Relationship Between The Courts and Parliament in Law Making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit 3 AoS 3 Revision DP 5: Strengths and weaknesses of law making through the courts DP 6: The relationship between parliament and the courts in law making.
Advertisements

Unit 3 AOS 3 The Role of the Courts in law-making
EOC Judicial – Systems / Structures
Sources of Law Chapter 1.2.
Unit 1 – The South African Legal System Advocate Samuels BUSINESS LAW.
Basic notions and sources of law
BASICS OF THE AUSTRALIAN LEGAL SYSTEM FIRST YEAR SEMINAR 2013 JO MITCHELL.
 Following the development of legal principles through the decisions of judges in earlier cases can be difficult.  Determining which precedent, if any,
The Doctrine of Precedent
UNWRITTEN LAW JUDICIAL DECISION.
UNIT 3 LEGAL STUDIES AO3- THE ROLE OF THE COURTS
Judicial Precedent by Lisa Incledon.
Business Law 1 Case Law The hierarchy of the courts.
Doctrine of Precedent.
The relationship between parliament and the courts.
Shaping Public Policy Chapter 12 Section 2.
The Five Main Sources of U.S. Law
Judicial Precedent.
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
A bit of revision.
Evaluation of Law-Making Through Courts. Evaluation The main role of the courts is to resolve disputes. Precedent develops as judges reach decisions in.
4.5 THE EFFECT OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION KEY CONCEPT Judges will often be required to interpret a statute in the process of arriving at a decision in.
COMMON LAW, CASE LAW AND PRECEDENT
Structure and Principles
The Constitution The Supreme Law of the Land. 6 Basic Principles the Constitution is Built On #1: Popular Sovereignty – The people are all Powerful.
English Legal System “It is not a faultlessly coherent and single, logically developed system. It grew piecemeal and various parts of it have been reformed.
Judges and the judiciary — eg role of judiciary (adjudicating the meaning of law, presiding over the courts, sitting on government bodies). Relationship.
T HE R ELATIONSHIP B ETWEEN C OURTS AND P ARLIAMENTS.
3 Branches of Government The Judicial Branch. Creation of the Judicial Created by the Constitution These courts are called “Guardians of the Constitution”
Classifying Law Sources of Canadian Law. What do you think? 1.Which of these situations involve law? 2.Explain how the law is involved in the situations.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 18.
YR 12 LEGAL STUDIES How courts make law. Chapter overview This chapter looks at the concepts of Common law Doctrine of precedent Judgments and precedents.
Welcoming Activity….  Pair …Share…. Answers from last night’s homework.
Chapter 18: The Federal Court System Section 1. Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 2 Chapter 18, Section 1 Origins of the Judiciary The Constitution.
Sources of Law in Canada
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Business Law 4e by Barron & Fletcher. Slides prepared by Kay Fanning. Copyright.
3/10/ The Federal Court System: An Introductory Guide For Mr. Brady’s Awesome Class.
THE ABILITY OF JUDGES TO MAKE LAW. INTRODUCTION: COMMON LAW  Common law – founded in England, adopted by Australia  It is law developed through the.
Structures and Principles. Structure  Contains 7,000 words  Divided into 3 parts The Preamble The Articles The Amendments.
Corporate and Business Law (ENG). 2 Designed to give you knowledge and application of: Section A: Essential elements of the legal system A1. Court structure.
Ethics and the Law. Defining Ethics What You Will Learn How ethical decisions are made How ethical decisions are made When to apply the greatest good.
Sources of Law - Varsha Aithala.
Dividing Governmental Power
CHAPTER 2 LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
Commercial & Property Law
Relationship between the courts and parliament in law-making
Common Law Legal Studies 3C.
The Doctrine of Precedent
BANKSTOWN COLLEGE OF TAFE HSC LEGAL STUDIES
Peter F Hughes Legal Studies 2017 Robinvale College
UNIT 8 THE HIERARCHY OF COURTS AND THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT
Principles of the Constitution
Sources of Law 1 The common law
Judicial Review.
BANKSTOWN COLLEGE OF TAFE HSC LEGAL STUDIES
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH.
The U.S. Constitution.
The relationship between parliament and the courts
Classifying Law.
COURTS JUDGE-MADE LAW.
COURTS VS PARLIAMENT.
Coach Kuntz United States History
COURTS JUDGE-MADE LAW.
Problems Facing the Framers
Sources of Law Legislature – makes law Executive – enforces law
The Role of the Courts in Law-Making
The Relationship Between Courts and Parliament in Law-Making
Article III.
Judicial Branch Vocabulary
Victorian Court Hierarchy
Presentation transcript:

Relationship Between The Courts and Parliament in Law Making

The supremacy of parliament The ability of courts to influence parliament The interpretation of statutes by courts The codification of common law The abrogation of common law Five Main Features of the Relationship Between Parliament and the Courts

The supremacy of Parliament Can make and change law within its constitutional power. Has the ability to pass legislation to either confirm or override (abrogate) decisions made through the courts (with the exception of the high court on constitutional matters.) Responsible for passing legislation that establishes the courts and states the power they have to hear cases. Can also pass legislation to alter the jurisdiction of courts eg Magistrates Act amended to create specialist list (sexual offences list) and divisions (Koori Court, Drug Court and Family Violence Court) X Separation of Powers – must ensure courts remain independent and retains the power to determine if Parliament has made laws beyond its law-making authority.

The Ability of Courts to Influence Parliament Judges can make comments when handing down judgement in ratio decidendi or obiter dictum that inspire parliament to initiate law reform. Parliament can also be influenced to change law If court bound by previous precedent but decision creates injustice Court acts with judicial conservatism (eg Trigwell) Court acts with judicial activism (eg Mabo) Courts decision may highlight an issue or lead to public uproar (eg abortion law)

The Interpretation of Statutes by Courts For legislation to be effective the courts must apply legislations to the cases that come before them. To do this courts must sometimes interpret the meaning to the words of phrases of the Act.

Codification vc Abrogation Parliament may abolish common law principles it disagrees with. Codification Parliament may decide to bring common law principles within statute law. This means that the common law is restated in Acts and becomes statute law.

Summary Where statute law and common law conflict, statute law prevails. This is because parliament is the supreme law- making authority. Courts give meaning to the terms used in Acts in order to apply them to specific cases. The decisions made by courts about the meaning of terms used in an Act form a precedent for future cases. Parliament may legislate to abrogate or codify the decisions made by a court.