The effectiveness of the using bulls evaluated by different methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natural Selection Four factors:
Advertisements

2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Use of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) in Dairy Sire Selection Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
Effects of complex vertebral malformation gene on production and reproduction M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and C. P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Dr. Gordon F. Jones Professor of Animal Science / Retired Western Kentucky University.
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
In-Service: Animal Breeding and Genetics Dr. Alan Fahey March 24 th 2011 NCE-MSTL, University of Limerick.
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.
2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
Economics of Genetic Improvement - Why countries should invest in genetic improvement programmes Leo Dempfle International Consultant and Department of.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
Obj: Discuss reproductive management terms used in the animal science industry.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
7 th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod Selection of dairy cattle for lifetime profit Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.
Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding April 27, 2010 Interpretation of genomic breeding values from a unified, one-step national evaluation Research project.
Growth and development Part two: Genetic factors: breeds Animal sex and hormones Climate Revision.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
 Genes- located on chromosomes, control characteristics that are inherited from parents.  Allele- an alternative form of a gene (one member.
2005 P.M. VanRaden and M.E. Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Effect.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Possibilities and requirements for organic dairy breeding lines
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
SELECTION SCHEMES.
Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation
Using EPDs in Selection
Genomic Evaluations.
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Improving production efficiency through genetic selection
HOW TO SELECT ANIMALS FOR BREEDING AND HOW TO GET THE BEST RESULT FROM THE SELECTION OF ANIMALS FOR BREEDING. Lecture 5 : Selection of Breeding Stock.
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Percent of total breedings
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

The effectiveness of the using bulls evaluated by different methods TAP TO GO BACK TO KIOSK MENU Saksa E.¹, Plemyashov K. ¹, Anipchenko P.² ¹ Russian Research Institute for Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding  — Branch of the L.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Russia ² - Saint-Petersburg State Academy of Veterinary Medicine, Russia (Click) Conclusion It is established that as the period of testing sires for offspring increases, the effectiveness of their genomic evaluation fall down; Evaluation of the same sires showed that animals, estimated in Canada for the level of the productivity of daughters, at times exceed the indicator of breeding value by milk yield of sires estimated in the USA; Analysis of the pedigree value of the same 18 sires of the American breeding in the herds of the Leningrad Region and in the flocks of US farms showed that in the USA they outnumbered their peers by 68 kg of milk, while in the Leningrad Region they reduced their yield by 53 kg; To increase the accuracy of assessing hereditary qualities of sires, the effectiveness of their selection, it is necessary to introduce the genetic evaluation of animals by the BLUP method into practical selection of dairy cattle. Abstract This research shows the effectiveness of using sires, evaluated by different methods, with the improvement of herds with milk yield of 8000-12000 kg of milk per cow. The results of a simultaneous assessment of the breeding values of sires estimated by genome in the USA and Canada showed that sires, valued in Canada on the basis of its own base comparisons, at times exceed the indicator of breeding value by daughter's milk yield, to sires, estimated in the US based on their national comparison base. In Russia, when using genomic assessments and assessments of the quality of progeny, it is necessary to take into account the difference in the valuation of the breeding value of the sires of the USA and Canada. Comparing the results of the 18 sires evaluated by the genome in the US, on the quality of progeny in the US and the Leningrad Region, correlation coefficients between the EBV BLUP assessment and the “contemporary comparison" method (CC-method) were: yield of milk - 0.55, fat - 0.74, protein - 0.72. Material & Methods Results (Click) The material of the study were information on a database about 1st lactation of cows from farms in the Leningrad Region, information of a database of sires of the «Nevskoye» and «Moskovskoye» breeding stations, sites Holstein associations: www.cdn.ca, www.accelgen.com. The research method included statistical processing of data using common methods: the "Data Analysis" (Excel). Click Headings to View More Information

Abstract Achieved genetic potential of dairy cattle, using effective methods of breeding and improving the technology of feeding allowed to get a milk yield per cow 8389 kg of milk in 2017 in Leningrad region. In the leading dairy farms of the region by means of an saturation crossbreeding of cattle Black-and-white breed with sires of Holstein breed created purebred Holstein herds of Leningrad breeding with medium milk yield of more than 10,000 kg per lactation. The growth of the genetic potential of the herds was ensured by using sperm of imported bulls-enhancers of North American breeding, which are annually selected with particular care to develop individual pairs selection plans. On the sites of the Holstein associations of America and Canada, their evaluation of the quality of the progeny on all the available signs of productivity, appearance, and functional features is monitored on a quarterly basis. Using up to 70% of highly valued sires in the leading breeding farms has determined the success of breeding of the last decades. According to researchers from the Moscow region, a breeding scheme has been developed to implement work on custom pairings, which involves the use of young bulls and cows with updated estimates of their own productivity, estimated by the genome on the basis of the national reference population. To improve the accuracy of assessing the hereditary qualities of bulls, the effectiveness of their selection in the farms of the Leningrad region, an assessment of the breeding value of black-and-white cattle with a high proportion of Holstein genes was carried out using the BLUP ANIMAL MODEL method. In the dairy farms of the Leningrad Region, imported sires that have a genomic rating have been used only marginally since 2009, most widely since 2014. Along with the imported bulls estimated by the genome, purebred producers imported from Canada to «Nevskoye» and «Moskovskoye» for breeding work were used in reproduction. In connection with the foregoing, it became possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of sires, evaluated by different methods, with the improvement of highly productive flocks on a specific material and analysis of the obtained data. References: 1. Doormaal B.V. Genomic Young Bulls: Accelerating Genetic Progress // Internet-resource www.cdn.ca (https://www.cdn.ca/document.php?id=476, circulation date 26.10.2017). 2. Sermyagin AA Regional system of genomic evaluation as a basic element of the national program of genetic improvement of cattle / Sermyagin AA, Ermilov AN, Yanchukov IN, Kharitonov SN, Plemyashov KV, Tyurenkova EN , Strekozov NI, Zinovieva NA // Milk and meat cattle breeding. - 2017. - № 7. -FROM. 3-6. 3. Plemiashov K.V. Use of the BLUP ANIMAL MODEL method in determining the breeding value of Holsteinized livestock in the Leningrad Region / K.V. Plemyashov, V.V. Labinov, E.I. Saksa, M.G. Smaragdov, A.A. Kudinov, A.V. Petrova // dairy and beef cattle breeding. - 2016. - №1. - P. 2-5. 4. Internet sites: www.accelgen.com, www.cdn.ca/query/detailge.php?breed

Results Year of birth n Method of evaluation Year of evaluation For practical operation for many years tracked changes in the breeding value of the sires in time, imported from Canada at the JSC "GTSV". For the analysis, sires were selected, the evaluation of which was on the sites of the Holstein associations of the USA and Canada. It is established that as the period of checking sires for offspring increases, the effectiveness of their genomic evaluation decreases (Table 1) Of the 9 sires born in 2009 according to the American genomic evaluation, only the daughters of one sire, 95.7%, retained their superiority over their contemporaries in 2017 from the daughters of the sires when assessed in 2014; of the 16 producers of 2010 births, the daughters of the 3 sires surpassed their peers during the same years, and in 2017 exceeded by 104.4, 107.8 and 135.9% by the milk yield of the daughters of sires when estimated in 2014. According to the Canadian genomic evaluation of the daughter of two sires in 2009, they retained their superiority over their contemporaries in 2017 from the indicators of the bull's daughters when evaluated in 2014; of 16 sires in 2010, the birth of a daughter of four sires - 80.7, 82.0, 92.1 and 97.6%, respectively. Simultaneous evaluation of the same sires showed that animals, estimated in Canada by the level of excellence in the productivity of daughters, at times exceed the indicator of breeding value by milk yield of bulls estimated in the USA. Since the sires in each country are estimated on the basis of their own comparison base (in the United States for average cow productivity in 2015, in Canada for the productivity of the cows of birth in 2012, 2013, 2014), the milk yield in each country is different. Sires (b. 2009) after 6 years of use (by 2015) in the United States have a genomic rating of -25 kg of milk, in Canada the estimate is positive +358 kg of milk. On average, the breeding value of the sires of the birth of 2010 is higher than the producers of the birth of 2009. Table 1. Breeding value of bulls estimated by genome in the USA and Canada in time Year of birth n Method of evaluation Year of evaluation Place of evaluation USA Canada Breeding value by milk, kg fat, % protein, % milk, кг 2009 9 origin  +793 +0,34 +0,02 genomic 2014 +42 +0,07 +0,03 +393 +0,05 +0,01 2015 -25 0,00 +358 2016 -21 +256 2017 -31 +45 2010 16 +951 +0,09 0,03 +137 +0,04 +865 +126 +750 +0,06 +128 +679 +88 +590

 compared with peers for Results Table 2. Assessment of the quality of progeny estimated by the genome of US sires (1st lactation) Place of evaluation Method of evaluation N of daughters Milk yield, кг Mm Fat, % Protein, %  compared with peers for milk, кг fat, % protein, % Leningrad region «СС-method» 897 8998101 3,790,01 3,170,03 -53 -0,01 +0,00 USA EBV BLUP 6419 1224836 3,770,02 3,060,02 +68 +0,05 +0,01 Analysis of the pedigree value of the same 18 sires of the American breeding in the Leningrad region and in the herds of US farms showed that in the USA they outnumbered their peers by 68 kg of milk, while in the Leningrad region they reduced their milk yield by 53 kg. Of the 18 sires evaluated by the genome, estimates of the quality of offspring in the United States and in the Leningrad region coincided with the estimates of 10 sires, including the daughters of 3 manufacturers who outperformed their peers from milk yield of 333 kg to 464 kg. Between the estimates of the breeding value of sires evaluated by the genome under different conditions, a rather high positive relationship was found: on the milk yield, the correlation coefficient was +0.547, on the milk fat +0.738 and by the protein +0.716. Correlation of milk yield indicates the probability of error in choosing the best sires for the average productivity of daughters, which can reach 45%. It can be assumed that the introduction of the BLUP procedure in the Holstein cattle population will significantly improve the efficiency of the choice of sires with genuinely better genotypes. Thus, when using genus-rated sires, the best results in assessing the quality of progeny are obtained from males with a high genomic rating. When selecting sires, we should take into account the level of excellence in the productivity of daughters of specific sires, the change in the breeding value of sires in the years after the first genomic evaluation. Comparing the results of the 18 sires evaluated by the genome in the US, on the quality of progeny in the US and the Leningrad Region, correlation coefficients between the EBV BLUP assessment and the CC- method were: yield of milk - 0.55, fat - 0.74, protein - 0.72. Loss in the efficiency of breeding cows by milk yield while ignoring the BLUP method can reach 45.0%. To increase the accuracy of assessing hereditary qualities of sires, the effectiveness of their selection, it is necessary to introduce the genetic evaluation of animals by the BLUP method into practical selection of dairy cattle.