Protein Folding: An unfolding story

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energetics and kinetics of protein folding. Comparison to other self-assembling systems?
Advertisements

Chemical Thermodynamics Chapter Gibbs Free Energy and a Bit More About Entropy.
Rerun of essentials of week 1-3 Protein structure analysis, comparison, and prediction.
Chap. 4. Problem 1. Part (a). Double and triple bonds are shorter and stronger than single bonds. Because the length of a peptide bond more closely resembles.
Lecture 8 Stability and reactivity. We tend to say that substances are ‘stable’ or ‘unstable’, ‘reactive’ or ‘unreactive’ but these terms are relative.
Free Energy and Temperature. What happens when reactions occur at various temperature? Assume Δ H° and Δ S° remain fairly constant Equilibrium constant.
Riboswitch Structures: Purine Ligands Replace Tertiary Contacts
Solvation Effects on Reactions
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Determine protein structure from amino acid sequence
Estimates for the potential accuracy required in realistic protein folding simulations and structure recognition experiments  Antônio F Pereira de Araújo,
Yinghao Wu, Barry Honig, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular chaperones: Pathways and networks
The Contribution of Entropy, Enthalpy, and Hydrophobic Desolvation to Cooperativity in Repeat-Protein Folding  Tural Aksel, Ananya Majumdar, Doug Barrick 
A Gate in the Selectivity Filter of Potassium Channels
Enzyme Kinetics & Protein Folding 9/7/2004
Dejun Lin, Alan Grossfield  Biophysical Journal 
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Volume 106, Issue 8, Pages (April 2014)
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
Comparing Folding Codes in Simple Heteropolymer Models of Protein Evolutionary Landscape: Robustness of the Superfunnel Paradigm  Richard Wroe, Erich.
Complex Energy Landscape of a Giant Repeat Protein
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment  Aaron R Dinner, Andrej Šali, Lorna J Smith, Christopher M Dobson, Martin.
ATP-Dependent Allosteric DNA Enzymes
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Filip Lankaš, Richard Lavery, John H. Maddocks  Structure 
Kinetics Chapter 14.
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Thomas Gurry, Paul S. Nerenberg, Collin M. Stultz  Biophysical Journal 
Nonadditivity in Conformational Entropy upon Molecular Rigidification Reveals a Universal Mechanism Affecting Folding Cooperativity  Oleg K. Vorov, Dennis.
Quick Thoughts on Protein Folding
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Michael Torrez, Michael Schultehenrich, Dennis R. Livesay 
Ingunn W. Jolma, Xiao Yu Ni, Ludger Rensing, Peter Ruoff 
Volume 90, Issue 8, Pages (April 2006)
Magnetic Field Effects in Arabidopsis thaliana Cryptochrome-1
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Probing the Energy Landscape of the Membrane Protein Bacteriorhodopsin
Speeding up protein folding: mutations that increase the rate at which Rop folds and unfolds by over four orders of magnitude  Mary Munson, Karen S. Anderson,
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Michael Schlierf, Zu Thur Yew, Matthias Rief, Emanuele Paci 
A Chemically Reversible Brownian Motor: Application to Kinesin and Ncd
Universality and diversity of the protein folding scenarios:a comprehensive analysis with the aid of a lattice model  Leonid A Mirny, Victor Abkevich,
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Untangling the Influence of a Protein Knot on Folding
An Effective Solvent Theory Connecting the Underlying Mechanisms of Osmolytes and Denaturants for Protein Stability  Apichart Linhananta, Shirin Hadizadeh,
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Cell dynamics of folding in two-dimensional model proteins
Exploring the Complex Folding Kinetics of RNA Hairpins: I
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution
Jong-Chin Lin, D. Thirumalai  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
Dependence of Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics on the Density and Composition of Macromolecular Crowders  Jeetain Mittal, Robert B. Best  Biophysical.
Transcriptional promiscuity in testes
Enzymes Function and Kinetics Recap.
The Influence of Configurational Dependent Diffusion on Fast Protein Folding Dynamics Jin Wang, SUNY at Stony Brook 1. Diffusion coefficients versus Q.
The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy
Tural Aksel, Doug Barrick  Biophysical Journal 
Polymerization and Bundling Kinetics of FtsZ Filaments
Presentation transcript:

Protein Folding: An unfolding story T.E. Creighton  Current Biology  Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 353-356 (April 1995) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00070-4

Figure 1 Cooperativity in protein folding. Schematic illustration of entropic cooperativity between two interactions A and B, with respective equilibrium constants KA and KB in the unfolded polypeptide chain (U). If both interactions can be present simultaneously, the presence of one will increase the proximity of the other pair of potentially interacting groups and less conformational entropy of the polypeptide chain will need to be lost for them to interact. Consequently, each interaction will be stronger when the other is also present, by the factor Coop. The effect must be mutual, due to the thermodynamic requirement that there be no free energy change around such a cycle; therefore, the two interactions are linked. Current Biology 1995 5, 353-356DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00070-4)

Figure 2 A simple explanation of why the nature of the transition state for folding appears to vary as the stability of N is altered by mutation. Greatly simplified free energy surfaces for the U and N states are shown, along the one-dimensional ‘reaction coordinate’ (in reality, the energy surfaces should not be smooth and should be represented in multi-dimensional conformational space, rather than with a one-dimensional reaction coordinate). The mutation to N∗ is assumed to alter only the absolute free energy of the N state energy surface. The transition state (‡) is depicted as being where the energy surfaces of the U and N states intersect. As a mutation destabilizes N, the transition state moves along the reaction coordinate to become more like the N state. Current Biology 1995 5, 353-356DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00070-4)

Figure 3 The cooperativity produced by the simultaneous presence of multiple weak interactions. In this simplified example, up to 10 interactions are possible in the fully folded state. A single interaction in the unfolded polypeptide chain has an equilibrium constant of 10−4 and each additional interaction occurs in a defined sequence and is 10-times stronger than the preceding one as a result of cooperativity. (a) The equilibrium constant, Ki′ for forming the ith interaction. (b) The overall equilibrium constant, Knet,i′ for the ith species, which defines the free energy of the species i relative to that of U: ΔGnet,i = −RT In Knet,i (right scale). With increasing number of interactions, the value of Knet,i decreases, and the species become less stable, until Ki is greater than unity. The overall equilibrium constant, Knet,i′ then increases but becomes greater than unity, and the folded structure becomes stable, only when all 10 interactions are present simultaneously. The overall transition state for folding would occur during formation of the 5th interaction. The dashed line indicates the free energy of the species with no cooperativity between independent interactions, and the arrow indicates the magnitude of the stabilizing interactions in the folded state resulting from cooperativity. The kinetic barriers to each step are not indicated. Adapted from [16]. Current Biology 1995 5, 353-356DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00070-4)

Figure 3 The cooperativity produced by the simultaneous presence of multiple weak interactions. In this simplified example, up to 10 interactions are possible in the fully folded state. A single interaction in the unfolded polypeptide chain has an equilibrium constant of 10−4 and each additional interaction occurs in a defined sequence and is 10-times stronger than the preceding one as a result of cooperativity. (a) The equilibrium constant, Ki′ for forming the ith interaction. (b) The overall equilibrium constant, Knet,i′ for the ith species, which defines the free energy of the species i relative to that of U: ΔGnet,i = −RT In Knet,i (right scale). With increasing number of interactions, the value of Knet,i decreases, and the species become less stable, until Ki is greater than unity. The overall equilibrium constant, Knet,i′ then increases but becomes greater than unity, and the folded structure becomes stable, only when all 10 interactions are present simultaneously. The overall transition state for folding would occur during formation of the 5th interaction. The dashed line indicates the free energy of the species with no cooperativity between independent interactions, and the arrow indicates the magnitude of the stabilizing interactions in the folded state resulting from cooperativity. The kinetic barriers to each step are not indicated. Adapted from [16]. Current Biology 1995 5, 353-356DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00070-4)