Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus DgkB Structure Reveals a Common Catalytic Mechanism for the Soluble Diacylglycerol Kinases  Darcie J. Miller, Agoston.
Crystal Structure of Chicken γS-Crystallin Reveals Lattice Contacts with Implications for Function in the Lens and the Evolution of the βγ-Crystallins 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 2107-2118 (December 2013) The Structural Motifs for Substrate Binding and Dimerization of the α Subunit of Collagen Prolyl 4-Hydroxylase  Jothi Anantharajan, M. Kristian Koski, Petri Kursula, Reija Hieta, Ulrich Bergmann, Johanna Myllyharju, Rik K. Wierenga  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 2107-2118 (December 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Organization of the α and β Subunits of Human C-P4H-α(I) (A) The domains of the α(I) subunit are colored as the N domain (gray), PSB domain (pink) and CAT domain (violet). The N domain and the PSB domain together are referred to as the double domain (DD) of the α(I) subunit. The β subunit consists of four domains (a, b, b′, a′, each colored differently). The linker region between the b′ and a′ domain is labeled as X. (B) Sequence alignment of the DD region of vertebrate C-P4H α subunits. The amino acid sequence alignment includes the three C-P4H α subunit isoforms from human (Hs_α_I, Hs_α_II, Hs_α_III), bovine (Bt_α_I, Bt_α_III), rat (Rn_α_I, Rn_α_III), mouse (Mm_α_I, Mm_α_II, Mm_α_III) and chicken (Gg_α_I, Gg_α_II). The secondary structure elements indicated above the sequences are based on the crystal structure of the DD1–238-(PPG)3 complex (see Figure 3B). The α helices of the dimerization domain (α1–α6) and the PSB domain (α7–α11) are colored in gray and pink respectively. The coiled-coil helix α1 is highlighted with a red box. The α helices in the linker region, and the following flexible loop region, are highlighted with green color. The hydrophobic “a” and “d” positions of the coiled-coil heptad repeats, are shown by filled red spheres and boxes, respectively. The important exceptions of the motif are shown in filled black boxes and are labeled. The conserved aromatic residue cluster and the other residues which form the binding groove of the PSB domain are shown by filled black arrows. Ile182, which has been previously predicted to contribute to the substrate specificity of C-P4H-I, is marked with an asterisk. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structural Characterization of DD1–238 and DD53–238 in Solution (A) SAXS data for DD1–238 (blue) and DD53–238 (orange). Shown are also the fits (DD1–238, black; DD53–238, red) of the built chain-like ab initio (GASBOR) models. The fits of the corresponding crystal structures and other models are shown in Figure S1. Inset: Distance distribution functions for DD1–238 (blue) and DD53–238 (orange). (B) Structural models of DD1–238 and DD53–238. Superimposed are bead-like (DAMMIN) and chain-like (GASBOR) ab initio models. Further modeling and comparisons to the crystal structures are presented in Figure S1. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Monomeric Structure of the DD Region of the C-P4H-α(I) Subunit (A) Detailed domain structure of the DD region of the C-P4H-α(I) subunit based on its crystal structure shown in (B). The following color codes are used to represent the structural regions of the dimerization domain: coiled-coil, red; return helices, gray; linker region, green; PSB domain, pink. (B) A cylindrical cartoon diagram of the crystal structure of monomeric DD1–238 subunit. The structure is all helical consisting of 11 α helices, except for DD1–238-P9, which lacks the short α2 (see also Figure S2). The PSB domain with bound (PPG)3 peptide (yellow sticks) consists of two TPR units (helices α7–α10) with a solvating helix α11. The arrow marks the flexible loop of the linker region. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Dimeric Structure of the DD Region of C-P4H-α(I) Subunit (A) A stereo image of the Cα-trace of the DD1–238 intertwined dimer, viewed down the 2-fold axis of the dimer, shows the four-helix bundle dimerization motif (see also Figure S3). The dimeric structure of DD1–238-P9 complex was generated using symmetry operation and the monomeric chains of DD are colored in yellow and blue, respectively. The P9 peptide bound to the PSB domain is shown in magenta. The N and C termini of the subunits and the peptide are labeled. (B) Stereo image of the linker region of the DD1–238-P9 structure. The figure highlights helix α5 (green) and its hydrogen bond network with the PSB domain (in particular helix α7, pink) and the dimerization domain of the other subunit (in particular the return helix α3, gray). The side chains of Gln110, Lys115 and Gln121 are hydrogen bonded and salt bridged to Glu152 (in α7), Glu160 (in a loop between α7 and α8) and Trp169 (in α8) of the PSB domain, respectively. The Gln121-Trp169 interaction is very likely present in all C-P4H α subunit isoforms, because these residues are highly conserved (Figure 1B). Furthermore, direct hydrogen bond interactions also exist between the PSB domain and the return helix α3 of the neighboring subunit. Shown are also some highly conserved polar residues in the solvent exposed side of α5 (Glu108, Asp109, Arg119, Thr123), the function of which is not revealed by the crystal structures. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 The Peptide Binding Groove of the PSB Domain of the C-P4H-α(I) Subunit A Surface representation showing the PSB domain of the (PPG)3 liganded DD structure. The peptide (shown as sticks) and the highly conserved residues shaping the groove are explicitly shown. The terminal residues (Pro1, Gly9), and the anchoring residues (Pro5, Pro8) of the peptide are also labeled. The following color code is used for the surface representation of the first monomer of the DD dimer: red (coiled-coil), light brown (return helices), green (linker region) and pink (PSB domain). Also included (marked by a star) is the return helix α3 of the second monomer of the DD dimer (light brown). Ile182, which has been predicted to contribute to the substrate specificity of C-P4H-I, is also shown and labeled. See also Figure S4. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Peptide Binding Mode of (PPG)3 and P9 to the PSB Domain of the C-P4H-α(I) Subunit (A) The peptide-protein interactions of the DD1–238-(PPG)3 complex structures. The representative (Fo-Fc) omit electron density, (contoured at 1.0 σ), is also shown for the (PPG)3 peptide. Direct and water mediated hydrogen bonds between the peptide and the protein are colored in green and black dashed lines, respectively. The Asp192-Arg223 salt bridge is shown in magenta (see also Figure S5A). (B) The (Fo-Fc) omit electron density map (contoured at 1.0 σ) and the peptide-protein interactions for P9. Hydrogen bonding network is colored as in (B). See also Figure S5B. (C) Superimposition of the peptide binding sites of DD1–238-(PPG)3 (yellow), DD1–238-P9 (blue), and the apo structure of the PSB domain (pink, PDB-ID 1TJC). The different positions of the tyrosine side chains lining the peptide binding groove are clearly visible. Also depicted is the slightly different mode of binding of the (PPG)3 and P9 peptides. The hydrogen bonding networks of the binding groove in both peptide bound structures are shown using the same color code as (B) and (C). Highlighted are W187 (black asterisk), which is conserved in all three structures, and W154 (green asterisk), which have similar interactions in the two ligand bound structures. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Calorimetric Analysis of Binding of (PPG)3 and P9 to the DD1–238 of Human C-P4H-α(I) Subunit (A and B) The isothermal calorimetry experiments for the binding studies of (PPG)3 (A), and P9 (B) were carried out by injecting 1 mM peptide solutions into a 50 μM of DD1–238 protein sample solution. The top panel shows the raw data and the bottom panel shows the calorimetric binding isotherm. The Kd values are 144 μM and 9.8 μM for (PPG)3 and P9, respectively. The titration profile for both peptides shows that the reaction is exothermic but saturation is not reached in the case of (PPG)3 due to the weaker affinity. (C) Depiction of the thermodynamic data of the binding of (PPG)3 and P9, as listed in Table 3. Structure 2013 21, 2107-2118DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.09.005) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions