Mid- and long-term device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A comparison of AneuRx and Zenith endografts  Britt H. Tonnessen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes  John E. Jones, MD, Marvin.
Advertisements

Late open conversion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair  George Kouvelos, MD, PhD, Andreas Koutsoumpelis, MD, MSc, Andreas Lazaris, MD,
The value of the initial post-EVAR computed tomography angiography scan in predicting future secondary procedures using the Powerlink stent graft  Mitul.
Victor J. Davila, MD, William Stone, MD, Audra A
Graft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Any nonadherence to instructions for use predicts graft-related adverse events in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair  Christine.
Thoracic aortic lesions treated with the Zenith TX1 and TX2 thoracic devices: Intermediate- and long-term outcomes  Jose P. Morales, MD, Roy K. Greenberg,
Effect of type II endoleaks and antiplatelet therapy on abdominal aortic aneurysm shrinkage after endovascular repair  Atsushi Aoki, MD, Takanori Suezawa,
Aortoduodenal fistula 5 years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the Ancure stent graft  Blaine J. Ruby, MD, Thomas H. Cogbill,
Secure fixation following EVAR with the Powerlink XL System in wide aortic necks: Results of a prospective, multicenter trial  William D. Jordan, MD,
Aortic neck enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair using balloon-expandable versus self-expanding endografts  Janis Savlovskis, MD, Dainis Krievins,
The influence of neck thrombus on clinical outcome and aneurysm morphology after endovascular aneurysm repair  Frederico Bastos Gonçalves, MD, Hence J.M.
Peyman Benharash, MD, Jason T. Lee, MD, Oscar J
Results of endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms using the Endurant stent graft  Herman J.A. Zandvoort, MD, PhD, Frederico Bastos Gonçalves,
Novel technique for endovascular salvage of a folded aortic endograft
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in octogenarians: An analysis based on EUROSTAR data  Conrad Lange, MD, Lina J. Leurs, MSc, Jaap Buth,
A technique for increased accuracy in the placement of the “giant” Palmaz stent for treatment of type IA endoleak after endovascular abdominal aneurysm.
Results of standard suprarenal fixation endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysms with neck length ≤10 mm in high-risk patients unfit for open repair.
Role of type II endoleak in sac regression after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms  Jared Kray, DO, Spencer Kirk, DO, Jan Franko,
Late conversion of aortic stent grafts
David Nabi, MD, Erin H. Murphy, MD, Jimmy Pak, MD, Christopher K
Results of the United States multicenter prospective study evaluating the Zenith fenestrated endovascular graft for treatment of juxtarenal abdominal.
Bruce A. Perler, MD, MBA  Journal of Vascular Surgery 
Melanie K. Rose, MD, Benjamin J. Pearce, MD, Thomas C
Fourteen-year outcomes of abdominal aortic endovascular repair with the Zenith stent graft  Fabio Verzini, MD, PhD, FEBVS, Lydia Romano, MD, Gianbattista.
What is the clinical utility of a 6-month computed tomography in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair patients?  Michael R. Go, MD, Joel E. Barbato,
Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Long-term outcome measures in patients at high-risk for open surgery  Gregorio A. Sicard, MD, Robert M.
Kevin J. Bruen, MD, Robert J. Feezor, MD, Michael J
Midterm results from a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption clinical trial evaluating physician-modified endovascular grafts for the treatment.
Durability and survival are similar after elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in younger patients  Kevin Lee, MD, Elaine.
The natural history of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm  Anna E. Boniakowski, MD, Randall R.
Is three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction justified before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?  L.Richard Sprouse, MD, George H. Meier,
Is abdominal aortic aneurysm repair appropriate in oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients?  Christopher N. Compton, MD, Ellen.
Niyant V. Patel, MD, Graham W. Long, MD, Zulfiqar F
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome  Maseer A. Bade, MD, Luis A. Queral, MD, Dipankar Mukherjee, MD,
A limited and customized follow-up seems justified after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair in octogenarians  Linda Visser, MD, Robert A. Pol, MD,
Type II endoleak prevention with coil embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in high-risk patients  Dominique Fabre, MD, Elie Fadel, PhD, Philippe.
Endovascular repair of an iliac artery aneurysm in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV  Britt H. Tonnessen, MD, W. Charles Sternbergh, MD, Krishna.
Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): An anatomic and device-specific analysis  Thomas A. Abbruzzese, MD, Christopher.
Unusual course of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient treated with chemotherapy for gastric cancer  Juergen Zanow, MD, Yvonne Leistner, MD, Stephan.
Thomas S. Monahan, MD, Timothy A. M. Chuter, MD, Linda M
Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth 
Zenith abdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular graft
Outcome of common iliac arteries after straight aortic tube-graft placement during elective repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms  Réda Hassen-Khodja,
Stent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation  Christopher K Zarins, MD, Daniel A Bloch, PhD, Tami Crabtree,
Comparison of the impact of open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair on renal function  Athanasios Saratzis, MBBS, MRCS, PhD, Pantelis Sarafidis,
Kenneth Ouriel, MD, Daniel G. Clair, MD, K
Long-term postplacement cost after endovascular aneurysm repair
Redefining postoperative surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: Recommendations based on 5-year follow-up in the US Zenith multicenter trial 
Successful endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with unfavorable anatomy  Benjamin R. Grey, MB. ChB, MRCS, John S.
Evaluation of the Endurant stent graft under instructions for use vs off-label conditions for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair  Giovanni Torsello,
Endoleak as a predictor of outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial  Christopher K. Zarins, MDa, Rodney A. White,
Sideways displacement of the endograft within the aneurysm sac is associated with late adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair  Evert J. Waasdorp,
Midterm results of the multicenter trial of the Powerlink bifurcated system for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair  Jeffrey P. Carpenter, MD  Journal.
The impact of stent graft evolution on the results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair  Rami O. Tadros, MD, Peter L. Faries, MD, Sharif H.
Jocelyn M. Beach, MD, Yuki Kuramochi, RN, BSN, Corey Brier, MA, Eric E
Franklin S. Yau, MD, Eric B. Rosero, MD, G. Patrick Clagett, MD, R
Predictive factors and clinical consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable.
Aortic neck enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair using balloon-expandable versus self-expanding endografts  Janis Savlovskis, MD, Dainis Krievins,
Secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using current endografts. A EUROSTAR report  Roel Hobo, MSc, Jacob Buth,
Long-term dilatation of polyester and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene tube grafts after open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms  Peter L.
Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair on renal function compared with open repair  Michele Antonello, MD, PhD, Mirko Menegolo, MD, Michele Piazza,
Type B aortic dissection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair causing endograft collapse and severe malperfusion  Vikram Iyer, MD, Mark.
Influence of endograft oversizing on device migration, endoleak, aneurysm shrinkage, and aortic neck dilation: results from the zenith multicenter trial 
Midterm outcomes of the Zenith Renu AAA Ancillary Graft
Repair of juxtarenal para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms after previous open repair with fenestrated and branched endovascular stent grafts  Donald J. Adam,
Thomas L. Forbes, MD, Gregory E.J. Harding, MD 
Effect of type II endoleaks and antiplatelet therapy on abdominal aortic aneurysm shrinkage after endovascular repair  Atsushi Aoki, MD, Takanori Suezawa,
Open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a centenarian
Presentation transcript:

Mid- and long-term device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A comparison of AneuRx and Zenith endografts  Britt H. Tonnessen, MD, W. Charles Sternbergh, MD, Samuel R. Money, MD  Journal of Vascular Surgery  Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 392-401 (September 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040 Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 1 Freedom from migration (≥10 mm or clinical event) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. AneuRx freedom from migration was 96.1% ± 2.2%, 89.5% ± 3.8%, 78.0% ± 5.8%, 72.0% ± 6.8%, and 72.0 ± 6.8% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Zenith freedom from migration was 100% at 1 year and 97.6% ± 2.4% at 2, 3, and 4 years. Censored observations accounted for 19.5% to 38.5% of AneuRx and 20.8% to 42.3% of Zenith patients, depending on the selected time interval. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 42, 392-401DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040) Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 2 Freedom from migration (≥5 mm) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. AneuRx freedom from migration was 89.6% ± 3.5%, 83.0% ± 4.5%, 73.5% ± 6.0%, 67.4% ± 6.9%, and 48.1% ± 9.8% at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Zenith freedom from migration was 96.2% ± 2.6%, 93.8% ± 3.5%, 90.1% ± 5.0% and 90.1% ± 5.0% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years. Censored observations accounted for 24.7% to 27.8% of AneuRx and 22.6% to 48.0% of Zenith patients, depending on the selected time interval. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 42, 392-401DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040) Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 3 Axial computed tomography images 2 days (left) and 44 months (right) after endovascular aneurysm repair with an AneuRx endograft. The top frames show the top of the stent-graft, at the infrarenal position (left) and after migration of 14 mm (right). The bottom frames show comparable more caudal slices, with the interval development of a large type I endoleak (arrow) as a result of the migration. This patient represents the only case of delayed open conversion for migration in this series. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 42, 392-401DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040) Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 4 Number of patients treated and untreated for migration stratified by definition. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 42, 392-401DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040) Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 5 Cumulative aortic neck dilation over time after AneuRx or Zenith endograft. Aortic necks dilated more with Zenith than AneuRx endografts at 1 (0.9 ± 0.2 mm vs 0.3 ± 0.1 mm, P = .002), 2 (1.8 ± 0.2 mm vs 0.8 ± 0.2 mm, P < .0001), and 3 (1.9 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.1 ± 0.2 mm, P = .03) years after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but were similar at 4 years after EVAR (1.9 mm ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 mm ± 0.3, P = .84).*Statistically significant. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 42, 392-401DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040) Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig 6 Algorithm for the management of migration after endovascular aneurysm repair. Proximal fixation length may not be measurable with suprarenal fixation devices. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2005 42, 392-401DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.040) Copyright © 2005 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions