tau-Mu Yi  Biophysical Journal 
DNA Hairpins: Fuel for Autonomous DNA Devices
Affinity and Specificity of Levamlodipine-Human Serum Albumin Interactions: Insights into Its Carrier Function  Zuojia Liu, Xiliang Zheng, Xiurong Yang,
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Laser-Assisted Single-Molecule Refolding (LASR)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Michael J. Reddish, Robert Callender, R. Brian Dyer 
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
EPR Spectroscopy Targets Structural Changes in the E
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
V. Vetri, G. Ossato, V. Militello, M.A. Digman, M. Leone, E. Gratton 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Dániel Szöllősi, Gergely Szakács, Peter Chiba, Thomas Stockner 
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Quantifying the Interaction between EGFR Dimers and Grb2 in Live Cells
Structural Basis of Homology-Directed DNA Repair Mediated by RAD52
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Functional Role of Ribosomal Signatures
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Michael C. Puljung, William N. Zagotta  Biophysical Journal 
Thermodynamic Characterization of the Unfolding of the Prion Protein
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
Translational Entropy and DNA Duplex Stability
Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Allosteric Control of Syntaxin 1a by Munc18-1: Characterization of the Open and Closed Conformations of Syntaxin  Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso 
Binding-Linked Protonation of a DNA Minor-Groove Agent
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Crystal Structure of the Carboxyltransferase Domain of Acetyl-Coenzyme A Carboxylase in Complex with CP   Hailong Zhang, Benjamin Tweel, Jiang Li,
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 105, Issue 11, Pages (December 2013)
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Effect of Anions on the Binding and Oxidation of Divalent Manganese and Iron in Modified Bacterial Reaction Centers  Kai Tang, JoAnn C. Williams, James.
Cotranslational Folding Increases GFP Folding Yield
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Ancestral Interactions of Ribosomal RNA and Ribosomal Proteins Kathryn A. Lanier, Poorna Roy, Dana M. Schneider, Loren Dean Williams  Biophysical Journal  Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages 268-276 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.007 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain III rRNA and rProtein uL23 as observed in the native ribosome. (a) DIIIcore (magenta) interacts with rProtein uL23 (green). The remainder of Domain III is gray. (b) uL23tail (green) forms a β-hairpin that traverses the surface of DIIIcore. (c) Shown here is a cartoon representation of the β-hairpin structure of uL23tail. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. (d) Shown here is the secondary structure of the LSU rRNA highlighting Domain III (gray box) and DIIIcore (magenta line). (e) The rRNA wraps around uL23tail, forming a pocket that is complementary to the folded peptide. The anionic phosphate oxygens of the rRNA are red. Cationic nitrogens of uL23tail are blue. Coordinates are from the T. thermophilus ribosomal structure (PDB: 1VY4; (12)). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 268-276DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.007) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Continuous variation of fluorescence intensity versus mole fraction (X) of uL23tail and Domain III or DIIIcore rRNAs. (a) and (b) represent binding in the absence of divalent cations, whereas (c) and (d) represent binding in the presence of 10 mM Mg2+. In the absence of Mg2+ the best-fit lines intersect at uL23tail mole fraction (a) x = 0.55 for Domain III and (b) at x = 0.54 for DIIIcore, each suggesting 1:1 stoichiometry of interaction of uL23tail with Domain III or DIIIcore rRNAs. (c) In the presence of Mg2+, the best-fit lines intersect at x = 0.71 for Domain III and (d) at x = 0.62 for DIIIcore. The fluorescence emission was monitored at 350 nm. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 268-276DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.007) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mobility shift assays of uL23tail in association with Domain III or DIIIcore. rRNA, rPeptide, and rRNA-rPeptide complexes were visualized on 5% native-PAGE gels by two-color EMSA. Binding reactions were performed with 1 μM rRNA in 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The [rRNA]:[rPeptide] ratios are indicated above the lanes. All gels show uL23tail alone (lane 1), rRNA alone (lane 2), and MBP controls (lanes 9 and 10). MBP alone shows no interaction with rRNA (lane 9). (a) Shown here is Domain III with uL23tail (lanes 3–8). (b) Shown here is DIIIcore with uL23tail (lanes 3–8). (c) Shown here is Domain III with uL23tail (lanes 3–8) under the same conditions as (a), except with the addition of 5 mM Mg2+. (d) Shown here is DIIIcore with uL23tail (lanes 3–8) under the same conditions as (b), except with the addition of 5 mM Mg2+. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 268-276DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.007) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mobility shift assays demonstrating that intact rProtein uL23 binds to multiple sites on Domain III and DIIIcore rRNAs. All binding reactions were performed with 1 μM rRNA in 100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The [rRNA]:[rProtein] ratios are indicated above the lanes. All gels show uL23 alone (lane 1), rRNA alone (lane 2), and MBP controls (lanes 9 and 10). MBP alone shows no interaction with Domain III or DIIIcore (lane 9). (a) Shown here is Domain III with rProtein uL23 (lanes 3–8). (b) Shown here is DIIIcore with rProtein uL23 (lanes 3–8). (c) Shown here is Domain III with rProtein uL23 (lanes 3–8) under the same conditions as (a), except with the addition of 5 mM Mg2+. (d) Shown here is DIIIcore with rProtein uL23 (lanes 3–8) under the same conditions as (b), except with the addition of 5 mM Mg2+. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 268-276DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.007) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Yeast three-hybrid assay for interaction of Domain III or DIIIcore with uL23. This plot shows the level of 3-AT resistance of yeast strain YBZ-1 expressing Domain III-MS2 or DIIIcore-MS2 fusions and GAD-uL23 fusions. Cell growth (measured at optical density 630 nm after 48 h) is plotted against 3-AT concentration. Resistance to 3-AT indicates RNA-protein interaction. The positive control is p50-MS2 and GAD-p53. Negative controls (shown in dashed lines) are MS2 RNA alone (lacking Domain III or DIIIcore) assayed with rProtein uL23 and p53. Activity from negative controls were used to determine the background signal. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 113, 268-276DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.007) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions