The Department of Defense Acquisition Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C.B. Cochrane 1 Jan 2009 The 5000 documents have been issued as a directive, two directives, a directive and an instruction, a directive and a regulation,
Advertisements

MODIFICATION 5/ N N Y PROGRAM TO BE MODIFIED STILL IN PRODUCTION 6/ Y SEPARATE ACQUISITION EFFORT 5/ N TOTAL COST OF MODIFICATION >= MAIS or MDAP 5/, 8/
Lesson Objectives Review Capabilities Development documents and processes for Information Technology and Information Systems IT Box – (current JCIDS manual)
1 May 2009 ver. 5.5 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) MDA: Approves AoA Study Guidance Determines acquisition phase of entry Identifies initial review.
Phase B Exit Criteria Issues Resolved or Addressed Technical Reviews / Readiness Reviews, Audits Initiate Milestone C Program Review Planning Process Initiate.
“Common Process for Developing Briefings for Major Decision Points” INSTRUCTIONS Provide Feedback via to: Lois Harper PEO C4I and Space
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF)
New 5000 Documents 14 May 2001 New 5000 Documents 14 May 2001 Defense Systems Management College Acquisition Policy Department.
The Defense Acquisition Management System 2009 Implementing DoDI 5000
Presented at the 2nd Annual DAU-South CONTRACTING CONFERENCE & EXPO
Life Cycle Logistics.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
System Integration Exit Criteria Issues Resolved or Addressed Preliminary Design Review/Critical Design Review, Audits Initiate Design Readiness Review.
1 3 Dec 2008 Changes from the May 2003 DoDI Policy Flowing from Numerous New/Revised sections of Public Law since 2003 (some with Multiple Requirements)
PEO C4I and SPACE FULL-RATE PRODUCTION REVIEW TIMELINE
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Information Requirements
2.1 ACQUISITION STRATEGYSlide 1 Space System Segments.
Business, Cost Estimating & Financial Management Considerations
PRODUCTION/ DEPLOYMENT
MORS Special Meeting: Risk, Trade Space, & Analytics for Acquisition
Lesson Objectives Determine the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone A to Milestone B Explain the purpose.
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Contracting (Product) Considerations
Lesson Objectives Determine the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone A to Milestone B Explain the purpose.
Lesson Objectives Determine the key Requirements Manager activities and the role of the ICD leading up to the MDD and during Materiel Solution Analysis.
Lesson Objectives Determine the key Requirements Manager activities leading up to the MDD, the outputs of the MDD, and the Defense Acquisition documents.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities July 12, 2016.
System Engineering Considerations (See Chapters 3 and 9)
Life Cycle Logistics.
MNS - Mission need statement
Competitive Prototyping – the New Reality
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities April 25, 2017.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities March 7, 2017.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
New Space Systems Acquisition Policy
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Space System Segments This presentation provides background on space systems along with tailoring considerations when acquiring Department of Defense space.
CPFF,CPIF,CPAF FPIF FFP,FPIF FFP CPFF FPIF,FPAF FFP FP (EPA)
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Information Required for Milestone and Decision Reviews
Space System Segments This presentation provides background on space systems along with tailoring considerations when acquiring Department of Defense space.
CBA ICD CDD CDD CPD MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA AoA RVA RVA RVA
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Product Support Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
International Acquisition and Exportability (IA&E) Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
8 Tech Processes Drive Acquisition
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presentation transcript:

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process FULL- SCALE DEVELOPMENT Full-Scale Development Decision 1971 Program Initiation Production Go-ahead CONCEPTUAL EFFORT PRODUCTION/ DEPLOYMENT And the saga continues... But, let us return to the beginning Deputy Secretary of Defense Packard signed the first DoD Directive 5000.1 in 1971. This 8 page document created the Defense Systems Acquisition Review Council (DSARC), and required three decision points with one supporting document. Over the next 46 years this “DoD 5000 process” will be revised 19 times. The 5000 documents have been issued as a directive, two directives, a directive and an instruction, a directive and a regulation, a directive an instruction and a manual, and a directive and instruction and a regulation, with combined page count of as little as eight (1971) to as many as 840 (1991). Currently a directive and an instruction with 182 pages total. Phases of the process have ranged from three (1971 to 1977) to four (1977 to 1991 & 1996 to 2000), to five (1991 & 2003 to 2018). The first DoD - level requirements document appeared in 1977, the Mission Element Need Statement (MENS), format and content in DoDI 5000.02. The second DoD - level requirements document appeared in 1991, the Operational Requirements Document (ORD), format and content in DoDI 5000.02. Milestone review information requirements have ranged from as few as one document (1971) to over 50 information requirements (2018). Program initiation has been: Secretary of Defense approval of the one milestone document (1971-1976), and approval of the MENS (1977 to 1981); approval of the JMSNS in the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) (1982 to 1985); and at a milestone: Milestone 0 (1986 to 1990), Milestone I (1991 to 1999), and Milestone B (2000 to 2018). The number of milestones and other decision points have been as few as two (1982 - 1985) and as many as seven (2008 -2018). The Secretary of Defense was the milestone decision authority for major defense acquisition programs from 1971 to 1991. From 1991 to February 2018 it was the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistic, now it is the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition & Sustainment.

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process PRODUCTION/ DEPLOYMENT 1975 1971 Major Programs $50M RDT&E or $200M Procurement (FY1972 dollars) FULL- SCALE DEVELOPMENT Full-Scale Development Decision Full-Scale Engineering Development Decision FULL-SCALE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTUAL EFFORT VALIDATION PHASE PRODUCTION/ DEPLOYMENT Program Initiation Production & Deployment Decision Production Go-ahead Decision First DoDI 5000.02 Issued Development Concept Paper (DCP) becomes Decision Coordinating Paper – max 20 page guidance document signed by SECDEF after DSARC review Defense Systems Acquisition Review Council (DSARC) Created Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) decisions documented in approved Development Concept Paper (DCP)

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1977 1975 Major Programs $50M RDT&E or $200M Procurement (FY1972 dollars) $75M RDT&E or $300M Procurement MENS Approved By SECDEF Program Initiation Program Initiation Approval to Enter Demonstration & Validation Phase I I DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION Production & Deployment Decision PRODUCTION/ DEPLOYMENT Approval to Enter Full-Scale Engineering Development FULL-SCALE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT Phase II II Approval to Enter Production & Deployment PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Phase III III Full-Scale Engineering Development Decision FULL-SCALE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT EXPLORATION OF ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM CONCEPTS Phase 0 VALIDATION PHASE Milestones are numbered Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering (USD(R&E)) appointed Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) and DSARC Chair Mission Element Need Statement (MENS) (max 10 pages) appears as first DoD-level requirements document Military Departments required to establish Service Acquisition Review Councils First DoDI 5000.02 Issued Development Concept Paper (DCP) becomes Decision Coordinating Paper – max 20 page guidance document signed by SECDEF after DSARC review

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1980 1977 Major Programs $75M RDT&E or $300M Procurement (FY1972 dollars) Major Programs $100M RDT&E or $500M Procurement (FY1980 dollars) I II Approval to Enter Production & Deployment PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Phase III III Phase 0 Phase I Phase II EXPLORATION OF ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM CONCEPTS Approval to Enter Full-Scale Engineering Development FULL-SCALE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT EXPLORATION DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION Approval to Enter Full-Scale Development FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT MENS Approved By SECDEF Program Initiation Approval to Enter Demonstration & Validation Milestones are numbered Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering (USD(R&E)) appointed Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) and DSARC Chair Mission Element Need Statement (MENS) (max 10 pages) appears as first DoD-level requirements document Military Departments required to establish Service Acquisition Review Councils SECDEF Decision Memorandum (SDDM) implemented to document milestone decisions MENS content streamlined to not more than 5 pages Appointment of Component Acquisition Executives (CAEs) required

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1980 1982 Major Programs (FY1980 dollars) $100M RDT&E or $500M Procurement $200M RDT&E or $1B Procurement Phase 0 I II III Phase I Phase II Phase III CONCEPT EXPLORATION DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT MENS Approved By SECDEF Program Initiation Approval to Enter Demonstration & Validation Concept Selection Approval to Enter Full-Scale Development Program Go-Ahead Production Decision (Delegated To Components) Approval to Enter Production & Deployment Milestone 0 deleted. Justification for Major System New Start (JMSNS) (max 3 pages) replaces MENS – JMSNS approval in PPBS is program initiation May proceed into Full-Scale Development (FSD) with delayed MS II – contracts must be written so program can be terminated at least cost to government if Milestone II not approved Document formats removed from DoDI 5000.02 and issued in separate memo Milestone III delegated to Components unless thresholds are breached SECDEF Decision Memorandum (SDDM) implemented to document milestone decisions MENS content streamlined to not more than 5 pages Appointment of Component Acquisition Executives (CAEs) required

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1983 1982 Major Programs (FY1980 dollars) $200M RDT&E or $1B Procurement I II III Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Phase III CONCEPT EXPLORATION DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Concept Selection Program Go-Ahead Production Decision (Delegated To Components) Milestone 0 deleted. Justification for Major System New Start (JMSNS) (max 3 pages) replaces MENS – JMSNS approval in PPBS is program initiation May proceed into Full-Scale Development (FSD) with delayed MS II – contracts must be written so program can be terminated at least cost to government if Milestone II not approved Document formats removed from DoDI 5000.02 and issued in separate memo Milestone III delegated to Components unless thresholds are breached Document formats return to DODI 5000.02 Funding/affordability implications added to JMSNS New enclosure to DoDI 5000.02 for 39 acquisition management principles Joint Requirements Management Board (JRMB), composed of the Service vice chiefs, created to evaluate weapon systems, and resolve disputes in joint service acquisition programs.

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1983 1985 Major Programs $200M RDT&E or $1B Procurement (FY1980 dollars) I II III Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Phase III CONCEPT EXPLORATION DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Mission Need Determination Concept Selection Program Go-Ahead Production Decision (May Be Delegated To Components) Production Decision (Delegated To Components) Document formats return to DODI 5000.02 Funding/affordability implications added to JMSNS New enclosure to DoDI 5000.02 for 39 acquisition management principles Joint Requirements Management Board (JRMB), composed of the Service vice chiefs, created to evaluate weapon systems, and resolve disputes in joint service acquisition programs. Milestone 0 returns (approval of JMSNS in PPBS) Deputy Secretary of Defense (DEPSECDEF) appointed as Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE)

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1985 1986 Major Programs $200M RDT&E or $1B Procurement (FY1980 dollars) Phase 0 I II III Phase I Phase II Phase III CONCEPT EXPLORATION DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Mission Need Determination Concept Selection Program Go-Ahead Production Decision (May Be Delegated To Components) Two DSARC Chairs: USD(R&E) for Milestones I and II; Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition & Logistics (ASD(Acq & Log)) for Milestone III (if not delegated) SECDEF decisions required at Milestones I and II (and III if thresholds are breached) Milestone 0 returns (approval of JMSNS in PPBS) Deputy Secretary of Defense (DEPSECDEF) appointed as Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE)

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1987 1986 Major Programs $200M RDT&E or $1B Procurement (FY1980 dollars) I II III Logistics Readiness & Support Review IV Major Upgrade\ Replace Decision V Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Phase III PRODUCTION, FIELDING/ DEPLOYMENT, & OPERATIONAL SUPPORT Approval For Full-Rate Production & Deployment CONCEPT EXPLORATION/ DEFINITION CONCEPT DEMONSTRATION/ VALIDATION FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT & LRIP Approval to Enter Full- Scale Development CONCEPT EXPLORATION DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT Program Go-Ahead PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Production Decision (May Be Delegated To Components) Approval to Enter Concept Exploration/ Definition Mission Need Determination Approval to Enter Concept Demonstration/ Validation Concept Selection JRMB renamed Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC); DSARC renamed JRMB, then renamed again as Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) DAB review at all milestones; 10 DAB support committees formed JMSNS replaced by Mission Need Statement (MNS); format in DODI 5000.2 Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition (USD(A)) assumes role as DAB Chair Competitive Prototyping Strategy required by law and DoDI 5000.2 Two DSARC Chairs: USD(R&E) for Milestones I and II; Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition & Logistics (ASD(Acq & Log)) for Milestone III (if not delegated) SECDEF decisions required at Milestones I and II (and III if thresholds are breached)

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1991 1987 Major Programs (FY1980 dollars) $200M RDT&E or $1B Procurement $300M RDT&E or $1.8B Procurement I II III Logistics Readiness & Support Review Major Upgrade\ Replace Decision IV V Major Modification Approval IV Determination of Mission Need Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Phase III PRODUCTION, FIELDING/ DEPLOYMENT, & OPERATIONAL SUPPORT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONS SUPPORT Phase III Phase IV CONCEPT EXPLORATION/ DEFINITION CONCEPT DEMONSTRATION/ VALIDATION Approval to Enter Concept Demonstration/ Validation DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION Concept Demonstration Approval Development Approval ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT FULL-SCALE DEVELOPMENT & LRIP Approval to Enter Full- Scale Development Approval to Enter Concept Exploration/ Definition Approval to Conduct Concept Studies Approval For Full-Rate Production & Deployment Production Approval JRMB renamed Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC); DSARC renamed JRMB, then renamed again as Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) DAB review at all milestones; 10 DAB support committees formed JMSNS replaced by Mission Need Statement (MNS); format in DODI 5000.2 Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition (USD(A)) assumes role as DAB Chair Competitive Prototyping Strategy required by law and DoDI 5000.2 Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) signed by USD(A) replaces SDDM USD(A) assumes role of Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Provision for delayed Milestone II eliminated Acquisition Category (ACAT) structure created JROC approved Mission Need Statement (MNS) replaces SECDEF approved JMSNS at MS 0 Operational Requirements Document (ORD) appears in DoDI 5000.2, required at MS I and II

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 1996 1991 Major Programs $300M RDT&E or $1.8B Procurement (FY1990 dollars) Approval to Begin a New Acquisition Program PROGRAM DEFINITION & RISK REDUCTION I I Concept Demonstration Approval DEMONSTRATION & VALIDATION II III Major Modification Approval IV Approval to Enter Engineering & Manufacturing Development ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT Development Approval ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT Determination of Mission Need Phase 0 Phase I Phase II PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONS SUPPORT Phase III Phase IV PRODUCTION, FIELDING/ DEPLOYMENT, & OPERATIONAL SUPPORT Phase III Demilitarization & Disposal CONCEPT EXPLORATION/ DEFINITION CONCEPT EXPLORATION Approval to Conduct Concept Studies Production or Fielding/ Deployment Approval Production Approval Program Initiation moved to Milestone I Automated Information System (AIS) acquisition programs folded into the DoD 5000 process Milestone “documents” become “information” MNS moved from DoD 5000 to Joint Staff; ORD retained in DoD 5000.2-R Competitive Prototyping requirement eliminated Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM) signed by USD(A) replaces SDDM USD(A) assumes role of Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) Provision for delayed Milestone II eliminated Acquisition Category (ACAT) structure created JROC approved Mission Need Statement (MNS) replaces SECDEF approved JMSNS at MS 0 Operational Requirements Document (ORD) appears in DoDI 5000.2, required at MS I and II

2000 & 2001 1996 The Department of Defense Acquisition Process A B C I Major Programs $300M RDT&E or $1.8B Procurement (FY1990 dollars) Major Programs $365M RDT&E or $2.19B Procurement (FY2000 dollars) Technology Opportunities & User Needs Approval to Enter Concept & Technology Development CONCEPT & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT A B Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT C Phase 0 Approval to Conduct Concept Studies Begin a New Acquisition Program CONCEPT EXPLORATION PROGRAM DEFINITION & RISK REDUCTION Phase I I II Approval to Enter Engineering & Manufacturing Development ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT Phase II III Approval to Enter System Development & Demonstration SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION Determination of Mission Need Production or Fielding/ Deployment Approval PRODUCTION, FIELDING/ DEPLOYMENT, & OPERATIONAL SUPPORT Demilitarization & Disposal Phase III OPERATIONS & SUPPORT Decision Review Interim Progress Review FRP Decision Review Component Advanced Development Low Rate Initial Production Concept Exploration System Integration System Demonstration Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment Program Initiation at MS B Commitment to Production at MS C (LRIP) Evolutionary Acquisition (EA) becomes preferred approach Program Initiation moved to Milestone I Automated Information System (AIS) acquisition programs folded into the DoD 5000 process Milestone “documents” become “information” MNS moved from DoD 5000 to Joint Staff; ORD retained in DoD 5000.2-R Competitive Prototyping requirement eliminated

2000 & 2001 2002 The Department of Defense Acquisition Process A B C Major Programs $365M RDT&E or $2.19B Procurement (FY2000 dollars) Technology Opportunities & User Needs User Needs & Technology Opportunities Approval to Enter Concept & Technology Development CONCEPT & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT A B Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT C OPERATIONS & SUPPORT Approval to Enter System Development & Demonstration SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION Decision Review Interim Program Review Interim Progress Review FRP Decision Review Component Advanced Development Low Rate Initial Production Concept Exploration System Integration System Demonstration Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment DEPSECDEF cancels all three DoD 5000 documents Interim Guidance memos issued: “Defense Acquisition” for basic policy, and “Operation of the Defense Acquisition System” for implementation procedures DoD 5000.2-R becomes “Interim Defense Acquisition Guidebook”; format for ORD eliminated from 5000 series and moved to Joint Staff Program Initiation at MS B Commitment to Production at MS C (LRIP) Evolutionary Acquisition (EA) becomes preferred approach

2003 2002 The Department of Defense Acquisition Process A B C Major Programs $365M RDT&E or $2.19B Procurement (FY2000 dollars) Technology Opportunities & User Needs User Needs & Technology Opportunities A B C Concept Decision CONCEPT & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT Concept Exploration Component Advanced Development Decision Review OPERATIONS & SUPPORT CONCEPT REFINEMENT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT Approval to Enter System Development & Demonstration SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Interim Program Review Design Readiness Review FRP Decision Review Low Rate Initial Production System Integration System Demonstration LRIP/ IOT&E Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment Approval to Enter Concept & Technology Development Approval to Enter Concept Refinement Approval to Enter Technology Development Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) replaces Requirements Generation System. MNS and ORD replaced with ICD, CDD and CPD ICD (Initial Capabilities Document) required prior to Concept Decision CDD (Capability Development Document) required at Milestone B CPD (Capability Production Document) required at Milestone C DEPSECDEF cancels all three DoD 5000 documents Interim Guidance memos issued: “Defense Acquisition” for basic policy, and “Operation of the Defense Acquisition System” for implementation procedures DoD 5000.2-R becomes “Interim Defense Acquisition Guidebook”; format for ORD eliminated from 5000 series and moved to Joint Staff

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 2003 2008 Major Programs $365M RDT&E or $2.19B Procurement (FY2000 dollars) Technology Opportunities & Resources User Needs Technology Opportunities & User Needs A B C CONCEPT & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS & SUPPORT CONCEPT REFINEMENT MATERIEL SOLUTION ANAYLSIS ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT & DEMONSTRATION System Integration Demonstration Design Readiness Review PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT Decision Review FRP Decision Review Component Advanced Development Concept Decision Materiel Development Decision Concept Exploration Post- PDR A Post- CDR A LRIP/ IOT&E Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment Approval to Enter Acquisition Process Approval to Enter Concept Refinement Approval to Enter Technology Development Approval to Enter Engineering & Manufacturing Development Approval to Enter System Development & Demonstration Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) replaces Requirements Generation System. MNS and ORD replaced with ICD, CDD and CPD ICD (Initial Capabilities Document) required prior to Concept Decision CDD (Capability Development Document) required at MS B CPD (Capability Production Document) required at MS C Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Required For Entry Into Acquisition Process Phase of entry determined at MDD Competitive Prototyping returns; required during Technology Development Phase Preliminary Design Review (PDR) moved prior to Milestone B (there are exceptions); PDR and Critical Design Review (CDR) reports required for MDA Program certification required by Congress at Milestones A and B

The Department of Defense Acquisition Process 2013 2008 Major Programs $365M RDT&E or $2.19B Procurement (FY2000 dollars) $480M RDT&E or $2.79B Procurement (FY2014 dollars) Technology Opportunities & Resources User Needs Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision FRP Decision IOC FOC A B C MATERIEL SOLUTION ANAYLSIS TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY MATURATION & RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONS & SUPPORT FRP Decision Review Materiel Development Decision Concept Exploration Post- PDR A Post- CDR A LRIP/ IOT&E Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal Pre-Systems Acquisition Systems Acquisition Sustainment dashed diagonal lines and color blending imply overlapping activities. Approval to Enter Acquisition Process Approval to Enter Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Approval to Enter Technology Development Approval to Enter Engineering & Manufacturing Development Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment Interim 5000.02 provides six program models to provide a starting point for program planning Adds CDD Validation point (Requirements Validation Authority decision) Adds Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision – the most important decision point in the acquisition process Provides a rapid fielding process for urgent needs Strong emphasis on affordability and flexibility Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Required For Entry Into Acquisition Process Phase of entry determined at MDD Competitive Prototyping returns; required During Technology Development Phase Preliminary Design Review (PDR) moved prior to Milestone B (there are exceptions); PDR and Critical Design Review (CDR) reports required for MDA Program certification required by Congress at MS A and B

2015 2013 The Department of Defense Acquisition Process A B C Major Programs $480M RDT&E or $2.79B Procurement (FY2014 dollars) Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision Materiel Development Decision FRP Decision IOC FOC A B C MATERIEL SOLUTION ANAYLSIS TECHNOLOGY MATURATION & RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONS & SUPPORT Concept Exploration LRIP/ IOT&E Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal dashed diagonal lines and color blending imply overlapping activities. Approval to Enter Acquisition Process Approval to Enter Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Approval to Enter Engineering & Manufacturing Development Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment Interim 5000.02 provides six program models to provide a starting point for program planning Adds CDD Validation point (Requirements Validation Authority decision) Adds Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision – the most important decision point in the acquisition process Provides a rapid fielding process for urgent needs Strong emphasis on affordability and flexibility Cancels Interim DoDI 5000.02 Extensive changes to acquisition program categories and compliance requirements, acquisition of business systems, and rapid fielding of capabilities (urgent needs) Changes “limited fielding” for software intensive systems to “limited deployment”

2017 2015 The Department of Defense Acquisition Process A B C Major Programs $480M RDT&E or $2.79B Procurement (FY2014 dollars) Capability Development Document (CDD) Validation Development Request for Proposal (RFP) Release Decision Materiel Development Decision FRP Decision IOC FOC A B C MATERIEL SOLUTION ANAYLSIS TECHNOLOGY MATURATION & RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION & DEPLOYMENT OPERATIONS & SUPPORT Concept Exploration LRIP/ IOT&E Full Rate Production Sustainment Disposal dashed diagonal lines and color blending imply overlapping activities. Approval to Enter Acquisition Process Approval to Enter Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction Approval to Enter Engineering & Manufacturing Development Approval to Enter LRIP/ Production & Deployment January 2017, Change 1 to DoDI 5000.02 Deletes three threat documents; Adds Validated On-Line Life-cycle Threat Report (VOLT) Deletes Manpower Estimate Report; Adds DAB Planning Meeting Revises content of Acquisition Strategy and Milestone Certifications and Determinations Provides that Service Secretary and Chief must concur in cost, schedule, technical feasibility, and performance trade-offs August 2017, Change 3 to DoDI 5000.02 Minor administrative corrections February 2017, Change 2 to DoDI 5000.02 Deletes acquisition of Defense Business Systems (now in DoDI 5000.75) Cancels Interim DoDI 5000.02 Extensive changes to acquisition program categories and compliance requirements, acquisition of business systems, and rapid fielding of capabilities (urgent needs) Changes “limited fielding” for software intensive systems to “limited deployment”

Until Next Revision of DoDI 5000.02 That’s All Until Next Revision of DoDI 5000.02