The Spike-Timing Dependence of Plasticity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spike timing dependent plasticity Homeostatic regulation of synaptic plasticity.
Advertisements

1 The length constant of the dendritic tree markedly effects passive conduction.
Spike timing-dependent plasticity Guoqiang Bi Department of Neurobiology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
By Eamon Quick. The Rundown Long-Term Potentiation (LTP): activity-dependent increase in synaptic activity –Dependent upon NMDA receptor activation Favors.
Long term potentiation (LTP) of an excitatory synaptic inputs is input specific.
Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) and its relation to differential Hebbian learning.
Building Better Models of Visual Cortical Receptive Fields
Conventional Synapses for Unconventional Cells
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages e5 (March 2018)
The Brain as an Efficient and Robust Adaptive Learner
Presynaptic Self-Depression at Developing Neocortical Synapses
Endocannabinoids Control the Induction of Cerebellar LTD
Learning without Training
Emre O. Neftci  iScience  Volume 5, Pages (July 2018) DOI: /j.isci
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Biochemical Computation for Spine Structural Plasticity
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Timing Rules for Synaptic Plasticity Matched to Behavioral Function
PSA–NCAM Is Required for Activity-Induced Synaptic Plasticity
Cellular Mechanisms for Direction Selectivity in the Retina
Sensory Deprivation Unmasks a PKA-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Mechanism that Operates in Parallel with CaMKII  Neil Hardingham, Nick Wright, James Dachtler,
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Bidirectional Modification of Presynaptic Neuronal Excitability Accompanying Spike Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity  Cheng-yu Li, Jiang-teng Lu, Chien-ping.
Activity-Dependent Neural Plasticity from Bench to Bedside
Aligning a Synapse Neuron
How Inhibition Shapes Cortical Activity
Sensory Deprivation Unmasks a PKA-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Mechanism that Operates in Parallel with CaMKII  Neil Hardingham, Nick Wright, James Dachtler,
Rebecca S. Jones, Reed C. Carroll, Scott Nawy  Neuron 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Spike Timing-Dependent LTP/LTD Mediates Visual Experience-Dependent Plasticity in a Developing Retinotectal System  Yangling Mu, Mu-ming Poo  Neuron 
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
John T.R. Isaac, Michael C. Ashby, Chris J. McBain  Neuron 
Benjamin Scholl, Daniel E. Wilson, David Fitzpatrick  Neuron 
Zhiru Wang, Ning-long Xu, Chien-ping Wu, Shumin Duan, Mu-ming Poo 
A Cooperative Switch Determines the Sign of Synaptic Plasticity in Distal Dendrites of Neocortical Pyramidal Neurons  Per Jesper Sjöström, Michael Häusser 
Edward S Boyden, Jennifer L Raymond  Neuron 
Aaron D. Milstein, Ivan Soltesz  Neuron 
Kevin Fox, Rachel O.L. Wong  Neuron 
Patrick Kaifosh, Attila Losonczy  Neuron 
Tiago Branco, Michael Häusser  Neuron 
Plasticity of Burst Firing Induced by Synergistic Activation of Metabotropic Glutamate and Acetylcholine Receptors  Shannon J. Moore, Donald C. Cooper,
A Molecular Link Tethering Neuronal Responses with the Past
Zhenglin Gu, Jerrel L. Yakel  Neuron 
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages e7 (September 2017)
Zane N. Aldworth, Mark Stopfer  Current Biology 
Stephan D. Brenowitz, Wade G. Regehr  Neuron 
Noradrenergic Control of Associative Synaptic Plasticity by Selective Modulation of Instructive Signals  Megan R. Carey, Wade G. Regehr  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 19, Pages (October 2011)
Synapse-Specific Encoding of Fear Memory in the Amygdala
Serotonergic Modulation of Sensory Representation in a Central Multisensory Circuit Is Pathway Specific  Zheng-Quan Tang, Laurence O. Trussell  Cell Reports 
Encoding of Oscillations by Axonal Bursts in Inferior Olive Neurons
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (May 2001)
Dopamine-Dependent Interactions between Limbic and Prefrontal Cortical Plasticity in the Nucleus Accumbens: Disruption by Cocaine Sensitization  Yukiori.
Metaplasticity of Hypothalamic Synapses following In Vivo Challenge
The Brain as an Efficient and Robust Adaptive Learner
The Back and Forth of Dendritic Plasticity
Differential Effects of Excitatory and Inhibitory Plasticity on Synaptically Driven Neuronal Input-Output Functions  Tiago P. Carvalho, Dean V. Buonomano 
Hiroto Takahashi, Jeffrey C. Magee  Neuron 
Motion Detection: Neuronal Circuit Meets Theory
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP)
Rapid Neocortical Dynamics: Cellular and Network Mechanisms
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Alexandre Mathy, Beverley A. Clark, Michael Häusser  Neuron 
Per Jesper Sjöström, Gina G Turrigiano, Sacha B Nelson  Neuron 
Direction-Selective Dendritic Action Potentials in Rabbit Retina
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Patrick Kaifosh, Attila Losonczy  Neuron 
Gwendolyn G. Calhoon, Patricio O’Donnell  Neuron 
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Presentation transcript:

The Spike-Timing Dependence of Plasticity Daniel E. Feldman  Neuron  Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 556-571 (August 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (A) Induction of STDP by pairing presynaptic spikes and associated EPSPs with postsynaptic spikes. bAP, backpropagating spike. (B) Pre-leading-post spiking drives LTP, while post-leading-pre spiking drives LTD. Pre- or postsynaptic spikes alone do not alter synapse strength. From Feldman (2000). (C) STDP in hippocampal cell culture. Each symbol is one neuron. From Bi and Poo (1998). Neuron 2012 75, 556-571DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 STDP Exists in Different Forms Selected examples illustrating each form are shown schematically. (A) Hebbian STDP that is equally balanced between LTP and LTD. 1, Froemke et al. (2005). 2, Fino et al. (2008). (B) Hebbian STDP that is biased toward LTD. 3, Celikel et al. (2004). 4, Froemke et al. (2005). (C) Anti-Hebbian STDP that contains both LTP and LTD. 5, Fino et al. (2005). 6, Letzkus et al. (2006). (D) Anti-Hebbian STDP that contains only LTD (anti-Hebbian LTD). 6, Han et al. (2000). 7, Lu et al. (2007). 8, Safo and Regehr (2008). Neuron 2012 75, 556-571DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Plasticity Is Interdependent on Spike Timing, Firing Rate, and Depolarization (A) STDP at L5-L5 pyramid unitary synapses as a function of firing rate. Based on Sjöström et al. (2001). (B) Joint firing rate and timing dependence for this same synapse modeled using a phenomenological multifactor STDP rule (points show data, Sjöström et al., 2001; lines show model, Clopath et al., 2010). (C) The LTP component of Hebbian STDP requires dendritic depolarization provided by synaptic cooperativity. Data are from distal synapses on L5 pyramidal cells (Δt = +10 ms) (Sjöström and Häusser, 2006). Open and filled symbols show inputs with weak and strong cooperativity, respectively. Neuron 2012 75, 556-571DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cellular Mechanisms for Timing Dependence of Plasticity (A) Biochemical signaling pathways for major forms of STDP. N and A, NMDA and AMPA receptors. Red, depolarization. For mGluR-CB1-LTD, the proposed presynaptic coincidence detector is in green, and the postsynaptic coincidence detector is in blue. A, astrocyte. Signals conveying pre- and postsynaptic spike timing in each model are labeled. (B) Dendritic plasticity zones based on efficiency of bAP propagation through the dendrites. Neuron 2012 75, 556-571DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Recent Evidence for STDP In Vivo (A) Stimulus-timing-dependent plasticity of face perception in humans. Subjects classified a series of morphed face images as being “more like face A” or “more like face B.” Sequential A→B or B→A pairing (Δt = 20 ms) biased perception toward the earlier-presented face, with a dependence on Δt similar to Hebbian STDP. From McMahon and Leopold (2012). (B) STDP induced by visual motion stimuli in Xenopus optic tectum. Simulated motion consisting of three rapidly flashed bars was presented within the receptive field of a tectal neuron (Δt = 17 ms between bars). Bars 1 and 3 were adjusted to evoke subthreshold PSPs, while bar 2 evoked spikes. Simulated motion training caused bar 1 and 2-evoked synaptic currents to increase, but bar 3-evoked synaptic currents to decrease, consistent with Hebbian STDP. No plasticity occurred when bar 2 did not evoke spikes (not shown). From Mu and Poo (2006). (C) STDP synchronizes β-LN firing in the locust olfactory system. Odors normally evoke β-LN spikes synchronized with the trough of the local field potential (LFP). Injecting current in a β-LN to phase-delay spikes (left) induces LTP at Kenyon cell→β-LN synapses, thus phase-advancing future odor-evoked spikes (middle). Spike phase shifts bidirectionally depending on Δt during conditioning, consistent with STDP (right). From Cassenaer and Laurent (2007). Neuron 2012 75, 556-571DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions