Driverless Car Summit 2012 Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) Richard Bishop, Automotive Lead.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ben Pierce, Battelle March 2, 2010 US DOT IntelliDrive SM Program.
Advertisements

Strengthening Military Families: Opportunities for Commanders.
1 Mobility Management 17 th Annual Transportation Training and Technology Conference Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged August 18.
“Technological opportunities to improve efficiency and safety on the roads” Geneva,27 June 2013 Roberto ARDITI, SINA Joint ITU/UNECE Workshop on “Intelligent.
58 th Traffic Safety Conference Romell Cooks Regional Administrator Central Region May 10,
Connected/Automated Vehicles: Issues for Transportation Research Daniel S. Turner TRB Technical Activities Council Chair.
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
1 Challenge the future The Dutch Automated Vehicle Initiative: Challenges for automated driving Dr. R.(Raymond) G. Hoogendoorn Assistant Professor Delft.
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty Chief of Strategic Planning, California DMV.
To delegate or not to delegate: A human factors perspective of autonomous driving Dale Richards, Coventry University Presentation to: European Conference.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Transportation Working Group ITS Experts Group Chicago, Illinois September 2002 Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
Joint Actions Update Development of Clean Air Council 2015 – 2017 Priorities, Declaration & Workplan.
Autonomous Vehicles in California Stephanie Dougherty California DMV
ITFVHA 2013: rough notes. Two Most Significant Developments of Past Year? 1.automaker announcements of commercial availability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.automakers.
1 Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D.Ching-Yao Chan, Ph.D.
Autonomous Vehicles in California Bernard Soriano and Stephanie Dougherty.
Legal issues addressed in the EU funded AdaptIVe project
Definition for Levels of Automation
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
Advancing Safety Through Innovation University Transportation Centers Safety Summit March 19-20, 2015 Jeffrey Onizuk Intelligent Transportation System.
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
Internet 2 Corporate Value Proposition Stuart Kippelman (J&J) Jeff Lemmer (Ford) December 12, 2005.
IntelliDrive Policy and Institutional Issues Research Valerie Briggs Team Lead, Knowledge Transfer and Policy, ITS Joint Program Office, RITA May 4, 2010.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Meeting of State Pooled Fund Partners April 20, 2005 "Reducing Crashes at Rural Intersections: Toward a Multi-State Consensus on Rural Intersection Decision.
Joint Infant and Toddler Steering Committee/Early Learning Regional Coalition Statewide Meeting “Using our Data for Continuous Improvement” Organizational.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Mike Schagrin US Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office IntelliDrive Safety Program Overview.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Towards Zero Deaths: A National Strategy on Highway Safety Tony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan.
Engaging State DOT’s Engaging State DOT’s 2008 ITS America State Chapters Council Annual Meeting and State Chapters Strengthening Workshop Bernie Arseneau,
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Briefing to OFCM CEISC James Pol USDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office May 17, 2005.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Last Updated 1/17/02 1 Business Drivers Guiding Portal Evolution Portals Integrate web-based systems to increase productivity and reduce.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
2005 ITS Georgia Annual Meeting 1 MDOT VII Vision and Test Bed Plan States and OEM’s Working Together Gregory D. Krueger, P.E. MDOT ITS Program Manager.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Stephanie C. Binder National Highway Traffic Safety Administration US Department of Transportation Human Factors.
A Tire Industry Perspective on Tire Rolling Resistance Tracey Norberg Rubber Manufacturers Association Presentation to the California Energy Commission.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
Self-driving cars Connelly Barnes CS 6501 – Large-scale data-driven graphics and vision.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism New Priorities of Japan -Future Measures for Vehicle Safety for a Society with No Traffic Accidents-
White House Conference on Aging: Policy Committee Listening Session – Transportation – January 8, 2004 The Role of the State Motor Vehicle Department Robert.
Automated vehicles on public roads Alwin Bakker.
Intro to Driving Part 2 Mobility Study guide and Notes.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
U.S. DOT Automated Vehicle Policy Activities ITS PCB T3 Webinar The National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation Office of.
A Look into Autonomous Vehicles
Good Roads and Beyond Charles Gardner, MD, CCFP, MHSc, FRCPC Medical Officer of Health.
AASHTO CV/AV RESEARCH NCHRP (98) NCHRP
1 Autonomous Vehicles. 2 One of our top priorities is preparing our members for the impact of automation in vehicles.
Loughborough University research areas
Autonomous Vehicles in California
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
Road Safety Behaviour Symposium: New technology, new connectivity
Regional Road Safety Workshop African Development Bank,
Promises and pitfalls of Autonomous vehicles
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING GEORGIA TECH Academic Year
Autonomous/Connected Vehicle – Joint Lee/Collier MPO October 20, 2017
Vehicle to Infrastructure Deployment Coalition (V2I DC) & SPaT Challenge Overview January 8, 2017.
Thank you for this opportunity.
Accelerating the Introduction of
Road Infrastructure for Road Vehicles Automation
District Seven Secretary Paul Steinman
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
Presentation transcript:

Driverless Car Summit 2012 Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) Richard Bishop, Automotive Lead

AUVSI Non-profit industry association focusing on air/land/water unmanned operations 40 years 500+ corporate members expanding into civilian vehicle autonomy Driverless Cars 2022 Initiative: stretch goal what does it take to get there? DCS 2012 first meeting of its kind

Driverless Car Summit Detroit, June 12-13, 2012 Agenda included: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy USDOT (ITS JPO and NHTSA) USDOD Nevada Dept. of Motor Vehicles Google, GM, Daimler, Continental ~ 250 attendees www.auvsi.org

Types of Automation beyond automated longitudinal control (ACC) to add some level of automated lateral control (lane centering) driver must still maintain vigilance as to any unusual situation on the road How successful will these systems be in maintaining driver engagement? Will driver monitoring become common? Traffic Jam Assistant (full control below a speed threshold on highways) automated urban “citycars”

Industry Representation Car industry Chrysler, Daimler, Ford, GM, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo Cars Suppliers Valeo, Continental, others Google Ground vehicle robotics firms Transportation engineering firms

Car Industry Perspectives the advent of vehicle automation is by now a given systems are being designed to handle the roads and traffic “as-is.” The role of the infrastructure is open, as to how traffic management and mobility enhancement systems adapt. Expanding mobility for the disabled and elderly is a motivator compelling given the aging of the Baby Boom generation

Car Industry Perspectives Dr. Gary Smyth, General Motors significant vehicle evolution in the next decades expansion of the DNA of today’s personal mobility vehicle to include electrification, electronics, and connectivity. “transferred control” (hands/feet off) by mid-end decade autonomous driving by the end of the decade. Super Cruise (combined lat/lon control): near term Knowledge of the driver state and vehicle capability is essential investing significant effort into understanding transfer of control – this has to be done successfully in 2-3 seconds

Car Industry Perspectives Dr. Luca Delgrossi, Daimler: stepwise approach to automated driving looking at autonomous driving as their final goal F800 prototype: Traffic Jam Assistance requires driver to touch the steering wheel at regular intervals to stay engaged Christian Schumacher, Continental combined longitudinal and lateral control using equipment currently on the car implementing new features through sophisticated software

Industry Perspective Chris Urmson, Google: key priority is to program the vehicle to operate as if driven by a human. strong focus on defining performance metrics Re introduction: “the perfect is the enemy of the good” we should not wait for perfection

Government States passing driving laws USDOT assessing risks and addressing challenges USDOD beginning deployments for specific vehicles and operational environments Active collaboration between these DOT and DOD being explored

USDOT John Augustine, USDOT ITS Joint Program Office “the technology is feasible and deployment achievable.” automation can help across the board in addressing road transportation goals JPO funding multi-agency Automated Vehicle Exploratory Research program passenger cars, heavy trucks, and transit John Maddox, NHTSA newly defined automated driving research program stake in the ground: autonomous vehicles must be “better than humans.” goal for automated vehicles: “crash-less … I don't think people are willing to accept robotic error resulting in killing people.” “challenges can be met”

USDOD Dr. Jim Overholt, US Army Tank and Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center (TARDEC), Ground Vehicle Robotics Innovation Center “I want to allow soldiers to do something else while doing the mundane task of driving.” Autonomous Robotics for Installation and Base Operations (ARIBO) program application of autonomous vehicles to real-world needs at military bases roads and facilities at these bases can serve as a more “protected” environment compared to the open road Army sees these bases as a good testbed for autonomous operations possible way to collaborate with USDOT for testing pursuing the use of robotic vehicles at Fort Bragg to ferry “wounded warriors” to medical care facilities on-base

User Panel: Urban Complexity constant interaction outside the car – other drivers, bicyclists, pedestrians cyclists must be confident they are “seen” in entering an intersection, and they confirm this by looking at the driver how will the self-driving car “communicate” in such a situation and share the road space appropriately? will this new technology be designed for use by the blind to expand their mobility? a series of demonstrations and public campaigns will be important to inspiring public confidence in automated driving.

Legal Issues Panel change the legal infrastructure to enable automated vehicles, or change the vehicles to adapt to existing law? general response: vehicles will adapt to the law – not realistic to seek for laws to be passed just to address liability issues with automated vehicles. on-board data recording important use electronic discovery of evidence to prepare the way today for lawsuits tomorrow using data to prove in court when the vehicle is not responsible for a mishap. significant uncertainty in the legal realm is inhibiting the industry.

Connectivity <> Automation connected vehicles and automated vehicles are separate topics yet inter-related and complementary in the longer term, exchange of data between vehicles promises to enhance performance overall. cybersecurity is a significant concern

DCS12 Summary interactive format deepened understanding and cross- industry connections telling the story important -- we need a strategy and plan in educating the public cross-industry issues should be addressed, for example: testing / certification state-level regulations continue regular information sharing

2013 Driverless Car Summit Detroit May or June 2013 Annual meetings planned in following years