Join Dependencies and Fifth Normal Form

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Slide
Advertisements

Schema Refinement and Normal Forms Given a design, how do we know it is good or not? What is the best design? Can a bad design be transformed into a good.
METU Department of Computer Eng Ceng 302 Introduction to DBMS Further Dependencies by Pinar Senkul resources: mostly froom Elmasri, Navathe and other books.
Relational Normalization Theory. Limitations of E-R Designs Provides a set of guidelines, does not result in a unique database schema Does not provide.
C.1 Appendix C: Advanced Relational Database Design Reasoning with MVDs Higher normal forms Join dependencies and PJNF DKNF.
Database System Concepts, 6 th Ed. ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan See for conditions on re-usewww.db-book.com Appendix B: Advanced.
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design. ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan7.2Database System Concepts Chapter 7: Relational Database Design First Normal.
Database Design Conceptual –identify important entities and relationships –determine attribute domains and candidate keys –draw the E-R diagram Logical.
Part 6 Chapter 15 Normalization of Relational Database Csci455 r 1.
1 Functional Dependency and Normalization Informal design guidelines for relation schemas. Functional dependencies. Normal forms. Normalization.
1 Multi-valued Dependencies. 2 Multivalued Dependencies There are database schemas in BCNF that do not seem to be sufficiently normalized. Consider a.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 15 Basics of Functional Dependencies and Normalization for Relational.
Normalization II. Boyce–Codd Normal Form (BCNF) Based on functional dependencies that take into account all candidate keys in a relation, however BCNF.
Chapter 14 Advanced Normalization Transparencies © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
Chapter 11 Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe.
Introduction to Schema Refinement
Ch 7: Normalization-Part 2 Much of the material presented in these slides was developed by Dr. Ramon Lawrence at the University of Iowa.
©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan7.1Database System Concepts Chapter 7: Relational Database Design First Normal Form Pitfalls in Relational Database Design.
Chapter 10 Functional Dependencies and Normalization for Relational Databases.
Copyright © Curt Hill Schema Refinement III 4 th NF and 5 th NF.
©Silberschatz, Korth and SudarshanC.1Database System Concepts, 5 th Ed. Appendix C: Advanced Relational Database Design.
Chapter 13 Further Normalization II: Higher Normal Forms.
Database Management COP4540, SCS, FIU Relation Normalization (Chapter 14)
Lecture 6 Normalization: Advanced forms. Objectives How inference rules can identify a set of all functional dependencies for a relation. How Inference.
Further Normalization II: Higher Normal Forms Prof. Yin-Fu Huang CSIE, NYUST Chapter 13.
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Slide DESIGNING A SET OF RELATIONS (2) Goals: Lossless join property (a must). Dependency.
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Chapter 11 Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies.
Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies.
Chapter 11: Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies Chapter 11: Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies 1.
Database System Concepts, 6 th Ed. ©Silberschatz, Korth and Sudarshan See for conditions on re-usewww.db-book.com Appendix B: Advanced.
Copyright, Harris Corporation & Ophir Frieder, The Process of Normalization.
Normalization.
Relational Database Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies.
Chapter 8 Relational Database Design. 2 Relational Database Design: Goals n Reduce data redundancy (undesirable replication of data values) n Minimize.
Copyright © Curt Hill Schema Refinement II 2 nd NF to 3 rd NF to BCNF.
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Slide
Functional Dependency and Normalization
Advanced Normalization
Chapter 15 Relational Design Algorithms and Further Dependencies
CHAPTER 14 Basics of Functional Dependencies and Normalization for Relational Databases.
Normalization Karolina muszyńska
Higher Forms of Normalization
Module 5: Overview of Database Design -- Normalization
Chapter 15 Basics of Functional Dependencies and Normalization for Relational Databases.
Database Design Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor
Relational Database Design by Dr. S. Sridhar, Ph. D
Chapter 8: Relational Database Design
Advanced Normalization
Chapter 15 Basics of Functional Dependencies and Normalization for Relational Databases.
11/12/2018.
Relational Model and ER Model: in a Nutshell
Database Management systems Subject Code: 10CS54 Prepared By:
Module 5: Overview of Normalization
Chapter 7: Relational Database Design
Normalization Murali Mani.
Functional Dependencies and Normalization
Multivalued Dependencies & Fourth Normal Form
Multivalued Dependencies & Fourth Normal Form
Appendix C: Advanced Normalization Theory
Chapter 15 Basics of Functional Dependencies and Normalization for Relational Databases.
Normalization cs3431.
Instructor: Mohamed Eltabakh
Designing Relational Databases
Relational Database Design
Appendix C: Advanced Relational Database Design
Chapter 28: Advanced Relational Database Design
Database Design Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor
Database.
Chapter 7a: Overview of Database Design -- Normalization
Presentation transcript:

Join Dependencies and Fifth Normal Form

Join Dependencies: A join dependency (JD) denoted by JD (R1, R2, …….Rn) specified on relation schema R, specifies a constraint on the state of R. The constraint states that query legal state r of R should have a lossless join decomposition into R1, R2, …….Rn. ie. for every such r we have, π(πR1(r), πR2(r), ……. πRn(r)) = r.

Join Dependencies (cont…) A join dependency JD (R1, R2, …….Rn) specified on relation schema R is a trivial JD if one of the relation schema R in JD (R1, R2, …….Rn) is equal to R. Such a dependency is called trivial because it has the lossless join property for any relation state r of R and hence does not specify any constraint on R. R R1 R2 (Decompose) R

Fifth Normal Form (5NF) Definition: A relation R is in fifth normal form (5NF) if and only if the following conditions are satisfied simultaneously. (i) R is already in 4NF. (ii) If cannot be further non-lossless decomposed [Project – Join normal form with respect to a set f of functional multivalued and join dependencies if, for every non trivial join dependency. Actually, 5NF is of little practical use for a database designer.

Example 1 Shipments Supplier number Part number Project number S1 P1 Join over part numbers

PJ Part number Supplier number P1 J2 P2 J1 Join over part numbers JS Project number Supplier number J2 S1 J1 S2 Join over project numbers, supplier numbers Original shipments Part number Project number Supplier number S1 P1 J2 P2 J1 S2 J2 (Extra) (Join first two)

Example 2: Dealer – Ports – Customer (DPC) Dealer Ports Customer D1 P1 C1 C2 P2 D2 Dealer – Ports (DP) Dealer Ports D1 P1 P2 D2 Ports – Customer (PC) Ports Customer P1 C1 C2 P2

Customer – Dealer (CD) Customer Dealer C1 D1 C2 D2 Join over ports DP – DC Dealer Ports Customer D1 P1 C1 C2 P2 D2 C1 (Extra) Join DP – DC with CD over customer and dealer together. Dealer Ports Customer D1 P1 C1 P2 C2 D2

Domain – Key Normal Form (DKNF): The idea behind DKNF is to specify the ultimate normal form that takes into account all possible types of dependencies. Definition: A relation is in DKNF if every general constraint can be inferred from the knowledge of the attributes involved in the schema their underlying domains and the sets of attributes that from the keys. Example: Course is 3 digit long 000 to 900. Grade is from the set {A,B,C,D,E,F}. Anomalies in DKNF: Insert Anomaly: It occurs when a tuple is inserted in a relation and the resulting relation violates one or more general constraints. Deletion Anomaly: It occurs when a tuple from a relation is deleted and the remaining relation violates one or more general constraints.