Existing Priority Substances EQS revision - MS questionnaire

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Water.europa.eu Review of priority substances under the WFD Chemicals and Water Workshop European Environment Agency Copenhagen 6-7 December 2010 Helen.

Advertisements

THE EU-LIST OF PRIORITY SUBSTANCES A NEW STRATEGY AGAINST WATER POLLUTION Bernd Mehlhorn, Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.

Discharges of Dangerous Substance Directive 76/464/EEC and “daughter” directives Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment.

Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.

Criteria for water quality assessment between countries: how to proceed in the next few years ? F. László Water Resources Research Centre Budapest, Hungary.

Regional Sea Conventions indicators and data flows for hazardous substances TG DATA workshop on Eutrophication (D5) and Hazardous substance (D8) indicators.

1 AMPS 5 Expert Group on Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances Georg Hanke, Jan Wollgast JRC IES IMW.

Water.europa.eu Questionnaire on existing priority substances WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels October 2010 Agenda Item 5.3(a) Helen Clayton WFD Team.

MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.

1 New policies in environmental quality strategies within the EU Twinning Project SK 05/IB/EN/01 Fulvio Ferrara Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Rome, Italy.

Methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on monitoring programmes (Article 11) Milieu Ltd Consortium WG DIKE, September 2014.

Water.europa.eu EQS revision for existing priority substances WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels October 2010 Agenda Item 5.3(b) Helen Clayton WFD Team.

AMPS 2 Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances and Chemical Pollutants Second Meeting Ispra Review of Actions.

Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.

CMA-3 Support to Standardisation 8 th CMA Plenary Meeting in conjunction with NORMAN and EAQC-WISE final meetings Paris, France, 21 st October 08 Ulrich.

CMA-3 Support to Standardisation 7 th CMA Plenary Meeting Palais Beaumont, Pau, France, 14 th May 08 Ulrich Borchers, Peter Lepom, Bernd Gawlik.

Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Strategic Co-ordination Group meeting May 2011 Jorge Rodriguez.

October 2008 CMA on-site 2 17./ Budapest, Hungary.

Review of the Daughter Directives of the Discharge of Dangerous Substances Directive Thomas Zabel.

Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.

1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,

Potential of ozone for the removal of hazardous micropollutants and related changes in dissolved organic matter composition in a municipal biotreated effluent.

DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.

1 Current Analytical Challenges in Water Policy Philippe QUEVAUVILLER Joint NORMA-EAQCWISE-CMA Workshop, Paris 21 October 2008.

Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.

Priority Substances - Source Screening and Measures Sheets Tenth Meeting of Working Group E on Chemical Aspects 24 June 2010.

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs PRIORITY SUBSTANCES AND EQS’s IN THE PROYECT INCEPTION WORKSHOP Istanbul February -

Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.

Dedicated maps on contaminants

Project Briefing for WG/E Brussels 15/03/10

4th Expert E-PRTR Group Meeting Brussels, 4 February 2011

Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template

Chemical state in lakes and rivers

Review of the WFD priority substances list

Proposed CIS Workshop on WFD Economic Issues

Identification of standardisation needs in the light of the SW/MW Guidance development - 3rd CMA meeting - 23 March 2006, Brussels Ulrich Borchers,

Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.

OSPAR chemical monitoring and assessment of the North-East Atlantic

European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water

Dedicated maps on contaminants

Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit

1st CHEMICAL MONITORING AND EMERGING POLLUTANTS (CMEP) PLENARY MEETING 25th November 2010 Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Bratislava.

Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs

Table of existing standard methods and proposed quality standards for priority substances in water AMPS (2) Jan Wollgast.

Activity on environmental objectives and exemptions

CMA on-site 2 Announcement

Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances and Chemical Pollutants

New Priority Substances - EQS derivation

Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Guidance Document on Chemical Monitoring of Surface Water (Version 3.0)

Agenda Item 10: Feedback on dangerous substances workshop and Implementation Guidance WG-E(1)-07/04/INERIS - Implementation guidance.

Contaminants products for EMODNet Chemistry 3

Data collection and dedicated maps on contaminants

CMA Drafting group on sediment/biota monitoring

Overview of environmental monitoring at EU and regional level

Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC

EU Water Framework Directive

Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive

Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances

WG E on Priority Substances

EQS derivation for proposed priority substances

Draft Mandate to request SCHER opinion on the TGD-EQS

13th Working Group E meeting March 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero

Short update on the Status of the execution of

Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play

Sediment & biota standards Monitoring for prioritisation & emerging pollutants National EQSs for specific substances.

WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003

Review of the results of monitoring-based prioritisation

Identification of new Priority Substances – state of play

7th Expert Advisory Forum on Priority Substances June 2004 Article 16 on priority substances under the Water Framework Directive.

Mandate and proposal for working methods

Presentation transcript:

Existing Priority Substances EQS revision - MS questionnaire WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels 24-25 June 2010 Agenda item 3(i)(a) Helen Clayton WFD Team DG Environment European Commission

Questionnaire on existing priority substances 21 MS returned questionnaires – thank you! Document WG E(1)-10-03(i)(a) summarises MS proposals for review of EQS. Summaries of responses to other questions will be circulated when analysis is complete. Responses will be analysed in relation also to the source screening and measures sheets for existing substances.

Substances for which EQS should be reviewed because of new RAR data Anthracene Fluoranthene Naphthalene The 5 PAHs Check RAR for pitch: relevant new info?

Substances for which more stringent EQS might be derived because of (new) RAR data Lead + compounds (2008 RAR) Nickel + compounds (2008 RAR) PBDE (higher AF used in RAR?; + OctaBDE to be covered following prioritisation)

Substances for which EQS should be reviewed in order to comply with new EQS guidance Carbon tetrachloride Chlorpyrifos-ethyl The 4 cyclodiene pesticides para,para-DDT Tetrachlor-ethylene Trichlor-ethylene

Substances whose EQS should be reviewed for other reasons Benzene Carcinogenicity means human health should be assessment endpoint - more stringent EQS? Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Mercury + compounds Biota EQS should take account of different sensitivities of species, life stages etc Mercury: less stringent EQS in view of exceedances due to natural background?

Substances for which some MS suggested less stringent EQS (or EQS for other matrices) because of analytical difficulties 2 PAHs : Benzo(g,h,i)-perylene and Indeno(1,2,3-cd)-pyrene PBDE Cadmium + compounds C10-13 chloroalkanes Chlorpyrifos-ethyl The 4 cyclodiene pesticides Endosulfan Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Nonylphenols Octylphenols Pentachlorobenzene Tributyltin compounds