Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Advertisements

Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Identification of E2/E3 Ubiquitinating Enzymes and Caspase Activity Regulating Drosophila Sensory Neuron Dendrite Pruning  Chay T. Kuo, Sijun Zhu, Susan.
Seven-up Controls Switching of Transcription Factors that Specify Temporal Identities of Drosophila Neuroblasts  Makoto I. Kanai, Masataka Okabe, Yasushi.
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Kim F. Rewitz, Naoki Yamanaka, Michael B. O'Connor  Developmental Cell 
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
The Intracellular Domain of the Frazzled/DCC Receptor Is a Transcription Factor Required for Commissural Axon Guidance  Alexandra Neuhaus-Follini, Greg J.
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Hierarchical Deployment of Factors Regulating Temporal Fate in a Diverse Neuronal Lineage of the Drosophila Central Brain  Chih-Fei Kao, Hung-Hsiang Yu,
Regulation of Temporal Identity Transitions in Drosophila Neuroblasts
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
HBL-1 Patterns Synaptic Remodeling in C. elegans
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Elizabeth E. Caygill, Andrea H. Brand  Cell Reports 
The Snail Family Member Worniu Is Continuously Required in Neuroblasts to Prevent Elav-Induced Premature Differentiation  Sen-Lin Lai, Michael R. Miller,
Lethal Giant Larvae Acts Together with Numb in Notch Inhibition and Cell Fate Specification in the Drosophila Adult Sensory Organ Precursor Lineage  Nicholas.
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
insomniac and Cullin-3 Regulate Sleep and Wakefulness in Drosophila
A microRNA Mediates EGF Receptor Signaling and Promotes Photoreceptor Differentiation in the Drosophila Eye  Xin Li, Richard W. Carthew  Cell  Volume.
Wonho Kim, Yoon-Gu Jang, Jinsung Yang, Jongkyeong Chung 
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Clock and cycle Limit Starvation-Induced Sleep Loss in Drosophila
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages (January 2007)
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
PAR-1 Kinase Plays an Initiator Role in a Temporally Ordered Phosphorylation Process that Confers Tau Toxicity in Drosophila  Isao Nishimura, Yufeng Yang,
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Extremes of Lineage Plasticity in the Drosophila Brain
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Piezo-like Gene Regulates Locomotion in Drosophila Larvae
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Giovanni Marchetti, Gaia Tavosanis  Current Biology 
A microRNA Mediates EGF Receptor Signaling and Promotes Photoreceptor Differentiation in the Drosophila Eye  Xin Li, Richard W. Carthew  Cell  Volume.
Caroline Medioni, Mirana Ramialison, Anne Ephrussi, Florence Besse 
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
Developmental Timing in C
E93 Directs Steroid-Triggered Programmed Cell Death in Drosophila
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S. Sokol  Developmental Cell  Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 202-209 (July 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.013 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2012 23, 202-209DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Temporal Onset of let-7-C in MB Neurons (A) let-7-CGKI crossed to UAS-mCD8::GFP (green) is detected in the MBs (indicated by dotted box) of adult brains counterstained with neuropil marker nc82 (magenta). (B) An increasing gradient of let-7 miRNA is expressed in CNS tissue at the larval-to-pupal transition, along with miR-100 and miR-125 (see Figure S1). Total RNA was extracted from CNS tissues dissected from staged animals, and probed for U6 snRNA as loading control. (C) let-7-Cp12.5kb::lacZ (white in top panels, green in bottom panels) is not detected in wandering L3 MBs stained for Dac (magenta, bottom panels) but is detected in increasing numbers of MB neurons in white prepupae (0), 12 hr pupae (12), and 24 hr pupae (24). Asterisks mark the location of Nbs and GMCs. (D) let-7-Cp12.5kb::lacZ (white in top panel, red in bottom panel) is detected in a white prepupae MB clone expressing GFP (green, outlined) and Dac (blue) that was induced ∼18 hr earlier. Scale bars, 25 μm (A) and 10 μm (C and D). See also Figure S1. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 202-209DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 MB Temporal Identity Is Sensitive to let-7-C Dosage (A) Percentages of different subtypes of MB neurons (y axis) among single- and two-cell clones that were induced in wild-type and let-7-C mutant animals at different times relative to puparium formation (x axis). (B) Percentages of different subtypes of MB neurons (y axis) among single- and two-cell clones that were induced in wild-type and 4Xlet-7-C larvae at different times relative to puparium formation (x axis). (C) Average number of c305a-Gal4-positive α′/β′ neurons in wild-type (2X) or let-7-CKO1 and let-7-CKO2 transheterozgyotes (0X). ∗p = 0.0283. (D) Average number of c305a-Gal4-positive α′/β′ neurons in wild-type (2X) and 4Xlet-7-C (4X) adults. ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (E) Average number of c708a-Gal4-positive p. α/β neurons in wild-type (2X), let-7-CKO1 and let-7-CKO2 transheterozgyotes (0X), let-7-CKO2 heterozygotes harboring a let-7-C rescuing transgene (2X-R), and wild-type harboring a let-7-C rescuing transgene (3X). ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 comparing either 2X and 0X or 2X and 3X. (F and G) OK107-Gal4, UAS-mCD8::GFP-labeled wild-type (F) and let-7-C KO2 (G) adult MB clones generated in newly hatched larvae and stained with anti-FasII antibodies. Although the α, α′, β′, and γ lobes appear normal in the let-7-C mutant clone (compare arrowheads in G to F), β neurons display a midline crossing defect (arrow in G). Scale bar in (F) is 50 μm and refers to (G). Numbers in parentheses represent the total number of clones (A and B) or brains (C–E) analyzed for each genotype. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S2. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 202-209DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 let-7-C miRNAs Regulate Chinmo Expression (A, C, and E) OK107-Gal4, UAS-mCD8::GFP-labeled wild-type (A), UAS-let-7-C (C), and chinmo1 (E) adult MB clones generated in newly hatched larvae and stained with anti-FasII antibodies. In wild-type, γ lobes are weakly stained with FasII, whereas α′ and β′ are devoid of FasII staining. Note the absence of γ, α′, and β′ lobes in UAS-let-7-C and chinmo1 MBs (asterisks). Arrowheads indicate α, α′, β, β′, and γ lobes in the wild-type clone (A). Both the UAS-let-7-C and chinmo1 clones are apparently lacking the α′/β′ and γ lobes (arrowheads with asterisks in C and E, respectively). Scale bar in (A) is 50 μm and refers to (C) and (E). (B, D, and F) OK107-Gal4-labeled wild-type (B), UAS-let-7-C (D), and chinmo1 mutant (F) L3 MB clones labeled with GFP generated in newly hatched larvae and stained with anti-Chinmo antibodies. Clones are outlined in yellow in the Chinmo channel. Scale bar in (B) is 7.5 μm and refers to (D) and (F). (G) Fold repression of luciferase reporters containing the 8.5 kb full-length chinmo 3′ UTR, a 1.4 kb chinmo 3′ UTR fragment, a mutated 1.4 kb 3′ UTR fragment, or the white 3′ UTR in cell cultures in which let-7-C miRNAs were ectopically expressed either together or individually. ∗p = 0.0135,∗∗∗p = 0.0003, and ∗∗p = 0.0049 comparing repression of chinmo1.4kb versus chinmo1.4kbmut by let-7-C miRNAs, let-7 alone, or miR-125 alone, respectively. (H) Quantification of pigment levels from flies harboring white reporter transgenes containing the white (w), chinmo (chin), or abrupt (ab) 3′ UTR and containing either wild-type (+) or let-7-CKO1 mutant (−) eye cells. ∗∗p = 0.0028 or ∗∗p = 0.0060 comparing chinmo or abrupt 3′ UTR in wild-type and let-7-CKO1 cells. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. (I and J) Wild-type (I) and let-7-C (J) adult brains harboring OK107-Gal4 and UAS-mCD8::ChRFP insertions and stained with anti-Chinmo antibodies. MBs are outlined. Scale bars, 25 μm. See also Figures S3 and S4. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 202-209DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Chinmo Suppresses let-7-C MB Phenotypes and Is Epistatic to let-7-C (A) Average number of c708a Gal4-positive p. α/β neurons in adults that are wild-type (+) or heterozygous (−) for chinmo1 (columns 3, 5, 6), let-7-CKO1 (columns 2, 3), or let-7-CKO2 (columns 4, 5). ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001 comparing either column 2 and 3 or column 4 and 5. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. (B) Percentages of different subtypes among single- and two-cell wild-type, chinmo1, or chinmo1, let-7-CKO2 mutant clones that were induced at different times relative to puparium formation (x axis). (C) OK107-Gal4, UAS-mCD8::GFP-labeled chinmo1, let-7-CKO2 double-mutant adult MB clone generated in newly hatched larvae and stained with anti-FasII antibodies. Note the absence of γ, α′, and β′ lobes (asterisks). Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) let-7 and miR-125 are upregulated at the larval-to-pupal transition and promote transitions in MB temporal identity by repressing chinmo. Numbers in parentheses represent the total number of brains (A) or clones (B) analyzed for each genotype. Developmental Cell 2012 23, 202-209DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.013) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions