Dealing from the Evolutionary Pawnshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antigen-Independent B-Cell Development
Advertisements

Stems Cells and the Pathways to Aging and Cancer
Control of gene expression
Establishing the Follicular Helper Identity
Suneet Agarwal, Anjana Rao  Immunity 
Suneet Agarwal, ScBa, João P.B. Viola, MD, PhDb, Anjana Rao, PhDa 
Programming Perpetual T Helper Cell Plasticity
Essentials of Th17 cell commitment and plasticity
Differentiation and Functions of CD8+ Effector T Cells
TCF-1 Flips the Switch on Eomes
Regulating the Immune Response to Transplants
Cell signaling and cancer
Antibodies and B Cell Memory in Viral Immunity
Plasticity of CD4+ T Cell Lineage Differentiation
Kaitlin A. Read, Michael D. Powell, Paul W. McDonald, Kenneth J
Development in Motion: Helper T Cells at Work
Jacob H. Hanna, Krishanu Saha, Rudolf Jaenisch  Cell 
MicroRNA Regulation of Stem Cell Fate
Mechanism and Significance of cis-Inhibition in Notch Signalling
B Cells and Immunological Tolerance
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 2-14 (October 2009)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (May 2014)
Dwelling on T Cell Fate Decisions
Like Parent, Like Child: Inheritance of Effector CD8+ T Cell Traits
The Genetics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Stem Cell Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Epithelia
Roles for KRAS in Pancreatic Tumor Development and Progression
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Tilo Biedermann, Martin Röcken, José M. Carballido 
The Mechanism and Regulation of Chromosomal V(D)J Recombination
Thomas R. Malek, Iris Castro  Immunity 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Russell G. Jones, Edward J. Pearce  Immunity 
Liying Guo, Jane Hu-Li, William E. Paul  Immunity 
Experimental Hematology
Molecular Dissection of Psoriasis: Integrating Genetics and Biology
Natural Killer Cell Memory
Regulatory T Cells and Immune Tolerance
Tumor Promotion via Injury- and Death-Induced Inflammation
Control of B Lymphocyte Apoptosis by the Transcription Factor NF-κB
The Expression Pattern of Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Genes In Vivo Is Dependent upon the Differentiation Stage of the Infected B Cell  Gregory J Babcock,
Plasma Cells for Hire: Prior Experience Required
Regulating the Immune Response to Transplants
Establishing the Follicular Helper Identity
Elanor N. Wainwright, Paola Scaffidi  Trends in Cancer 
Wenjun Ouyang, Anne O’Garra  Immunity 
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Multistep Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Disease
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
IL-7 Knocks the Socs Off Chronic Viral Infection
Inflaming the CD8+ T Cell Response
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Th17: An Effector CD4 T Cell Lineage with Regulatory T Cell Ties
Helper T Cell Differentiation Is Controlled by the Cell Cycle
Peripheral Tolerance of CD8 T Lymphocytes
The TNF Receptor 1 Cell Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Cell-Intrinsic Barriers of T Cell-Based Immunotherapy
Sites and Stages of Autoreactive B Cell Activation and Regulation
Vaccines for Lung Cancer
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Keeping STATs on Memory CD8+ T Cells
The Transcriptional Regulation of B Cell Lineage Commitment
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Immunity and the Animation of the Genome
TCF-1 Flips the Switch on Eomes
γδ T Cells and the Lymphoid Stress-Surveillance Response
Stems Cells and the Pathways to Aging and Cancer
Presentation transcript:

Dealing from the Evolutionary Pawnshop Steven L Reiner, Robert A Seder  Immunity  Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-10 (July 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80076-X

Figure 1 Helper T Cell Differentiation Is Coupled to the Cell Cycle In the thymus (A), a double-positive cell makes a postmitotic and exclusive choice to become either a CD4+ or a CD8+ cell. In the hypothetical and analogous model of the peripheral immune response (B), a helper T cell precursor (ThP) transits through a bipotent stage (Th0) to then turn down selected genes and become either a Th1 or a Th2 cell. These two models allow for one clone to adopt only one fate. Based on more recent evidence, however, a model is suggested (C) where the effector decision is coupled to proliferation, providing the possibility that more than one fate can be assumed by cells expressing the same receptor. Yellow represents undifferentiated cells. Immunity 1999 11, 1-10DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80076-X)

Figure 2 Alternative Models for the Regulation of Helper T Cells by Cytokines In all cases, a naive helper T cell precursor (P) activated in the presence of the Th2-promoting factor, IL-4, proliferates and ultimately gives rise to a predominant population of Th2 (blue) cells. The bold arrows indicate at which cellular stage IL-4 is acting. Instructive models predict that IL-4 produces signals which transform the gene expression pattern of the precursor into a Th2 cell. In selection, a cell stochastically, autonomously, and inefficiently adopts both the Th1 fate (after one cell cycle) and the Th2 fate (after three cell cycles), independently of the IL-4 signal. The early presence of IL-4, enriches the mixed population by inhibiting the growth (minus, negative selection) of both Th1 (red) and undifferentiated (yellow) cells and/or favoring the growth (plus, positive selection) of Th2 cells. Negative instruction predicts that the presence of IL-4 inhibits the ability of progeny to adopt the Th1 fate. Limited positive instruction predicts that IL-4 produces a signal that makes a greater number of progeny adopt the Th2 fate than would do so in the absence of the IL-4 signal. We believe current evidence argues against the upper-most (purely instructive) model and favors a combination of the three models below the dashed line. Immunity 1999 11, 1-10DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80076-X)

Figure 3 Two Pathways to Random Monallelic Expression Each pair of bars represents the two alleles of a hypothetical gene within a single cell. (A) In true allelic exclusion, a reliable gene activation (or recombination) event (red allele) is accompanied by an equally reliable prohibition of activation (blue) of the other allele among all cells competent to reach a differentiation step. (B) Allelic unlikelihood assumes that among cells competent to reach a differentiation step, only a small percentage are capable of the gene activation (or recombination) event. If individual alleles are independently regulated, the chance of two alleles in a single cell achieving activation is highly unlikely. Selective survival or progression of the differentiated cells results in a homogeneous population of monallelically expressing cells with some degree of apparent leakiness, which may vary with the length of the differentiation step and the selection process. Although not yet experimentally established, we believe virtually all monoallelic expression of lymphocyte genes may represent allelic unlikelihood with the illusion of exclusion. Immunity 1999 11, 1-10DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80076-X)

Figure 4 A Spectrum of Silencing by Epigenetic Effects In this simplified, hypothetical model, methylation (blue) represents the mechanism of gene silencing or repression. Chromatin and rate-limiting concentrations of trans-acting factors could also mediate this effect. The likelihood of expression (red) varies inversely to the amount of repression. Essential (“housekeeping”) genes are rigorously protected from promoter methylation, while dangerous retroelements that invade the genome (“junk DNA”) are heavily methylated. In between these two poles, many lymphocyte genes (cytokines, antigen receptors) are regulated by moderate methylation or inaccessibility in order to yield a reliable but infrequent (variegated) pattern of expression. Immunity 1999 11, 1-10DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80076-X)