Ly6d-L, a Cell Surface Ligand for Mouse Ly6d

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
-The methods section of the course covers chapters 21 and 22, not chapters 20 and 21 -Paper discussion on Tuesday - assignment due at the start of class.
Advertisements

Figure S1. Production of recombinant NS1 protein
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Christopher L. Kepley, PhD, Bridget S. Wilson, PhD, Janet M
Monomeric and Oligomeric Complexes of the B Cell Antigen Receptor
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Competing Functions Encoded in the Allergy-Associated FcϵRIβ Gene
Skin-Specific Expression of ank-393, a Novel Ankyrin-3 Splice Variant
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
Apaf-1, a Human Protein Homologous to C
Insulin Degrading Enzyme Is a Cellular Receptor Mediating Varicella-Zoster Virus Infection and Cell-to-Cell Spread  Qingxue Li, Mir A. Ali, Jeffrey I.
Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation
Specific Lysis of Melanoma Cells by Receptor Grafted T Cells is Enhanced by Anti- Idiotypic Monoclonal Antibodies Directed to the scFv Domain of the Receptor 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Live Cell Fluorescence Imaging of T Cell MEKK2
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Durbaka V.R Prasad, Sabrina Richards, Xoi Muoi Mai, Chen Dong  Immunity 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
Isoforms and splice variant of transforming growth factor β–binding protein in rat hepatic stellate cells  Wenrong Gong, Sylke Roth, Kristin Michel, Axel.
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
Interleukin-18 Binding Protein
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
M.Brandon Parrott, Michael A. Barry  Molecular Therapy 
James I Kim, I-Cheng Ho, Michael J Grusby, Laurie H Glimcher  Immunity 
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
Lipotransin Molecular Cell
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits renal interstitial myofibroblast activation by inducing hepatocyte growth factor expression  Yingjian Li, Bradley C.
GRASP65, a Protein Involved in the Stacking of Golgi Cisternae
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages (October 2001)
Soluble CD86 Is a Costimulatory Molecule for Human T Lymphocytes
Yuji Yamanashi, David Baltimore  Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Abrogation of TGFβ Signaling in T Cells Leads to Spontaneous T Cell Differentiation and Autoimmune Disease  Leonid Gorelik, Richard A Flavell  Immunity 
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
ROG, Repressor of GATA, Regulates the Expression of Cytokine Genes
FAK-Mediated Src Phosphorylation of Endophilin A2 Inhibits Endocytosis of MT1-MMP and Promotes ECM Degradation  Xiaoyang Wu, Boyi Gan, Youngdong Yoo,
Ubiquitin-Related Proteins Regulate Interaction of Vimentin Intermediate Filaments with the Plasma Membrane  Ai-Ling Wu, Jun Wang, Alexander Zheleznyak,
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
B7h, a Novel Costimulatory Homolog of B7. 1 and B7
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
A Novel Gene Expressed in Human Keratinocytes with Long-Term In Vitro Growth Potential is Required for Cell Growth  Laure Aurelian, Cynthia C. Smith,
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Rodney P. DeKoter, Hyun-Jun Lee, Harinder Singh  Immunity 
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Interleukin-18 Binding Protein
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (March 1997)
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Control of B Cell Production by the Adaptor Protein Lnk
Abrogation of TGFβ Signaling in T Cells Leads to Spontaneous T Cell Differentiation and Autoimmune Disease  Leonid Gorelik, Richard A Flavell  Immunity 
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (May 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Ly6d-L, a Cell Surface Ligand for Mouse Ly6d Jim Apostolopoulos, Ian F.C McKenzie, Mauro S Sandrin  Immunity  Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 223-232 (February 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2

Figure 1 Analysis of Recombinant Ly6d (A) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE (15% acrylamide) of recombinant soluble Ly6d (1 μg) following purification with Talon resin and FPLC. (B) Mass spectrometry and N-terminal sequencing (box) of purified soluble Ly6d. A minor species (-K) in the spectrogram represents the C-terminal cleavage of a lysine. (C) Binding of fluorescent multimeric protein microsphere complexes to lymphocytes. Multimeric microspheres were bound to Ly6d, CD48, GFP, or sheep anti-mouse IgG (as indicated) and incubated with lymphocytes. In blocking studies, the relevant microspheres were preincubated with anti-Ly6d, anti-CD48, or 10 μg of recombinant soluble Ly6d (rsLy6d) prior to binding with lymphocytes, as described in Experimental Procedures. The percentage of cells binding microspheres was determined by dividing the number of cells binding microspheres by the number of total cells in each field (SEM). All assays were performed in triplicate. Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)

Figure 2 Sequence Analysis of Ly6d-L (A) DNA sequence of a Ly6d-L clone. “+1” indicates the start of the coding region and asterisks represents the stop codon TAA. (B) Identification of a short repeat in Ly6d-L as indicated by amino acid positions. (C) Amino acid alignment and homology (boxes) between Ly6d-L and Motch. Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)

Figure 7 Western Analysis of Ly6d-L-Transfected COS Cells (A) Reducing SDS-PAGE (Western) analysis in 15% acrylamide gels with supernatants (S) or lysates (L) from Ly6d-L-transfected COS cells (lanes 1–4) or CD48-transfected COS cells (lanes 5–8), which were treated (plus signs) or untreated (minus signs) with 10 μU PIPLC. Samples from control mock–transfected cells are also shown (lanes 9–12). (B) Nonreducing SDS-PAGE analysis in 15% acrylamide gels with samples of the media from three separate wells of Ly6d-L-transfected COS cells (lanes 1–3) and 2 μl (diluted 1:10) of Ly6d-L COS cell lysate (lane 4). Detection in (A) and (B) was performed with anti-FLAG antibody followed by ECL. (C) Reducing and nonreducing SDS-PAGE analysis in 15% acrylamide gels with samples from Ly6d-L or mock-transfected COS cells that were cell surface labeled with biotin. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with the following monoclonal antibody prior to loading on gels. Lane 1: mock (control plasmid)-transfected COS cells, anti-FLAG; lane 2: Ly6d-L transfection, control isotype antibody; and lane 3: Ly6d-L transfection, anti-FLAG. Detection in the left-hand side panels was performed with streptavidin-HRP followed by ECL reagent, as indicated. The same samples were then detected on the right-hand side panels with anti-FLAG. Lane 4: Ly6d-L transfection, anti-FLAG; lane 5: mock (control plasmid)-transfected COS cells, anti-FLAG; and lane 6: Ly6d-L transfection, control isotype antibody. Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)

Figure 3 Expression of Ly6d-L in Various Tissues (A) Northern analysis of 10 μg of total RNA from various tissues probed with 32P-labeled Ly6d-L cDNA. Lanes: (1) liver, (2) spleen, (3) brain, and (4) thymus. This Northern was also probed with 32P-labeled γ-actin. (B) Equal amounts of Poly(A)+ RNA were loaded on a blot and probed with 32P-labeled Ly6d-L cDNA. A1, brain; A2, eye; A3, liver; A4, lung; A5, kidney; B1, heart; B2, skeltal muscle; B3, smooth muscle; C1, pancreas; C2, thyroid; C3, thymus; C4, submaxillary gland; C5, spleen; D1, testis; D2, ovary; D3, prostate; D4, epididymis; D5, uterus; E1, day 7 embryo; E2, day 11 embryo; E3, day 15 embryo; E4, day 17 embryo. (C) Southern analysis: 10 μg of genomic C57BL/6 DNA was digested with EcoRI (lane 1), BamHI (lane 2), or PstI (lane 3), followed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and probing with 32P-labeled Ly6d-L cDNA. Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)

Figure 4 Transfection of COS Cells with FLAG-Tagged Ly6d-L cDNA Transfection of COS Cells with either N-terminal (A) or C-terminal (B) FLAG-tagged Ly6d-L cDNA. (C) COS cells were transfected with pCDM8 plasmid only. Detection was performed with anti-FLAG antibody followed by rat a-mouse Ig-FITC and microscopy (magnification ×200). In addition, purified BL/6 spleen T cells (D) and B cells (E) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Antibodies were used to detect T cells (anti-CD3), B cells (anti-CD45R), and Ly6d+/− (anti-Ly6d) cells. Control cells were incubated with a control isotype monoclonal antibody. Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)

Figure 5 Binding Studies with Ly6d-L-Transfected COS Cells and Multimeric Ly6d Microspheres or Lymphocytes The Ly6d-L+ COS cells were incubated with (A) Ly6d microspheres, (B) 10 μg of recombinant soluble Ly6d and then with Ly6d microspheres, (C) Ly6d microspheres preincubated with anti-Ly6d antibody, or (D) Ly6d microspheres preincubated with control isotype antibody. In addition, pCDM8-transfected COS cells were incubated with (E) Ly6d microspheres. Ly6d-L+-transfected COS cells were also incubated with (F) thymocytes, (G) splenic B cells, (H) 10 μg of recombinant soluble Ly6d then incubated with splenic B cells, (I) splenic B cells preincubated with anti-Ly6d antibody, (J) splenic B cells preincubated with control isotype antibody, or (K) splenic T cells. Plasmid pCDM8–transfected COS cells were incubated with (L) purified splenic B cells. Binding was examined by light microscopy (A–E at 200×; F–L at 100×). Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)

Figure 6 Binding Studies with Ly6d-Transfected COS Cells and Lymphocytes COS cells were transfected with Ly6d cDNA and incubated with (A) thymocytes, (B) splenic B cells, (C) splenic B cells preincubated with 10 μg of recombinant soluble Ly6d, (D) anti-Ly6d antibody then splenic B cells, or (E) control isotype antibody then splenic B cells. Plasmid pCDM8–transfected COS cells were incubated with (F) splenic B cells. Ly6d+ COS cells were also incubated with (G) splenic T cells, (H) splenic T cells preincubated with 10 μg of recombinant soluble Ly6d, (I) anti-Ly6d antibody then splenic T cells, or (J) control isotype antibody then splenic T cells. Plasmid pCDM8–transfected COS cells were incubated with (K) splenic T cells. Binding was examined by light microscopy (100×). Immunity 2000 12, 223-232DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80175-2)