Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Harassment, Intimidation & Bullying Investigations Guidance FAQs Learning and Teaching Support The School Safety Center
Advertisements

Please take out the book that looks like this. Acknowledgment page MUST be signed and returned to homeroom by Friday, September 15. This is located in.
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND BULLYING POLICY AND PR0CEDURES Irvington Public Schools Staff Training School Year.
Student Code of Conduct Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Committee Assistant principals, parents, interventionists, AEA representatives.
Discipline of Students with Disabilities under IDEA 2004 October 2007.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Acknowledgement Program Established Day 2.
FAX Region10 CISS co-op presents… Take a Peek at Policy.
Office of Safety and Youth Development Elayna Konstan, Chief Executive Officer Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor.
PBIS POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION SUPPORT OCTOBER 2, 2014.
School, Family & Community Partnerships Safe and Supportive Schools Resolution SFUSD.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support: School-wide Implementation.
Sutton Public Schools Anti-Bullying Law Overview.
Manifestation Determination and Bullying
To (FORMERLY GUIDE TO POSITIVE STUDENT BEHAVIOR).
Policy Safe and Supportive Schools The Board of Education is committed to providing a safe, engaging, and supportive school climate: Behaviors that.
1 Effective Procedures for Dealing with Problem Behaviors.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
PBIS POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS Created by Roxann Johnson Learning Plan 6 Models of Behavior Management.
Edgewood ISD PBIS. PBIS 5 Guiding Principles 1.DEFINE the Behavior you want..what does it look and sound like? 2.TEACH the behavior to staff and students.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Effective Schoolwide Discipline A Systems Change Initiative Effective Schoolwide Discipline Implementer’s Forum July 28, 2008 Rebecca Hill-Shifflett, Supervisor.
School Safety Update Guilford County Schools 712 North Eugene Street Greensboro, NC Presentation to the Board of Education July 28,
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
THE NEW ANTI-BULLYING LAW PROCEDURES AND POLICY REQUIREMENTS.
+ Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Lilja Elementary School Respect. Responsibility. Kindness. Engaged Learning.
Discipline Continuous Improvement: Suspension & Expulsion Best Practices Proposal 1Board Report.
C. Effective Procedures for Dealing with Discipline
PCSSD Elementary and Secondary Parent/Student Handbook for Student Conduct and Discipline “What’s New”
BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening.
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment pr/students/smspr021/
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support: School-wide Implementation.
CHAMPs II: What do I do?. Classroom Management Foundations CHAMPS RTI.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
UPDATE ON DISPROPORTIONATE DISCIPLINE DATA August 25, 2015.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS Wauwatosa School Board – January 9, 2012.
Administrative Dilemma Problem: Two years ago we were dealing with a punitive culture in our school. The suspension rates were exceedingly high. The Superintendent,
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Multi-Tiered System of Supports William Avila, Director Student Support Services Dr. Rachel Monarrez, Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services Marlo.
Status of the Behavioral Learning Guides
PBIS Focus/Reflection
Sutton Public Schools Anti-Bullying Law Overview
Tabetha Bernstein-Danis, Ph.D. Kutztown University
Department of Behavioral Learning: Update Dr. Linda Burruss Director
Code of Conduct Fall 2017.
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
Impacting Students with Autism through All 3 Tiers of PBIS
Welcome to TUSD’s Informational Presentation about our School’s Culture, Student Expectations, and Discipline SY USP VI D2.
Behavioral Learning Guide Update
Education Queensland SMS-PR-021: Safe, Supportive and Disciplined School Environment
Harassment and Discrimination
Comprehensive Planning
Student Discipline.
BULLYING AND MORE Presented by Dana Rahman Assistant District Attorney
Using PBIS to Support Social/Emotional and Academic Needs
Department of Behavioral Learning Update Dr. Linda Burruss, Director
PBIS PRACTICES.
Harassment/Discrimination Located Under Personnel
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)
Alternatives to Suspension
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
Interim Superintendent
Open House Welcome to the Coyote Wolves Team. Thank you for coming!
Harassment, Intimidation & Bullying The New Legislation FAQs
Oceanport School District EVVRS Statistics for the School Year Presented by Matthew Howell, Principal October 22, 2014 Electronic Violence.
Proposed Revisions to the Behavioral Learning Guides
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
“Student Due Process Rights”
Feedback from Teacher Superintendent Council & Next Steps
Code of Student Conduct
Harassment and Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Behavioral Learning Guide (BLG) Updates Donna Clark Coordinator, Behavioral Learning July 12, 2018

BLG and Matrices: What Stayed the Same There are still three documents: the BLG; the Elementary Matrix; and the Secondary Matrix. All three still rely on progressive disciplinary strategies paired with appropriate interventions. The Secondary Matrix still has 5 Response Levels The Elementary Matrix still has 4 Response Levels The majority of the documents went unchanged, so this should be the smallest number of changes our teachers will have had in the last 5 years!

BLG and Matrices: Summary of Major Changes In the BLG: We changed the expulsion timeline and appeal procedure; We updated the glossary of terms; and Added language for particularly egregious behavior. In the Elementary and Secondary Matrices: We added four new offenses; We changed the levels for a few offenses; We built in more principal discretion; and We expanded the usage of Restorative Practices. The proposed edits came from teachers, assistant principals, principals, administrators, the DOJ, and our discipline expert.

Major BLG Changes Expulsion: Updated Glossary Terms: The typical expulsion periods are now 90 and 180 days, depending on the offense. Possession or usage of a gun; Violent physical assault with injuries; and Forcible sexual assault There is a new procedure for appealing the Superintendent’s decision to the Board. Updated Glossary Terms: Assignment to alternative school Expulsion Over the Counter and Non-Prescription Medicine Prohibited Drugs Drug Paraphernalia Restorative Conference Restorative Panel Meeting

Major BLG Changes (continued) Multiple Level 3s for a Single Event: There is a new procedure for students who commit multiple Level 3 behaviors in a single act. Previously, there was no provision for this. The new language is: Although comprehensive, the Behavioral Learning Guide and Matrices do not contain descriptions for how to handle every possible set of student behaviors. When a student’s misbehavior for a single event covers offenses assigned to multiple Level 3 Responses, the administrator may respond with a Level 4 Response. The administrator must seek approval from the Superintendent, or designee, before proceeding with a Level 4 Response.   This procedure should be used only in extenuating circumstances.    [This applies to Secondary Only]

Major Matrix Changes Four new behaviors were added. The first deals with students who buy, sell, or distribute Over the Counter and Non-Prescription Medicine: Buying, selling, or participating in the distribution of Over the Counter and Non-Prescription Medicine, as defined in the glossary, to another student. Distribution may be inferred by the particular facts including the amount of the drugs in a student’s possession.   When assigning Disciplinary Consequences for behaviors involving Over the Counter and Non-Prescription Medicine, the school administrator should consider the intent of the student (i.e. helping a student with a headache as opposed to trying to make money off the sale of the medicine). Opportunity for Restorative Panel Meeting as a Response to a Level 3. [This is assigned to Levels 1, 2, and 3 in Elementary/ Levels 2, 3, and 4 in Secondary]

Major Matrix Changes The second deals with students who file a false report involving school safety: Filing a false report of a school safety incident (such as a false report of a shooting or the presence of a gun on campus) in any form, whether anonymous or otherwise. Administrators have the discretion to begin at a Level 2 or Level 3 [Level 3 or Level 4, in Secondary] depending on the scope of the threat and the disruption to the school environment. [This is assigned to Levels 2 and 3 in Elementary/ Levels 3 and 4 in Secondary]

[This is assigned to Levels 2 and 3 in both Matrices] Major Matrix Changes The third deals with failure to respect property. In the past, the offenses have been separated by type (stealing or damaging) and by value (less than $50, more than $50). The new language is: Damaging, defacing, destroying, or taking property that belongs to another person or the District. This behavior does not include horseplay where the student taking or obtaining the property has no intent to keep the property.   Teachers have discretion to handle minor situations in the classroom. For Level 2 and Level 3 Responses, the administrator should conduct a Restorative Conversation with the students. [This is assigned to Levels 2 and 3 in both Matrices]

Major Matrix Changes The last new offense covers students who pay other students to commit an offense in the matrix: Paying another student to do any behavior that is prohibited by the Behavioral Learning Guide Elementary (or Secondary) Matrix. The Response Level for this behavior should correspond with the Response Levels assigned to the prohibited behavior.

Major Matrix Changes Some behaviors had their levels readjusted. Here are some examples: Setting off fire alarm, setting fires, or detonating explosives are now Level 3 in Elementary and Level 4 in Secondary. In Secondary, inciting a fight is now a Level 3 and Level 4. In Secondary, possessing or observing pornography is now a Level 2 and Level 3. In Secondary, possessing a weapon without intent is now a Level 3 and Level 4. In Elementary, Inappropriate Touching is now a Level 2 and Level 3.

Major Matrix Changes There are more behaviors that give principals the discretion to begin with the higher Response Levels. Here are some examples: School shooting threats False school safety threats (New Offense) Failure to Respect Property of Others (New Offense)

Major Matrix Changes There is a greater focus on Restorative Practices at the school level. Here are some examples of behaviors where Restorative Practices should be used: Being late to class Not being in assigned classroom Leaving campus without permission Use of Profanity Directed at School Personnel

Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS)

What is PBIS? PBIS is a process for creating safer and more effective schools. Through PBIS, schools teach and support positive behavior for all students and all staff everywhere in the schools.

PBIS is… PBIS is NOT… Popcorn, pencils, & popsicles A framework for reducing problem behaviors and maximizing instructional time A system for making data-based decisions A research-based framework focused on prevention and instruction A structure for creating safe and positive schools Popcorn, pencils, & popsicles A canned program or specific curriculum Limited to only certain students Demeaning to students

PBIS Supports Schoolwide Discipline Common & consistent approach to discipline by staff and administration Expectations and procedures for behavior in various environments are taught (becomes part of the school culture) Practices move away from over reliance on punishing students and behavioral support strategies are designed to meet the needs of all students Student behavior data is analyzed & monitored via PST and monthly PBIS leadership team meetings Positive behaviors are publicly acknowledged & problem behaviors have clear consequences

PBIS Celebrations and Areas of Growth “Mid-year Persistence Award” Winner and Runner-Up Elementary Winner – Sonnie Hereford Elementary Secondary Winner – Grissom High School Elementary Runner-Up – Lakewood Elementary Secondary Runner-Up – Huntsville High School “PBIS Model Demonstration School” (end of year) Elementary Schools: Blossomwood, Chaffee, Challenger, Farley, James Dawson, Lakewood, McDonnell, Sonnie Hereford, Whitesburg P-8 Secondary Schools: Grissom and Huntsville Areas of Growth Consistent implementation across the district and implementation with fidelity