Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
F learning & memory in flies F environmental sources of plasticity F genetic dissection of learning & memory F anatomical mutants F biochemical mutants.
Advertisements

The Circadian Timekeeping System of Drosophila Paul E. Hardin Current Biology Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages R714-R722 (September 2005) DOI: /j.cub
An Octopamine-Mushroom Body Circuit Modulates the Formation of Anesthesia- Resistant Memory in Drosophila Chia-Lin Wu, Meng-Fu Maxwell Shih, Pei-Tseng.
Mushroom-Body Memories: An Obituary Prematurely Written? Ronald L. Davis, Martin Giurfa Current Biology Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages R272-R275 (April 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (February 2018)
The nature of Drosophila melanogaster
Laminopathies: Too Much SUN Is a Bad Thing
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Theta Rhythm: Temporal Glue for Episodic Memory
Neuronal Homeostasis: Does Form Follow Function or Vice Versa?
Generalizable Learning: Practice Makes Perfect — But at What?
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Morphogens: Precise Outputs from a Variable Gradient
Infant cognition Current Biology
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Color Discrimination with Broadband Photoreceptors
Deconstructing Memory in Drosophila
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Motor Networks: Shifting Coalitions
Drosophila's View on Insect Vision
Björn Brembs, Wolfgang Plendl  Current Biology 
Marine Battesti, Celine Moreno, Dominique Joly, Frederic Mery 
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Octopamine in Male Aggression of Drosophila
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 13, Pages (July 2013)
Temperature Synchronization of the Drosophila Circadian Clock
Drosophila Learn Opposing Components of a Compound Food Stimulus
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 16, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 139, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Meilin Wu, James E. Robinson, William J. Joiner  Current Biology 
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
A GABAergic Feedback Shapes Dopaminergic Input on the Drosophila Mushroom Body to Promote Appetitive Long-Term Memory  Alice Pavlowsky, Johann Schor,
Mario R. Pagani, Kimihiko Oishi, Bruce D. Gelb, Yi Zhong  Cell 
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Sarina M. Rodrigues, Glenn E. Schafe, Joseph E. LeDoux  Neuron 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Neural Coding: Sparse but On Time
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Clock and cycle Limit Starvation-Induced Sleep Loss in Drosophila
FOXO transcription factors
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Neuronal Plasticity: How Do Neurons Know What To Do?
Volume 25, Issue 22, Pages (November 2015)
Aging Specifically Impairs amnesiac-Dependent Memory in Drosophila
Pierre-Yves Musso, Paul Tchenio, Thomas Preat  Cell Reports 
Social Facilitation of Long-Lasting Memory Retrieval in Drosophila
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
Volume 22, Issue 21, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages e5 (May 2018)
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Neuronal Homeostasis: Does Form Follow Function or Vice Versa?
Shixing Zhang, Gregg Roman  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Allison L. Blum, Wanhe Li, Mike Cressy, Josh Dubnau  Current Biology 
Neurodegeneration: Paying It Off with Sleep
The mushroom body Current Biology
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Maria J.S. Guerreiro, Lisa Putzar, Brigitte Röder  Current Biology 
New Insights in Human Memory Interference and Consolidation
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages 1647-1653 (October 2011) Parallel Processing of Appetitive Short- and Long-Term Memories In Drosophila  Séverine Trannoy, Christelle Redt-Clouet, Jean-Maurice Dura, Thomas Preat  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages 1647-1653 (October 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.032 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mushroom Body αβ Neuron Output Is Required for Appetitive Long-Term Memory Retrieval, and MB γ Neuron Output Is Required for Appetitive Short-Term Memory Retrieval (A) Blocking mushroom body (MB) αβ neuron output during the test does not affect 2 hr memory [F(2,41) = 0.354, p = 0.704; n = 14]. (B) Blocking αβ neuron neurotransmission during the test impairs 24 hr memory [F(4,37) = 5.325, p = 0.002; n ≥ 6]. The memory defect is rescued by expressing MB247-GAL80 combined with shi in αβ neurons using c739-GAL4 driver. (C) At permissive temperature, long-term memory (LTM) retrieval is not affected [F(2,26) = 0.554, p = 0.582; n = 9]. (D and G) Blocking MB γ neuron output during the test abolished appetitive short-term memory (STM). The 2 hr memory defect is rescued by expressing MB247-GAL80 transgene. (D) shows [F(4,88) = 4.312, p = 0.003; n ≥ 16], and (G) shows [F(4,60) = 5.819, p = 0.0005; n ≥ 9]. (E and H) At permissive temperature, 2 hr memory is normal. (E) shows [F(2,36) = 1.43, p = 0.252; n ≥ 12], and (H) shows [F(2,26) = 0.011, p = 0.896; n = 9]. (F and I) Blocking γ neuron output during the test does not affect LTM. (F) shows [F(2,26) = 0.32, p = 0.729; n = 9], and (I) shows [F(2,32) = 0.897, p = 0.418; n ≥ 10]. The following abbreviations are used: C, conditioning; T, test. Each graph displays mean performance indices ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The red line indicates time when synaptic transmission is blocked. Current Biology 2011 21, 1647-1653DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.032) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 LTM Formation Does Not Require γ Neuron Output (A) Blocking γ neurons during training and consolidation does not affect STM formation [F(2,56) = 0.853, p = 0.43; n ≥ 18]. (B) Blocking γ neurons during training and consolidation does not affect LTM formation [F(2,42) = 2.042, p = 0.143; n ≥ 14]. (C) Constitutively blocking synaptic transmission from γ neurons impairs STM [F(2,38) = 12.28, p < 0.0001; n = 13]. (D) Constitutively blocking γ neuron output does not affect LTM [F(2,31) = 0.253, p = 0.778; n ≥ 10]. Each graph displays mean performance indices ± SEM. The red line indicates time when synaptic transmission is blocked. Current Biology 2011 21, 1647-1653DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.032) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RUT Adenylyl Cyclase Is Recruited in γ Neurons for Normal Appetitive STM and in αβ Neurons for Normal LTM (A) NP21-driven RUT expression in γ neurons fully restores rut2080 STM defect [F(3,46) = 3.95, p = 0.014; n ≥ 8]. (B) c739-driven RUT expression in αβ neurons does not restore STM rut2080 defect [F(3,48) = 4.99, p = 0.0045; n ≥ 6]. (C) RUT expression in γ neurons does not restore rut2080 LTM defect [F(3,36) = 3.54, p = 0.025; n ≥ 6]. (D) RUT expression in αβ neurons fully restores rut2080 LTM defect [F(3,33) = 4.80, p = 0.0075; n ≥ 6]. Each graph displays mean performance indices ± SEM. Current Biology 2011 21, 1647-1653DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.032) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Immediate Appetitive Memory Processing Involves γ but Not αβ Neurons (A) Blocking constitutively MB γ neuron output affects immediate memory [F(2,23) = 7.39, p = 0.0037; n = 8]. (B) Blocking MB γ neuron output affects immediate memory [F(2,22) = 4.349, p = 0.023; n = 10]. (C) At permissive temperature, immediate memory is normal [F(2,22) = 0.35, p = 0.707; n ≥ 7]. (D) Blocking output of αβ neurons does not impair immediate memory [F(2,36) = 1.02, p = 0.372; n ≥ 12]. (E) NP21-driven RUT expression in γ neurons restores rut2080 immediate memory [F(2,52) = 8.41, p = 0.0001; n ≥ 12]. (F) c739-driven RUT expression in αβ neurons does not restore rut2080 defect [F(2,52) = 5.045, p = 0.0041; n ≥ 12]. (G) Representation of appetitive memory phase dynamic: STM and LTM processes are fully independent of each other. STM is RUT dependent and is formed in γ neurons, whereas LTM is RUT dependent but is formed in αβ neurons. The following abbreviations are used: C, conditioning; T, test. Each graph displays mean performance indices ± SEM. The red line indicates time when synaptic transmission is blocked. Current Biology 2011 21, 1647-1653DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.032) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions