Mesenteric revascularization: management and outcomes in the United States, 1988- 2006 Marc L. Schermerhorn, MD, Kristina A. Giles, MD, Allen D. Hamdan, MD, Mark C. Wyers, MD, Frank B. Pomposelli, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 341-348.e1 (August 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.03.004 Copyright © 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Procedure volume for revascularization of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting (PTA/S), compared with open repairs from 1988 to 2006. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009 50, 341-348.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.03.004) Copyright © 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Procedure volume for revascularization of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting (PTA/S), compared with open repairs from 1988 to 2006. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009 50, 341-348.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.03.004) Copyright © 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Mortality rate after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting (PTA/S), compared with surgical repair for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) from 1988 to 2006. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009 50, 341-348.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.03.004) Copyright © 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Mortality rate after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting (PTA/S), compared with surgical repair for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) from 1988 to 2006. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2009 50, 341-348.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2009.03.004) Copyright © 2009 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions