Environmental targets for the NEC analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Amann, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes. Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, W. Winiwarter The CAFE baseline scenarios: Key findings.
Advertisements

The CAFE baseline scenarios: Air quality and impacts
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution: First ideas for scenarios Matti Vainio Clean Air for Europe programme Working Group on Target Setting and Policy Assessment.
IIASA Janusz Cofala, Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Emission Projections for 2020 Results from a study for the.
Evaluation of CAFE scenarios and outstanding modelling issues Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
A first set of optimized scenarios from RAINS: Exploring the range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions for 2020 M.
Three policy scenarios for CAFE Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.
Exploratory CAFE scenarios for further improvements of European air quality in Europe M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes,
Approaches for Cost-effective Reductions of Population Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter in Europe M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas,
State of model development: RAINS/GAINS International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, A. Chambers, J. Cofala,
RAINS1 ECON 4910 Spring 2007 Environmental Economics Lecture 7, The RAINS model Memorandum No 37/99 Lecturer: Finn R. Førsund.
Emission control scenarios for EU and non-EU countries M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Meeting of.
Options for Setting Environmental Interim Targets for Health for CAFE Summary of presentations to the CAFE Working Group on Target Setting and Policy Advice.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,
Sensitivity analyses for the CAFE policy scenarios Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.
Methodology and applications of the RAINS air pollution integrated assessment model Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
The inclusion of near-term radiative forcing into a multi-pollutant/multi-effect framework Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Recent methodological changes in the GAINS model M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Meeting of the Task.
EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON AIR AND CLIMATE CHANGE N:\adm\arkiv\overhead\stl \etc-acc\geneve.ppt 1 Air Quality in Europe 1999 Steinar Larssen, Kevin J. Barrett,
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.
Baseline emission projections for the EU-27 Results from the EC4MACS project and work plan for the TSAP revision Markus Amann International Institute for.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.
Application of IIASA GAINS Model for Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution in Europe Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
Baseline projections of European air quality up to 2020 M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, K. Kupiainen, W. Winiwarter,
New concepts and ideas in air pollution strategies Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.
IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.
Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling Review of the Gothenburg Protocol UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC.
Lecture notes 2, 4910 spring 2005, The RAINS model Transboundary pollution  UN 1972 conference on the human environment: States have...the responsibility.
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.
Janusz Cofala and Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Application.
Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,
1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,
Data sources for GAINS Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,
Scenarios for the Negotiations on the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol with contributions from Imrich Bertok, Jens Borken-Kleefeld, Janusz Cofala, Chris.
The three CAFE policy scenarios Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Chris Heyes, Zbigniew Klimont, Wolfgang Schöpp, Fabian Wagner.
IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) RAINS-Asia Phase 2: An Integrated Assessment Model for Controlling SO 2 Emissions in.
Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,
IIASA Projections of SO 2, NO x, NH 3 and VOC Emissions in East Asia up to 2030 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Z. Klimont,
Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.
The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Uniform limit value for air quality: Bring down PM2.5 everywhere below a AQ limit value Gap closure concept: Reduce PM2.5 levels everywhere by same.
IIASA Riku Suutari, Markus Amann, Janusz Cofala, Zbigniew Klimont Wolfgang Schöpp A methodology to propagate uncertainties through the RAINS scenario calculations.
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution
Impacts of air pollution on ecosystems, human health and materials under different Gothenburg Protocol scenarios a LRTAP dataflow A.C. Le Gall, S. Doytchinov,
State of play in developing the NEC baseline scenario
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z
Emission Projections for 2020
Markus Amann, CIAM Status of the RAINS model development for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol.
Presentation of final results
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
Changes to the methodology since the NEC report #2
Methods for Benefits Assessment and CBA for the NEC Directive Revision
CAFE CBA Paul Watkiss and Steve Pye, AEA Technology Environment
Environmental objectives and target setting
The CAFE baseline scenarios: Air quality and impacts
Draft Baseline Scenarios for CAFE
Steve Pye / Mike Holland NEC-PI Working Group, 19th June 2007
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Tentative Ideas for Co-operation
Presentation transcript:

Environmental targets for the NEC analysis M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, W. Schöpp, F. Wagner Environmental targets for the NEC analysis Meeting of the NECPI working group, March 29-30, 2007

Target setting for the NEC analysis TSAP has established environmental targets for 2020 In the meantime, methodology, data and boundary conditions have changed: Ecosystem-specific deposition for eutrophication Multi-year meteorology Extension to EU-27 Extension to Norway Mapping of environmental targets to new conditions has been done in NEC report #2 on the basis of relative improvements stated in TSAP

Impact indicators for 2000 computed with 5-years meteorology compared to 1997 met. *) with different population data

TSAP environmental targets

Translation of eutrophication target TSAP target (-43% km2) was calculated with grid-average deposition NEC analysis applies ecosystem-specific deposition, which is generally higher for ecosystems TSAP percentage target is not achievable with new calculation method NEC approach: Relative change in km2 achieved with TSAP emission reductions recomputed with ecosystem-specific deposition. Resulting reduction percentage (-31%) applied for NEC

Distribution of ecosystems area with nitrogen deposition above critical loads TSAP calculations vs. NEC optimizations with Euro-VI

Extension to EU-27 and Norway TSAP targets have been computed for EU-25 For NEC, percentage changes have been applied to EU-27 + Norway.

Translation of the TSAP environmental targets EU25 EU27 EU-27 + Norway Unit TSAP target for 2020 Impact indicator for 2000 Target level 2020 Lost life years YOLL 47% 200.3 106.2 213.8 113.3 214.4 113.6 Eutrophication 1000 km2 31% 913,7 681,7 1,019,9 703,8 1,033,0 705,6 Acidification – forests 74% 255,9 66,6 259,4 67,4 262,2 68,2 Acidification – freshwater 39% 37,6 22,9 37,5 105,2 64,1 Premature mortality # of cases 10% 18,7 16,9 20,3 18,3 20,4

Summary Health impacts for PM: Acidification target: EU-27+N –wide reductions in YOLLs by 47% Acidification target: EU-27+N –wide reduction in unprotected ecosystems area by 74% for forests and 39% for water. In each Member State, a 30% gap closure of accumulated excess deposition between CLE and MRR Eutrophication target: EU-27+N –wide reduction in unprotected ecosystems area by 31%. In each Member State, gap closure of accumulated excess deposition between CLE and MRR accumulated by 67% (national proj.) and 61% (PRIMES/CAPRI proj.) Ozone target: EU-27+N –wide reduction in premature mortality by 10%

Conclusions There is some ambiguity in translating the targets stated in TSAP to the NEC environment Revised methodologies, improved data, multi-year meteorology Extension to EU-27 + Norway CAFE applied equity criteria for acidification, eutrophication and ozone, but they are not reflected in the TSAP target The approach applied for this analysis: Achieves equivalent environmental improvements as stated in the TSAP Might re-distribute environmental improvements across Member States Increased flexibility reduces costs for measures