Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IL-18 Downregulates Collagen Production in Human Dermal Fibroblasts via the ERK Pathway  Hee Jung Kim, Seok Bean Song, Jung Min Choi, Kyung Moon Kim,
Advertisements

Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
LPS-Induced Upregulation of SHIP Is Essential for Endotoxin Tolerance
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Increased Expression of CTLA-4 in Malignant T Cells from Patients with Mycosis Fungoides – Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma  Henry K. Wong, Adam J. Wilson, Heather.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
by Alexander Kiani, Francisco J
Inhibition of Th1 Differentiation by IL-6 Is Mediated by SOCS1
Wei Hu, Ty Dale Troutman, Ramakrishna Edukulla, Chandrashekhar Pasare 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Marc Hertz, David Nemazee  Immunity 
IL-13-Stimulated Human Keratinocytes Preferentially Attract CD4+CCR4+ T cells: Possible Role in Atopic Dermatitis  Rahul Purwar, Thomas Werfel, Miriam.
Biochemical Mechanisms of IL-2–Regulated Fas-Mediated T Cell Apoptosis
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
I-Cheng Ho, Martin R Hodge, John W Rooney, Laurie H Glimcher  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Yongli Bai, Chun Yang, Kathrin Hu, Chris Elly, Yun-Cai Liu 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Jia Guo, MD, Xin Lin, PhD, Marc A
James I Kim, I-Cheng Ho, Michael J Grusby, Laurie H Glimcher  Immunity 
IL-2–inducible T-cell kinase modulates TH2-mediated allergic airway inflammation by suppressing IFN-γ in naive CD4+ T cells  Arun K. Kannan, MS, Nisebita.
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Andrew J Henderson, Ruth I Connor, Kathryn L Calame  Immunity 
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Down-Regulation of IL-4 Gene Transcription and Control of Th2 Cell Differentiation by a Mechanism Involving NFAT1  Alexander Kiani, João P.B Viola, Andrew.
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Antigen-Presenting Cell Production of IL-10 Inhibits T-Helper 1 and 17 Cell Responses and Suppresses Colitis in Mice  Bo Liu, Susan L. Tonkonogy, R. Balfour.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
A Mutation in the Nlrp3 Gene Causing Inflammasome Hyperactivation Potentiates Th17 Cell-Dominant Immune Responses  Guangxun Meng, Fuping Zhang, Ivan Fuss,
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
C5a Negatively Regulates Toll-like Receptor 4-Induced Immune Responses
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
IL-18 Downregulates Collagen Production in Human Dermal Fibroblasts via the ERK Pathway  Hee Jung Kim, Seok Bean Song, Jung Min Choi, Kyung Moon Kim,
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Antigen-4 Accumulation in the Immunological Synapse Is Regulated by TCR Signal Strength  Jackson G. Egen, James P. Allison  Immunity 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Repulsive Guidance Molecule-a Is Involved in Th17-Cell-Induced Neurodegeneration in Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis  Shogo Tanabe, Toshihide Yamashita  Cell.
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Presentation transcript:

Signaling through Itk Promotes T Helper 2 Differentiation via Negative Regulation of T- bet  Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg  Immunity  Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 67-80 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009

Figure 1 Itk−/− CD4+ T Cells Can Efficiently Differentiate into Polarized Th1 and Th2 Cells Purified CD4+ T cells from 5C.C7 Itk+/− RAG−/− and 5C.C7 Itk−/− RAG−/− mice were stimulated in vitro with APCs and peptide in Th1- or Th2-skewing conditions. (A) Following 3 days of culture, cells were restimulated with fresh APCs and MCC93-103 peptide for 6 hr, stained with anti-CD4-Cy and anti-Vα11-FITC, fixed, permeabilized, and stained intracellularly with anti-IL-4-PE and anti-IFN-γ-APC. Ten thousand CD4+ Vα11+ events were collected on a flow cytometer. An example of raw data is shown. (B) Intracellular cytokine staining data from the experiment shown in (A) in bar graph format, depicting the percentage of cells that are producing IFN-γ or IL-4, in the Th1- or Th2-skewed cultures, respectively, in response to varying doses of MCC93-103. (C) Following 7 days in culture, cells were restimulated for 24 hr with fresh APCs and varying doses of MCC93-103. Supernatants were analyzed for the production of IFN-γ and IL-4, respectively, by ELISA. Error bars indicate SD of values obtained from stimulations performed in triplicate. (D and E) Cells were restimulated for 6 hr on day 7 with fresh APCs and varying doses of MCC93-103. Following stimulation, RNA was isolated and 1 μg was reverse transcribed into cDNA and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR analysis for β-actin, IFN-γ, and IL-4 (D), or T-bet, GATA-3, and c-Maf (E). The y axis values represent the respective transcript normalized to the β-actin values determined for each sample. Error bars are the SD of transcript values obtained from triplicate reactions. Immunity 2004 21, 67-80DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009)

Figure 2 Low-Avidity TCR Stimulation Promotes Th2 Differentiation by Itk+/−, but Not by Itk−/−, CD4+ T Cells Purified CD4+ T cells from 5C.C7 Itk+/− RAG−/− and 5C.C7 Itk−/− RAG−/− mice were stimulated in vitro with APCs and either 100 or 1 nM of MCC93-103, 100 nM of MCCT102S, or 100 nM of MCCA96S. Following 3 days in culture, cells were restimulated for 6 hr and assayed for IFN-γ and IL-4 production by intracellular cytokine staining as described in Figure 1. (A) An example of raw data showing cytokine staining profiles. (B–E) The percentages of cells that produce either IFN-γ, IL-4, or both are depicted in bar graph formats corresponding to the initial stimulus: 100 nM MCC93-103 (B), 1 nM MCC93-103 (C), 100 nM MCCT102S (D), or 100 nM MCCA96S (E). (F) RNA was isolated from cells on day 3, transcribed into cDNA, and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR analysis for β-actin, T-bet, and GATA-3. The y axis values represent the respective transcript normalized to the β-actin values determined for each sample. Error bars are the SD of transcript values obtained from triplicate reactions. Immunity 2004 21, 67-80DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009)

Figure 3 T-bet mRNA Expression Is Aberrantly Regulated by TCR Signals in the Absence of Itk Purified CD4+ T cells from 5C.C7 Itk+/− RAG−/− and 5C.C7 Itk−/− RAG−/− mice were stimulated in vitro with APCs and MCC93-103 in Th1- or Th2-skewing conditions (A–D) or stimulated with APCs and 100 nM of MCCT102S (E–H) in either nonskewing (no exogenous cytokine) or neutralizing conditions (anti-IL-4 and anti-IFN-γ antibodies). Cells were stimulated for either 0, 12, or 24 hr. Following the indicated time points, RNA was isolated from cells, transcribed into cDNA, and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR analysis for GATA-3 (A and E), T-bet (B and F), IL-4 (C and G), or IFN-γ (D and H). The y axis values represent the respective transcript normalized to the GAPDH values determined for each sample. The data are graphed on a log scale in (A)–(D) and a linear scale in (E)–(H) to more clearly display the overall magnitude of the changes in gene expression under each set of conditions. Normalization to GAPDH, β-actin, or β2-microglobulin yielded comparable results. Additionally, these housekeeping genes are regulated comparably between Itk+/− and Itk−/− cells (data not shown). Error bars are the SD of transcript values obtained from triplicate reactions. The asterisk next to the horizontal bar indicates the limit of quantitation for the cytokine transcripts. The ratio for the limit of quantitation was calculated by dividing the actual lowest quantifiable copy of IFN-γ or IL-4 cDNA by the average GAPDH value. Immunity 2004 21, 67-80DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009)

Figure 4 Itk Negatively Regulates T-bet upon Low-Avidity TCR Stimulation Purified CD4+ T cells from 5C.C7 Itk+/− RAG−/− and 5C.C7 Itk−/− RAG−/− mice were stimulated with the indicated concentrations of either MCC93-103 or MCCT102S peptide plus APCs for 0 or 12 hr in neutralizing conditions (with anti-IL-4 and anti-IFN-γ antibodies). Following stimulation, RNA was isolated, transcribed into cDNA, and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR analysis for T-bet and GAPDH. The y axis represents T-bet normalized to the GAPDH values determined for each sample. Error bars are the SD of transcript values obtained from triplicate reactions. Immunity 2004 21, 67-80DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009)

Figure 5 Itk Is Upregulated and Rlk Is Downregulated during Th2 Differentiation (A–D) Purified CD4+ T cells from 5C.C7 Itk+/− RAG−/− and 5C.C7 Itk−/− RAG−/− mice were stimulated in Th1- or Th2-skewing conditions and harvested at 0, 6, 18, and 24 hr (A and C) as well as at 1, 4, 8, and 11 days poststimulation (B and D). Following the indicated time points, RNA was isolated and subject to real-time quantitative PCR for either Rlk (A and B) or Itk (C and D). (A) and (C) represent Rlk and Itk copy numbers, respectively, normalized to cell number equivalents. (B) and (D) represent Rlk and Itk copy numbers, respectively, normalized to GAPDH values. The asterisk denotes that the indicated ratio is greater in these particular circumstances as a result of GAPDH values being very low in naive T cells compared to activated and expanding cells in culture. (E) In the top panel, 3.5 × 106 Itk+/− Th1 and Th2 cells were removed from culture at 8 (lanes 1 and 3) and 11 (lanes 2 and 4) days poststimulation. As controls, lysates from Rlk−/−Itk−/− (DKO) CD4+ T cells and from the AE7 Th1 cell line were also prepared. Total cell lysates were blotted for Rlk. The filter was then reblotted with antibody to Erk 1/2 as a loading control. In the bottom panel, total cell lysates from 3.5 × 106 Itk+/− Th1, Itk−/− Th2, and Itk+/− Th2 cells at day 10 poststimulation were blotted for Itk. The filter was then reblotted with antibody to Erk 1/2 as a loading control. (F) A summary of the changes in Rlk and Itk expression levels in differentiating Th1 and Th2 cells. Differences between Th1 and Th2 cells are first observed at 24 hr for Rlk and at ∼ day 8 of differentiation for Itk. Immunity 2004 21, 67-80DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009)

Figure 6 Signaling Deficiencies in Th1 versus Th2 Cells Lacking Itk Purified CD4+ T cells from 5C.C7 Itk+/− RAG−/− and 5C.C7 Itk−/− RAG−/− mice were stimulated in Th1- or Th2-skewing conditions and cultured for 11 days. Cells were then restimulated by anti-CD3 antibody crosslinking for either 0, 1, or 2 min. Total lysates were immunoblotted with an anti-phospho-specific antibody to PLC-γ1 (P-PLC-γ1(PY783)) or anti-phospho-ERK (p-ERK1 and 2). The membrane was stripped and reprobed for total PLC-γ1, ERK, and Itk protein. Immunity 2004 21, 67-80DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2004.06.009)