Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PORT STATE CONTROL Safety onboard. Picture from:

Advertisements

Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs

How the IMO is meeting the challenges of dealing with maritime safety and security – an overview Neil Frank R. Ferrer Ocean Concerns Office Department.

International Maritime Organization Safety, Security and the Prevention of Pollution- in Shipping.

1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.

ROLE OF THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LABOUR STANDARDS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF MARITIME SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION FROM BMA’S.

National Marine Educators Association “How the Modern Cruise Industry is Regulated and Operates” June 30, 2015 Newport, Rhode Island Bud Darr Senior VP.

1 OECD Work on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials Environment, Health and Safety Division Environment Directorate OECD.

Leaders in Asset Management ISO Asset Management Systems 1 Prepared by Jim Dieter, MIAM CPPM CF NPMA Executive Vice President Director of Strategic.

YOUR LOGO Round Table on "Dangerous Goods: Global and Regional Dimensions" Sea Transport Regulations Alfredo Parroquin Ohlson Technical Officer, Cargoes.

Asta Sihvonen-Punkka Director General of EMA Vice-Chair of ERGEG Baltic Electricity Mini-Forum 24 th of April, 2009 Riga The 3 rd Package – implied changes.

IMO Organisation.

REVIEW OF THE RCA AGREEMENT 2013 RCARO Workshop on Strengthening the RCA/RCARO Activities and its Efficiency, 7-9 August 2013, Seoul, South Korea Alumanda.

ONGOING COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE STCW CONVENTION AND CODE

RISC Regulatory Monitoring Matrix Status in the pilot project Cecilia Lind, Project Officer, Safety Unit Brussels, 29 January 2014.

LONG RANGE IDENTIFICATION AND TRACKING (LRIT) A FLAG STATE PERSPECTIVE

International Maritime Organization and How it works.

The Negotiations on the International Regime on Access and Benefit-Sharing within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity.

Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.

| 1 European Maritime Day 2010 Gijon Workshop 2.9 Shipping in the Common European Maritime Space Gijón, 21 May 2010 European maritime transport space without.

INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL MARITIME SECURITY: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AT IMO JOSEPH J. ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.

Brief To ERVO Meeting 14 th to 15 th May 2009 Geraint West & Roland Rogers

Maritime Training & Human Element Section IMO IMO Regional Seminar on Familiarization with The 2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code Mumbai.

E-navigation – a global concept for safer, more secure, efficient and environmentally friendly maritime transport Finn Martin Vallersnes Senior Adviser.

SOLAS Chapter XI-2 and the ISPS Code: The Human Element Frank Wall and Associates ISPS: The Human Element Frank Wall.

M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport policy Bilateral screening:

29 OCTOBER 20141REGULATIONS FOR OFFSHORE SERVICE VESSELS DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATIONS FOR OFFSHORE SERVICE VESSELS - FOCUS AREAS KVNR Niels van de Minkelis.

To Satisfaction of the Administration Seminar on the Implementation of measures to ensure that safety standards are “to the Satisfaction of the Administration.

RATIFICATION OF THE 1991 FAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, 1948 A PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE OF.

NATIONAL MEDIA VISITS Visits for print, radio, agency media during LS1 April April 2014 Hello, In order to reply to the huge amount of visit requests.

CES Road Map on statistics for SDGs

PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO

BIMCO,IMO,IAPH Prof.V.M.Mohamed ali.

Six Sigma Total Error Percent Process Sigma 1,000, ,000 10% 2.78

EXPERIENCE OF THE BULGARIAN MARITIME ADMINISTRATION

PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO

International Maritime Organization

Comprehensive Review of the STCW Convention

PORT ACCESS ROUTE STUDIES AN UPDATE

PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO

EU legislation on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

3rd Asia-Pacific Water Summit

The Polar Code Rear Admiral Steven D. Poulin United States Coast Guard

International Maritime Organization

Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee

15th South West Pacific Hydrographic Commission Conference 21 – 22 February Nadi, Fiji Francesca Pradelli Policy and Legal Officer / Pacific Safety of.

INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANISATION

Ministry of the Environment

International Chamber of Shipping

Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop

سازمان بین المللی دریانوردی

CHEMICAL ACCIDENTS Programme

Strategic Plan Review Working Group

DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry

Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009

The Dawn of autonomous shipping

IMO MSC 96 Summary Report London, 11 to 21 May 2016 BUREAU VERITAS

What does this all mean for Autonomous Vessels?

The Public Finance and Empoyment Database of the OECD Dirk Kraan National Accounts Working Party Paris 1 December 2010.

(Adapted from the presentation made by Mr Colin Young at MACHC18)

OUR VISION World class seaport of choice

The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table

IMSAS and the role of the SWPHC

Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee

A Framework for the Governance of Infrastructure - Getting Infrastructure Right - Jungmin Park, OECD Budgeting & Public Expenditures Division 2019 Annual.

EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.

Master Mariner’s Seminar April 2018

CIRM Presentation Raytheon Anschütz Distributor Meeting 2016

Progress on goose management

Keith Manch Director of Maritime New Zealand

Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments The 4th UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Conference 2019-01-17 Henrik Tunfors Senior advisor

International Maritime Organization 1948 Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), changed to IMO in 1982 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 Governance and organization structure: Assembly Council Main Committees (MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL) Sub-Committees Member States and International Organizations (IGOs, NGOs etc.)

Looking back… MSC VIII (March 1964)…

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS The ninety-eighth session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 98), agreed to work on a "Regulatory scoping exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", with a target completion year of 2020.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Why? The Organization should be proactive and take a leading role on this issue To review IMO’s international regulatory framework and Determine which provisions apply or not to MASS and may preclude or not MASS operations (as currently drafted) Identify gaps or issues and analyse the best way to address.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS MSC 98–100 (June 2017–December 2018) The need to take into consideration the human element and legal aspects Not a “drafting exercise” The work on MASS should be user-driven and not technology driven LEG 105 (April 2018) RSE with a target completion year of 2023 for LEG instruments. MSC to take a coordinating role.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – definition For the purpose of the regulatory scoping exercise, MASS is defined as: “a ship which, to a varying degree, can operate independent of human interaction”

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – degrees of autonomy Ship with automated processes and decision support Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board Fully autonomous ship.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – methodology – the 2 steps First step: to identify provisions in IMO instruments which, as currently drafted: First step “regulation by regulation” Second step: to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors by: Second step “high level”.

IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – documentation step 1

Instruments to be considered COLREGs 1972 CSC 1972 LL 1966 LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 SOLAS 1974 SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 STCW 1978 STCW-F 1995 STP 1971 SPACE STP 1973 TONNAGE 1969 …and Codes. MARPOL 73/78 FAL 1972 SUA 2005 SALVAGE 1989 OPRC 1990 CLC 1969 NUCLEAR 1971 HNS 1996 …

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Timeline for the regulatory scoping exercise (MSC) First step: January-April-September 2019 Inter-Sessional Working Group September 2019 Second step: October-December 2019 MSC 102 Final consideration: May 2020

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments and volunteering States Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS 1974 Chapter II-1 All France Sweden, Iran (Islamic Republic of) Chapter II-2 Japan Chapter III Netherlands Belgium Chapter IV Turkey China, Japan Chapter V China Denmark, Japan, Singapore Chapter VI Chapter VII Chapter IX Norway China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation Chapter XI-1 Finland Chapter XI-2

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments cont’d Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 SOLAS PROT 1988 STCW 1978 and STCW Code All United States Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, STCW-F 1995 Japan New Zealand COLREG 1972 Marshall Islands China, Japan, Singapore, United States CSC 1972 Finland LL 1966 India LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 Spain, France Turkey SPACE STP 1973 STP 1971 TONNAGE 1969

Summing up and final remarks Regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) High level exercise Deadlines 2020/2023 so far MSC, LEG --- MEPC, FAL? Participation of all stakeholders is required: IMO, ship owners, industry, Administrations, shore services, other international organizations, amongst others MSC 101 to consider proposals related to the development of guidance for MASS trials.

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

The Swedish Transport Agency We enable the travel and transport needs of tomorrow @transportstyrelsen @TS_Nyheter

Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments The 4th UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Conference 2019-01-17 Henrik Tunfors Senior advisor

International Maritime Organization 1948 Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), changed to IMO in 1982 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 Governance and organization structure: Assembly Council Main Committees (MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL) Sub-Committees Member States and International Organizations (IGOs, NGOs etc.)

Looking back… MSC VIII (March 1964)…

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS The ninety-eighth session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 98), agreed to work on a "Regulatory scoping exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", with a target completion year of 2020.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Why? The Organization should be proactive and take a leading role on this issue To review IMO’s international regulatory framework and Determine which provisions apply or not to MASS and may preclude or not MASS operations (as currently drafted) Identify gaps or issues and analyse the best way to address.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS MSC 98–100 (June 2017–December 2018) The need to take into consideration the human element and legal aspects Not a “drafting exercise” The work on MASS should be user-driven and not technology driven LEG 105 (April 2018) RSE with a target completion year of 2023 for LEG instruments. MSC to take a coordinating role.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – definition For the purpose of the regulatory scoping exercise, MASS is defined as: “a ship which, to a varying degree, can operate independent of human interaction”

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – degrees of autonomy Ship with automated processes and decision support Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board Fully autonomous ship.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – methodology – the 2 steps First step: to identify provisions in IMO instruments which, as currently drafted: First step “regulation by regulation” Second step: to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors by: Second step “high level”.

IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – documentation step 1

Instruments to be considered COLREGs 1972 CSC 1972 LL 1966 LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 SOLAS 1974 SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 STCW 1978 STCW-F 1995 STP 1971 SPACE STP 1973 TONNAGE 1969 …and Codes. MARPOL 73/78 FAL 1972 SUA 2005 SALVAGE 1989 OPRC 1990 CLC 1969 NUCLEAR 1971 HNS 1996 …

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Timeline for the regulatory scoping exercise (MSC) First step: January-April-September 2019 Inter-Sessional Working Group September 2019 Second step: October-December 2019 MSC 102 Final consideration: May 2020

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments and volunteering States Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS 1974 Chapter II-1 All France Sweden, Iran (Islamic Republic of) Chapter II-2 Japan Chapter III Netherlands Belgium Chapter IV Turkey China, Japan Chapter V China Denmark, Japan, Singapore Chapter VI Chapter VII Chapter IX Norway China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation Chapter XI-1 Finland Chapter XI-2

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments cont’d Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 SOLAS PROT 1988 STCW 1978 and STCW Code All United States Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, STCW-F 1995 Japan New Zealand COLREG 1972 Marshall Islands China, Japan, Singapore, United States CSC 1972 Finland LL 1966 India LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 Spain, France Turkey SPACE STP 1973 STP 1971 TONNAGE 1969

Summing up and final remarks Regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) High level exercise Deadlines 2020/2023 so far MSC, LEG --- MEPC, FAL? Participation of all stakeholders is required: IMO, ship owners, industry, Administrations, shore services, other international organizations, amongst others MSC 101 to consider proposals related to the development of guidance for MASS trials.

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

The Swedish Transport Agency We enable the travel and transport needs of tomorrow @transportstyrelsen @TS_Nyheter

Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments The 4th UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Conference 2019-01-17 Henrik Tunfors Senior advisor

International Maritime Organization 1948 Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), changed to IMO in 1982 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 Governance and organization structure: Assembly Council Main Committees (MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL) Sub-Committees Member States and International Organizations (IGOs, NGOs etc.)

Looking back… MSC VIII (March 1964)…

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS The ninety-eighth session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 98), agreed to work on a "Regulatory scoping exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", with a target completion year of 2020.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Why? The Organization should be proactive and take a leading role on this issue To review IMO’s international regulatory framework and Determine which provisions apply or not to MASS and may preclude or not MASS operations (as currently drafted) Identify gaps or issues and analyse the best way to address.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS MSC 98–100 (June 2017–December 2018) The need to take into consideration the human element and legal aspects Not a “drafting exercise” The work on MASS should be user-driven and not technology driven LEG 105 (April 2018) RSE with a target completion year of 2023 for LEG instruments. MSC to take a coordinating role.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – definition For the purpose of the regulatory scoping exercise, MASS is defined as: “a ship which, to a varying degree, can operate independent of human interaction”

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – degrees of autonomy Ship with automated processes and decision support Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board Fully autonomous ship.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – methodology – the 2 steps First step: to identify provisions in IMO instruments which, as currently drafted: First step “regulation by regulation” Second step: to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors by: Second step “high level”.

IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – documentation step 1

Instruments to be considered COLREGs 1972 CSC 1972 LL 1966 LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 SOLAS 1974 SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 STCW 1978 STCW-F 1995 STP 1971 SPACE STP 1973 TONNAGE 1969 …and Codes. MARPOL 73/78 FAL 1972 SUA 2005 SALVAGE 1989 OPRC 1990 CLC 1969 NUCLEAR 1971 HNS 1996 …

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Timeline for the regulatory scoping exercise (MSC) First step: January-April-September 2019 Inter-Sessional Working Group September 2019 Second step: October-December 2019 MSC 102 Final consideration: May 2020

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments and volunteering States Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS 1974 Chapter II-1 All France Sweden, Iran (Islamic Republic of) Chapter II-2 Japan Chapter III Netherlands Belgium Chapter IV Turkey China, Japan Chapter V China Denmark, Japan, Singapore Chapter VI Chapter VII Chapter IX Norway China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation Chapter XI-1 Finland Chapter XI-2

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments cont’d Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 SOLAS PROT 1988 STCW 1978 and STCW Code All United States Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, STCW-F 1995 Japan New Zealand COLREG 1972 Marshall Islands China, Japan, Singapore, United States CSC 1972 Finland LL 1966 India LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 Spain, France Turkey SPACE STP 1973 STP 1971 TONNAGE 1969

Summing up and final remarks Regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) High level exercise Deadlines 2020/2023 so far MSC, LEG --- MEPC, FAL? Participation of all stakeholders is required: IMO, ship owners, industry, Administrations, shore services, other international organizations, amongst others MSC 101 to consider proposals related to the development of guidance for MASS trials.

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

The Swedish Transport Agency We enable the travel and transport needs of tomorrow @transportstyrelsen @TS_Nyheter

Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments The 4th UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Conference 2019-01-17 Henrik Tunfors Senior advisor

International Maritime Organization 1948 Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), changed to IMO in 1982 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 Governance and organization structure: Assembly Council Main Committees (MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL) Sub-Committees Member States and International Organizations (IGOs, NGOs etc.)

Looking back… MSC VIII (March 1964)…

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS The ninety-eighth session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 98), agreed to work on a "Regulatory scoping exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", with a target completion year of 2020.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Why? The Organization should be proactive and take a leading role on this issue To review IMO’s international regulatory framework and Determine which provisions apply or not to MASS and may preclude or not MASS operations (as currently drafted) Identify gaps or issues and analyse the best way to address.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS MSC 98–100 (June 2017–December 2018) The need to take into consideration the human element and legal aspects Not a “drafting exercise” The work on MASS should be user-driven and not technology driven LEG 105 (April 2018) RSE with a target completion year of 2023 for LEG instruments. MSC to take a coordinating role.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – definition For the purpose of the regulatory scoping exercise, MASS is defined as: “a ship which, to a varying degree, can operate independent of human interaction”

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – degrees of autonomy Ship with automated processes and decision support Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board Fully autonomous ship.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – methodology – the 2 steps First step: to identify provisions in IMO instruments which, as currently drafted: First step “regulation by regulation” Second step: to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors by: Second step “high level”.

IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – documentation step 1

Instruments to be considered COLREGs 1972 CSC 1972 LL 1966 LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 SOLAS 1974 SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 STCW 1978 STCW-F 1995 STP 1971 SPACE STP 1973 TONNAGE 1969 …and Codes. MARPOL 73/78 FAL 1972 SUA 2005 SALVAGE 1989 OPRC 1990 CLC 1969 NUCLEAR 1971 HNS 1996 …

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Timeline for the regulatory scoping exercise (MSC) First step: January-April-September 2019 Inter-Sessional Working Group September 2019 Second step: October-December 2019 MSC 102 Final consideration: May 2020

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments and volunteering States Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS 1974 Chapter II-1 All France Sweden, Iran (Islamic Republic of) Chapter II-2 Japan Chapter III Netherlands Belgium Chapter IV Turkey China, Japan Chapter V China Denmark, Japan, Singapore Chapter VI Chapter VII Chapter IX Norway China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation Chapter XI-1 Finland Chapter XI-2

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments cont’d Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 SOLAS PROT 1988 STCW 1978 and STCW Code All United States Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, STCW-F 1995 Japan New Zealand COLREG 1972 Marshall Islands China, Japan, Singapore, United States CSC 1972 Finland LL 1966 India LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 Spain, France Turkey SPACE STP 1973 STP 1971 TONNAGE 1969

Summing up and final remarks Regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) High level exercise Deadlines 2020/2023 so far MSC, LEG --- MEPC, FAL? Participation of all stakeholders is required: IMO, ship owners, industry, Administrations, shore services, other international organizations, amongst others MSC 101 to consider proposals related to the development of guidance for MASS trials.

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

The Swedish Transport Agency We enable the travel and transport needs of tomorrow @transportstyrelsen @TS_Nyheter

Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments The 4th UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Conference 2019-01-17 Henrik Tunfors Senior advisor

International Maritime Organization 1948 Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), changed to IMO in 1982 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 Governance and organization structure: Assembly Council Main Committees (MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL) Sub-Committees Member States and International Organizations (IGOs, NGOs etc.)

Looking back… MSC VIII (March 1964)…

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS The ninety-eighth session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 98), agreed to work on a "Regulatory scoping exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", with a target completion year of 2020.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Why? The Organization should be proactive and take a leading role on this issue To review IMO’s international regulatory framework and Determine which provisions apply or not to MASS and may preclude or not MASS operations (as currently drafted) Identify gaps or issues and analyse the best way to address.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS MSC 98–100 (June 2017–December 2018) The need to take into consideration the human element and legal aspects Not a “drafting exercise” The work on MASS should be user-driven and not technology driven LEG 105 (April 2018) RSE with a target completion year of 2023 for LEG instruments. MSC to take a coordinating role.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – definition For the purpose of the regulatory scoping exercise, MASS is defined as: “a ship which, to a varying degree, can operate independent of human interaction”

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – degrees of autonomy Ship with automated processes and decision support Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board Fully autonomous ship.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – methodology – the 2 steps First step: to identify provisions in IMO instruments which, as currently drafted: First step “regulation by regulation” Second step: to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors by: Second step “high level”.

IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – documentation step 1

Instruments to be considered COLREGs 1972 CSC 1972 LL 1966 LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 SOLAS 1974 SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 STCW 1978 STCW-F 1995 STP 1971 SPACE STP 1973 TONNAGE 1969 …and Codes. MARPOL 73/78 FAL 1972 SUA 2005 SALVAGE 1989 OPRC 1990 CLC 1969 NUCLEAR 1971 HNS 1996 …

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Timeline for the regulatory scoping exercise (MSC) First step: January-April-September 2019 Inter-Sessional Working Group September 2019 Second step: October-December 2019 MSC 102 Final consideration: May 2020

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments and volunteering States Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS 1974 Chapter II-1 All France Sweden, Iran (Islamic Republic of) Chapter II-2 Japan Chapter III Netherlands Belgium Chapter IV Turkey China, Japan Chapter V China Denmark, Japan, Singapore Chapter VI Chapter VII Chapter IX Norway China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation Chapter XI-1 Finland Chapter XI-2

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments cont’d Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 SOLAS PROT 1988 STCW 1978 and STCW Code All United States Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, STCW-F 1995 Japan New Zealand COLREG 1972 Marshall Islands China, Japan, Singapore, United States CSC 1972 Finland LL 1966 India LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 Spain, France Turkey SPACE STP 1973 STP 1971 TONNAGE 1969

Summing up and final remarks Regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) High level exercise Deadlines 2020/2023 so far MSC, LEG --- MEPC, FAL? Participation of all stakeholders is required: IMO, ship owners, industry, Administrations, shore services, other international organizations, amongst others MSC 101 to consider proposals related to the development of guidance for MASS trials.

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

The Swedish Transport Agency We enable the travel and transport needs of tomorrow @transportstyrelsen @TS_Nyheter

Regulatory Scoping Exercise of IMO instruments The 4th UK Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory Conference 2019-01-17 Henrik Tunfors Senior advisor

International Maritime Organization 1948 Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO), changed to IMO in 1982 The IMO Convention entered into force in 1958 Governance and organization structure: Assembly Council Main Committees (MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL) Sub-Committees Member States and International Organizations (IGOs, NGOs etc.)

Looking back… MSC VIII (March 1964)…

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS The ninety-eighth session of the Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 98), agreed to work on a "Regulatory scoping exercise for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS)", with a target completion year of 2020.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Why? The Organization should be proactive and take a leading role on this issue To review IMO’s international regulatory framework and Determine which provisions apply or not to MASS and may preclude or not MASS operations (as currently drafted) Identify gaps or issues and analyse the best way to address.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS MSC 98–100 (June 2017–December 2018) The need to take into consideration the human element and legal aspects Not a “drafting exercise” The work on MASS should be user-driven and not technology driven LEG 105 (April 2018) RSE with a target completion year of 2023 for LEG instruments. MSC to take a coordinating role.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – definition For the purpose of the regulatory scoping exercise, MASS is defined as: “a ship which, to a varying degree, can operate independent of human interaction”

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – degrees of autonomy Ship with automated processes and decision support Remotely controlled ship with seafarers on board Remotely controlled ship without seafarers on board Fully autonomous ship.

Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – methodology – the 2 steps First step: to identify provisions in IMO instruments which, as currently drafted: First step “regulation by regulation” Second step: to analyse and determine the most appropriate way of addressing MASS operations, taking into account, inter alia, human element, technology and operational factors by: Second step “high level”.

IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Autonomous ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Framework – documentation step 1

Instruments to be considered COLREGs 1972 CSC 1972 LL 1966 LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 SOLAS 1974 SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 STCW 1978 STCW-F 1995 STP 1971 SPACE STP 1973 TONNAGE 1969 …and Codes. MARPOL 73/78 FAL 1972 SUA 2005 SALVAGE 1989 OPRC 1990 CLC 1969 NUCLEAR 1971 HNS 1996 …

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS Timeline for the regulatory scoping exercise (MSC) First step: January-April-September 2019 Inter-Sessional Working Group September 2019 Second step: October-December 2019 MSC 102 Final consideration: May 2020

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments and volunteering States Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS 1974 Chapter II-1 All France Sweden, Iran (Islamic Republic of) Chapter II-2 Japan Chapter III Netherlands Belgium Chapter IV Turkey China, Japan Chapter V China Denmark, Japan, Singapore Chapter VI Chapter VII Chapter IX Norway China, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation Chapter XI-1 Finland Chapter XI-2

Autonomous/Smart ships IMO’s regulatory scoping exercise on MASS List of instruments cont’d Instrument Chapter/ Section Degree of autonomy Member State preparing the initial review Supporting/assisting SOLAS AGR 1996 SOLAS PROT 1978 SOLAS PROT 1988 STCW 1978 and STCW Code All United States Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, STCW-F 1995 Japan New Zealand COLREG 1972 Marshall Islands China, Japan, Singapore, United States CSC 1972 Finland LL 1966 India LL PROT 1988 SAR 1979 Spain, France Turkey SPACE STP 1973 STP 1971 TONNAGE 1969

Summing up and final remarks Regulatory scoping exercise on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) High level exercise Deadlines 2020/2023 so far MSC, LEG --- MEPC, FAL? Participation of all stakeholders is required: IMO, ship owners, industry, Administrations, shore services, other international organizations, amongst others MSC 101 to consider proposals related to the development of guidance for MASS trials.

Thank you for your attention! Questions?

The Swedish Transport Agency We enable the travel and transport needs of tomorrow @transportstyrelsen @TS_Nyheter