Lo sviuppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Lo studio APACT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discussion Pancreatic Cancer Abstracts 145, LBA146, 147, & LBA148
Advertisements

Our bold approach to life-changing medicines
Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Case presented by Dr Schwartz 44 yo woman with 4 mo hx of abdominal pain –Imaging = pancreatic.
Pancreatic Cancer Ali Shamseddine MD Proessor of Medicine AUBMC
Inclusion Criteria Patient has definitive histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The definitive diagnosis.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
Treatment Regimens of HER2+ Adjuvant Patients (Actuals) Source: Genentech ASCO 2005 (data release) Nov 2006 (Approval)
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
Correlation of Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFS) with Treatment Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) Patients (pts) Treated with Gemcitabine/Capecitabine plus.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
ADJUVANT CAPECITABINE AND OXALIPLATIN FOR GASTRIC CANCER AFTER D2 GASTRECTOMY (CLASSIC): A PHASE 3 OPEN-LABEL,RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL Yung-Jue Bang*,
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Best Supportive Care Compared With Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study Atul Sharma, Amit Dutt Dwary, Bidhu.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Phase II HALO-202: nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine ± PEGPH20 in Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Phase III Trial of Capecitabine + Oxaliplatin vs
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Modena
LUX-Lung 3 clinical trial
A Single-Arm Phase IIIb Study of Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab with a Taxane as First-Line Therapy for Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
NCI/CTEP 7435: Eribulin Active, Tolerable in Urothelial Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* May 29 - June 2,
ASCO Recap Palak Desai, MD.
What do we do after FOLFIRINOX? Gemcitabine-Based Therapy is Standard
ESPAC-4: Adjuvant Gemcitabine/ Capecitabine Improves 5-Yr Survival vs Gemcitabine Alone in Resected Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma CCO Independent Conference.
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Abraxane-Pembro nei carcinomi uroteliali avanzati
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
Ruolo di carboplatino + nab-paclitaxel nel trattamento di I linea nel carcinoma polmonare non a piccole cellule         P.Bidoli S.C. Oncologia Medica.
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
PRODIGE 24/CCTG PA.6: Phase III Trial of Adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma CCO Independent.
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a clinical experience Silvia Vecchiarelli Istituto di Ematologia e Oncologia “L.& A. Serágnoli”,
Fernando De Vita Oncologia Medica Seconda Università di Napoli
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Nicola Silvestris
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Jordan Berlin Co-Director, GI Oncology Program
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
CoPrincipal Investigators
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Nab-paclitaxel: lo stato dell’arte
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
La nanomedicina in oncologia: presente e futuro
Presentation transcript:

Lo sviuppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Lo studio APACT Alessandro Bittoni Scuola di Dottorato di Ricerca- Clinica di Oncologia Medica AOU Ospedali Riuniti - Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment: Rationale NCCN and ESMO guidelines recommend 5-FU (NCCN: + leucovorin) or Gem as adjuvant chemotherapy options Recurrence rates with adjuvant Gem were 77% and 81% in 2 phase III trials, suggesting a need for improved therapies nab-P + Gem demonstrated superior efficacy vs Gem alone for the treatment of metastatic PC in the phase III MPACT trial Median OS: 8.5 vs 6.7 months; HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 - 0.83; P < 0.001 Median PFS: 5.5 vs 3.7 months; HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58 - 0.82; P < 0.001 ORR By independent review: 23% vs 7%; P < 0.001 By investigator review: 29% vs 8%; P < 0.001 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; ESMO, European Society for Medical Oncology; Gem, gemcitabine; HR, hazard ratio; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; NCCN, National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PC, pancreatic cancer; PFS, progression-free survival. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162].

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Trial Rationale (cont) The goals of adjuvant therapy are to reduce recurrence and improve DFS and OS following surgery for resectable PC There are few ongoing phase III trials of adjuvant therapy in PC Trial No. Treatment Estimated Enrollment NCT01013649 Gem ± radiotherapy with Cape or 5-FU N ≈ 950 NCT01526135 Gem vs mFolfirinoxa N ≈ 490 NCT01150630b Neoadjuvant and adjuvant Gem ± Cis, Epi, and Cape vs adjuvant Gem N ≈ 370 a Modified: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, folinic acid 400 mg/m2, 5-fluourouracil 1200 mg/m2/day (no bolus), q2w × 24 weeks. b Phase II/III. 5-FU, 5-fluourouracil; Cape, capecitabine; Cis, cisplatin; DFS, disease-free survival; Epi, epirubicin; Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; OS, overall survival; PC, pancreatic cancer; q2w, every 2 weeks. 3

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment: Objectives Primary To compare disease-free survival between patients randomized to nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone Secondary Assess OS between patients randomized to nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone Assess safety and tolerability of the 2 treatment regimens Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. 4

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment: Study Design Max 12 weeks from surgery Randomization 1:1 Stratification Factors: resection status (R0 vs R1), nodal status (LN- vs LN+), geographical region (North America vs Europe vs Australia vs Asia Pacific) Primary Endpoint: independently assessed DFS (defined as time from randomization to disease recurrence or death) Secondary Endpoint: OS, safety Exploratory Endpoints: Molecular profiling of tumor tissue to correlate tumor heterogeneity with clinical outcome Quality of life as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PAN26 DFS, disease-free survival; EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; Gem, gemcitabine; LN, lymph node; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; OS, overall survival; PC, pancreatic cancer; QLQ, quality of life questionnaire; qw 3/4, first 3 of 4 weeks. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162]. 5

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Key Inclusion Criteria Histologically confirmed resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with macroscopic complete resection (R0 and R1) Stage T1-3, N0-1, M0 Able to begin treatment ≤ 12 weeks after resection Age ≥ 18 years ECOG PS 0 or 1 ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162]. 6

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Key Inclusion Criteria (cont) Adequate hematologic and blood chemistry levels Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500 cells/mm3 Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm3 Hemoglobin ≥ 9 mg/dL AST/SGOT and ALT/SGPT ≤ 2.5 × ULN Total bilirubin ≤ ULN Serum creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 CA19-9 < 100 U/mL assessed within 14 days of randomization ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer; SGOT, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; SGPT, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase; ULN, upper limit of normal. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162]. 7

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Key Exclusion Criteria Neuroendocrine tumors Prior neoadjuvant treatment or radiation therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma Presence or history of metastatic PC Any other malignancy within ≤ 5 years of randomization, excluding adequately treated in situ cervical, uterine, or nonmelanomatous skin cancer Treatment should have been completed 6 months before randomization Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. 8

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Key Exclusion Criteria (cont) Active, uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infection(s) requiring systemic therapy Infection with hepatitis B or C History of HIV or use of immuno/myelosuppressive medications that could increase the risk of neutropenia History of hypersensitivity to study drugs Gem, gemcitabine; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162]. 9

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Dose Modifications Two dose reductions are allowed for hematologic and other toxicities Patients will be discontinued from the study if more than 2 dose reductions are required Dose Levela nab-P, mg/m2 Gem, mg/m2 Starting dose 125 1000 −1 100 800 −2 75 600 a Dose reductions may or may not be concomitant in the nab-P + Gem arm. Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162]. 10

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Patient Follow-up DFS CT/MRI scans will be performed at screening, every 8 weeks for the first 24 weeks, every 12 weeks for the first 3 years, then every 24 weeks until disease recurrence for up to 5 years from last treatment Patients who discontinue treatment in the absence of disease recurrence should undergo repeat imaging until disease recurrence, death, or the start of new therapy Post-treatment OS will be monitored every 3 months until death, withdrawal of consent, or end of study A data monitoring committee is in place for this trial CT, computed tomography; DFS, disease-free survival; Gem, gemcitabine; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; OS, overall survival; PC, pancreatic cancer. 11

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Statistical Analysis DFS was reported with a median of 13.4 months and 14.3 months for patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received Gem as adjuvant therapy in 2 separate randomized phase III studies The planned enrollment of ≈ 800 in this trial was selected based on the following assumptions Gem will result in a median DFS of 14 months nab-P + Gem will result in a median DFS of 19 months, representing an HR of 0.74 At least 489 DFS events from 800 patients would allow 90% power to detect the HR of 0.74 at a 2-sided significance level of 0.05 DFS, disease-free survival; Gem, gemcitabine; HR, hazard ratio; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. 12

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Statistical Analysis (cont) Two interim efficacy analyses are planned The first will be conducted at 33% information time (ie, after 163 DFS events) to assess futility The second will assess both futility and superiority at either 70% information time (ie, after 342 DFS events) or the enrollment of 800 patients, whichever is later One interim safety analysis is planned after 100 patients are treated for at least 2 cycles Patient enrollment is ongoing DFS, disease-free survival; Gem, gemcitabine; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PC, pancreatic cancer. Tempero MA, Cardin D, Biankin A, et al. APACT: a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study of nab® -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone as adjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting; May 30 - Jun 3, 2014; Chicago, IL [abstract TPS4162]. 13

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Global Enrolment

APACT : Phase III Trial of nab-P + Gem vs Gem as Adjuvant PC Treatment Italian Enrolment

Grazie per l’attenzione!