Universality and diversity of the protein folding scenarios:a comprehensive analysis with the aid of a lattice model  Leonid A Mirny, Victor Abkevich,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical Physics of the Transition State Ensemble in Protein Folding Alfonso Ramon Lam Ng, Jose M. Borreguero, Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Eugene.
Advertisements

Fabio Trovato, Edward P. O’Brien  Biophysical Journal 
How Does a Simplified-Sequence Protein Fold?
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Hahnbeom Park, Frank DiMaio, David Baker  Structure 
Alan R. Lowe, Albert Perez-Riba, Laura S. Itzhaki, Ewan R.G. Main 
Comparing Folding Codes in Simple Heteropolymer Models of Protein Evolutionary Landscape: Robustness of the Superfunnel Paradigm  Richard Wroe, Erich.
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Linkage Thresholds for Two-stage Genome Scans
Protein folding via binding and vice versa
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment  Aaron R Dinner, Andrej Šali, Lorna J Smith, Christopher M Dobson, Martin.
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Fuqing Wu, David J. Menn, Xiao Wang  Chemistry & Biology 
Axel T Brünger, Paul D Adams, Luke M Rice  Structure 
CA3 Retrieves Coherent Representations from Degraded Input: Direct Evidence for CA3 Pattern Completion and Dentate Gyrus Pattern Separation  Joshua P.
Folding of the Protein Domain hbSBD
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
From Computer Simulations to Human Disease
Statistical Dynamics of Spatial-Order Formation by Communicating Cells
Stationary Gating of GluN1/GluN2B Receptors in Intact Membrane Patches
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (November 1998)
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Single-Molecule Tracking of Collagenase on Native Type I Collagen Fibrils Reveals Degradation Mechanism  Susanta K. Sarkar, Barry Marmer, Gregory Goldberg,
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
Ivan Coluzza, Daan Frenkel  Biophysical Journal 
Protein folding kinetics: timescales, pathways and energy landscapes in terms of sequence-dependent properties  Thomas Veitshans, Dmitri Klimov, Devarajan.
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Michael Schlierf, Felix Berkemeier, Matthias Rief  Biophysical Journal 
Atomic-Level Protein Structure Refinement Using Fragment-Guided Molecular Dynamics Conformation Sampling  Jian Zhang, Yu Liang, Yang Zhang  Structure 
M. Müller, K. Katsov, M. Schick  Biophysical Journal 
Cell dynamics of folding in two-dimensional model proteins
Yan Xia, Axel W. Fischer, Pedro Teixeira, Brian Weiner, Jens Meiler 
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Exploring the Complex Folding Kinetics of RNA Hairpins: I
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Eric R. May, Jun Feng, Charles L. Brooks  Biophysical Journal 
Coupled Oscillator Dynamics of Vocal Turn-Taking in Monkeys
Reliability of Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction Methods
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Dependence of Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics on the Density and Composition of Macromolecular Crowders  Jeetain Mittal, Robert B. Best  Biophysical.
Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding using inexact potentials: how accurate must parameters be in order to preserve the essential features of the.
Alan R. Lowe, Albert Perez-Riba, Laura S. Itzhaki, Ewan R.G. Main 
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Interplay between Protein Thermal Flexibility and Kinetic Stability
Tural Aksel, Doug Barrick  Biophysical Journal 
Unfolding Barriers in Bacteriorhodopsin Probed from the Cytoplasmic and the Extracellular Side by AFM  Max Kessler, Hermann E. Gaub  Structure  Volume.
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Evolution of Specificity in Protein-Protein Interactions
Presentation transcript:

Universality and diversity of the protein folding scenarios:a comprehensive analysis with the aid of a lattice model  Leonid A Mirny, Victor Abkevich, Eugene I Shakhnovich  Folding and Design  Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 103-116 (April 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3 Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The ‘native’ conformation and two sequences, Seq1 and Seq2, designed to fold into this conformation. In the contact matrix, a position (i,j) is marked with a black dot if residues i and j are non-covalent neighbors in the native structure below. For example, position (16,27) on the contact matrix is marked by a black square because residues 16 and 27 are in contact in the native structure. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The ‘native’ conformation and two sequences, Seq1 and Seq2, designed to fold into this conformation. In the contact matrix, a position (i,j) is marked with a black dot if residues i and j are non-covalent neighbors in the native structure below. For example, position (16,27) on the contact matrix is marked by a black square because residues 16 and 27 are in contact in the native structure. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The ‘native’ conformation and two sequences, Seq1 and Seq2, designed to fold into this conformation. In the contact matrix, a position (i,j) is marked with a black dot if residues i and j are non-covalent neighbors in the native structure below. For example, position (16,27) on the contact matrix is marked by a black square because residues 16 and 27 are in contact in the native structure. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Equilibrium compactness C and degree of folding Q as a function of temperature for (a) Seq1 and (b) Seq2. These quantities were obtained at each temperature by averaging compactness and degree of folding over 10 MC runs each 107 steps. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Equilibrium compactness C and degree of folding Q as a function of temperature for (a) Seq1 and (b) Seq2. These quantities were obtained at each temperature by averaging compactness and degree of folding over 10 MC runs each 107 steps. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The MC-time dependence of average (over 100 runs) compactness and degree of folding for (a) Seq1 and (b) Seq2. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The MC-time dependence of average (over 100 runs) compactness and degree of folding for (a) Seq1 and (b) Seq2. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The MC-time dependence of average (over 100 runs) number of non-native contacts (C–Q) for both sequences. The maximum on the curve corresponding to Seq2 is the signature of the kinetic intermediate for this sequence. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Kinetics of formation of individual native contacts for both sequences. (a) Native contacts for Seq1. (b) Native contacts for Seq2. These data were obtained from analysis of snapshots taken every 1000 steps in 100 independent runs. The fractions of conformations (out of 100) having specific contact are plotted as kinetic curves. Each curve corresponds to a specific contact (40 curves total). The plots illustrate wide dispersion of rates and final amplitudes for Seq2 in contrast to much less dispersion for Seq1. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Kinetics of formation of individual native contacts for both sequences. (a) Native contacts for Seq1. (b) Native contacts for Seq2. These data were obtained from analysis of snapshots taken every 1000 steps in 100 independent runs. The fractions of conformations (out of 100) having specific contact are plotted as kinetic curves. Each curve corresponds to a specific contact (40 curves total). The plots illustrate wide dispersion of rates and final amplitudes for Seq2 in contrast to much less dispersion for Seq1. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Kinetics of formation of individual non-native contacts for both sequences. (a) Non-native contacts for Seq1. (b) Non-native contacts for Seq2. The log scale for MC-time axis was used to emphasize fast stages at which the intermediate is formed. The procedure for obtaining the data for these curves is the same as described in the caption to the previous figure. Kinetics for each non-native contact are shown (total 249 curves on each plot). A number of non-native contacts become significantly populated in the kinetic intermediate of Seq2 (at MC-time ∼105). Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Kinetics of formation of individual non-native contacts for both sequences. (a) Non-native contacts for Seq1. (b) Non-native contacts for Seq2. The log scale for MC-time axis was used to emphasize fast stages at which the intermediate is formed. The procedure for obtaining the data for these curves is the same as described in the caption to the previous figure. Kinetics for each non-native contact are shown (total 249 curves on each plot). A number of non-native contacts become significantly populated in the kinetic intermediate of Seq2 (at MC-time ∼105). Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 An example of contact kinetics for one of the contacts (5–28) in Seq2. Insert shows separately the fast and slow exponential components. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 (a) The contact matrix of the kinetic intermediate of Seq2. It was obtained by averaging the contact maps of conformations recorded in the 100 000–300 000 MC step interval (every 1000 steps). Dots of different grayscale density denote populations of contact in the kinetic intermediate. The darker the dot, the more often a contact was found in conformations of the kinetic intermediate. (b) Contact matrix of the equilibrium intermediate of Seq2 at T=0.25. This matrix was obtained by averaging contact matrices of the individual conformations having an intermediate degree of folding 0.35<Q<0.55. These conformations correspond to the maximum of the probability distribution of different values of Q observed in long simulations (of 8×107 steps). Conformations were recorded every 1000 steps. Both contact matrices (a) and (b) yield the same chain topology, as shown in Figure 9. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 The topology of one of the misfolded traps for Seq2. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Time evolution of distribution between species with different degrees of folding for Seq1 and Seq2. The statistics are taken over 100 runs. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 10 Time evolution of distribution between species with different degrees of folding for Seq1 and Seq2. The statistics are taken over 100 runs. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 The temperature dependence of equilibrium occupancy of all native contacts in (a) Seq1 and in (b) Seq2. An equilibrium intermediate having some native and some non-native contacts can be distinguished for Seq2 at 0.27<T<0.33. Each curve was calculated using the histogram method described in the text. Local contacts have high equilibrium occupancy even at high temperature. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 11 The temperature dependence of equilibrium occupancy of all native contacts in (a) Seq1 and in (b) Seq2. An equilibrium intermediate having some native and some non-native contacts can be distinguished for Seq2 at 0.27<T<0.33. Each curve was calculated using the histogram method described in the text. Local contacts have high equilibrium occupancy even at high temperature. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 The temperature dependence of equilibrium occupancy of all non-native contacts of (a) Seq1 and (b) Seq2. The non-native contacts for Seq2 which are populated at equilibrium temperature are the same as the ones populated in the kinetic intermediate (shown in Figure 6b). Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 12 The temperature dependence of equilibrium occupancy of all non-native contacts of (a) Seq1 and (b) Seq2. The non-native contacts for Seq2 which are populated at equilibrium temperature are the same as the ones populated in the kinetic intermediate (shown in Figure 6b). Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 The schematic representation of the free energy landscape for Seq1 and Seq2. Each trajectory passes through the saddle point which is the nucleation transition state. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 13 The schematic representation of the free energy landscape for Seq1 and Seq2. Each trajectory passes through the saddle point which is the nucleation transition state. Folding and Design 1996 1, 103-116DOI: (10.1016/S1359-0278(96)00019-3) Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions