Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Advertisements

High-protein diets prevent steatosis and induce hepatic accumulation of monomethyl branched-chain fatty acids  Sonia C. Garcia Caraballo, Tine M. Comhair,
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Ling Yang, Ping Li, Suneng Fu, Ediz S. Calay, Gökhan S. Hotamisligil 
Irs1 Serine 307 Promotes Insulin Sensitivity in Mice
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Grzegorz Sumara, Olga Sumara, Jason K. Kim, Gerard Karsenty 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Antidiabetic Effects of IGFBP2, a Leptin-Regulated Gene
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Selective versus Total Insulin Resistance: A Pathogenic Paradox
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Imbalanced Insulin Actions in Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: Key Mouse Models of Insulin Signaling Pathway  Tetsuya Kubota, Naoto Kubota, Takashi Kadowaki 
Volume 18, Issue 13, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Insulin Signaling in α Cells Modulates Glucagon Secretion In Vivo
The Stunned β Cell: A Brief History
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Antidiabetic Effects of IGFBP2, a Leptin-Regulated Gene
Regulation of Hepatic Energy Metabolism and Gluconeogenesis by BAD
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Is a Key Determinant of HCC Development by Regulating Hepatic Steatosis and Metabolic Syndrome  Xiongjie Jin, Demetrius.
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Varman T. Samuel, Gerald I. Shulman  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Prevention of Steatosis by Hepatic JNK1
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 134, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
PAS Kinase Drives Lipogenesis through SREBP-1 Maturation
A Non-invasive Method to Assess Hepatic Acetyl-CoA In Vivo
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
AMPK: An Emerging Drug Target for Diabetes and the Metabolic Syndrome
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages e3 (November 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (June 2017)
Nicotinamide Mononucleotide, a Key NAD+ Intermediate, Treats the Pathophysiology of Diet- and Age-Induced Diabetes in Mice  Jun Yoshino, Kathryn F. Mills,
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 499-506 (December 2009) Prevention of Hepatic Steatosis and Hepatic Insulin Resistance by Knockdown of cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein  Derek M. Erion, Irena D. Ignatova, Shin Yonemitsu, Yoshio Nagai, Paula Chatterjee, Dirk Weismann, Jennifer J. Hsiao, Dongyan Zhang, Takanori Iwasaki, Romana Stark, Clare Flannery, Mario Kahn, Christopher M. Carmean, Xing Xian Yu, Susan F. Murray, Sanjay Bhanot, Brett P. Monia, Gary W. Cline, Varman T. Samuel, Gerald I. Shulman  Cell Metabolism  Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 499-506 (December 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.007 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 CREB ASO Improves Metabolic Parameters in Three Other Diabetic Models (A–H) Fasting plasma glucose (A) and insulin (B) concentrations (n = 8–21) in the normal chow and T2DM rat models. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations (C) were decreased with CREB ASO in the ZDF rat model (n = 4–5). Due to the pancreas-saving effect of lower glucose values, plasma insulin values tended to be increased (D) (n = 4–5). In the lard-diet-based model, CREB ASO reduced fasting plasma glucose (E) and insulin (F) concentrations (n = 7–9). Lastly, CREB ASO also reduced fasting plasma glucose in an ob/ob mouse model (G) due to reductions in gluconeogenic genes (H) (n = 4–5). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005. All values are expressed as the average SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 10, 499-506DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 CREB ASO Treatment Reduces Hepatic Lipid Content (A–G) Long-chain acyl-CoAs (A) and liver DAGs (B) were decreased with CREB ASO treatment (n = 8–10). Liver triglycerides were reduced in the fasted and fed states with CREB ASO (C). In vivo lipogenesis was reduced with CREB ASO, as assessed by the incorporation of [1-14C]palmitate into triglycerides (n = 4 per group) (D). C/EBPα (E), C/EBPβ (F), and key lipogenic genes (G) were assessed by RT-PCR (n = 4–7). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005 for control ASO versus CREB ASO; # p < 0.05 for control ASO-fasted versus control ASO-fed. All values are expressed as the average SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 10, 499-506DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 CREB ASO Treatment Improves Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity in T2DM Rats (A–D) Suppression of hepatic glucose production (A) was assessed using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (n = 4–14 per treatment group). In the T2DM rat model, CREB ASO reduced membrane PKCɛ (B) (n = 4 per treatment group), increased IRS-2 tyrosine phosphorylation (C) (n = 9 per treatment group), and improved Akt2 activity (D) (n = 5 per treatment group). ∗p < 0.05 for CREB ASO versus control ASO; # p < 0.05 for T2DM control ASO versus normal chow control ASO. All values are expressed as the average SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 10, 499-506DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CREB ASO Therapy Decreases Plasma Triglycerides and Cholesterol (A–F) Plasma triglycerides were decreased with CREB ASO (n = 10–12) (A). The lipoprotein profile showed significant reductions in VLDL, LDL, and HDL with CREB ASO (B). Free hepatic cholesterol was unchanged with CREB ASO (n = 4 per treatment group) (C), but CREB ASO decreased the concentration of hepatic cholesterol esters (D), as assessed by NMR. Synthesis of cholesterol in rat hepatocytes was assessed by relative [1-14C]acetic acid incorporation into sterols (E) (n = 3–7 per treatment group). Amount of bile acids extracted from feces during a 12 hr fast is shown in (F) (n = 7 per treatment group). ∗p < 0.05 for control ASO versus CREB ASO. All values are expressed as the average SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 10, 499-506DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.007) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions