Metadata Updates (for S / 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can I Use It, and If so, How? Christian Lieske SAP AG – MultiLingual Technology Discussion of Consortium Proposal for OLIF2 File Header.
Advertisements

AIS AIM SG Ad-hoc Chapters 5-6 Group TOKYO MEETING REPORT.
26 May 2004IVOA Interoperability Meeting - Boston1 IVOA Registry Working Group VOResource v1.0 Ray Plante.
WMO Core Profile of the ISO Metadata Standard Steve Foreman Chair IPET-Metadata Implementation.
FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.
Overview of key concepts and features
1 ISO – Metadata Next Generation International consensus being built on structured metadata within a broader Geomatics Standard under ISO Technical.
Geospatial standards Beyond FGDC Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 3, 2006.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
Evolution of Metadata Standards: New Features in ISO Ted Habermann NOAA National Data Centers December, 2007
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
© 2010 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved CPE Prefix Property MythBusters* CPE Core Team Technical Working Group (TWG) 05/11/2010 * This presentation.
AIXM 5.1 Seminar 12 – 13 December 2011
Cover Environment and Natural Resources Service Sustainable Development Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Geographic Metadata North American Profile Development for ISO Geographic Metadata.
SAML Right Here, Right Now Hal Lockhart September 25, 2012.
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Sept 19,  Provides a common set of terminology and definitions  A framework for describing resources and processes  Enables computer based interoperability.
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
DCAT- Last call comments. Editorials & Clarifications From: Aaron Couch Issue: List all properties in ToC and two typos
SAML 2.1 Building on Success. Outline n Summary of SAML 2.0 n Work done since 2.0 n Objectives of SAML 2.1 n Proposed Task List n Undecided Issues n Invitation.
® Hosted and Sponsored by OGC Met/Ocean DWG Best Practices for WMS 1.3 (DRAFT) 80th OGC Technical Committee Austin, Texas (USA) Jeff de La Beaujardière,
Advanced ISO Topics ISO for Data Documentation. Contents Content Updates – gmx:Anchor for text – Codelists NCEI Component Registry – Resolved Records.
Frank Farance, Farance Inc
AIXM 5 Metadata. Requirements for AIXM Metadata AIXM Metadata Model Examples Requirements for AIXM Metadata AIXM Metadata Model Examples.
Introduction to metadata
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata
Comparison of CEN, FGDC and ISO standards for metadata Ing. Jan Ruzicka Institute of Economics and Control Systems VŠB – Technical university Ostrava 17.
Sneak Preview: Sneak Preview: The New US Geospatial Metadata Standard GeoMaxim Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Lynda Wayne, GISP Sharon Shin.
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
KMIP Support for PGP Things to take out Things to put in.
UML Basics and XML Basics Navigating the ISO Standards.
Metadata Content Entering Metadata Information. Discovery vs. Access vs. Understanding Cannot search on content if it is not documented. Cannot access.
ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 Introducing ArcCatalog: Tools for Metadata and Data Management.
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
Forecast Model Run Collections and ISO Ted Habermann There has been considerable discussion of describing multiple times in forecast datasets This is not.
Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata Mandatory Legend Identification Information Data Quality Information Spatial Data Organization Information.
MNCS: DMA Extensions for Multinational Character Strings DMA Technical Committee Integration Subcommittee June 16, 1999 [ notes]
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
North American Profile Briefing FGDC Coordination Group May 1, 2007 Sharon Shin, FGDC Metadata Coordinator.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. DMTF and Cisco Profile overview/comparison August 17, 2005.
HMA-T Progress Meeting 26 November 2008 Slide 1 IMAA-CNR activity report HMA-T Progress Meeting 26 November 2008 S. Nativi, E. Boldrini, F. Papeschi IMAA-CNR.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
AIS AIM SG Ad-hoc Chapters 5-6 Group
Laboratory on Geoinformatics and Cartography
Julia Powell Coast Survey Development Laboratory
Verstat Related Best Practices
SDMX Information Model
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
Geospatial Metadata, Standards and Infrastructure
Updating GML datasets S-100 WG TSM September 2017
Interoperability Specifiation
Raphael Malyankar; Eivind Mong
MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Capturing metadata: Implementation of MSFD art – via a metadata catalogue.
Maritime Resource Names (MRN) concept S-100 WG TSM September 2017
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
S-127 – Marine Traffic Management Release Candidate NIPWG 6 30 January 2019 Raphael Malyankar Eivind Mong Sponsored by IHO.
WebDAV Design Overview
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
Web-based Imaging Management System Working Group - WIMS
YANG Instance Data for Documenting Server Capabilities
draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-06
Submission Title: TG9ma Opening Report for July Meeting
GIS Guidance for WISE supporting reporting and application of data
Submission Title: TG9ma Opening Report for September Meeting
Chapter 5.2 GIS Layers John Cima.
Submission Title: TG9ma Opening Report for September Meeting
Chapter 5.5 Metadata John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

Metadata Updates (for S-100 3. 1+ / 4 Metadata Updates (for S-100 3.1+ / 4.0) S-100 WG TSM5 19-21 September 2017 Raphael Malyankar, Consultant, Portolan Sciences Eivind Mong, Consultant Work performed under NOAA sponsorship

Overview Implementation of proposals accepted at S-100 WG2 Changes arising from S-104, S-111, S-122, S-123 experiences New metadata elements arising from NPUB product specification development Make vertical and sounding datums optional Updates arising from new editions of ISO 19115: ISO 19115-1:2014 & 19115-3:2015 ISO 19115-1 and 19115-3 replace ISO 19115 & 19139 Terms, metadata element names, metadata classes Metadata for services The proposals accepted at S-100 WG2 are described in the SPAWAR proposals for the WG2 meeting and the S-100 WG2 minutes.

Figure 4a-D-4 updated ‘interoperabilityCatalogue’ has been added to S100_CatalogueScope (see next slide) but otherwise this diagram is just the accepted changes

New proposed experience-based changes Add XML to S100_DataFormat in Part 4a and Part 12 for interoperability. Make vertical datum and sounding datum optional. Add elements describing the metadata discovery resource. Add a literal describing interoperability catalogue information to S100_CatalogueScope in order to describe interoperability catalogues. Literals for the new enumerations agreed at S100WG2 need to be determined. Redundant attribute digitalSignature in S100_DatasetDiscoveryMetadata should be removed and a “none” or “unsigned” literal added to S100_DigitalSignature; if digitalSignature is retained, its type should be Boolean. Mandatory digital signature for catalogues in table (in text) should become optional like Figure 4a-D-4. List of compression algorithms started for S100_exchangeCatalogue.algorithmMethod. 1) S100 WG2 accepted a proposal to remove “other” from S100_DataFormat. That leaves nothing to describe interoperability information which is not in GML, HDF5, or ISO 8211 format. 2) Some data products e.g., S-122 (Marine protected areas), S-123 (Marine radio services), S-412 (Weather overlay), etc., do not have depth, elevation or height thematic attributes and therefore vertical datum and sounding datum are not relevant to those datasets. 3) Deriving from S-122: MetadataFileIdentifier and the other elements proposed to be added describe the metadata resource itself. The names, types and multiplicities are: metadataFileIdentifier 1 CharacterString metadataPointOfContact 1 CI_ResponsibleParty metadataDateStamp 1 Date metadataLanguage 1..* CharacterString 4) A new literal in S100_CatalogueScope is needed for interoperability catalogues. Proposed literal: interoperabilityCatalogue Definition: “S-100 interoperability information” 5) New enumerations S100_DigitalSignature, S100_ProtectionScheme were agreed at S100WG2, literals TBD. 6) S100_DatasetDiscoveryMetadata attributes digitalSignature, digitalSignatureValue: Redundancy and/or improper type. Both are character strings. In fact the presence of the co-attribute digitalSignatureReference can be used to determine whether the dataset is signed: If it is absent the dataset is not signed, if it is present, the dataset is signed. digitalSignature should be deleted. If retained, it should be a Boolean. 7) Catalogue signatures need not always be mandatory. 8) S100_exchangeCatalogue.algorithmMethod: Agreed in principle at S100WG2 to make this an enumeration, list of algorithms is requested.

Changes related to new version of ISO 19115

ISO 19115 changes 4a 2.2 Note about backwards compatibility various Part No. Section No. Proposal Summary 4a 2.2 Note about backwards compatibility various Miscellaneous changes to terminology and/or semantics of metadata elements or attributes: fileIdentifier -> metadataIdentifier hierarchyLevel -> resourceType core metadata -> recommended metadata etc., etc. PT_Locale used for localisation, grouping language and characterset attributes Updated types for information about organizations and individuals; this is used for citation of responsible parties and contact information 5.4 various changes minimum metadata requirements 5.5 miscellaneous changes to recommended metadata for geographic datasets 5.6.5 Minor changes to specification of extensions 5.7 New section on metadata for service discovery App. 4a-A 4a-A-2 New diagram for service metadata classes App. 4a-D Figure 4a-D-4 Updated to reflect use of defaultLocale and otherLocale (type PT_Locale) for localisation of information Figure 4a-D-5 New table for service identification metadata

Examples of terminology update effects Table 4a-1 Minimum metadata for geographic datasets Name Path Datasets Other resources Metadata file identifier MD_Metadata.metadataIdentifier > MD_Identifier.code M Metadata language MD_Metadata.defaultLocale > PT_Locale.language C ( documented if not defined by the encoding process) C (same as for dataset) Metadata character set MD_Metadata.defaultLocale > PT_Locale.characterEncoding C (documented if ISO 10646-1, is not used and not defined by the encoding process) Metadata file parent identifier MD_Metadata.parentMetadata > CI_Citation.identifier C (documented if the hierarchy of a higher level exists) Party responsible for the metadata information   MD_Metadata.contact > CI_Responsibility.CI_Individual (table 4a-2) or MD_Metadata.contact > CI_Responsibility.CI_Organization (table 4a-3) (either organization or individual must be documented) (same as for dataset) Date(s) associated with the metadata MD_Metadata.dateInfo > CI_Date (creation date required, other dates may be provided) Resource default language MD_Metadata.identificationInfo > MD_DataIdentification.defaultLocale > PT_Locale.language M C (only used if MD_DataIdentification has been used) Resource default character set MD_Metadata.identificationInfo > MD_DataIdentification.defaultLocale > PT_Local.characterEncoding C (documented if UTF-8 is not used) Name of the scope/type of resource for which the metadata is provided MD_Metadata.metadataScope > MD_MetadataScope.resourceScope > MD_ScopeCode (codelist – ISO 19115-1) M (default = “dataset”) Description of scope of resource for which the metadata is provided MD_Metadata.metadataScope > MD_MetadataScope.name O

New service metadata class in relation to ISO classes

Re-drawn Figure 4a-D-4 showing relationships

Proposed discovery metadata for services ‘Service discovery metadata’ is analogous to the current discovery metadata, but for services