Midterm results of Manouguian double valve replacement: Comparison with standard double valve replacement Hiroshi Okuyama, MD, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, MD,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Max B. Mitchell, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Advertisements

Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,

Long-term prognosis of ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis Evaldas Girdauskas,

Abracadabra I, II…HeartMate 3?

Form ever follows function

It is still mostly about the mitral valve

How should we treat air leaks?

Harold L. Lazar, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

New treatment approaches create new disease processes: A short guide on how to reduce unexpected events to a minimum Martin Czerny, MD, MBA The Journal.

Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?

Commentary: Pursuit of the green jacket: Mastery of the long and short games Daniel P. Raymond, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The lord of the rings Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD

The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology

Support Your Specialty

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion: The welcome parameter

Innovation and science: The future of valve design

The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery Vinay Badhwar, MD The Journal of Thoracic and.

It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…

Fixing the supply problem

Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD

Military surgeons just want to have fun

Stentless biological valved conduit for aortic root replacement: Initial experience with the Shelhigh BioConduit model NR-2000C Abdullah Kaya, MD, Robin.

The aortic valve–sparing operation

Impact of pulmonary hypertension on outcomes after aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis Spencer J. Melby, MD, Marc R. Moon, MD, Brian R.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,

Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses

Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005 Scott D. Barnett, PhD,

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysms: Stabilizing the repair destabilizing the aortic valve? M. Sertaç Çiçek, MD, FACC The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

In search of the smoking gun in calcific aortic valve disease

Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve

A fate worse than death Jennifer S. Lawton, MD

Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery

Bradley G. Leshnower, MD, Robert A. Guyton, MD, Richard J

St Jude Medical Regent valve

Commentary: Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A high standard of comparison for transcatheter aortic valve implantation Aaron Martin, MD, Michael.

Commentary: Ongoing advancements in the understanding of tricuspid valve dynamics and functional geometry Daniel J.P. Burns, MD, MPhil The Journal of.

Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations

The Mitroflow aortic valve: A past, present, and future illuminated

Patrick T. Roughneen, MD, Grant T. Fankhauser, MD, Abe DeAnda, MD

Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?

Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for prime time unrestricted distribution? Not so fast, my friend G. Michael Deeb, MD, John Carroll, MD The Journal.

Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some

The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956 Richard A. DeWall, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide

Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable Craig M. Jarrett,

Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement Todd M. Dewey,

Commentary: Have mitral valve simulators made it to reality?

“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead

Commentary: Judgment day: Should you add atrial fibrillation ablation?

Toward a more rational approach in treating type B aortic dissection

Managing conflicts of interest

Commentary: The importance of being earnest and ... eclectic

More than vital: Who bears the burden?

Repetition is the mother of skill

Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind

Which biologic valve should we select for the 45- to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement? F. Dagenais, MD, P. Cartier, MD, P. Voisine,

Journal changes and initiatives

Lessons learned from Melody valve retrieved at transplantation

Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: “Busted”

Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location” Kevin L. Greason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Paul Philipp Heinisch, MD, Thierry Carrel, MD

Presentation transcript:

Midterm results of Manouguian double valve replacement: Comparison with standard double valve replacement Hiroshi Okuyama, MD, Kazuhiro Hashimoto, MD, Hiromi Kurosawa, MD, Kei Tanaka, MD, Yoshimasa Sakamoto, MD, Kazuaki Shiratori, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 129, Issue 4, Pages 869-874 (April 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.026 Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Manouguian annular enlargement. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 869-874DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.026) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Survival curve of the Manouguian group and standard DVR group. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 869-874DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.026) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Freedom from events in the Manouguian group and standard DVR group. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 869-874DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.026) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Transprosthetic pressure gradients examined with dobutamine stress echocardiography. There was no significant difference in the transprosthetic mean pressure gradient at the aortic valve between the 2 groups. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2005 129, 869-874DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.026) Copyright © 2005 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions