Spencer County Public Schools

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
South Carolina Succeeds
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
Academic Year – Dawson Springs Independent.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Communication Webinar:
Legislative Requirement 2013
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
PA School Performance Profile
Volusia County Schools
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
Release of PARCC Student Results
Stephen L. Pruitt, Ph.D. Commissioner of Education
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Kentucky’s New Accountability Model
Accountability Update
Next Generation Learners
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
H S Graduation Requirements
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Driving Through the California Dashboard
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Accountability Presentation
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Spencer County Public Schools 2017-2018 Data Release Spencer County Public Schools October 4th, 2018 Going the distance for all Students!!

Agenda 2017-2018 KY Testing System at a Glance Spencer County School Data SBDM Round Table Discussions (10-15 min. each) Group Discussion around Section VII Requests Final Questions

Learning Targets: I can give a general overview of the Kentucky state accountability process. I can identify the strengths and areas of growth for each school in the district. I can discuss and understand the process that each school will implement for continuous improvement. I will have an understanding of what we as a board can do to support the schools as they look to improve in specific areas.

Transition Period 2017-2018 transition period continues CSI/TSI/Other (not CSI/TSI) must be reported 5-Star Rating System not in use 2018-2019 school year The 5-Star Rating System will be in place Proficiency Separate Academic Indicator Growth Graduation Rate Transition Readiness Achievement Gap Closure Note: The Opportunity and Access Indicator is expected to be included in school accountability in 2019-20.

2017-2018 Changes Elementary and middle school science results based on scores on a new science assessment aligned with the Kentucky Academic Standards in Science, thus science scores cannot be compared to prior years High school results in reading, mathematics and science are based on student scores on the junior year administration of the ACT. New End-of-Course exams in Algebra II, English II and Biology were field tested so scores are not valid for accountability. New social studies standards are under development, so there was no social studies testing at the high school level.

2017-2018 Changes (cont.) High school Transition Readiness includes expanded measures and replaces college and career-readiness. Neither dual credit nor exceptional work experience will count toward high school readiness until 2018-2019. Progress toward English proficiency for English learners (ELs) is used for determining school classifications for the first time. At elementary/middle it is part of Growth indicator. At high, part of transition readiness. Accountability comparisons with previous years are not valid. Accountability comparisons can be made at the indicator level for 2017-2018. KDE is developing a new online School Report Card that will go online with accountability, assessment and other data later this year.

Comprehensive and Targeted Support Schools Schools will receive an identification of CSI, TSI or Other Ability to exit CSI or TSI status will occur annually Continued services will be offered Services will be offered to schools/districts with very low performance (CSI).

CSI/TSI Components 2017-2018 Proficiency Reading and Math are equally weighted Schools rated on performance levels (N=0, A=.5, P=1, D=1.25) Student performance aggregated to School, District and State levels. Separate Academic Indicator Elementary and Middle School Science, Social Studies and Writing Growth Reading and Math Reading includes English Learners movement to language proficiency Transition Readiness High School Earn a diploma All students meet Academic or Career Readiness English Learners’ attainment of English language proficiency Graduation Rate (Cohort) 4-year rate used for graduation rate goal 5-year rate used at high school reported

Accountability Cutscores Sch. Level Indicators Recommended Threshold Cutscores   Proficiency 60.5 Elem. Separate Academic 52.6 Growth 15.8 62 Middle 55 9.5 40 High Transition Readiness 41 Graduation Rate 85

Proficiency Student performance on state tests in reading and mathematics Achievement status will be Novice (N), Apprentice (A), Proficient (P), and Distinguished (D) Indicator scores are generated by a weighted average with the values N=0, A=.5, P=1 and D=1.25

Separate Academic Indicator Student performance on state tests in science, social studies and writing Achievement status will be Novice (N), Apprentice (A), Proficient (P), and Distinguished (D) Indicator scores are generated by a weighted average with the values N=0, A=.5, P=1 and D=1.25 All tested content areas science, social studies and writing contribute equally to the indicator

Growth Indicator Student’s continuous improvement toward the goal of proficiency Growth is measured at elementary and middle school levels in reading and mathematics using the K-PREP English Learner (EL) progress on Language Proficiency will be evaluated using the ACCESS for ELLs exam and included in the reading calculation Each student’s growth is projected into the future and evaluated as to whether the student is “less than catch up,” “catching up,” “keeping up,” or “moving up”

Growth Value Table Projected ► Novice Low High Apprentice Proficient 2 Year Performance Path Projected ► Novice Low High Apprentice Proficient Distinguished Current ▼ -1.50 (L) -1.25 (L) -1.00 (L) -0.75 (L) 0.00 (K) 0.25 (K) -0.50 (L) -0.25 (L) 0.50 (M) Apprentice High 0 (L) 0.25 (C) 0.75 (M) Apprentice Low 0.25 (L) 0.50 (C) 1.00 (M) Novice High 0.75 (C) 1.25 (M) Novice Low 1.00 (C) 1.50 (M) The Growth Value Table assigns points per student based current year performance coupled with that student’s prior year performance and other students’ similar performance through the years. This is a projection for where the data says that this student will be performing in two (2) years without intervention. L= Less Than Catch Up C = Catch Up K = Keep Up M = Move Up Novice and Apprentice categories have been subdivided into Low and High

Mathematics Growth Measure: Points are assigned from the Growth Value Table from the assessment for academic proficiency (K-PREP) Reading Growth Measure: Points from the Growth Value Table from the assessment for academic proficiency (K-PREP). Points from the English Learner (EL) Growth Table based on the current composite score from the Language Proficiency assessment (ACCESS 2.0).

English Learners (EL) Language Proficiency Table WIDA ACCESS score previous year WIDA ACCESS score current year ► ▼ 1 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 -1.5 -1.25 -1.0 -.75 -.50 -.25 .25 .50 .75 1.0 1.25 WIDA ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 is the current Language Proficiency assessment used by Kentucky. A composite score of 4.5 allows a student to exit from EL services.

Graduation Rate (Cohort) The graduation rate is the percentage of students completing the requirements for a Kentucky high school diploma compared to a cohort of students beginning at grade 9 Graduation rate calculations are based on the students’ final enrollment The Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate is defined as the number of students who graduate in four or five years with a regular high school diploma divided by the number of students who entered high school four or five years earlier adjusting for transfers in and out, émigrés and deceased students. Compute the 4-year rate by using the numbers for 4 years and do the same for the 5 year rate.

Transition Readiness Transition Readiness is the attainment of the necessary knowledge, skills and dispositions for a student to successfully transition to the next level of his or her educational career. For 2017-18, Transition Readiness will be used to identify schools for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI), Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI), and Other at the high school only.  

High School Students at the high school level must earn a high school diploma and meet one type of readiness (Academic or Career). In addition, students who have received English Language services during high school must meet criteria for English language proficiency.

Academic Readiness (2017-18) Benchmarks, determined by Council on Postsecondary Education (CPE) on a college admissions exam; OR A score of 3+ on exams in 2 or more Advanced Placement courses; OR A score of 5+ on 2 exams for International Baccalaureate courses; OR Benchmarks on 2 or more Cambridge Advanced International examinations; OR Completing a combination of academic readiness indicators above. Demonstration of academic readiness shall include one quantitative reasoning or natural sciences, and one written or oral communication, arts and humanities, or social and behavioral sciences learning outcomes.

Career Readiness (2017-18) Benchmarks on Industry Certifications (Approved by the Kentucky Workforce Innovation Board (KWIB) on an annual basis); OR  Scoring at or above the benchmark on the Career and Technical Education (CTE) End-of-Program Assessment for articulated credit; OR  Completing a KDE/Labor Cabinet-approved apprenticeship;

Questions? PROCESS QUESTIONS?

Spencer County Elementary Percent P/D Content 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 State % Reading (3rd-5th) 66.0 63.7 67.0 65.8 73.2 54.6 Math (3rd-5th) 63.2 63.9 68.2 63.8 68.3 48.8 Science (4th) * 82.6 NA 35.1 30.8 Lang. Mech. (4th) 53.5 60.0 66.2 Social St. (5th) 62.9 68.5 75.3 72.3 53.0 Writing (5th) 46.5 54.5 60.1 57.2 58.9 40.5 * Completely different test and format used in 13-14. No comparisons can be made between these two assessments.

Taylorsville Elementary Percent P/D Content 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 State % Reading (3rd-5th) 47.9 45.9 53.7 47.3 54.0 54.6 Math (3rd-5th) 36.2 53.2 46.9 58.9 48.8 Science (4th) * 79.2 NA 21.7 30.8 Lang. Mech. (4th) 48.6 36.7 58.6 63.6 Social St. (5th) 55.1 49.3 46.2 51.7 53.3 53.0 Writing (5th) 35.9 43.5 43.1 46.6 36.4 40.5 * Completely different test and format used in 13-14. No comparisons can be made between these two assessments.

Spencer County Middle School Percent P/D Content 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 State % Reading (6th-8th) 58.8 67.5 68.0 70.3 71.1 60.0 Math (6th-8th) 50.3 54.1 61.9 61.7 56.6 47.0 Science (7th) * 74.8 NA 32.8 25.9 Lang. Mech. (6th) 40.3 53.6 51.6 55.2 Social St. (8th) 64.0 67.4 74.4 75.1 68.9 60.2 Writing (8th) ** 37.8 ** 40.2 ** 48.9 37.8 54.7 44.3 * Completely different test and format used in 13-14. No comparisons can be made between these two assessments. ** 6th grade also took the writing component in these years.

Spencer County High School Percent P/D Content 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 State % Writing – 11th **36.3 **44.3 **36.7 64.0 51.5 51.8 Lang. Mech. - 10th 54.8 52.7 53.1 NA Reading 61.2 53.6 57.0 64.7 * 62.6 45.4 Math 33.9 35.0 28.6 28.8 * 40.9 37.5 Social St. 52.5 46.2 55.1 55.2 Science 39.7 31.4 20.1 36.6 * 33.3 29.6 * 17-18 data comes directly from the ACT and not the EOC’s as in previous years. Therefore, it can’t be compared. Previous years data provided for information purposes only. ** 10th grade writing data included during these years

School Classification: School Name CSI/ TSI/ Other CSI/TSI Reason Proficiency Indicator Separate Academic Indicator Growth Indicator Spencer County Elementary Other NA 89.7 70.5 77.1 64.8 16.3 17.1 Taylorsville Elementary 77.0 65.4 15.7 Spencer County Middle School 83.2 72.8 75.9 66.8 13.9 12.1 Proficiency Indicator Transition Readiness Graduation Rate Spencer County High School TSI Disability Group (Scores in Parenthesis) (32.3) 59.3 (20.7) 60.9 99.1 (84.3) 90.8 Numbers in red represent the state average for each component

Strengths: Significant increases in reading and math at both elementary schools Proficiency indicator well above state average in all schools SCES 60/722 (8.3%) SCMS 59/320 (18.4%) SCHS 37/228 (16.2%) Above state averages in many of the content areas at all schools Four year graduation rate is 10/230 high schools (4.3%) SCHS ACT composite score is 41/228 (17.9%) District ACT score is 22nd out of 168 school districts (13%)

Areas for Growth: Writing Science Although there was improvement in math overall we realize there is a need to continue to focus on this content area Individual student growth especially at the elementary schools Individual demographic groups especially disability at the HS. Readiness

Overall Accountability Rating On future report cards each school will be assigned an Overall Rating of one to five stars, based on strengths of performance on school- level measures and indicators: Proficiency Separate Academic Indicator, Growth, Transition Readiness, Graduation Rate, Achievement Gap Closure Opportunity and Access

Questions? DATA QUESTIONS?