Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Liam M. Longo, Ozan S. Kumru, C. Russell Middaugh, Michael Blaber 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Structure and Signaling Mechanism of Per-ARNT-Sim Domains
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (March 2010)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Crystal Structures of Oligomeric Forms of the IP-10/CXCL10 Chemokine
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Naomi Courtemanche, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Probing the “Dark Matter” of Protein Fold Space
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of the Secretin GspD from ETEC Determined with the Assistance of a Nanobody  Konstantin V. Korotkov, Els Pardon,
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
The first step in sugar transport: crystal structure of the amino terminal domain of enzyme I of the E. coli PEP: sugar phosphotransferase system and.
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
A YidC-like Protein in the Archaeal Plasma Membrane
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Structural Analysis of Sensor Domains from the TMAO-Responsive Histidine Kinase Receptor TorS  Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure  Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 1195-1204 (September 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure-Based Sequence Alignments (A) The sequences of ecTorSS and vpTorSS are aligned and numbered accordingly. Secondary structure elements are symbolized and labeled above and below the respective sequences, where residues present in the crystallized protein but not ordered in the crystal structure are indicated by red dots. TorSS sequences from Salmonella typhimurium (st), Photobacterium profundum (pp), and Shewanella oneidensis (so) are also aligned. Conserved residues are shown in red, structurally aligned regions where at least three contiguous Cα positions of ecTorSS are within 3.0 Å of vpTorSS are shaded green, and residues predicted to form the transmembrane helices (TM1 and TM2) by TMHMM (Krogh et al., 2001) are shaded blue. (B) The sequences of ecTorSS, Escherichia coli (ec) NarX, and Salmonella typhimurium (st) Tar are aligned and numbered accordingly. Secondary structure elements are labeled above the sequences and are the same color as the protein labels. The green shaded regions are where at least three contiguous Cα positions of ecTorSS are within 3.0 Å of stTar or ecNarX, respectively. The gap in structural alignment that results from the presence of the distal domain is indicated by three asterisks in the ecTorSS sequence and secondary structure label, as well as the label 268 to connote the re-entrant sequence number. Structure 2009 17, 1195-1204DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of ecTorSS and vpTorSS (A) A stereo plot of the Cα trace of ecTorSS. Every tenth Cα atom modulo 10 is depicted as a black sphere and labeled accordingly. (B) Ribbon diagrams of ecTorSS with the six helices, α1–α6, colored in spectral order from purple to red. (C) Ribbon diagrams of vpTorSS with the six helices, α1–α6, colored as in (B). Drawings for B and C were made using Pymol (DeLano, 2002). (D) Topology diagram of TorSS. The six helices of TorSS are depicted in a flattened out schematic to show the arrangement of the helices in the two four-helix bundles. Coloring is as in B and C. Structure 2009 17, 1195-1204DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structural Elements of TorSS (A) Ribbon diagram of helices α3 and α6 of vpTorSS looking down toward the membrane (left) and along the long axis of the coiled coil (right). Notice the supercoiling of ∼180° over ∼15 helical turns. (B) Ribbon diagram of the distal domain of vpTorSS viewed down the long axis of its four-helix bundle, toward the membrane. (C) Ribbon diagram of the proximal domain of vpTorSS viewed down the long axis of its four-helix bundle, toward the membrane. (D) A topology diagram showing the arrangement of helices within the four-helix bundles. The distal domain is on the left and the proximal domain is on the right. The circular arrows connote the handedness of each bundle, with the distal domain in a left-handed topology and the proximal domain in a right-handed topology. The crossed connections helices of α3 and α6 between the two domains reflect the coiled-coil motif. Coloring throughout is as in Figure 2B. Structure 2009 17, 1195-1204DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Superposition of Helices α1 and α2 in TorSS and NarX (A) A stereo plot of the Cα trace of helices α1 and α2 of vpTorSS (red) superimposed on helices α1 and α2 of ecTorSS (blue). Every tenth Cα atom of ecTorSS modulo 10 and its Cα counterpart from vpTorSS from the structure-based sequence alignment (Figure 1A) is depicted as a sphere and labeled accordingly at the Cα atoms of ecTorSS. In helices α3 and α6, the partnered Cα atoms are indicated using dotted lines. (B) A stereo plot of the Cα trace of helices α1 and α2 of nitrate-bound NarX superimposed on helices α1 and α2 of apo NarX. Every tenth Cα atom is depicted as a sphere and labeled accordingly. Structure 2009 17, 1195-1204DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Equilibrium Centrifugation Analysis of TorSS Oligomerization (A) The dots below represent measured absorbances (280 nm) for ecTorSS taken at 8,000 (red), 11,000 (blue), and 15,000 (green) rpm. The best-fit curves (continuous lines) for the reversible equilibrium model of ecTorSS in a monomer-dimer equilibrium with Kd = 49.6 μM are superimposed. The distribution of residuals for a least-squares fit to the models are shown above the plots. (B) The dots below represent measured absorbances (280 nm) for vpTorSS taken at 8,000 (red), 11,000 (blue), and 15,000 (green) rpm. The best-fit curves (continuous lines) for the reversible equilibrium model of vpTorSS in a monomer-dimer equilibrium with Kd = 282 μM are superimposed. The distribution of residuals for a least-squares fit to the models are shown above the plots. Structure 2009 17, 1195-1204DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dimer Models of the Tar, NarX, and TorS Sensor Domains (A) Ribbon diagram of Tar in complex with aspartate (Protein Data Bank [PDB] code 1VLT). (B) Ribbon diagram of a constructed ecTorSS dimer. The orientation of the protomers was generated by superimposing an ecTorSS molecule on each protomer in the Tar dimer. The transmembrane helices are from the HtrII transducer structure in complex with sensory rhodopsin II (Gordeliy et al., 2002), which is connected to the N and C termini of ecTorSS by helices of 11 and 8 residues, respectively, as dictated by the locations of predicted transmembrane helices TM1 and TM2 (Figure 1). (C) Ribbon diagram of a constructed vpTorSS dimer. The orientation of the protomers was generated by superimposing a vpTorSS molecule on each protomer in the Tar dimer. The transmembrane helices are again from the HtrII transducer for sensory rhodopsin. The N and C termini of ecTorSS are connected to predicted TM1 and TM2 by helical extensions of 11 residues each. (D) Ribbon diagram of NarX in complex with nitrate (PDB code EZH). Structure 2009 17, 1195-1204DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.07.015) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions