Quantifying Nonuse in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Study Into Paretic, Nonparetic, and Bimanual Upper-Limb Use in Daily Life Marian E. Michielsen, MSc, Ruud W. Selles, PhD, Henk J. Stam, MD, PhD, Gerard M. Ribbers, MD, PhD, Johannes B. Bussmann, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 93, Issue 11, Pages 1975-1981 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016 Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Activity patterns. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 1975-1981DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Duration of upper-limb use (24-h period). Abbreviations: aff, affected; dom, dominant; ndom, nondominant; unaff, unaffected. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 1975-1981DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Upper-limb use as a percentage of total time spent sitting or standing. Abbreviations: aff, affected; dom, dominant; ndom, nondominant; unaff, unaffected. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 1975-1981DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Intensity of upper-limb use during the periods of uni- and bimanual use. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012 93, 1975-1981DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016) Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions