Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cool-2/α-Pix Protein Mediates a Cdc42-Rac Signaling Cascade
Advertisements

Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Analysis of Telomerase Processivity
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Erik Procko, Ian Ferrin-O'Connell, Sze-Ling Ng, Rachelle Gaudet 
Hung-Ta Chen, Steven Hahn  Cell 
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Organization of an Activator-Bound RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Structure of the RGS-like Domain from PDZ-RhoGEF
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 118, Issue 3, Pages (August 2004)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages (June 2001)
An Activator Target in the RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 21-31 (July 2001) Binding of the Initiation Factor σ70 to Core RNA Polymerase Is a Multistep Process  Tanja M. Gruber, Dmitriy Markov, Meghan M. Sharp, Brian A. Young, Chi Zen Lu, Hong Ji Zhong, Irina Artsimovitch, Katherine M. Geszvain, Terrance M. Arthur, Richard R. Burgess, Robert Landick, Konstantin Severinov, Carol A. Gross  Molecular Cell  Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 21-31 (July 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1

Figure 1 The Fragments of RNA Polymerase Utilized in This Study Linear diagrams of σ70 (A), β (B), and β′ (C) with the fragments analyzed are displayed. The endpoints of the four fragments of β (β1–β4; B), the three fragments of β′ (β'1–β'3, C), and the fragments of σ70 were based on proteolytic cleavage experiments, naturally occurring split sites, sequence homology, and functional studies (discussed in the text). Evolutionarily conserved regions of β, β′, and σ subunits are labeled above the bar (Lonetto et al., 1992; Severinov, 2000). The cloned amino acid residues of each fragment are indicated in parentheses. The position of three structural features, the flexible flap in β and the Zn++ finger and coiled-coil in β′, are shown. Mutational changes are indicated below the lines. For the flap, we either deleted its tip or introduced one of five different point mutations (see Figure 5B). For the Zn++ finger, we either deleted it or replaced the four Cys that chelate the Zn++ with Ala (see Experimental Procedures). For the coiled-coil in β′1, we introduced the point mutation A302D. For σ70, the single point mutations that were introduced into the full-length construct are indicated below the line representing the construct. A variety of mutants were used: (1) those exhibiting decreased binding when competing with wild-type σ70 for binding to core (Q406A, E407K/A, P504A, E555A, L598A; Sharp et al., 1999), (2) those inferred from the crystal structure to be involved in binding but showed no defect in a competitive binding assay (R374A, K392A; Malhotra et al., 1996; Sharp et al., 1999), and (3) a mutant that interferes with open complex formation but did not have a severe binding defect (I53A; Bowers and Dombroski, 1999). Mutational changes present in the fragments are depicted by a short vertical line Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)

Figure 2 GST Pull-Down Experiments of Full-Length σ70 and Its Point Mutants (Top panel) Relative interaction of each core fragment with σ70; 250 nM GST-tagged σ70 attached to glutathione agarose beads was incubated with 750 nM amounts of each His6-tagged core fragment. Following washing, the fragments were eluted and visualized on a Western blot with an anti-His6 antibody. The bands from a single blot are aligned next to each other for easier viewing. (Bottom panel) Relative interaction of wild-type and mutant σ70 with core fragments. Western blot analysis of GST pull-down results of wild-type or single-point mutant constructs of σ70 with the five most strongly interacting core fragments; 250 nM of σ70 constructs were incubated with 750 nM core fragments. Graphs on right show a graphical representation of the binding defects of point mutations that yielded consistent and reproducible defects with the particular core fragment. Each measurement represents at least three experiments, and error bars representing standard deviation from the average are indicated. GST alone never yielded a significant signal and is only shown in this figure Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)

Figure 4 Relative Interaction of Wild-Type and Mutant σ70 Domains with Core Fragments (A) Region 1.1 interactions with core fragments. (B) Region 1.2–2.4 interactions with core fragments. (C) Region 3.1–4.2 interactions with core fragments. For each segment, the top panel indicates the relative interaction of each core fragment with the particular σ70 domain tested, following the procedure described in Figure 2 (top panel). For each segment, the bottom panel indicates the relative interaction of wild-type and mutant σ70 domains with core fragments, following the procedure described in Figure 2 (bottom panel). To obtain a better signal, when the interactions of σ70 fragment 1.2–2.4 and its mutants were compared, 1500 nM of β′1 were used (B, bottom panel); for 3.1–4.2 and its mutants 1500 nM of β′1 and β4 were used (C, bottom panel). Graphs on right show a graphical representation of consistent binding defects. The measurement represents three experiments, and error bars are indicated Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)

Figure 3 A Comparison between the Interactions of Full-Length σ70 and Its Fragments with Core Fragments His6-tagged core fragments are visualized on a Western blot with an anti-His6 antibody after incubation with GST-tagged σ70 fragments attached to glutathione agarose beads. Core fragments were present in a 3-fold molar ratio over GST-tagged σ70 Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)

Figure 5 Effects of Mutational Changes in Core on Interaction with σ70 (A) Relative binding of core fragment β′1 and its mutants to σ70. A302D represents a mutation within the β′ coiled-coil motif. ΔZn lacks the Zn++ finger region of this fragment (aa 35–107), whereas 4C4A denotes the construct which has the four Cys residues coordinating the Zn++ mutated to Ala. (B) Relative binding of σ70/Q406A and 3.1–4.2 fragments to core fragments β′1, β′1 ΔZn, and β′1 4C4A. (C) Relative binding of core fragment β3 and its mutants to σ70. “Δ” refers to the construct of β3 containing a deletion of the tip of the flap element (aa 900–909). The effects of five single mutational changes (K900E, L901R, I905N, F906A, and K909A) within this region are also shown. (D) Relative binding of region 1.1–2.4 and its point mutant I53A to core fragment β3. In all cases, binding was measured as describe in Figure 2B. Graphs on right show a graphical representation of the binding defects of point mutations that yielded consistent and reproducible defects with the particular core fragment. Each measurement represents at least three experiments, and error bars are indicated Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)

Figure 6 Structural Model of the Initial Interactions of σ70 with Core Surface representation of the three-dimensional structure of T. aquaticus RNA polymerase (Zhang et al., 1999), where the β′ subunit is shown in pink, the β subunit in light blue, and the two α subunits and the ω subunit in gray. The three initial interaction sites of σ70 with E. coli core are modeled onto the structure and indicated in darker colors. Region 1.1 (residue I53) of σ70 interacts with the tip of the flap domain of β (dark blue). Region 2.2 (residues Q406, E407) of σ70 interacts with the coiled-coil domain of β′ (red). Region 3.1 (residue P504) interacts with a region close to the active site which is contained within fragment β4 of β (magenta). The active site Mg2+ is depicted in yellow. For details, see text Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)

Figure 7 A Model of the New Contact Sites Formed at Each Stage of σ70-Core Interaction A model of interaction sites utilized in the initial interface (A) and the new interaction sites between σ70 and core in the holoenzyme interface are shown (B). Although not indicated in the figure, we believe that initial interface contacts are maintained in the holoenzyme interface (see text). The σ70 domains are placed further apart in (B), representing the conformational changes upon initial binding to core, as well as the reorientation of regions 1.1 and 3.1–4.2 by 20 Å relative to the region 1.2–2.4 domain upon core binding (Callaci et al., 1999). Rectangles represent σ70 fragments, and ovals represent core fragments. Specific residues implicated in interactions are indicated. Interactions indicated in gray did not satisfy as stringent conditions as the interactions displayed in black (see Discussion) Molecular Cell 2001 8, 21-31DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00292-1)