UNC Modification Performance Assurance Framework Incentive Regime

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-code User Pays. 2 What we will cover Background Current Services Governance Arrangements What is working well What is not working as well.
Advertisements

ADD PRESENTATION TITLE HERE (GO TO: VIEW / MASTER / SLIDE MASTER TO AMEND) ADD PRESENTER’S NAME HERE / ADD DATE HERE © Copyright EDF Energy. All rights.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services Progress Report for Ofgem 5 th December 2006.
Draft Review Proposal 175 Encouraging Participation in the elective DM Regime Phil Broom 25 October 2007.
MOD506 – Gas Performance Assurance Framework and Governance Arrangements.
Gas Performance Assurance Framework 11 th January 2013 Confidential.
Governance and Charging Methodology for User Pays Services 10 th January 2007.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
User Pays User Committee 12th November 2013
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Modification Proposal 0283 Update
EU Implementation Programme
Please use the top of the slide. The area that will be printed is 4
Review Group 291- Ofgem Update
Gas Performance Assurance Framework March 2013
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Transmission Workgroup 4th October 2012
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Performance Assurance Framework Risk Register Consultation Summary
MOD570 Obligation on Shippers to provide at least one valid meter reading per meter point into settlement once per annum 25th February 2016 Angela Love.
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Incentives 26 September 2018.
UNC User Representatives Process
Modification th July 2008.
Slide Title Edit Master text styles Second level Third level
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Connected System Exit Points Administration Options
Rebecca Hailes For 15 March 2018
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
ASC Qdos Scheme Changes Agent
Project Nexus Workgroup
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Review Group 291- Ofgem Update
Connected System Exit Points - Update
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Performance Assurance – Consideration of Discussions to date
Entry Overrun Calculation
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
UNC User Representatives Process
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Gas Performance Assurance Framework February 2013
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Title slide [from Title Slide master]
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Introduction
Project Nexus Workgroup
Dis 1208: Mod The ability and requirement for Users and Transporters to raise issues to be considered by the Allocation of Unidentified Gas Expert.
Modification 440 Project Nexus iGT Single Service Provision
PN UNC Workgroup (AQ topic)
Joint Office UNC Elections
Erika Melén, Senior Settlements Analyst Modification Proposal 141a
Joint Office UNC Elections
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
Joint Office UNC Elections
Mod UNC 0674 Business Rule Development
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Capacity Access Review
Presentation transcript:

UNC Modification 483 - Performance Assurance Framework Incentive Regime UNC Panel Slides (February 2014) Title slide [from Title Slide master] The title slide is available as a Title Master and the background and graphic elements are fixed. Text is editable for the slide heading and presentation details but the British Gas brand mark and other graphic elements are fixed on the Title Master. Font, type size and colours are fixed for the Title Master style and should not be modified.

Performance Assurance Framework Incentive Regime Industry Background The new Settlement regime introduced as part of Project Nexus arrangements is expected to offer wide benefits to the industry, however it is also recognised that new risks may be introduced. The volume of un-reconciled energy after any period is dependent on accurate and timely data provision, including asset and available consumption data. The gas Performance Assurance Workgroup (PAW) was established by the Uniform Network Code (UNC) Modification Panel to consider the development of a framework that can help to ensure the gas settlement risks are understood, and to provide assurance that the actions of parties are not inappropriately passing costs to others. One key area that has been agreed at PAW is the need for a Top-down cost reflective risk based incentive model.

Performance Assurance Framework Incentive Regime Modification Background Discussions at PAW have taken place over the last 12 months. At January’s PAW meeting the requirement for a modification was raised several times. British Gas believe it is a positive step to raise a modification on behalf of workgroup which seeks to focus these discussions. The objective of the change is to introduce a top-down cost reflective risk based incentive regime to incentivise Shippers to ensure they reconcile appropriate volumes of Energy within their portfolio.

Performance Assurance Framework Incentive Regime We request that February's Uniform Network Code (UNC) Modification Panel send this modification to the March Performance Assurance Workgroup (PAW) for development. Many thanks...