Modified Modal Methods in Asymmetric Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MDOF SYSTEMS WITH DAMPING General case Saeed Ziaei Rad.
Advertisements

Reliable Dynamic Analysis of Structures Using Imprecise Probability Mehdi Modares and Joshua Bergerson DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND EVIRONMENTAL.
Active Calibration of Cameras: Theory and Implementation Anup Basu Sung Huh CPSC 643 Individual Presentation II March 4 th,
Motion Analysis Slides are from RPI Registration Class.
Ch 5.1: Review of Power Series
Ch 5.1: Review of Power Series Finding the general solution of a linear differential equation depends on determining a fundamental set of solutions of.
COMP322/S2000/L221 Relationship between part, camera, and robot (cont’d) the inverse perspective transformation which is dependent on the focal length.
Differential Equations
Solution of Eigenproblem of Non-Proportional Damping Systems by Lanczos Method In-Won Lee, Professor, PE In-Won Lee, Professor, PE Structural Dynamics.
Lecture 35 Numerical Analysis. Chapter 7 Ordinary Differential Equations.
Mechanical Vibrations Multi Degrees of Freedom System
Yeong-Jong Moon*: Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Kang-Min Choi: Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Hyun-Woo Lim: Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Jong-Heon Lee:
한국강구조학회 2001 년도 학술발표대회 Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Structures under Wind Loads *Byoung-Wan Kim 1), Woon-Hak Kim 2) and In-Won Lee 3) 1)
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 09 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Student, KAIST Sang-Won Cho* : Ph.D. Student, KAIST Dong-Hyawn Kim: Senior Researcher, KORDI Dong-Hyawn Kim: Senior Researcher, KORDI.
1 Efficient Mode Superposition Methods for Non-Classically Damped System Sang-Won Cho, Graduate Student, KAIST, Korea Ju-Won Oh, Professor, Hannam University,
In-Won Lee, Professor, PE In-Won Lee, Professor, PE Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. Korea Advanced.
A Case Study for a Coupled System of Acoustics and Structures Deng Li (Japan Research Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Craig C. Douglas (UK, Yale.
* 김 만철, 정 형조, 박 선규, 이 인원 * 김 만철, 정 형조, 박 선규, 이 인원 구조동역학 및 진동제어 연구실 구조동역학 및 진동제어 연구실 한국과학기술원 토목공학과 중복 또는 근접 고유치를 갖는 비비례 감쇠 구조물의 자유진동 해석 1998 한국전산구조공학회 가을.
Computational Structural Engineering Institute Autumn Conference 2002 Oct , 2002 VIBRATION CONTROL OF BRIDGE FOR SERVICEABILITY Jun-Sik Ha 1),
Hong-Ki Jo 1), Man-Gi Ko 2) and * In-Won Lee 3) 1) Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kongju.
*Man-Cheol Kim, Hyung-Jo Jung and In-Won Lee *Man-Cheol Kim, Hyung-Jo Jung and In-Won Lee Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab. Structural Dynamics.
Yeong-Jong Moon 1), Jong-Heon Lee 2) and In-Won Lee 3) 1) Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
대한토목공학회 추계 학술발표회 대구 2003 년 10 월 24 일 T. X. Nguyen, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 박사과정 김병완, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과 박사후연구원 정형조, 세종대학교 토목환경공학과 교수 이인원, 한국과학기술원 건설 및 환경공학과.
* In-Won Lee 1), Sun-Kyu Park 2) and Hong-Ki Jo 3) 1) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
Modal Dynamics of Wind Turbines with Anisotropic Rotors Peter F
STATIC ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAIN STRUCTURES USING INTERVAL EIGENVALUE DECOMPOSITION Mehdi Modares Tufts University Robert L. Mullen Case Western Reserve University.
Dynamics Primer Lectures Dermot O’Dwyer. Objectives Need some theory to inderstand general dynamics Need more theory understand the implementation of.
Yeong-Jong Moon 1), Sun-Kyu Park Lee 2) and In-Won Lee 3) 1) Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Department of Civil.
Velocity Propagation Between Robot Links 3/4 Instructor: Jacob Rosen Advanced Robotic - MAE 263D - Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering - UCLA.
Coordinate Transformations
Digital and Non-Linear Control
By Dr. A. Ranjbaran, Associate Professor
Dynamic Analysis of Structures by
Engineering Analysis I
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 21
ECE 3301 General Electrical Engineering
Manipulator Dynamics 1 Instructor: Jacob Rosen
OSE801 Engineering System Identification Spring 2010
Boundary Element Analysis of Systems Using Interval Methods
Differentiation-Continuous Functions
Ch 11.1: The Occurrence of Two-Point Boundary Value Problems
VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURE USING CMAC
Dr-Ing Asrat Worku, AAIT
CHE 391 T. F. Edgar Spring 2012.
The Inverse Z-Transform
Chapter 2 Interconnect Analysis
LOCATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF DAMPING PARAMETERS
1C9 Design for seismic and climate changes
Class Notes 9: Power Series (1/3)
Introduction.
Modern Control Systems (MCS)
A BRIDGE WITH VEHICLE LOADS
© Sharif University of Technology - CEDRA By: Professor Ali Meghdari
중복근을 갖는 감쇠 시스템의 고유진동수와 모드의 고차 민감도 해석
한국지진공학회 춘계 학술발표회 서울대학교 호암교수관 2003년 3월 14일
5.3 Higher-Order Taylor Methods
Numerical Analysis Lecture 38.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 24
Modified Sturm Sequence Property for Damped Systems
Chapter 4. Time Response I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. Pusan National University Intelligent.
ISEC-02 Second International Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction Algebraic Method for Sensitivity Analysis of Eigensystems with Repeated.
Simplified Algebraic Method
A Survey on State Feedback AMD Control
한국지진공학회 추계학술발표회 IMPROVED SENSITIVITY METHOD FOR NATURAL FREQUENCY AND MODE SHAPE OF DAMPED SYSTEM Hong-Ki Jo1), *Man-Gi Ko2) and In-Won Lee3) 1) Graduate.
Modified Sturm Sequence Property for Damped Systems
ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY
Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Chapter 4 . Trajectory planning and Inverse kinematics
November 5, 2002 SE 180 Final Project.
Presentation transcript:

Modified Modal Methods in Asymmetric Systems Yeong-Jong Moon1), Jong-Heon Lee2) and In-Won Lee3) 1) Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST 2) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Kyungil Univ. 3) Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, KAIST Thank you Mr. Chairman. The title of my presentation is ‘modified modal methods in asymmetric systems’

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Previous Study 3. Proposed Methods 4. Numerical Example 5. Conclusions The contents of this presentation are as follows; Introduction, previous study, proposed methods, numerical example and conclusions.

Introduction Many real systems have asymmetric mass, damping and stiffness matrices. - moving vehicles on roads - ship motion in sea water - offshore structures Recently Adhikari and M. I. Friswell proposed a modal method for asymmetric damped systems. It is well known that many real systems have asymmetric mass, damping and stiffness matrices. For example, moving vehicles on roads, ship motion in sea water and offshore structures. To calculate the eigenpair derivatives in these cases, Adhikari and Friswell proposed a modal method for asymmetric damped systems.

Previous Study Modal Method – Expand and as complex linear combinations of and Modal Method (1) (2) In the modal method, the basic idea is as follows. To get the eigenvector derivatives, we can expand the eigenvector derivatives as complex linear combination of eigenvectors as shown equations (1) and (2). where : the j-th right eigenvector : the j-th left eigenvector : the derivatives of j-th right eigenvector : the derivatives of j-th left eigenvector

From this idea, Adhikari has calculated the eigenvector derivatives - The derivatives of right eigenvectors (3) - The derivatives of left eigenvectors From this idea, Adhikari has calculated the derivatives of eigenvectors. The equations (3) and (4) are the derivatives of right eigenvectors and left eigenvectors, respectively. (4)

Disadvantage of conventional modal method - For accurate result, all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of system are needed - In large systems, only a few lower modes are available - The truncated error may become significant But conventional modal method has following disadvantages. For accurate result, all eigenvalues and eigenvectors of system are needed. But In large systems, only a few lower modes are available. So the truncated error may become significant.

- Develop the effective sensitivity techniques for Objective - Develop the effective sensitivity techniques for asymmetric large systems The objective of our study is to develop the effective sensitivity techniques for asymmetric large systems.

Proposed Methods 1. Modal Acceleration Method (MA) • The general equation of motion for asymmetric systems (5) (6) • Differentiate the Eq. (5) with a design parameter (7) We modify the Adhikari’s modal method to obtain the proposed method. The eigenproblem of asymmetric systems is given as equations (5) and (6). First, we consider the right eigenvector derivatives. Differentiate the equation (5) with respect to design parameter alpha. We can get equation (7).

• Separate the response into and (8) where (9) (10) And separate the right eigenvector derivatives into d_sub_s0 and d_sub_d0. where d_sub_s0 is (B inverse f) and d_sub_d0 is this. This equation is transformed into equation (10). where Z and Y is the modal matrix to be formed by the right and left eigenvector, respectively.

• Substituting the Eq. (9) and (10) into the Eq. (8) (11) • By the similar procedure, the left eigenvector derivatives can be obtained The derivatives of right eigenvector are obtained by substituting the equations (9) and (10) into the equation (8). By the similar procedure, the left eigenvector derivatives can be obtained. When k is larger than j, these term are smaller than 1. So the convergence of modal acceleration method is better than that of conventional modal method. Therefore the effects of truncated higher modes are reduced. (12)

• Separate the response into and 2. Multiple Modal Acceleration Method (MMA) • Separate the response into and (13) where (14) For more high convergence rate, separate the eigenvector derivatives into d_sub_s1 and d_sub_d1. Where d_sub_s1 is equation (14) and d_sub_d1 is this. This equation is transformed into equation (15). (15)

• Therefore the right eigenvector derivatives are given as (16) • By the similar procedure, Therefore the right eigenvector derivatives are given as equation (16). By the similar procedure, we can obtain the left eigenvector derivatives. These equations converge faster than the modal acceleration method because this term is second order. (17)

• Based on the similar procedure, we can obtain the higher order equations (18) Based on the similar procedure, we can obtain the higher order equations. (19)

Multiple Modal Acceleration with Shifted-Poles (SP) • For more high convergence rate, the term is expanded in Taylor’s series at the position (20) For more high convergence rate, this term (s_sub_j A+B inverse) is expanded in Taylor’s series at the position beta

• Using the Eq. (20), we can obtain the following equation (21) Using the previous equation, the derivatives of right eigenvectors are given as following equations. If beta is close to s_sub_j, the convergence of equation (21) is further speeded up.

• By the similar procedure (22) By the similar procedure, left eigenvector derivatives are given as equation (22).

Numerical Example Design parameter = L To verify the effectiveness of proposed method, following example is considered. This example is whirling beam whose system matrices are asymmetric. This example is a gyroscopic system rotating with high speed and has a lumped mass in center of beam as figure. We choose the length L as the design parameter The material properties are as follows. Design parameter = L

1. The first right-eigenvector and their derivative DOF Number Eigenvector Derivative 1 2 3 4 5 6 -4.138e-2 - 5.596e-5i -1.404e-1 + 7.721e-4i 5.446e-5 - 4.221e-2i -7.804e-4 - 1.433e-1i 7.416e-3 - 4.927e-5i 5.578e-3 + 8.632e-5i 4.942e-5 + 7.736e-3i -8.601e-5 + 6.276e-3i This table shows the exact first right eigenvector and their derivative with respect to design parameter.

2. Proposed Methods 4 mode use, = eigenvlaue - 1 DOF Number MA (%) MMA SP 1 2 3 4 5 6 14.856 66.975 11.578 48.401 6.736 31.353 8.122 33.950 0.389 1.845 0.377 1.546 To demonstrate the effectiveness of proposed methods, right eigenvector derivative is calculated using four modes. This table shows errors of results. As you can see in the table, the multiple modal acceleration method with shifted poles is very effective. • MA : Modal Acceleration Method (first order) • MMA : Multiple Modal Acceleration Method (second order) • SP : Multiple Modal Acceleration Method with Shifted Poles

3. Multiple Modal Acceleration Method with Shifted Poles = eigenvlaue - 1 DOF Number 4 mode (%) 3 mode 2 mode 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.389 1.845 0.377 1.546 2.884 1.661 4.483 1.392 7.148 2.211 7.070 1.870 To demonstrate the effectiveness of multiple modal acceleration method with shifted poles, right eigenvector derivatives are calculated using a fewer modes. We can see that the maximum error is about 7% when by using only two modes. The eigenvalues of this system are very close each other. The convergence of proposed methods depend on the distance between eigenvalues. So if the distance of eigenvalues of system is relatively far, we can obtain more accurate results.

Conclusions The modified modal methods for the eigenpair derivatives of asymmetric damped systems is derived - using only a few modes - applicable to large systems The modified modal methods for the eigenpair derivatives of asymmetric damped system has been proposed. In the proposed methods, the eigenvector derivatives of asymmetric systems can be calculated by using only a few lower modes. So the proposed method can be used in the large systems.