Comparison of outcomes following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on size threshold Charles J. Keith, BA, Marc A. Passman, MD, Michael J. Gaffud, MD, Zdenek Novak, MD, MSHI, Benjamin J. Pearce, MD, Thomas C. Matthews, MD, Mark A. Patterson, MD, William D. Jordan, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 1458-1466 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.060 Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Distribution of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximum diameters at the time of treatment. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1458-1466DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.060) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Long-term freedom from all-type endoleak development. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1458-1466DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.060) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Freedom from abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) expansion ≥5 mm. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1458-1466DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.060) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Freedom from secondary intervention. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1458-1466DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.060) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 5 Ten-year survival of all patients by maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2013 58, 1458-1466DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.060) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions