Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews 
Advertisements

Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Structural Basis of Interdomain Communication in the Hsc70 Chaperone
Selective Substrates and Inhibitors for Kallikrein-Related Peptidase 7 (KLK7) Shed Light on KLK Proteolytic Activity in the Stratum Corneum  Simon J.
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Crystal Structures of Sirt3 Complexes with 4′-Bromo-Resveratrol Reveal Binding Sites and Inhibition Mechanism  Giang Thi Tuyet Nguyen, Melanie Gertz,
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
John Hines, Michael Groll, Margaret Fahnestock, Craig M. Crews 
Cross-Linking of SPINK6 by Transglutaminases Protects from Epidermal Proteases  Jan Fischer, Yulia Koblyakova, Ties Latendorf, Zhihong Wu, Ulf Meyer-Hoffert 
Allosteric Activation of DegS, a Stress Sensor PDZ Protease
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Potent and Selective Peptidyl Boronic Acid Inhibitors of the Serine Protease Prostate- Specific Antigen  Aaron M. LeBeau, Pratap Singh, John T. Isaacs,
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structural Basis for Endosomal Targeting by the Bro1 Domain
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 5-11 (January 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Kevin M. Marks, Michael Rosinov, Garry P. Nolan  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Structural Analysis of the Protein Phosphatase 1 Docking Motif: Molecular Description of Binding Specificities Identifies Interacting Proteins  Heike.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e11 (December 2017)
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Ramon Hurtado-Guerrero, Daan M.F. van Aalten  Chemistry & Biology 
Discovery of Antagonist Peptides against Bacterial Helicase-Primase Interaction in B. stearothermophilus by Reverse Yeast Three-Hybrid  Laurence Gardiner,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Maria Brattsand, Kristina Stefansson, Thomas Hubiche, Stefan K
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
Structural Basis of Proline-Proline Peptide Bond Specificity of the Metalloprotease Zmp1 Implicated in Motility of Clostridium difficile  Magdalena Schacherl,
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Protein Phosphorylation and Prevention of Cytochrome Oxidase Inhibition by ATP: Coupled Mechanisms of Energy Metabolism Regulation  Rebeca Acin-Perez,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 633-643 (June 2009) Substrate-Guided Design of a Potent and Selective Kallikrein-Related Peptidase Inhibitor for Kallikrein 4  Joakim E. Swedberg, Laura V. Nigon, Janet C. Reid, Simon J. de Veer, Carina M. Walpole, Carson R. Stephens, Terry P. Walsh, Thomas K. Takayama, John D. Hooper, Judith A. Clements, Ashley M. Buckle, Jonathan M. Harris  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 633-643 (June 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.008 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Amidolytic Activity of KLK4 against Sparse Matrix Library pNA Substrates The y axis represents the rate of substrate cleavage in mOD/min(405), with the amino acid at position P2 indicated beside each y axis. The x axis labels the bars corresponding to substrates with each of the 25 combinations of the amino acids in the P4 and P3 positions. Arginine was kept constant in the P1 position while varying the amino acid in positions P2–P4 as indicated in the graph. Data represent mean and standard error of the mean (± SEM) of three experiments in triplicate. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 633-643DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.008) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Inhibition of serine protease proteolytic activity by SFTI and SFTI-FCQR Kallikrein and trypsin-mediated proteolysis of fibrinogen assessed by SDS-PAGE. Proteolytic products are visualized by Coomassie blue staining following resolution on 12% polyacrylamide gels. (A) Effect of increasing concentrations of SFTI-FCQR on fibrinogen digestion by KLK4 and SFTIwt at a concentration of 2000 nM. (B) Trypsin digestion of fibrinogen in the presence and absence of 2000 nM SFTI-FCQR. (C–F) Digestion of fibrinogen by KLK2, 5, 12, and 14, respectively, in the presence of increasing concentrations of SFTI-FCQR. Gels are representative of three independent experiments. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 633-643DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.008) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Stability of SFTI-FCQR in Contact with Prostate Cancer Cells In Vitro Residual SFTI-FCQR was assayed in cell culture media from prostate cancer cells treated with a single 1 μM dose of inhibitor at time 0. Endogenous inhibitors were removed by boiling followed by centrifugation to remove precipitated denatured protein. Stability was assessed against LNCaP (closed circles), 22RV1 (open circles), and PC3 cells (triangles). Data are mean ± SEM from three experiments in triplicate. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 633-643DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.008) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of SFTI-FCQR on Calcium Release in Cell-Based Assays Lung murine fibroblasts (LMF) stably expressing human PAR-2 were incubated after 30 s with either activated insect cell-derived KLK4 (iKLK4, 300 nM), trypsin (10 nM), or PAR-2-activating peptide (100 nM) with or without SFTI-FCQR (1 μM). The fluorescence at 510 nm was measured following alternating excitation at 340 and 380 nm (Em510[340/380]). The ratio of Em510(340/380) is proportional to intracellular Ca2+ ion concentration. The data are represented as mean of three experiments in triplicate. Treatment with (A) buffer or (B) SFTI-FCQR only had no effect whereas treatment with (C) trypsin, (D) iKLK4, (E) trypsin and SFTI-FCQR, or (F) PAR-2-activating peptide resulted in increased intracellular Ca2+ ion concentration. Calcium flux was restored in cells initially treated with iKLK4 and SFTI-FCQR at 30 s by addition of (G) trypsin or (H) PAR-2-activating peptide after 3.5 min. Arrows indicate injection points for solutions as indicated. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 633-643DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.008) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structural Characteristics of the Protease-Inhibitor Interfaces for the Trypsin-SFTI and the Modeled KLK4/SFTI-FCQR Complex Catalytic residues are labeled with an asterisk. SFTI residues that have been substituted in this study are labeled in green. (A) Superposition between trypsin (cyan)-SFTI (green) complex (1SFI) and KLK4 (1BD1, pink) in and around the active site, showing regions of structural differences, notably around the “99 loop” (L/T98; L99) and at residue 175. Side chains are shown and labeled for sequence differences or where significant structural differences are observed (KLK residue shown before trypsin residue in label). The S2 subsite is indicated. (B and C) Hydrogen bonds (magenta dashed lines) between trypsin (yellow) and SFTI (green) (B), and (C) modeled KLK4 (yellow) and SFTI-FCQR (green). Viewed from the inverse angle compared with all other figures in panel, i.e., view from protease toward inhibitor. (D and E) Molecular surfaces of (D) trypsin-SFTI and (E) modeled KLK4-SFTI-FCQR complexes colored according to electrostatic potential (red indicates negative, blue is positive). Subsites are labeled as S1, S2, etc. Structural differences between trypsin and KLK4, notably at L95 and L/T98, shown in A, cause an increase in the width and depth of the electronegative S2 pocket, allowing its occupation by the modeled glutamine (4Q) side chain of SFTI-FCQR. Chemistry & Biology 2009 16, 633-643DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.05.008) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions