The 1.5 Å Crystal Structure of a Prokaryote Serpin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Yu Luo, Su-Chen Li, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Teh Li, Ming Luo  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages (May 1998)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Presentation transcript:

The 1.5 Å Crystal Structure of a Prokaryote Serpin James A. Irving, Lisa D. Cabrita, Jamie Rossjohn, Robert N. Pike, Stephen P. Bottomley, James C. Whisstock  Structure  Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 387-397 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00057-1

Figure 1 A Schematic Summarizing the Inhibitory Mechanism of Serpins The RCL is the region responsible for interacting with target proteinases and is at the top of the molecule. Residues within the RCL are numbered according to Schecter and Berger [78], in which the residues of a peptide substrate are designated Pn…P2, P1, and P1′…Pn′, and interact with corresponding subsites in the proteinase, designated Sn…S2, S1, and S1′…Sn′; cleavage occurs by definition between the P1 and P1′ positions. The proteinase (denoted by “P”) recognizes the RCL sequence and cleaves the serpin between P1 and P1′; after this, prior to hydrolysis of the acyl bond that links enzyme to inhibitor, the RCL inserts into the central “A” β sheet. The proteinase is thereby translocated to the distal end of the molecule, where it is compressed against the base of the serpin and its active site is distorted. Structure 2003 11, 387-397DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00057-1)

Figure 2 Sequence Alignment between α1-Antitrypsin and Thermopin Based upon a Superposition of the Cleaved Structures of the Two Molecules Numbering for antitrypsin is shown above the alignment, and numbering for thermopin is shown below the alignment. Elements of secondary structure (calculated with DSSP [76]) are colored as in Figure 4 and are shown above (antitrypsin) and below (thermopin) the alignment. Amino acids are shaded according to their physicochemical characteristics: hydrophobic residues, yellow; polar, noncharged residues, green; acidic, red; basic, blue. Residues that are identical to those conserved in 70% of the serpin superfamily [2] are shown in white on black text. Non-shaded amino acids in lowercase letters represent residues that were present in the thermopin construct but were not seen in the X-ray crystal structure. The red triangle indicates the site of cleavage in the thermopin crystal structure; the filled black triangle indicates the primary site of chymotrypsin cleavage, while the empty black triangles indicate secondary sites of cleavage with this enzyme. Structure 2003 11, 387-397DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00057-1)

Figure 3 Inhibitory Activity and Stability of Thermopin (A) SDS-PAGE gel illustrating the formation of SDS stable complex after incubation at 37°C. The amount of thermopin was kept constant, with decreasing amounts of bovine chymotrypsin from left to right; Ch, chymotrypsin alone. The expected positions of complex, intact, and cleaved material are shown. (B) Loss of inhibitory activity as a function of time after heating at 60°C, for α1-antitrypsin (gray line, open triangles), thermopin (black line, open squares), and thermopinΔct (dashed line, open circles). (C) The thermal unfolding of thermopin (black line, open squares) and thermopinΔct (dashed line, open circles) was followed by far-UV CD at 222 nm and a heating rate of 1°C/min. Structure 2003 11, 387-397DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00057-1)

Figure 4 Crystal Structure of Thermopin (A) Schematic representation of the X-ray crystal structure of cleaved thermopin. A β sheet, red; B β sheet, green; C β sheet, yellow; RCL, magenta. The eight α helices (cyan) are labeled. The C-terminal tail (dark blue) is marked by an asterisk (*). (B) Stereo pair showing the final 2Fo − Fc electron density (blue mesh) superposed onto the C-terminal tail (ball and stick format). The figure details the interactions that this region makes with the top of the A β sheet. Three highly conserved residues on the body of the serpin (Thr177, Arg258, and Glu309) (green stick) are labeled. Asp308, which forms a water-mediated hydrogen bond to the tail (green stick), is labeled. Residues in the tail (pink) and Asp363, Pro364, and Ala367 are labeled. Hydrogen bonds are represented by dashed black lines. (C) Deletion of the G helix in thermopin. B β sheet of thermopin, green; the H helix (red) is labeled. In eukaryote serpins, the loop connecting strand s3B and the H helix forms the G helix; however, this element of secondary structure is missing in thermopin. The corresponding region in antitrypsin is shown in dark blue, and the G and H helices from this structure are labeled. (D) Stereo pair showing a structural superposition of antitrypsin (red) and thermopin (black). Numbering is according to thermopin, and the N and C termini are labeled. Structure 2003 11, 387-397DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00057-1)

Figure 5 Unfolding of Thermopin and ThermopinΔct The guanidine-HCl (GdnHCl)-mediated unfolding of native thermopin (left, open squares), cleaved thermopin (left, filled squares), native thermopinΔct (right, open circles), and cleaved thermopinΔct (right, filled circles) are shown. The raw CD data at 222 nm have been converted to the fraction of unfolded protein (Fapp) as previously described [79]. Structure 2003 11, 387-397DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00057-1)