CMS Week Muon Alignment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Lee CMS EMU Alignment: 28 Feb, COCOA Simulation and Study of the EMU Alignment System Robert Lee CMS Endcap Alignment Muon EDR 28 February 2002.
Advertisements

Skeleton: Hardware Alignment for EMU meeting James N Bellinger 15-Mar-2009.
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Muon Alignment EDR: FEB. 28, Endcap Alignment EMU Alignment DAQ Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002 Outline: 1.Components to.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, Endcap Alignment Dick Loveless DOE/NSF Review 9 May 2001.
CLEO’s User Centric Data Access System Christopher D. Jones Cornell University.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison CMS Week June 2010 Coordination: Things to do Coordination: James N. Bellinger CMS week 2010.
1.Check Laser track of B=0 run and exclude some tracks in order to get precise GGV eff, which in turn is used when extract T1, T2 value by pos-B and neg-B.
Goal : Setup and monitor “chambers” with resolution of  < 200  m Demonstrate System Redundancy Test Setup : 1 SLM Line (2 Laser Redundancy) 1 Transfer.
First Reconstruction Results on the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment at CERN S. Guragain, G. Baksay, M. Hohlmann Florida Tech 74.
Hand Crosscheck HSLM1. Position of REF DCOPS CENTER MAB Target DM distance DMdowel to DCOPS dowel DCOPS dowel to center.
Alignment Software from the ME perspective Marcus Hohlmann Florida Tech Muon Alignment meeting during CMS week - CERN, March 15, 2005.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 27-November-2009 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 27-November-2009.
3rd December 2003James Loken – Oxford University1 SCT X-ray Alignment Software A First Update.
Kaori Maeshima (FNAL), Alignment Workshop at CERN: May 17-18, Endcap Alignment Status of Offline Software Alignment CERN 17, 18 May 2001.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Chamber Alignment Pins Δy = y PG – y nom. vs. Δx = x PG – x nom. M. Hohlmann 1, G. Baksay 1, S. Guragain 1, J. Bellinger 2, D. Carlsmith 2, F. Feyzi 2,
Alignment Meeting, CERN, Sept 19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 2-February-2011 Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment James N. Bellinger 2-February-2011.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 13 February 2008 Cocoa Plans.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 13-August-2010 Endcap Processing Notes James N. Bellinger 13-Aug-2010.
EMU Meeting, CERN, Sept 18-19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field up.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 15-March-2009 Hardware Alignment.
1 James N. Bellinger Robert Handler University of Wisconsin-Madison 11-Monday-2009 Laser fan non-linearity James N. Bellinger 20-March-2009.
1 James N. Bellinger 26-Feb-2008 DCOPS DAQ Control Main DAQ Runs on Linux Data directly to Oracle Controlled via DIM Errors presented via DIM PVSS component.
Status of physics analysis Fabrizio Cei On Behalf of the Physics Analysis Group PSI BVR presentation, February 9, /02/2015Fabrizio Cei1.
Unit 3 Lesson 2 Moon Phases and Eclipses. Round and Round They Go! How are Earth, the moon, and the sun related in space? Earth spins on its axis and.
1 James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin-Madison 19-Feb-2010 Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction James N. Bellinger 19-February-2010.
James Bellinger, December CMS Week Muon Alignment James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 5-December-2006 DCOPS Data from MTCC2.
University of Wisconsin at Madison
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Topics Introduction to Repetition Structures
EMU Alignment DAQ Endcap Alignment Muon Alignment EDR Feb. 28, 2002
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
Topics Introduction to Repetition Structures
The Sun-Earth-Moon System
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status and Plans for Endcap Hardware Alignment
Transfer Line and CSC Rφ Reconstruction
Plus Endcap Transfer Lines
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
DCOPS Readout before and during MTCC
DCOPS Monitoring of Iron Bending
Optimizing Endcap Navigation
University of Wisconsin at Madison
James N. Bellinger 1-November-2007
University of Wisconsin-Madison
DCOPS Data Quality Studies
Validating Transfer Line Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Comparing Laser Fit to Barrel Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of Transfer Line Reconstruction University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Topics Introduction to Repetition Structures
University of Wisconsin at Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Status of the η/η’ run (April 2009)
Presentation transcript:

CMS Week Muon Alignment James N. Bellinger University of Wisconsin at Madison 5-December-2006 DCOPS Data from MTCC2

CMS Week Muon Alignment General notes With a better understanding of disk deformation and more time available we were able to align the lasers better for MTCC2. Although disk deformation results in a laser position change larger than the DCOPS aperture, COCOA can use lasers from opposite sides to reconstruct positions.

CMS Week Muon Alignment Review of the structure of single SLM A typical SLM has 10 DCOPS along its line, with a crosshair laser pointing into the line from each end. This line is not perfectly radial. Each DCOPS has 4 CCDs arranged in a square. CCD numbers 1 and 3 measure something like “Rphi” and 2 and 4 measure “CMS Z.”

CMS Week Muon Alignment What happens when the field is on The center of the disk is pulled inward and the rim of the disk pushed outward. This tilts the lasers backwards, so that the beam is redirected about 2 mrad inward towards the solenoid. For the DCOPS near the laser, the pull of the disk inward approximately compensates for the laser tilt, and we don’t see large deflections in Z. We see a large effect in DCOPS far from the laser.

CMS Week Muon Alignment When the field is on Because the laser lines don’t go through the center of the disk, the laser tilt causes deflections in the “Rphi” as well as the “Z” measurements, so both are required to reconstruct the true rphi and z. Because the DCOPS are now in new locations with respect to each other and the laser, the CCD for one can shadow a downstream CCD and reduce the signal it sees.

CMS Week Muon Alignment Field Off data: laser positions in 2 CCDs in DCOPS along an SLM 9 CCD3 Rphi 5 Laser Background of glare from laser 10 9 8 7 6 The laser position does not change much from position 1 to 5, but once past the midpoint it quickly goes offscale in Z. The “Rphi” variation is well contained. CCD4 Z 5 4 3 2 1 Laser This reflection is unique: rarely a problem

CMS Week Muon Alignment Data Quality observations The double peak is a unique local reflection. The DCOPS next to the laser sees a substantial background due to glare. Some CCDs show a reasonable profile but have low signal strength (CCD 3 set, #9). Some show no signal (CCD 3 set, #5). Most profiles are perfectly useable.

CMS Week Muon Alignment Field On Same SLM as before The changes in “Z” are easy to see, and there are changes in “Rphi” also. CCD3 Rphi Saturation Position offscale in other direction 6 CCD4 Z

CMS Week Muon Alignment Deviations in Rphi Beam off – Beam on “Rphi” position in mm ME+2/SLM1 The trend of the deviations is consistent with the tilting of the laser. Relative position along the SLM in mm CCD has bad signal. Fit should have failed.

CMS Week Muon Alignment Field Off Laser CCD3 RPhi This is the same SLM as before, but with the laser at the opposite end. The profiles are generally clean, and COCOA will be able to link together the measurements. 9 8 7 6 10 CCD4 Z Laser 5 4 3 2 1

CMS Week Muon Alignment Field On 9 8 7 6 10 Laser CCD3 RPhi Same SLM as before. There appears to be some shadowing in CCD3 data, but the peaks are still detectable. 3 1 5 4 2 CCD4 Z Laser

CMS Week Muon Alignment As you can see here the fit result is decent even when the profile has some saturation, as in CCD3 (lower left plot). I restrict the fit to a range around the peak. This is the DCOPS I numbered ’10’ in the previous sets of plots.

CMS Week Muon Alignment This shows the Z-position of the laser peak as a function of field for 4 different Layer 2 chambers at ME+1. The overall deflection is O(.5mm): small because the disk bending and laser deflection are in the same direction.

CMS Week Muon Alignment COCOA reconstruction of CSC center positions, from Gyongyi Baksay at FIT CMS Z position of the CSC center In mm, arbitrary origin Position along the SLM in mm

CMS Week Muon Alignment CMS RPhi position of CSC Center In mm, arbitrary origin COCOA reconstruction of CSC center positions, from Gyongyi Baksay at FIT The error bars are smaller than the symbols. Position along SLM in mm

CMS Week Muon Alignment Running Experience At irregular intervals a random terminal server port would lose connection with the DCOPS, and remain offline until the power was cycled at the LV crate. (This required a reboot of the analog system, as we belatedly discovered). 3 times during the month a telnet access to a terminal server port wedged, and ran in an infinite loop. We did not recover any instances of data corruption.

CMS Week Muon Alignment http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~jnb/cms/data/index.html The majority of the DCOPS data is available online in text form via the address above. It includes the fit information and the raw profiles.

CMS Week Muon Alignment Near-term Plans Finish rewriting the core of the DAQ to get better speed. It isn’t complete, but I estimate that a full readout cycle will take less than 15 minutes. It addresses the hung port problem. Integrate the DAQ into the DCS/PVSS system. I think I can use DIM protocols, but need advice. Finish the code to retrieve and assemble DCOPS data from the database.

CMS Week Muon Alignment Old Readout Scheme A bash script looped over the laser lines and submitted scripts which would telnet to the port for each DCOPS, issue the commands, and read back the raw profile. Another short program fit the profiles, if possible, and another shell script accumulated the resulting fit information and committed it to the omds database. Since this was sequential, the time required to complete a cycle for the +side was over an hour and a half, and a hanging process could stall the readout.

CMS Week Muon Alignment New Readout Scheme A C++ program loops over the SLM Lines, forking a job to manage each Line and fork off subtasks to read out particular ports. The lowest level forked task is still a telnet invocation. I estimate that this part of the readout will take 9 minutes for all the SLMs, not just the +side ones. When the SLM jobs have completed or timed out, the Transfer Lines will be read. Then the profiles will be fit, data committed to the database, and the DIM service updated with the new results.