Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
3-Dimensional structure of membrane-bound coagulation factor VIII: modeling of the factor VIII heterodimer within a 3-dimensional density map derived by.
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Jason P. Mulvenna, Lillian Sando, David J. Craik  Structure 
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Noncatalytic Assembly of Ribonuclease III with Double-Stranded RNA
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structure and Mechanism of Imidazoleglycerol-Phosphate Dehydratase
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1495-1506 (August 2004) Structural Basis for Interactions between Tenascins and Lectican C-Type Lectin Domains  Anna Lundell, Anders I. Olin, Matthias Mörgelin, Salam al-Karadaghi, Anders Aspberg, Derek T. Logan  Structure  Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1495-1506 (August 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of Lecticans and Tenascins (A) The lecticans have a domain organization with N-terminal (G1) and C-terminal (G3) globular domains. In aggrecan, which is shown here, an additional G2 domain is inserted. The central part of the molecule carries keratin sulfate (KS) and chondroitin sulfate (CS) chains. Both G1 and G3 domains mediate interactions with other ECM components: G1 binds hyaluronan in an interaction stabilized by the link proteins, and the G3 domain binds multimeric ECM proteins such as tenascin-R. (B) Tenascin-R and tenascin-C consist of an N-terminal multimerization domain followed by EGF-like repeats (diamonds), fibronectin type III repeats (ovals), and a C-terminal fibrinogen-like globule (hexagon). Additional FnIII repeats can be inserted through alternative splicing (shaded ovals). The lectican G3 CLD binding site has been mapped to FnIII repeats 3–5 (black ovals). Tenascin-R forms trimeric and tenascin-C hexameric structures (right part of panel). (C) Schematic of lectican ECM organization through interactions with hyaluronan, link protein, and tenascin-R. The components are drawn as in (A). Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)

Figure 2 Overall Structure of the Complex between the Aggrecan CLD and FnIII Repeats 3–5 of Tenascin-R, TN3–5 A consistent coloring scheme is used throughout for the different domains. Surfaces, cartoon elements, and carbon atoms from domain 3 are colored beige, those in domain 4 are colored cyan, and those in domain 5 are purple. Figures 2–4 and 7 were made using Pymol (http://www.pymol.org). (A) Secondary structure cartoon. The three Ca2+ ions are shown as yellow spheres. The boxes marked a–c denote the interaction areas for which detailed views are given in Figures 4A–4C. (B) Surface representation colored by domain. (C) Exploded “open book” view of the interaction surface. The aggrecan CLD has been rotated 90° around a horizontal axis in the plane of the paper, TN3–5 in the opposite direction. The cyan and purple patches on the surface of the CLD represent the interaction areas with TN4 and TN5, respectively. Similarly, the maroon patches on the surface of TN3–5 represent the interaction area with the CLD. (D) The aggrecan CLD amino acid residues mediating interaction with tenascin-R form a surface corresponding to the sulfopeptide binding surface of P-selectin in complex with PSGL-1 (Somers et al., 2000). The interaction surface of P-selectin with the protein part of the PSGL-1 sulfoglycopeptide on is colored cyan, and the carbohydrate interaction surface is colored purple. The part of the PSGL-1 peptide visible in the crystal structure is shown as a ball-and-stick model. The figure is in the same orientation as the lower part of Figure 2C, showing the interaction surface of tenascin-R on aggrecan. Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)

Figure 3 The Aggrecan CLD Fold, Comparison to Other CLDs, and Ca2+ Binding (A) The aggrecan CLD. The cartoon elements are colored from blue at the N terminus to red at the C terminus. The disulfide bridges are highlighted, and the three Ca2+ ions are shown as yellow spheres. The same coloring scheme is used in (B) and (C). (B) A typical glycan binding CLD from mannose binding protein (Weis et al., 1992) in complex with an asparaginyl-mannose oligosaccharide, shown in ball-and-stick representation. (C) The long-form CLD from asialoglycoprotein receptor (Meier et al., 2000). (D) A stereoview of Ca2+ coordination in the aggrecan CLD. Water molecules are drawn as solid crosses. Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)

Figure 4 Details of the Interactions between the Aggrecan CLD and TN3–5 Important interacting side chains are shown as ball-and-stick, and the central hydrogen bonds are highlighted. The color scheme is as described in the legend to Figure 2. (A) Molecular interactions of the hydrophobic patch on loop L4 of the aggrecan CLD. The view is approximately the same as in Figure 2A. (B) Interactions involving the CC′ loop in TN4. The view is approximately as in (A). (C) Interactions of the TN4–5 linker region and the FG loop on TN5. The molecule has been rotated by approximately 180° around a vertical axis to make the interactions clearer; i.e., the view is from the back of the molecule as seen in Figure 2A. Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)

Figure 5 Tenascin-R and -C Molecules Crosslink Aggrecan-Hyaluronan Complexes Native link-stabilized aggrecan-hyaluronan complexes form networks with tenascin-C (A) and tenascin-R (B) as seen on electron micrographs after mica sandwich squeezing/rotary shadowing. The scale bar represents 100 nm. The right-hand panels show selected aggregates in a pseudocolor representation. The individual aggrecan molecules and the G3 domains were identified based on the expected structures from previous work using EM and antibody labeling (Olin et al., 2001), as are the tenascin-R and -C molecules (Pesheva et al., 1989; Vaughan et al., 1987). Individual aggrecan-hyaluronan complexes (blue) are crosslinked by tenascin-C (red hexabrachion structures in the upper panel) or tenascin-R (red tribrachion structures in the lower panel). To orient the viewer, the G1 and G3 domains of a single aggrecan molecule are labeled. C-terminal C-type lectin domains of aggrecan closely associated with the outer domains of the tenascins are indicated by arrowheads. The G1 domains form smaller clusters than those customarily seen in similar electron micrographs due to partial hyaluronan digestion by chondroitinase. Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)

Figure 6 Sequence Alignments of Lectican CLDs and Tenascin FnIII Repeats 4–5 from Rat and Human Sequence alignments of lectican CLDs and tenascin FnIII repeats 4–5 from rat and human (representative of the other sequences in the Swiss-Prot database). In both (A) and (B), residues in the interaction area of the present complex are marked with blue triangles. The secondary structure and numbering from the present structure are drawn above the sequence alignments. The sequence alignment was made using ESPRIPT (Gouet et al., 1999). (A) The lectican CLDs. The residues coordinating the Ca2+ ions are highlighted with green triangles (Ca2), black triangles (Ca1), and red triangles (Ca3). (B) Tenascin-R and tenascin-C, FnIII repeats 4–5. Residues in the interaction surface with the aggrecan CLD are marked with blue triangles. Residues shown in Figure 4A are highlighted with circles, Leu131 (see Figure 4B) is highlighted with a star, and the residues in Figure 4C are highlighted with boxes. Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)

Figure 7 A Comparison of the Linker Regions between FnIII Repeats in Fibronectin and Tenascin-R (A) Comparison of the linker between FN13 and 14 in fibronectin (Sharma et al., 1999) and the linker between TN3 and 4 in the present structure. FN13–14 is colored uniformly yellow. TN3 is colored beige, and the linker and TN4 are colored cyan. The molecules are superimposed using the coordinates of TN3 and FN13; i.e., the following domains are free to rotate. (B) A comparison of the FN13–14 linker in fibronectin with the one between TN4 and 5 in the present structure. TN4 is colored cyan and TN5 is colored blue. The structures are superimposed using the coordinates of TN4 and FN13. Structure 2004 12, 1495-1506DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.05.021)