The Cox maze IV procedure: Predictors of late recurrence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Late outcomes of the Cox-Maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation Matthew C. Henn MD, Timothy S. Lancaster MD, Jacob R. Miller MD, Laurie A. Sinn RN,
Advertisements

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Should paroxysmal atrial fibrillation be treated during cardiac surgery?  Patrick M. McCarthy, MD, Adarsh Manjunath, BA, Jane Kruse, RN, BSN, Adin-Cristian.
Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail
A Prospective Multicenter Trial of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Early Results  Nahush A. Mokadam, MD, Patrick M. McCarthy,
A minimally invasive Cox maze IV procedure is as effective as sternotomy while decreasing major morbidity and hospital stay  Christopher P. Lawrance,
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Ralph J. Damiano, MD, Christopher P. Lawrance, MD, Lindsey L
Jason O. Robertson, MD, Phillip S. Cuculich, MD, Lindsey L
The persistent problem of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation: A single-institution experience over two decades  Jeanne Shen, BS, Shelly Lall,
Shoichi Okada, MD, Timo Weimar, MD, Marc R. Moon, MD, Richard B
Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation
Ultrasound, endoscopy, and the recurrent nerve
The days of future past  Neel K. Ranganath, MD, Aubrey C. Galloway, MD 
Superiority of cut-and-sew technique for the Cox maze procedure: Comparison with radiofrequency ablation  John M. Stulak, MD, Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Thoralf.
Murray H. Kwon, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
James L. Cox, MD, Niv Ad, MD, Terry Palazzo, RN, MS 
The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures  Sunil M Prasad, MD,
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Multilevel data analysis: What? Why? How?
Go on-pump or off-pump in diabetic patients?
Should paroxysmal atrial fibrillation be treated during cardiac surgery?  Patrick M. McCarthy, MD, Adarsh Manjunath, BA, Jane Kruse, RN, BSN, Adin-Cristian.
Jennifer S. Lawton, MD, Nader Moazami, MD, Michael K
Prospective evaluation of patients readmitted after cardiac surgery: Analysis of outcomes and identification of risk factors  Hersh S. Maniar, MD, Jennifer.
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Historical perspectives of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery: George P. Muller, MD, ScD ( )  Richard N. Edie, MD  The Journal of Thoracic.
Left-Sided Surgical Ablation for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Surgical Procedures  Niv Ad, MD, Sari D. Holmes,
Shelly C. Lall, MD, Kelley V
Efficacy and safety of right and left atrial ablations on the beating heart with irrigated bipolar radiofrequency energy: A long-term animal study  Spencer.
Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation for two decades: Are the results of new techniques equivalent to the Cox maze III procedure?  John M. Stulak,
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
The influence of postoperative mitral valve function on the late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after the maze procedure combined with mitral valvuloplasty 
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Do we need a bibliometrician to know which way the wind is blowing?
A first start for lung transplantation?
The effect of ablation technology on surgical outcomes after the Cox-maze procedure: A propensity analysis  Shelly C. Lall, MD, Spencer J. Melby, MD,
Impact of pulmonary hypertension on outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis  Spencer J. Melby, MD, Marc R. Moon, MD, Brian R.
Do we increase the operative risk by adding the Cox Maze III procedure to aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery?  Niv Ad, MD, Linda.
Epicardial microwave ablation on the beating heart for atrial fibrillation: The dependency of lesion depth on cardiac output  Spencer J. Melby, MD, Andreas.
Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD 
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
Left atrial pressure measurement in a rat is currently impossible due to size limitations of balloon occlusion catheter  Filip Konecny, MSc, DVM, PhD 
Frank C. Spencer, MD, FACS, pioneering cardiothoracic surgeon
The Ross procedure: Time to reevaluate the guidelines
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Prognosis and “granularity”: Building on staging foundations?
Shunt right or left? Decision 2016
Ralph S. Mosca, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The harder one looks, the more one finds
The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956  Richard A. DeWall, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Matthew C. Henn, MD, Christopher P. Lawrance, MD, Laurie A
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
Postoperative medication management after surgical ablation: Clarifying the role of amiodarone therapy  Hersh Maniar, MD, Eric Novak, MS  The Journal.
Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement  Todd M. Dewey,
Ralph E. Delius, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Commentary: Judgment day: Should you add atrial fibrillation ablation?
Appropriate Use Criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease: What the surgeon needs to know  Harold L. Lazar,
Managing conflicts of interest
Ryan R. Davies, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
More than vital: Who bears the burden?
The evolution of cardiothoracic critical care
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
A good chimney requires a good sweep
How do we follow up our patients
Journal changes and initiatives
Presentation transcript:

The Cox maze IV procedure: Predictors of late recurrence Ralph J. Damiano, MD, Forrest H. Schwartz, BA, Marci S. Bailey, RN, MSN, Hersh S. Maniar, MD, Nabil A. Munfakh, MD, Marc R. Moon, MD, Richard B. Schuessler, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 141, Issue 1, Pages 113-121 (January 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.067 Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 A, Right atrial lesion set of the Cox maze IV procedure. B, Left atrial lesion set of the Cox maze IV procedure. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 113-121DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.067) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) with and without antiarrhythmic drugs at 3, 6, and 12 months with number of patients at risk. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 113-121DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.067) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Relationship between left atrial size and probability of atrial fibrillation (Pr [AF]) recurrence. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 141, 113-121DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.067) Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions