SOCS3 Deletion Promotes Optic Nerve Regeneration In Vivo

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neuronal Cell Types and Connectivity: Lessons from the Retina H. Sebastian Seung, Uygar Sümbül Neuron Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Advertisements

Figure Legend: From: B-RAF signaling promotes optic nerve regeneration
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (April 2018)
Motor Protein KIF1A Is Essential for Hippocampal Synaptogenesis and Learning Enhancement in an Enriched Environment  Makoto Kondo, Yosuke Takei, Nobutaka.
Live or Die? Depends on Who You Are
Robust Axonal Regeneration Occurs in the Injured CAST/Ei Mouse CNS
Daw Neuron Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)
Retinal Ganglion Cell Type, Size, and Spacing Can Be Specified Independent of Homotypic Dendritic Contacts  Bin Lin, Steven W Wang, Richard H Masland 
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Parabrachial CGRP Neurons Control Meal Termination
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 22, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Activation of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Pathway by AAV Gene Transfer Protects Retinal Ganglion Cells in Glaucoma  Yu Zhou, Vincent.
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages e6 (January 2018)
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages e6 (July 2017)
Lost in the jungle: new hurdles for optic nerve axon regeneration
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Minimal Purkinje Cell-Specific PCP2/L7 Promoter Virally Available for Rodents and Non- human Primates  Keisuke Nitta, Yasunori Matsuzaki, Ayumu Konno,
Retinal Input Instructs Alignment of Visual Topographic Maps
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
μ-Opioid Receptor and CREB Activation Are Required for Nicotine Reward
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages e4 (June 2017)
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (May 2015)
In Vivo Direct Reprogramming of Reactive Glial Cells into Functional Neurons after Brain Injury and in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model  Ziyuan Guo, Lei Zhang,
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2009)
Spatially and Temporally Regulated NRF2 Gene Therapy Using Mcp-1 Promoter in Retinal Ganglion Cell Injury  Kosuke Fujita, Koji M. Nishiguchi, Yukihiro.
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Increased Severity of Bleomycin-Induced Skin Fibrosis in Mice with Leukocyte-Specific Protein 1 Deficiency  JianFei Wang, Haiyan Jiao, Tara L. Stewart,
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Juan Ji An, Guey-Ying Liao, Clint E. Kinney, Niaz Sahibzada, Baoji Xu 
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages (September 2015)
An Intrinsic Epigenetic Barrier for Functional Axon Regeneration
Pranav Sharma, Hollis T. Cline  Neuron 
Volume 92, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Evidence for an Age-Dependent Decline in Axon Regeneration in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System  Cédric G. Geoffroy, Brett J. Hilton, Wolfram.
What the Fish’s Eye Tells the Fish’s Brain
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
J.M.I. Malik, Z. Shevtsova, M. Bähr, S. Kügler  Molecular Therapy 
Sorting Nexin 27 Regulation of G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying K+ Channels Attenuates In Vivo Cocaine Response  Michaelanne B. Munoz, Paul A. Slesinger 
Spinal Axon Regeneration Induced by Elevation of Cyclic AMP
Loss of ATF3 function modestly reduces axonal regeneration following sciatic nerve crush. Loss of ATF3 function modestly reduces axonal regeneration following.
SOCS3 Deletion Promotes Optic Nerve Regeneration In Vivo
Enhanced retinal ganglion cell production in Smo mutant retinas.
Retinal Ganglion Cell Axons Drive the Proliferation of Astrocytes in the Developing Rodent Optic Nerve  Julia F. Burne, Martin C. Raff  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2018)
Refinement of the Retinogeniculate Synapse by Bouton Clustering
Retinal Ganglion Cell Type, Size, and Spacing Can Be Specified Independent of Homotypic Dendritic Contacts  Bin Lin, Steven W Wang, Richard H Masland 
Repulsive Guidance Molecule-a Is Involved in Th17-Cell-Induced Neurodegeneration in Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis  Shogo Tanabe, Toshihide Yamashita  Cell.
Presentation transcript:

SOCS3 Deletion Promotes Optic Nerve Regeneration In Vivo Patrice D. Smith, Fang Sun, Kevin Kyungsuk Park, Bin Cai, Chen Wang, Kenichiro Kuwako, Irene Martinez-Carrasco, Lauren Connolly, Zhigang He  Neuron  Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 617-623 (December 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.021 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SOCS3 Deletion Promotes RGC Axon Regeneration (A–E) Confocal images of optic nerves showing CTB-labeled axons around the lesion sites at 14 days (A and B), 1 day (C), 3 days (D), and 7 days (E) postcrush injury (dpc) from SOCS3f/f mice injected with AAV-GFP (A) or AAV-Cre (B–E). ∗, crush site. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Quantification of regenerating axons at different distances distal to the lesion sites at 14 days after crush injury. At least five different sections (every fourth section) from each animal were quantified. At 14 dpc, there were significant differences between control and SOCS3-deleted mice groups (ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test, p < 0.05 for each distance, eight animals in each group). (G) Fluorescent photomicrographs of retinal whole mounts showing surviving TUJ1+ RGCs at 14 days after injury. Scale bar, 50 μm. (H) Quantification of RGC survival at 14 dpc, expressed as a percentage of the total number of TUJ1+ RGCs in the contralateral (intact) retina (n = 8 for each group). For each retina, 15–20 fields were chosen from different parts of the retina. The total viable RGC number was obtained by multiplying the average number per field of TUJ1+ cells in the ganglion cell layer by the retinal area. ∗p < 0.01, Dunnett's test. Neuron 2009 64, 617-623DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Phospho-S6 Levels in RGCs of SOCS3f/f Mice with AAV-GFP or AAV-Cre after Optic Nerve Injury (A and B) Immunofluorescence analysis with anti-p-S6 or TUJ-1 antibodies of the retinal sections from SOCS3f/f mice injected with AAV-GFP (A) or AAV-Cre (B) at different time points postcrush. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Quantification of p-S6+ RGCs. Data are presented as mean percentages of p-S6+and TUJ1+ cells among total TUJ1+ cells in the ganglion cell layer of each retina. Cell counts were performed on at least four nonconsecutive sections for each animal, from four or five mice per group. ∗p < 0.01 by Dunnett's test. Neuron 2009 64, 617-623DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 gp130 Codeletion Abolishes Axon Regeneration Effects of SOCS3 Knockout (A–C) Confocal images of optic nerves showing CTB-labeled axons around the lesion sites at 14 days postcrush injury (dpc) from SOCS3f/f mice (A), gp130f/f mice (B), or SOCS3f/f and gp130f/f mice (C) injected with AAV-Cre. ∗, crush site. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Quantification of regenerating axons at different distances distal to the lesion sites at 14 days after crush injury. At least five different sections (every fourth section) from each animal were quantified. There were significant differences between the SOCS3f/f group and the other two groups (ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test p < 0.05 for each distance, eight animals used in each groups). (E–G) Fluorescent photomicrographs of retinal whole mounts showing surviving TUJ1+ RGCs at 14 days after injury in AAV-Cre-injected SOCS3f/f (E), gp130f/f (F), or SOCS3f/f and gp130f/f (G) mice. Scale bar, 50 μm. (H) Quantification of RGC survival at 14 dpc expressed as a percentage of the total number of TUJ1+ RGCs in the contralateral (intact) retina (n = 8 for each group). For each retina, 15–20 fields were chosen from different parts of the retina. The total viable RGC number was obtained by multiplying the average number per field of TUJ1+ cells in the ganglion cell layer by the retinal area. There is a significant difference between the SOCS3f/f group and gp130f/f group, but not between SOCS3f/f group and SOCS3f/f/gp130f/f group (p < 0.05, ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's test). Neuron 2009 64, 617-623DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Enhancement of Axon Regeneration in SOCS3-Deleted Mice by CNTF (A–D) Confocal images of optic nerves showing CTB-labeled axons around the lesion sites at 14 days postcrush injury (dpc) from SOCS3f/f mice with AAV-GFP (A and B) or AAV-Cre (C and D) and subsequent injection of PBS (A and C) or CNTF (B and D). ∗, crush site. Scale bar, 100 μm. (E and F) Quantification of regenerating axons at different distances (250–1000 μm in E and 1500–2500 μm in F) distal to the lesion sites at 14 days after crush injury. At least five different sections (every fourth section) from each animal were quantified. There were significant differences between the SOCS3f/f with CNTF group and the other three groups (ANOVA with Bonferroni's post-test, p < 0.05 for each distance, three animals in each group). Neuron 2009 64, 617-623DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2009.11.021) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions