N. Barnsley, J.H. McAuley, R. Mohan, A. Dey, P. Thomas, G.L. Moseley 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

Visual Cortex Extrastriate Body-Selective Area Activation in Congenitally Blind People “Seeing” by Using Sounds Ella Striem-Amit, Amir Amedi Current Biology.
The Microbiome and Cancer: Is the ‘Oncobiome’ Mirage Real? Ryan M. Thomas, Christian Jobin Trends in Cancer Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (September 2015)
Sea turtles Current Biology
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
Eukaryotic Evolution: The Importance of Being Archaebacterial
Eye position predicts what number you have in mind
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Comparative Cognition: Action Imitation Using Episodic Memory
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Visual Categorization: When Categories Fall to Pieces
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Eye–Hand Coordination: Learning a New Trick
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Infant cognition Current Biology
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Addiction: Flies Hit the Skids
Behavior: Warriors Shaking Hands
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Plant Grafting: Making the Right Connections
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages R1025-R1026 (December 2013)
Palaeontology: Scrapes of Dinosaur Courtship
Physarum Current Biology
Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages R1114-R1116 (December 2015)
American birds: Audubon was not the first
Visual Attention: Size Matters
Plant vacuoles Current Biology
The FEAR network Current Biology
Volume 26, Issue 16, Pages R752-R754 (August 2016)
Immediate susceptibility to visual illusions after sight onset
Honeybee Communication: A Signal for Danger
Vision: When Does Looking Bigger Mean Seeing Better?
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages R265-R266 (April 2013)
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Evolution: Mirror, Mirror in the Pond
Volume 25, Issue 19, Pages R815-R817 (October 2015)
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Sea turtles Current Biology
Locomotion: Why We Walk the Way We Walk
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages R262-R263 (March 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages R88-R89 (February 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages R906-R910 (November 2006)
Figs and fig wasps Current Biology
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Honeybee buzz attenuates plant damage by caterpillars
It’s all about the constraints
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages R483-R484 (July 2005)
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Tool Use: Crows Craft the Right Tool for the Job
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages R784-R785 (September 2012)
FOXO transcription factors
Neuronal Plasticity: How Do Neurons Know What To Do?
Volume 20, Issue 19, Pages R835-R837 (October 2010)
Visual Perception: A Novel Difference Channel in Binocular Vision
Embodiment of an alien hand interferes with intact-hand movements
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
Horizontal Gene Transfer: Accidental Inheritance Drives Adaptation
Anemonefishes Current Biology
Dermatophytes Current Biology
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages R58-R60 (January 2018)
American birds: Audubon was not the first
Cell Division: The Need for Speed
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages R555-R556 (July 2010)
Basal bodies Current Biology
Axis Formation: Squint Comes into Focus
Matthew W. Hahn, Gregory C. Lanzaro  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Presentation transcript:

The rubber hand illusion increases histamine reactivity in the real arm  N. Barnsley, J.H. McAuley, R. Mohan, A. Dey, P. Thomas, G.L. Moseley  Current Biology  Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages R945-R946 (December 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.039 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The size of the wheal response and its relationship to the vividness of the rubber hand illusion. (A) Mean (squares) and standard deviation (error bars) of the surface are of the wheal in thousand pixels, for the experimental arm and control arm during the rubber hand illusion (RHI; filled squares) and the control condition (open squares). Images show each wheal from a representative participant. The reddening is the flare response. The wheal has been traced by an investigator blinded to condition and experimental arm. Horizontal lines denote difference at p = 0.05. (B) Scatterplot of the size of the wheal response on the experimental arm (vertical axis) and the vividness of the RHI (horizontal axis) for each participant in the RHI condition. Current Biology 2011 21, R945-R946DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.039) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions