Reference Materials Definitions:- Reference material (RM) “Material, sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to one or more specified properties',

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PART I Reference Material Requirements for Laboratories and the Role of Accreditation Bodies Alan Squirrell- ILAC Maree Stuart - NATA Laurie Besley - AGAL/NARL.
Advertisements

ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements
ISO in Histopathology Louise O’Callaghan MSc FAMLS
Ensuring Better Services and Fair Value “Introduction and roadmap to implementation of ISO in Zambia’s water utilities” Kasenga Hara March 2015.
Copyright Alan Rowley Associates Steps to an Accurate Result Select a method and validate it as suitable for the purpose envisaged. Establish that.
EMODNet Chemistry Steering Committee January 2014 Rome Giordano Giorgi
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Traceability to the SI: What does it mean in practice? Ms. Sally Bruce and Ms. Dana Leaman National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program NIST.
Transmille Training Quality System.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Prepared by Long Island Quality Associates, Inc. ISO 9001:2000 Documentation Requirements Based on ISO/TC 176/SC 2 March 2001.
Technical requirements  Sampling  Analysis  Reporting of the results.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
1Having confidence in certification CASCO Comms/ International Organization for Standardization.
4. Quality Management System (QMS)
World Health Organization
ISO/IEC A review of the new standard for laboratory accreditation
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
WHY CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT?. What is conformity assessment?  Conformity assessment is the name given to processes that are used to demonstrate that a.
Overview of existing assessment schemes Rolf Bienert, John Lin.
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation Practical Solutions to Traceability and Uncertainty in Accreditation Presented to CITAC-NCSLI Joint Workshop.
Role of RENAR and the Ministry of Research in Promoting Interlaboratory Comparisons (ILCs) Daniela-Eugenia CUCU RENAR.
Requirements for the Competence of Providers of Proficiency Testing Schemes ILAC Guide 13:2000 – supplementing ISO Guides 43-1 and 43-2.
SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006 ISO/TS 16949:2002 certification – Meeting the requirements of.
Principles behind ISO/IEC 17025
Use of Reference Materials in Medical Testing SLAB 10th Anniversary Celebrations Accreditation Conference 10 th November 2015 Dr Deepani Siriwardhana Senior.
Metrology for Chemical Analysis
Webinar FSSC audit report 7th september 2015
USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant.
Wenclawiak, B.: Fit for Purpose – A Customers View© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in.
Control Charts and Trend Analysis for ISO 17025
Proficiency Testing Bryanne Shaw Biology Section Manager.
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 Registration Management Committee Company Confidential RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC
THE ROLE OF PROFICIENCY TESTING - A PERSPECTIVE FROM AN ACCREDITATION BODY Randall Querry American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) November.
2016 MFRPS: Changes To Standard 10 Guy F. Delius, R. S. CSO Food and Drug Administration Office Of Partnerships Standards Implementation Staff February.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
1 SMA/November 2007 ISO/IEC 17025: International Organization for Standardization.
© A2LA Understanding the Accreditation Hierarchy - Who’s Who and What’s What ? NCSL International Conference Orlando, FL August 7, 2008 by Roxanne.
NCSLI 2007 Training Records from an Auditors Viewpoint Shawn Mason Boston Scientific.
Comparative characteristics of Standards ISO 15189:2012 and EN ISO/IEC 17025:2005 – detalization and peculiarities of accreditation process. Ioannis Sitaras.
QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR OFFICIAL FOOD LABORATORIES WITHIN EURL AND NRL (LABORATORY NETWORKS IN EUROPE) dr. Tina Pirš, dr. vet. med. Quality Manager, Veterinary.
Laboratory equipment Dr. W. Huisman Cairo, November 21th 2012.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
Metrology & Accreditation – Their Role in the Global Market Presented at the 2009 NCSLI Conference San Antonio, Texas 30 July 2009 by Roxanne Robinson.
1 IBMS Scottish Quality Management Discussion Group Meeting Perth – 20 th May 2008.
Traceability in Chemical Measurement Comparable results are needed in order to avoid duplicating measurements which cost time and money. Comparable results.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Method Validation-where do I start?
Challenges in Method Validation – A Regulatory Laboratory Perspective
ISO/IEC FDIS : 2017 โดย นางสาวรัชฎาธร กังวาลไกล ผู้เชี่ยวชาญเฉพาะด้านการรับรองระบบงาน สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการมาตรฐานแห่งชาติ
Importance of Reference Material for Assaying Precious Metals as per standards in vogue Pankaj Deshmukh 12th Aug 2017.
ISO/IEC
Page Status: Approved 2/25/10 The Scientific Association
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
By John Wilson Accreditation and Metrology Services (Pty) LTD.
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
Testing and Certification according to ISO and ISO 17065
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
International Organization
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
Calibration forum 2018 Dublin Castle.
Standardisation - What to expect from it?
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
HKAS Accreditation Service for Certification of Management System of RCHE Service Providers Mr WONG Wang-wah Assistant Commissioner for Innovation and.
AUDIT TESTS.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
IMPLEMENTING THE CHANGES WHAT’S IN IT FOR ACCREDITATION BODIES
Presentation transcript:

Reference Materials Definitions:- Reference material (RM) “Material, sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to one or more specified properties', which has been established to be fit for its intended use in a measurement process.”

RM RM is a generic term. Properties can be quantitative or qualitative, e.g. identity of substances or species. Uses may include the calibration of a measurement system, assessment of a measurement procedure, assigning values to other materials, and quality control. An RM can only be used for a single purpose in a given measurement.

CRM Definition Certified reference material (RM) Reference materials, characterized by a metrologicaly valid procedure for one or more specified properties, accompanied by a certificate that provides the value of the specified property, its associated uncertainty, and a statement of metrological traceability

ISO Guide 34:2009 to ISO 17034:2016 Reference Material Manufacturing Process Planning - Sampling - Feasibility Studies - Processing - Characterization - Value Assignment - Certification - Storage - Distribution - Post Distribution Process

Characterizations & intended use of the RMs ISO 17034 - 7 Characterizations & intended use of the RMs ISO 17034 - 7.12 Characterization Group of expert laboratories 1 expert lab & confirmation by 2 or more expert labs Formulation Interlaboratory comparison study Property value Derived as consensus value One value Value calculated from calibrant & confirmed from 1 or more labs. Type of Reference Material Certified Reference Material Quality Control Material Quality Control Material Quality Control Material Intended use All Quality Assurance aspects All Quality Assurance aspects For precision & for control charts

Metrological traceability TRACEABILITY: property of the result of a measurement or the value of a standard whereby it can be related to the stated reference, usually national or international standard, throughout an unbroken chain of calibrations all contributing to measurement uncertainty. VIM 3

Food Matrix “The food matrix organizational scheme can be used to select one or two food matrices representing each sector, for development of a series of reference materials representing all foods. In some sectors, several samples may be necessary to account for differences in all the types of protein, fat, or carbohydrate.” W. R. Wolf and K. W. Andrews, “A System for Defining Reference Materials Applicable to All Food Matrices”, Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem., 353:73-76 (1995)

Traceability What is involved in the calibration of a “black box” type instrument PCR testing Chemistry: (End point PCR) – one assessor described this as a Grey Area - GMO (Plants) - Meat Species e.g. “1% Pork in Beef” or “5% Horse in Beef”

Traceability with regard to PCR Process includes Volume (pipetting into) – Wells – plate – PCR Temperature (Temp difference) Traceability of measurement (these are critical measurements)

Traceability of Measurements Traceability is required for both Temp & Volumetric critical measuring equipment In UK there are 3 UKAS accredited calibration temp labs (ISO 17025) for PCR (e.g. Anachem)

Traceability of Measurements (PT’s are readily available in this area) Certified Reference Materials for Meat species there are available at different %’s CRM’s CRM used as calibrant (IRMM) European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements - if accredited to ISO 17034 :2016 (Nov) (Traceability assured)

Traceability with Automated PCR PCR – DNA Automated DNA purification, quantification, PCR and sequencing set up using the HamiltonStar and Starlet instruments Robotic Well automated platform for the processing of samples Extraction using automated system and the DNA investigator kit

Key measurements-Automated PCR Traceability of the Volumetric / Temperature Apparatus could be equally considered a critical measurement. - Liquid handler stations use low volumes of 1µl - range 1 -1000µl - Calibration certs for volume (balance) and temp

Automated PCR a) calibration demonstrable for all liquid handlers used in this 1 – 10 µl range. (Hamilton customised a method in order to test the 1μl volume verification) The manufacture wrote a script to enable the calibration carry out the on-site calibration. b) Calibration certificates for both temperature (Tecan/Hamilton/Qiagen) and balance (Tecan/Hamilton) was carried out so traceability to SI standards was demonstrable.

Automated PCR c) The Hamilton Heater Shakers are verified On-site calibration carried out by an INAB Calibration laboratory, traceability of balances used was completed.

Traceability in Microbiological tests In microbiological enumeration tests, uncertainty contributions of calibration will affect a number of items of equipment that may be used e.g. the calibration of balances, autoclaves, incubator temperature probes, pipettes etc. It is difficult to assess the actual affect as there are many factors involved; uncertainty contributions may be small but they are also likely to be cumulative.

The example of the incubator temperature Critical one would be the 44C incubation step for Detection of E.coli where a significant increase or decrease in temperature could adversely affect the result of the test too low, media not selective; too high, E.coli unable to grow.

INAB No 5 Traceability Policy Statement “It is emphasised that calibration certificates issued by equipment manufacturers or agents are not acceptable evidence of external traceability, unless these are clearly identified as having been issued by an acceptably accredited calibration laboratory”.

AB’s - ILAC Policy - Traceability ILAC – P10 (01:2013) “ILAC Policy on the traceability of Measurement Results” This document describes the ILAC policy with regard to the metrological traceability requirements, Implementation date was Jan 2014 Applicable for ISO/IEC 17025 and ISO 15189

ILAC – P10 This policy may also be applied to other conformity assessment activities where testing and/or calibration is involved (e.g., inspection and product certification).

Testing Labs - ISO 17025 General requirements for traceability ISO 17025:2005 Section 5.6.1 All equipment used for tests and/or calibrations, including equipment for subsidiary measurements (e.g. for environmental conditions) having a significant effect on the accuracy or validity of the result of the test, calibration or sampling shall be calibrated before being put into service.

Testing Labs - ISO 17025 For reference standards the traceability requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2005 are: 5.6.3.1 “The laboratory shall have a programme and procedure for the calibration of its reference standards. Reference standards shall be calibrated by a body that can provide traceability as described in 5.6.2.1. Such reference standards of measurement held by the laboratory shall be used for calibration only and for no other purpose, unless it can be shown that their performance as reference standards would not be invalidated. Reference standards shall be calibrated before and after any adjustment.”

ILAC P10 Policy For equipment and reference standards that require calibration, the ILAC P10 policy is that they shall be calibrated by:

ILAC P10 Policy 1) An (NMI) National Metrology Institution whose service is suitable for the intended need and is covered by the CIPM MRA. or 2) An accredited calibration laboratory whose service is suitable for the intended need (i.e, the scope of accreditation specifically covers the appropriate calibration) and the accreditation Body is covered by the ILAC Arrangement or by Regional Arrangements recognised by ILAC.

ILAC P10 Policy 3a) An NMI whose service is suitable for the intended need but not covered by the CIPM MRA. In this case the accreditation body shall establish a policy to ensure that those services meet the relevant criteria for metrological traceability in ISO/IEC 7025:2005.

ILAC P10 Policy 3b) A calibration laboratory whose service is suitable for the intended need but not covered by the ILAC Arrangement or by Regional Arrangements recognised by ILAC. In these cases the accreditation body shall establish a policy to ensure that those services meet the relevant criteria for metrological traceability in ISO/IEC 17025:2005.

ISO/IEC 17025 Clause 5.6.2.1.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005, states “certain calibrations that currently cannot be strictly made in SI units” “traceability to appropriate measurement standards such as”: - the use of certified reference materials provided by a competent supplier to give a reliable physical or chemical characterization of a material; (e.g. ISO 17034) - the use of specified methods and/or consensus standards that are clearly described and agreed by all parties concerned. Participation in a suitable programme of inter laboratory comparisons

ILAC P10 Policy The ILAC P10 policy is: 5) If the calibration of instruments used in testing contributes significantly to the overall uncertainty, the same policy for traceability applies (as detailed under 1) to 4) above). 6) If a calibration is not a dominant factor in the testing result, the laboratory shall have quantitative evidence to demonstrate that the associated contribution of a calibration contributes little (insignificantly) to the measurement result and the measurement uncertainty of the test and therefore traceability does not need to be demonstrated.

ISO/IEC 17025 In ISO/IEC 17025:2005 the further requirement for traceability for testing laboratories is: 5.6.2.2.2 Where traceability of measurements to SI units is not possible and/or not relevant, the same requirements for traceability to, for example, certified reference materials, agreed methods and/or consensus standards, are required as for calibration laboratories (see 5.6.2.1.2). In this case ILAC policy for traceability applies 4) of ILAC P10

ISO 15189 In ISO/IEC 15189:2012 5.3.1.4 Equipment calibration and metrological traceability: ………..The laboratory shall have a documented procedure for the calibration of equipment that directly or indirectly affects examination results………. a) taking into account conditions of use and the manufacturer’s instructions; b) recording the metrological traceability of the calibration standard and the traceable calibration of the item of equipment; c) verifying the required measurement accuracy and the functioning of the measuring system at defined intervals; Metrological traceability shall be to a reference material ……..

ISO/IEC 15189:2012 5.3.1.4 Where this is not possible or relevant, other means for providing confidence in the results shall be applied, including but not limited to the following: - use of certified reference materials; - examination or calibration by another procedure; - mutual consent standards or methods which are clearly established, specified, characterized and mutually agreed upon by all parties concerned.

ILAC P10 Policy If the calibration of instruments used in testing contributes significantly to the overall uncertainty, the same policy as in Sections (1 to 4) of ILAC P10 document apply

INAB Policy We will need to have consistency and be seen to apply the requirements of ILAC P10 to all testing labs