Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Crystal Structure of a Human Cleavage Factor CFIm25/CFIm68/RNA Complex Provides an Insight into Poly(A) Site Recognition and RNA Looping  Qin Yang, Molly.
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Ajaybabu V. Pobbati, Siew Wee Chan, Ian Lee, Haiwei Song, Wanjin Hong 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
A Cryptic TOG Domain with a Distinct Architecture Underlies CLASP-Dependent Bipolar Spindle Formation  Jonathan B. Leano, Stephen L. Rogers, Kevin C.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
A Dual E3 Mechanism for Rub1 Ligation to Cdc53
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
André Schiefner, Michaela Gebauer, Antonia Richter, Arne Skerra 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Scaffolding in the Spliceosome via Single α Helices
Dcn1 Functions as a Scaffold-Type E3 Ligase for Cullin Neddylation
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Michael M. Brent, Ruchi Anand, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Conformational Flexibility in the Multidrug Efflux System Protein AcrA
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1459-1469 (August 2015) Molecular Characterization of LubX: Functional Divergence of the U-Box Fold by Legionella pneumophila  Andrew T. Quaile, Malene L. Urbanus, Peter J. Stogios, Boguslaw Nocek, Tatiana Skarina, Alexander W. Ensminger, Alexei Savchenko  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 1459-1469 (August 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.05.020 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 1459-1469DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structures of LubX U-Box Domains (A) 1.95-Å structure of LubX [9–117] (U-box 1). Residues highlighted in blue belong to the canonical U-box fold. (B) 2.88-Å structure of LubX [123–197] (U-box 2). (C) Superposition of crystal structures of LubX [9–117] and LubX [123–197], and UBE4B (PDB: 3L1Z). (D) Sequence alignment and secondary structure assignments of LubX U-box domains. Black and gray shading indicate identical and similar residues, respectively. Closed circles above alignment refer to LubX residues that form polar contacts or become >80% buried upon contact with UBE2D2. Open circle above alignment refers to residues important for interaction with SidH. See also Figure S1. Structure 2015 23, 1459-1469DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Auto-Ubiquitination of LubX Is Dependent on U-Box 1 (A) LubX [1–186] was tested for its ability to facilitate the formation of poly-ubiquitin chains in the presence of E1, ubiquitin, ATP, and 29 different E2s. Ubiquitination activity was determined by SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis using anti-ubiquitin antibodies. Asterisks denote reactions with activity not attributable to E2 auto-ubiquitination (see Figure S2). (B) Representative auto-ubiquitination reactions for UBE2D2, UBE2E3, UBE2W, and UBE2L6 with LubX [1–186] as well as U-box 1 and 2 domain fragments. Only LubX fragments containing U-box 1 exhibited auto-ubiquitination activity. See also Figure S2. Structure 2015 23, 1459-1469DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of LubX-UBE2D2 Complex (A) Overall architecture of LubX-UBE2D2 complex. LubX U-box 1 and 2 are colored blue and red, respectively, and UBE2D2 is green. (B–D) Detailed comparison of U-box-E2 interactions. (B) LubX U-box 1-UBED2. (C) UBE4B-UBE2D3 (PDB: 3LIZ). (D) LubX U-box 2. Residues shown are those that form hydrogen bonds (dashed black line) or become >80% buried in the U-box-E2 interaction. See also Figure S4. Structure 2015 23, 1459-1469DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 In Vivo Screening of LubX Reveals Domains and Residues Essential for Effectual Rescue of SidH Toxicity (A) Spot dilutions of S. cerevisiae co-expressing SidH (lpg2829) and LubX (lpg2830), LubX U-box 1, U-box 1 plus αC helix, or U-box 2 indicate that full-length LubX alleviates the toxicity of SidH. Rescue of SidH toxicity was not observed when using U-box 1, U-box 1 plus αC helix, or U-box 2 domains. (B) Individual strains carrying SidH and LubX or a LubX mutant were arrayed in quadruplicate. Two strains (“isolate 1” and “isolate 2”) of each mutant were assayed per plate. (C) Expression of mutant LubX strains with a significant reduction in ability to rescue SidH was validated by western blot. (D) Plate images were processed using SGAtools to obtain spot sizes. The graph shows data for one of the isolates. Mutations with a significant defect in their ability to rescue SidH are highlighted in bold. Error bars show the standard deviation for this isolate. (E) The positions of LubX mutants with a significant reduction in their ability to rescue SidH are indicated on the LubX-UBE2D2 complex structure. See also Table S2. Structure 2015 23, 1459-1469DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.05.020) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions