KOREA OECD Economics Surveys: 1조 경제학과 한호성 경제학과 황준연

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of Employment for Growth and Poverty Reduction PREM learning week 2007 Catalina Gutierrez Pieter Serneels.
Advertisements

The Well-being of Nations
Supply Side policies. Supply side policies aim to… Improve the efficiency of factor markets, to boost productivity and hence the overall capacity of the.
Assistance for families: An assessment of Australian family policies from an international perspective Peter Whiteford, Social Policy Research Centre,
Sri Lanka: Strengthening Social Protection Key Messages Milan Vodopivec Senior Social Protection Economist The World Bank September 2006.
SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT EDUCATION AND TRAINING CONCERNING THE LABOUR MARKET IN VIETNAM Dr. Nguyen Ba Can Deputy General Director Department of Facilitates.
The Lisbon strategy and the Hungarian employment strategy László Kordás 29 April 2006 Balatongyörök.
1 Reducing the Gaps in Society: Policy Challenges in the Era of Globalization Dr. Karnit Flug June 2007 Taub Center Conference.
Productivity and Costs By Rupa Kaur And Cristina Ontiveros.
Employment Service Reform Plan in Korea Presenter: Jung, Tai-Myun, Director of Employment Policy Division Ministry of Labor, ROK.
AUSTRALIAN DEVELOPMENTS IN WELFARE TO WORK Budget
Education in South Korea: Challenges and Reforms
Ljubljana, 17/09/2012 Effects of labour market reforms in OECD countries – implications for Slovenia International Conference organized by the Ministry.
Structural Change and Labor Policy Reaction in Asia
Social Determinants of Health Gero 302 Jan SDOH There are nine SDOH as follows: Income inequality-The failure to reduce poverty levels to 1989 level.
STRENGTHENING SKILL USE AND SCHOOL-TO- WORK TRANSITIONS OECD Economic Survey of the Czech Republic 2014.
The Role of the Fiscal Policy in Poverty Reduction Youngsun Koh Korea Development Institute.
1 How do Asia/Pacific countries compare? Raymond Torres, OECD.
IGCSE®/O Level Economics
Europe Youth Unemployment Portugal Youth Unemployment.
11 OECD-EC Education Policy Outlook Country Profile POLAND Judith Peterka, OECD Directorate for Education & Skills Warsaw, 25 November 2015.
Why is productivity growth so vital? To see more of our products visit our website at Ruth Tarrant, Head of Economics and Politics, Bedales.
Skills Development and Korea’s Experiences October, 2006 Korea University of Technology and Education.
Maria Elena Valenzuela ILO ECLAC/ILO Bulletin Labour market and social protection policies to confront the crisis.
How to sustainably increase employment in Slovakia? Kristine Van Herck Director-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion 22 September 2016.
Women, Work, and the Economy: Macroeconomic Gains from Gender Equity The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and should not be.
The Korean Education, Training and Skills Sector
Access to Education and Formal Employment in Thailand Dr. Jessica Vechbanyongratana Labour and Management Development Centre Faculty of Economics Chulalongkorn.
Promoting social cohesion in Korea. Social spending is low but increasing rapidly Rising income inequality and relative poverty and the factors behind.
2 조 손동국 윤병웅 최준표 박혜원 배민주 오유선 OECD Economics Surveys, 2012 Chapter 1.
PRIORITIES OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING Budapest, 2-3 July 2012 Mato Lalić.
14 October 2016 Christian Daude
Ⅰ Background for Promoting Work-Family Balance Policies in South Korea.
Postsecondary Enrollment Rates of Recent High School Graduates by Household Income, 1985 to 2015
“Employment policies in turbulent times: a view from the Commission"
Family Policy across the OECD
Seminar presentation:
Facing the key challenges ahead in Korea
The 3 c’s: consumerism, choice and competition
Poverty and deprivation Resolution Foundation
Chapter 5 Microeconomic Reform
Human Capital Human capital corresponds to any stock of knowledge or characteristics the worker has (either innate or acquired) that contributes to his.
Family Policy across the OECD
What are The main challenges for the Swedish Economy?
OECD REPORT PREVENTING AGEING UNEQUALLY
Family Policy across the OECD
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
Improving Employment Outcomes for Disadvantaged Groups: The Irish Context Philip J. O’Connell Pobal Conference: Creating an Inclusive Labour Market 9th.
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
Vukica Jelić, State Secretary of MLSW
Gabriela Ramos, OECD Chief of Staff and Sherpa to the G20 GPN Meeting
Chief of Labor Markets Unit
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
WORKING WITH SOMALI PEOPLE TO BUILD PEACE AND PROSPERITY
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
Annual Growth Survey and Draft Joint Employment Report 2012
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
The Social Investment Package (SIP) -20 February 2013
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
Economics of Specialisation
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
Korea University of Technology and Education
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
Assess the level of harmonization of regional welfare state policies with the European Pillar of Social Rights - Good practice examples from the EU countries.
Unemployment What are the different types of unemployment?
TRENDS IN EDUCATION Guntars Catlaks Senior research co-ordinator
KOREA Econoic survey 김태용 한요셉 심준현
China’s Employment Policies
Government Policies and Actions
Presentation transcript:

KOREA OECD Economics Surveys: 1조 경제학과 20113169 한호성 경제학과 20113173 황준연 경제학과 20123121 김종헌 금융정보통계 20133412 김지혜 경제학과 20143135 송경희 경제학과 20143166 한민지

INDEX Promoting social cohesion in Korea 01 Rising income inequality and relative poverty and the factors behind it 02 social spending is low but increasing rapidly 03 Increasing social spending to promote social cohesion 04 Labour market reforms to promote social cohesion by breaking down dualism 05 Reforms in the education system to promote social cohesion Conclusion 06 The service sector as a factor in inequality 07 Conclusion

Promoting social cohesion in Korea 01 Rising income inequality and relative poverty and the factors behind it

OECD Economics Lower wages Precarious Jobs less training KOREA

employment protection improved social insurance coverage OECD Economics employment protection improved social insurance coverage Expanded training KOREA

OECD Economics A survey of 34 countries highest in Korea at 86% KOREA

OECD Economics KOREA

Causes of inequality Education system Service sector OECD Economics KOREA

Korea achieved one of the highest growth rates in the world, OECD Economics Korea achieved one of the highest growth rates in the world, KOREA

OECD Economics income inequality During the past decade. KOREA

should not focus solely on income growth OECD Economics Economic growth should not focus solely on income growth but should take into account income distribution KOREA

OECD Economics Rising inequality KOREA

Promoting social cohesion in Korea 02 Social spending is low but increasing rapidly

Accounted for only 2.7% of disposable income in Korea OECD Economics Accounted for only 2.7% of disposable income in Korea KOREA

income support to the working-age popolaton OECD Economics The government should move cautiously and incrementally in developing social welfare programmes All social services except health income support to the working-age popolaton KOREA

OECD Economics KOREA

OECD Economics Total labour supply unemployment KOREA

The government should at least freeze their OECD Economics The government should at least freeze their benefits, while allowing them to grow for the relatively poor. KOREA

OECD Economics KOREA

OECD Economics Weak coverage of the NPS and the EIS is a problem for non-regular workers KOREA

Promoting social cohesion in Korea 03 Increasing social spending to promote social cohesion 04 Labour market reforms to promote social cohesion by breaking down dualism

Korea, was the fourth highest in the OECD OECD Economics Korea, was the fourth highest in the OECD To promote social cohesion by breaking down dualism KOREA

intensified competition OECD Economics Reduce labor reduce fixed cost intensified competition Factors explaining the high level of labour market dualism KOREA

the labour market remains severely segmented OECD Economics the labour market remains severely segmented KOREA

Increasing the share of regular workers OECD Economics Wage disparity Increasing the share of regular workers Problems associated with the high share of non-regular workers KOREA

OECD Economics While the share of unemployed receiving benefits has risen from 7% in 2000 to over 30% in 2007 KOREA

regular workers nonregular workers OECD Economics Entrenched dualism creates conflicts regular workers nonregular workers KOREA

Promoting social cohesion in Korea 05 Reforms in the education system to promote social cohesion

OECD Economics In 1945, Korea’s KOREA

OECD Economics investment in schools KOREA

social mobility income equality OECD Economics economic growth compulsory education social mobility income equality KOREA

OECD Economics The educational quality of kindergarten is considered superior to that of childcare In a survey of parents 78% replied that there are significant differences between kindergarten and childcare KOREA

In Korea was the second lowest in the OECD area in 2008, OECD Economics In Korea was the second lowest in the OECD area in 2008, subsidies to families The government has been steadily increasing ECEC. KOREA

In 2011, the subsidy was raised to 100% of basic fees OECD Economics IN 2009 with the subsidy covering between 30% and 100% of basic childcare fees In 2011, the subsidy was raised to 100% of basic fees Extending such support to all three and four-year-olds beginning in 2013. KOREA

lack of capacity in public kindergartens. OECD Economics Their children to childcare centres, reflecting several factors. cheaper lack of capacity in public kindergartens. more conveniently located more convenient for working parents KOREA

participation is more than double the OECD average in every subject OECD Economics In 2010, around three-quarters of students participated in such courses. participation is more than double the OECD average in every subject KOREA

70% of students participating in private tutoring attend hagwons, OECD Economics 70% of students participating in private tutoring attend hagwons, includes individual or group tutoring and Internet and distance learning. KOREA

OECD Economics Most of the parents have to say that it is important that it is difficult to enroll in prestigious universities. KOREA

OECD Economics Participation and spending on private tutoring are highly correlated with family income KOREA

Entrance examination banned hagwons and other private tutoring A five-year plan to improve the quality of schools A 10 p.m. curfew on hagwons. OECD Economics Policies to reduce reliance on hagwons and other forms of private tutoring KOREA

Policies which parents want OECD Economics 1. improving the quality of schools 2.importance of creating diverse schools 3. Strengthening vocational education and career guidance Policies which parents want KOREA

Reducing the burden of tertiary education OECD Economics Reducing the burden of tertiary education tertiary education KOREA

Government’s several steps to address the tuition issue. OECD Economics Government’s several steps to address the tuition issue. To organise a tuition review committee The government established the Korean Student Aid Foundation Tuition beginning KOREA

Half-price tuition’s drawbacks OECD Economics Half-price tuition’s drawbacks The problem of overemphasis on tertiary education and skill mismatches half-price tuition raises questions about value for money less efficient and less equitable than targeting support on students which is limited to the lower 70% of the income distribution, KOREA

Promoting social cohesion in Korea 06 The service sector as a factor in inequality

services from nearly 100% of that in manufacturing to only 54% OECD Economics services from nearly 100% of that in manufacturing to only 54% KOREA

poverty workers small companies OECD Economics small companies poverty workers workers in firms with 10 to 29 workers earned 24% less than workers at companies with 300 or more workers KOREA

Promoting social cohesion in Korea 07 Conclusion

OECD Economics provide a double dividend in terms of boosting economic growth and fostering social cohesion. Apriority to reverse the rise in inequality Enhance social cohesion. To promote inclusive growth KOREA

PRESENTATION THANK YOU