Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
PHAPI, CAS, and Hsp70 Promote Apoptosome Formation by Preventing Apaf-1 Aggregation and Enhancing Nucleotide Exchange on Apaf-1  Hyun-Eui Kim, Xuejun.
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Andrew J. Deans, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Molecular Architecture of the Human Pre-mRNA 3′ Processing Complex
Shijiao Huang, Danming Tang, Yanzhuang Wang  Developmental Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
The Gemin5 Protein of the SMN Complex Identifies snRNAs
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Autoantigen La Promotes Efficient RNAi, Antiviral Response, and Transposon Silencing by Facilitating Multiple-Turnover RISC Catalysis  Ying Liu, Huiling.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
C-Raf Inhibits MAPK Activation and Transformation by B-RafV600E
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
The BRCT domain of the S. cerevisiae checkpoint protein Rad9 mediates a Rad9–Rad9 interaction after DNA damage  Jean Soulier, Noel F. Lowndes  Current.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 482-490 (November 2007) Promotion of Homologous Recombination and Genomic Stability by RAD51AP1 via RAD51 Recombinase Enhancement  Claudia Wiese, Eloïse Dray, Torsten Groesser, Joseph San Filippo, Idina Shi, David W. Collins, Miaw-Sheue Tsai, Gareth J. Williams, Bjorn Rydberg, Patrick Sung, David Schild  Molecular Cell  Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 482-490 (November 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.027 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Induction of MMC, CPT, and X-Ray Sensitivity and Chromatid Breaks by RAD51AP1 Knockdown (A) Survival curves of RAD51AP1-depleted HeLa cells treated with MMC. Nondepleting negative controls: pRNAi, GFP shRNA, and mutated shRNA #2. All points with error bars in (A)–(E) represent the average of at least three different experiments ± 1 SD. Note: shRNA #1 was tested in triplicate but with 2 μM MMC only, and resulted in the same sensitization as shRNAs #2 and #3. (B) Complementation of RAD51AP1 depletion in HeLa cells. Cells expressing both shRNA #2 and EGFP-RAD51AP1res are more resistant to MMC than cells expressing shRNA #2 only. (C) Epistasis between RAD51AP1 and XRCC3. HeLa cells depleted for both XRCC3 and RAD51AP1 show the same sensitivity to MMC as cells depleted for RAD51AP1 only. (D and E) Survival curves of RAD51AP1-depleted asynchronous HeLa cells treated with camptothecin or X-rays. Nondepleting negative controls are GFP shRNA and mutated shRNA #2 for (D), or just mutated shRNA #2 for (E). Note: shRNAs #1 and #3, which do not sensitize asynchronous HeLa cells to X-rays, do sensitize cells synchronized in S phase (Figure S2A). (F) Representative western blot analysis to show the extent of RAD51AP1 depletion observed in HeLa cells with three different shRNAs, probed with anti-GFP antibody. The EGFP-RAD51AP1 fusion protein is a surrogate marker for RAD51AP1 expression. pRNAi is a negative control and QM (a transcription factor) is a loading control. Additional western blots, also demonstrating depletion of endogenous RAD51AP1, are presented in Figure 2 and Figures S1 and S2. (G and H) MMC (50 nM)-induced and spontaneous ctbs in RAD51AP1-depleted cells. Mutated shRNA #2 is a nondepleting negative control. In (H), spontaneous ctbs were scored 72 hr and 96 hr after RAD51AP1 depletion. Error bars: ±1 SEM for two (G) or three (H) independent experiments. (I) Giemsa-stained metaphase spread of MMC-treated RAD51AP1-depleted HeLa cells. Black arrows, ctbs; red arrow, chromatid-type exchange aberration. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 482-490DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.027) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RAD51AP1 Depletion Impairs Homologous Recombination, but Not RAD51 DNA Repair Foci (A) TK6-DRGFP cells depleted for RAD51AP1 (shRNA #2 or shRNA #3) or XRCC3 show ∼2- to 2.5-fold lower levels of GFP+ cells (i.e., homologous recombinants) than control cells transfected with either pRNAi or mutated shRNA #2. In four experiments, both negative controls were used and both gave very similar numbers (for example, see Figure S3C). Therefore, their values were averaged and this average was set to 1.0. In the remaining experiments, only mutated shRNA was used as a negative control and this number was set at 1.0. Data for the depleted cells are the mean of the relative fraction of GFP+ cells from five to seven independent experiments ± 1 SEM (see also Figure S3C). (B and C) Western blot analyses to show the extent of EGFP-RAD51AP1 (here AP1) depletion (B) or XRCC3 (here X3) depletion (C) in TK6-DRGFP cells. Two hairpins were tested for each gene (lanes 2 and 3 corresponding to shRNA #2 and shRNA #3, respectively, for RAD51AP1) and compared to control cells (lane 1: transfected with mutated shRNA #2). QM, loading control. (D) RAD51 foci form normally in RAD51AP1-depleted HeLa cells after 8 Gy X-rays. Control transfected HeLa cells (mutated shRNA #2 [A and B]) and RAD51AP1-depleted cells (C–F) display bright RAD51 foci in ∼80% of the cells analyzed. In contrast, HeLa cells depleted for either RAD51C (G and H) or XRCC3 (I and J) show impaired RAD51 foci formation (i.e., only some cells form overall smaller and less intense RAD51 foci). The single cell with large foci in (J) may not have been transfected with the XRCC3 shRNA. Cells were fixed and stained at 8 hr after 8 Gy X-rays. Two panels for each sample from different areas of the chamber slide are shown. (E) Western blot analysis demonstrating the depletion of RAD51AP1, XRCC3, or RAD51C for the experiment shown in (D). RAD51 acts as both a nondepleted negative control and as a loading standard. XRCC3 and Rad51C exist as a complex (Wiese et al., 2002a), and depletion of XRCC3 reduces the level of RAD51C and vice versa, as has previously been reported (Lio et al., 2004). Molecular Cell 2007 28, 482-490DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.027) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RAD51AP1 Purification and Characterization (A) Purified GST-RAD51AP1, RAD51AP1, MBP-RAD51AP1, MBP-RAD51AP1 L319Q, MBP-RAD51AP1 H329A, and MBP-RAD51AP1 CΔ25 were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. (B) GST-tagged RAD51AP1 or GST was incubated with RAD51 or yRad51, and glutathione Sepharose beads were used to capture any protein complex that had formed. The beads were washed and treated with SDS to elute the bound proteins. The supernatant (S), wash (W), and SDS eluate (E) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie blue staining. (C) MBP-tagged wild-type, L319Q, H329A, or CΔ25 RAD51AP1 protein was incubated with RAD51, and amylose agarose beads were used to capture any protein complex that had formed. The analysis was as in (B). (D) RAD51AP1 (0.03–1.5 μM) was incubated with ssDNA and dsDNA (Da) or with dsDNA and the D loop substrate (Dc). The mobility shift of the DNA substrates was analyzed in a 10% (Da) or 5% (Dc) polyacrylamide gel. The asterisk denotes the position of the 5′ 32P label. The results from (Da) and (Dc) were plotted in (Db) and (Dd), respectively. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 482-490DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.027) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Specific Enhancement of the RAD51-Mediated D Loop Reaction by RAD51AP1 (A) Schematic of the D loop assay. (B) D loop reactions mediated by combinations of RAD51 (0.8 μM) and RAD51AP1 (0.05–1 μM). ATP was omitted from the reaction in lane 10. The results were plotted. (C) D loop reactions mediated by combinations of RAD51 K133R (0.8 μM) and RAD51AP1 (0.05–1 μM). ATP was omitted from the reaction in lane 10. The results were plotted. (D) D loop reactions mediated by combinations of RAD51 or RAD51 K133R (0.8 μM each) and the MBP-tagged form of wild-type or mutant RAD51AP1 (0.2 μM each). The results were plotted. Error bars in (B)–(D), ±1 standard deviation for at least three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 482-490DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.027) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions