Defining the load bearing axis of the lower extremity obtained from anterior-posterior digital radiographs of the whole limb in stance  Y. Iseki, T. Takahashi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anatomical alignment, but not goniometry, predicts femorotibial cartilage loss as well as mechanical alignment: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative 
Advertisements

Radiographic assessment of knee–ankle alignment after total knee arthroplasty for varus and valgus knee osteoarthritis  Fuqiang Gao, Jinhui Ma, Wei Sun,
The association between metacarpal ratio, radiographic hand and knee osteoarthritis and its progression after meniscectomy  P.T. Paradowski, L.S. Lohmander,
Anterolateral Biplanar Proximal Tibial Opening-Wedge Osteotomy
What should be considered in using standard knee radiographs to estimate mechanical alignment of the knee?  C.B. Chang, J.-Y. Choi, I.J. Koh, E.S. Seo,
The short-term effects of running on the deformation of knee articular cartilage and its relationship to biomechanical loads at the knee  M. Boocock,
Distal Femoral Osteotomy: Lateral Opening Wedge Technique
Changes in the T2 relaxation value of the tibiofemoral articular cartilage about 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the double-bundle.
Extraction of anatomical landmarks and axis for 3D coordinate system construction of femur and tibia bone models  X. Cui, H. Kim, S. Li, K.-S. Kwack,
James D. Wylie, M.D., M.H.S., Travis G. Maak, M.D. 
Arthroscopic and Computer-Assisted High Tibial Osteotomy Using Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty Navigation Software  Stephen R. Thompson, M.D., M.Ed.,
The relationships between bone mineral density in the spine, hip, distal femur and proximal tibia and medial minimum joint space width in the knees of.
Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb.
Eiji Kondo, M. D. , Ph. D. , Kazunori Yasuda, M. D. , Ph. D
Is barefoot regional plantar loading related to self-reported foot pain in patients with midfoot osteoarthritis  S. Rao, J.F. Baumhauer, D.A. Nawoczenski 
Evaluation of cartilage matrix disorders by T2 relaxation time in patients with hip dysplasia  T. Nishii, M.D., H. Tanaka, M.D., N. Sugano, M.D., T. Sakai,
Anatomical distribution of areas of preserved cartilage in advanced femorotibial osteoarthritis using CT arthrography (Part 1)  P. Omoumi, N. Michoux,
Relationships between tibial rim alignment and joint space width measurement reproducibility in non-fluoroscopic radiographs of osteoarthritic knees 
Three-dimensional MRI-based statistical shape model and application to a cohort of knees with acute ACL injury  V. Pedoia, D.A. Lansdown, M. Zaid, C.E.
H. Oka, M. D. , S. Muraki, M. D. , Ph. D. , T. Akune, M. D. , Ph. D
The role of obesity, biomechanical constitution of the pelvis and contact joint stress in progression of hip osteoarthritis  G. Recnik, V. Kralj-Iglič,
Knee joint subchondral bone structure alterations in active athletes: a cross-sectional case–control study  F.W. Roemer, M. Jarraya, J. Niu, J. Duryea,
Knee osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: are there characteristic patterns of pain location?  L.R.J. Wood, Ph.D., M.C.S.P., G. Peat, Ph.D.,
Assessment of the radioanatomic positioning of the osteoarthritic knee in serial radiographs: comparison of three acquisition techniques  M.-P. H. Le.
The responsiveness of three-dimensional knee accelerations used as an estimation of knee instability and loading transmission during gait in osteoarthritis.
Hidden osteophyte formation on plain X-ray is the predictive factor for development of knee osteoarthritis after 48 months – data from the Osteoarthritis.
Differences between X-ray and MRI-determined knee cartilage thickness in weight- bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions  M. Marsh, R.B. Souza, B.T.
Radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: the Kellgren– Lawrence scale is reliable and correlates with clinical symptoms  N.
An optimal duration of daily wear for an insole with subtalar strapping in patients with varus deformity osteoarthritis of the knee  Y. Toda, M.D., N.
Presence, location, type and size of denuded areas of subchondral bone in the knee as a function of radiographic stage of OA – data from the OA initiative 
Risk factors for meniscal body extrusion on MRI in subjects free of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative 
Protective effects of a cathepsin K inhibitor, SB , in the canine partial medial meniscectomy model of osteoarthritis  J.R. Connor, C. LePage, B.A.
Comparison of load responsiveness of cartilage T1rho and T2 in porcine knee joints: an experimental loading MRI study  H. Hamada, T. Nishii, S. Tamura,
A radiographic analysis of alignment of the lower extremities – initiation and progression of varus-type knee osteoarthritis  T. Matsumoto, M. Hashimura,
B. C. Fleming, H. L. Oksendahl, W. A. Mehan, R. Portnoy, P. D
D. Kumar, K.T. Manal, K.S. Rudolph  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Lateral trunk lean explains variation in dynamic knee joint load in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis  M.A. Hunt, P.T., Ph.D., T.B.
Anterolateral Biplanar Proximal Tibial Opening-Wedge Osteotomy
Residual hip dysplasia at 1 year after treatment for neonatal hip instability is not related to degenerative joint disease in young adulthood: a 21-year.
T. Nozaki, Y. Kaneko, H. Yu, K. Kaneshiro, R. Schwarzkopf, T. Hara, H
Diagnostic performance of knee ultrasonography for detecting degenerative changes of articular cartilage  S. Saarakkala, P. Waris, V. Waris, I. Tarkiainen,
DGEMRIC as a tool for measuring changes in cartilage quality following high tibial osteotomy: a feasibility study  M. Rutgers, L.W. Bartels, A.I. Tsuchida,
A. K. O. Wong, D. Inglis, K. A. Beattie, A. Doan, G. Ioannidis, J
Is increased joint loading detrimental to obese patients with knee osteoarthritis? A secondary data analysis from a randomized trial  M. Henriksen, D.J.
Quantification of differences in bone texture from plain radiographs in knees with and without osteoarthritis  J. Hirvasniemi, J. Thevenot, V. Immonen,
Baseline knee adduction and flexion moments during walking are both associated with 5 year cartilage changes in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis 
Quantitative regional and sub-regional analysis of femoral and tibial subchondral bone mineral density (sBMD) using computed tomography (CT): comparison.
Osteoarthritis may not be a one-way-road of cartilage loss – comparison of spatial patterns of cartilage change between osteoarthritic and healthy knees 
Pre-radiographic osteoarthritic changes are highly prevalent in the medial patella and medial posterior femur in older persons: Framingham OA study  D.
Anatomical alignment, but not goniometry, predicts femorotibial cartilage loss as well as mechanical alignment: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative 
Rates and sensitivity of knee cartilage thickness loss in specific central reading radiographic strata from the osteoarthritis initiative  S. Maschek,
Osteoarthritis of the knee after meniscal resection: long term radiographic evaluation of disease progression  P.T. Paradowski, L.S. Lohmander, M. Englund 
The lateral wedged insole with subtalar strapping significantly reduces dynamic knee load in the medial compartment  Y. Kuroyanagi, M.D., T. Nagura, M.D.,
G. Neumann, D. Hunter, M. Nevitt, L. B. Chibnik, K. Kwoh, H. Chen, T
Reproducibility and sensitivity to change of a new method of computer measurement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis. Performance of three radiographic.
Structural changes in the knee during weight loss maintenance after a significant weight loss in obese patients with osteoarthritis: a report of secondary.
Influence of medial meniscectomy on stress distribution of the femoral cartilage in porcine knees: a 3D reconstructed T2 mapping study  T. Shiomi, T.
Hip strengthening reduces symptoms but not knee load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: a randomised controlled trial 
MRI-derived T2 relaxation times and cartilage morphometry of the tibio-femoral joint in subjects with and without osteoarthritis during a 1-year follow-up 
X. Li, Ph. D. , C. Benjamin Ma, M. D. , T. M. Link, M. D. , D. -D
A pilot study of the reproducibility and validity of measuring knee subchondral bone density in the tibia  D. Dore, BBiotech.(Hons.), C. Ding, M.D., G.
Prevalence of naturally occurring cartilage defects in the ovine knee
L. Sheehy, T.D.V. Cooke, L. McLean, E. Culham 
Computed tomography topographic mapping of subchondral density (CT-TOMASD) in osteoarthritic and normal knees: methodological development and preliminary.
Coronal tibial slope is associated with incident accelerated knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative  J.B. Driban, A.C. Stout, J.
Population-based prevalence of multiple radiographically-defined hip morphologies: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project  R. Raveendran, J.L. Stiller,
B. C. Fleming, H. L. Oksendahl, W. A. Mehan, R. Portnoy, P. D
T.D.V. Cooke, M.A., M.B., B.Chir., F.R.C.S. (c) 
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Pain in patients with equal radiographic grades of osteoarthritis in both knees: the value of gray scale ultrasound  P.-T. Wu, C.-J. Shao, K.-C. Wu, T.-T.
Presentation transcript:

Defining the load bearing axis of the lower extremity obtained from anterior-posterior digital radiographs of the whole limb in stance  Y. Iseki, T. Takahashi, H. Takeda, I. Tsuboi, H. Imai, N. Mashima, S. Watanabe, H. Yamamoto  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 586-591 (May 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001 Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Methods of evaluating the alignment of the whole lower extremity. Left: Two lines are drawn from the center of the femoral head to the center of the distal femur and from the center of the distal femur to the center of the ankle mortise. The mechanical axis (degrees varus) is measured at the intersection of these lines. Middle: The load bearing axis deviation of the lower limb is the perpendicular distance from the weight-bearing line (hip-to-ankle line) and the center of the knee. Right: The weight-bearing ratio is calculated by measuring the distance from the medial edge of the proximal tibia to the point where the weight-bearing line intersects the proximal tibia (B), and dividing the measurement by the entire width of the tibia (A). A percentage is calculated by multiplying this ratio by 100%11. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17, 586-591DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001) Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 The measurement method (using Fuji Film OP-A software) was based on five anatomical points: (1) the center of the femoral head; (2) the middle of the distal tibial plafond; (3) the medial border of the proximal tibia; (4) the lateral border of the proximal tibia; and (5) the intersection of the line connection (3) and (4), and the load bearing axis of the lower extremity. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17, 586-591DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001) Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Method for calculating the load bearing axis of the lower extremity (%). The distance from the midpoint of the proximal tibia to the mechanical axis of the lower extremity (B) is divided by the width of the proximal tibia (A). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17, 586-591DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001) Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 (A): Correlation between the TFA and the load bearing axis deviation of the lower extremity measurements (expressed in %) obtained by rater A. The first set of measurements obtained by A was used (A1). (B): Correlation between the HKA and the load bearing axis deviation of the lower extremity measurements (expressed in %) obtained by rater A. The first set of measurements obtained by A was used (A1). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17, 586-591DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001) Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Correlations between the load bearing axis deviation of the lower extremity measurements as independently obtained by three raters (A, B, and C) for the same patients (A1, first set of measurements). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17, 586-591DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001) Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Correlation between two independent measurements of the load bearing axis deviation of the lower extremity in the same patient by the same rater (A). A1 and A2 represent the first and second sets of measurements, respectively. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2009 17, 586-591DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2008.10.001) Copyright © 2008 Osteoarthritis Research Society International Terms and Conditions