Di Jiang, Edwin M. Munro, William C. Smith  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Mesoderm-Forming Gene brachyury Regulates Ectoderm-Endoderm Demarcation in the Coral Acropora digitifera  Yuuri Yasuoka, Chuya Shinzato, Noriyuki.
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
The DHHC Palmitoyltransferase Approximated Regulates Fat Signaling and Dachs Localization and Activity  Hitoshi Matakatsu, Seth S. Blair  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Myosin II Dynamics Are Regulated by Tension in Intercalating Cells
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Gáspár Jékely, Hsin-Ho Sung, Carlos M. Luque, Pernille Rørth 
Spatiotemporal Brassinosteroid Signaling and Antagonism with Auxin Pattern Stem Cell Dynamics in Arabidopsis Roots  Juthamas Chaiwanon, Zhi-Yong Wang 
IFT88 Plays a Cilia- and PCP-Independent Role in Controlling Oriented Cell Divisions during Vertebrate Embryonic Development  Antonia Borovina, Brian.
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Planar Cell Polarity Genes Regulate Polarized Extracellular Matrix Deposition during Frog Gastrulation  Toshiyasu Goto, Lance Davidson, Makoto Asashima,
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e3 (October 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 18, Pages (September 2009)
A Rho GTPase Signaling Pathway Is Used Reiteratively in Epithelial Folding and Potentially Selects the Outcome of Rho Activation  Kelly K. Nikolaidou,
Kimberle Shen, Harwin Sidik, William S. Talbot  Cell Reports 
Dan Zhang, Aleksandar Vjestica, Snezhana Oliferenko  Current Biology 
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Vitaly Zimyanin, Nick Lowe, Daniel St Johnston  Current Biology 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Le A. Trinh, Didier Y.R Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Christian Schröter, Andrew C. Oates  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Katie S. Kindt, Gabriel Finch, Teresa Nicolson  Developmental Cell 
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 21, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 10, Issue 22, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Posterior Localization of Dynein and Dorsal-Ventral Axis Formation Depend on Kinesin in Drosophila Oocytes  Robert P. Brendza, Laura R. Serbus, William.
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Control of Embryonic Spindle Positioning and Gα Activity by C
The C. elegans evl-20 Gene Is a Homolog of the Small GTPase ARL2 and Regulates Cytoskeleton Dynamics during Cytokinesis and Morphogenesis  Igor Antoshechkin,
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Amy Brittle, Chloe Thomas, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Cortical Flows Powered by Asymmetrical Contraction Transport PAR Proteins to Establish and Maintain Anterior-Posterior Polarity in the Early C. elegans.
Åsa Apelqvist, Ulf Ahlgren, Helena Edlund  Current Biology 
Jeffrey D Amack, H.Joseph Yost  Current Biology 
Norihito Kishimoto, Ying Cao, Alice Park, Zhaoxia Sun 
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
FGF Signaling Regulates Mesoderm Cell Fate Specification and Morphogenetic Movement at the Primitive Streak  Brian Ciruna, Janet Rossant  Developmental.
Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Rac1 Localization and Lamellipodia Dynamics during Epithelial Cell-Cell Adhesion  Jason S. Ehrlich, Marc D.H. Hansen, W.James.
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Linking Chordate Gene Networks to Cellular Behavior in Ascidians
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Novel Functions for Integrins in Epithelial Morphogenesis
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
CDC-42 controls early cell polarity and spindle orientation in C
The Drosophila Microtubule-Associated Protein Mini Spindles Is Required for Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Oogenesis  Woongjoon Moon, Tulle Hazelrigg  Current.
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Ascidian prickle Regulates Both Mediolateral and Anterior-Posterior Cell Polarity of Notochord Cells  Di Jiang, Edwin M. Munro, William C. Smith  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 79-85 (January 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.041

Figure 1 Notochord Morphogenesis Is Deficient in aim Embryos (A) During gastrulation, C/E converts a four by ten sheet of developing notochord cells into a column of 40 stacked cells. Following C/E, notochord development continues as individual cells elongate in the A/P axis. M, muscle; N, notochord. (B and C) Normarski images of wild-type (B) and aim (C) tadpoles; lateral view, anterior to the left. (D–K) Confocal images of wild-type and aim embryos stained for filamentous actin (F-actin), which is enriched at the cortex of all notochord cells; dorsal view, anterior to the left. Scale bar, 50 μm. Current Biology 2005 15, 79-85DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.041)

Figure 2 Aim Phenotype Is Caused by a Mutation in the Cs pk Gene (A) AFLP-BSA analysis; arrow indicates linked band. (B) Linked markers and Cs pk in scaffold 53. Scale bar, 50,000 bp. (C–E) Expression of Cs pk is abolished in aim embryos at mid-tailbud stage as shown in RT-PCR assay (C), and in situ hybridization ([E]; compare with [D]); lateral view, anterior to the left. (F) Mutation in Cs pk genomic region and cDNA. (G–I) Immunohistochemical staining of Myc-tagged Cs pk. Expression of wild-type Myc-tagged Cs pk rescues aim phenotype ([H]; compare with [G]), while mutant version of pk fails to rescue (I); dorsal view, anterior to the left. Scale bar, 20 μm. Current Biology 2005 15, 79-85DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.041)

Figure 3 M/L Polarity of Notochord Cells Is Disrupted in aim Embryos (A–F) Time-lapse images of isolated notochord cells show that cells from aim/aim embryos have the ability to extend lamellipodia (arrow). (G–J) Confocal images of actin-rich protrusions in notochord cells (dorsal view). Any protrusions that are within 45° angle from M/L axis are considered to have M/L directionality. (K) Summary of cell protrusions from 10 wild-type and 11 aim embryos reveals that the M/L directionality of notochord cells is lost in aim embryos. ML/AP, ratio of protrusions along M/L axis versus A/P axis. (L–N) Coelectroporation of FLAG-tagged Ci dsh (in green, [L]) and Myc-tagged Cs pk (in red, [M]) under the control of Ci brachyury promoter in wild-type notochord cells ([N]; Normarski view); arrowhead, boundary between notochord and muscle. Membrane localization of dsh is lost in aim notochord cells (O) and restored by coelectroporation of Cs pk (P). Dorsal view, anterior to the left. Scale bar, 10 μm. (Q) A model of ascidian notochord C/E regulated by pk and dsh. “N,” notochord; “M,” muscle. Current Biology 2005 15, 79-85DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.041)

Figure 4 A/P Polarity of Individual Notochord Cells Is Disrupted in aim Mutant (A–E) Localization of pk, stbm, and dsh at early tailbud (13 hpf; [A–C]) and late tailbud (16 hpf; [D and E]) stages. (A′–E′ and A″–E″) Normarski images and DAPI nuclear staining of the same cells in (A)–(E), respectively. (F and G) Notochord cells in stable transgenic embryos expressing GFP under the Ci brachyury promoter in wild-type (F) and aim background (G). (H, H′, I, and I′) Normarski images (H and I) and DAPI nuclear staining (H′ and I′) of posterior-most notochord cells in wild-type (H and H′) and aim (I and I′) embryos at late tailbud stage (16 hpf). Scale bar, 10 μm. (J–L) The reiterated A/P polarity of ascidian notochord cells requires PCP gene pk. All dorsal view, anterior to the left. Current Biology 2005 15, 79-85DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.041)