ME1/1 Electronics Upgrade

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

Georgia Tech Digital Back-end µHRG interface Curtis Mayberry School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology January 13 th,
Electronics for large LAr TPC’s F. Pietropaolo (ICARUS Collaboration) CRYODET Workshop LNGS, March 2006.
Digital to Analog and Analog to Digital Conversion
ESODAC Study for a new ESO Detector Array Controller.
20 Feb 2002Readout electronics1 Status of the readout design Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Basic concept Features of proposal VFE interface issues.
Commissioning of CSCs and Peripheral Crates Task L M. Ignatenko UCLA October
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
© 2012 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All rights reserved. Electronic Devices, 9th edition Thomas L. Floyd Electronic Devices Ninth.
High Speed, high common mode immunity communication interface Team May12-05 Chendong Yang Mengfei Xu Advisor: Nathan Neihart Client: RBC Medical Development.
Digital CFEB Prototype Plans 1 B. Bylsma, CSC Upgrade Workshop, Ohio State Univ., April 23-24, 2010 Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
ITOP carrier amplifier test at Indiana University G. Visser 4/27/2015 (latest update) I use the recently (here) characterized JT0947 ch3 as input source.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade - DCFEB Status S. Durkin, B. Bylsma The Ohio State University FNAL ME1/1 Review 7/20/
David MacNair POWER SUPPLY 3/30/20061 Ethernet Power Supply Controller.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
Alexei Safonov (Texas A&M University) For the EMU community.
R. Kass US LC Conference 1 Design and Fabrication of a Radiation-Hard 500-MHz Digitizer Using Deep Submicron Technology R. Kass The Ohio State University.
CMS EMU CSC Upgrade Digital CFEB B. Bylsma, CMS Upgrade Workshop, FNAL, Nov. 8, Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
25th June, 2003CMS Ecal MGPA first results1 MGPA first results testing begun 29 th May on bare die (packaging still underway) two chips looked at so far.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade Status of Electronics Design Mikhail Matveev Rice University March 28, 2012.
A Study of Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC The Ohio State University - Task A.2 B.G. Bylsma, L.S. Durkin, D. Fisher, J Gilmore, J.H. Gu, D. Larson,
March 9, 2005 HBD CDR Review 1 HBD Electronics Preamp/cable driver on the detector. –Specification –Schematics –Test result Rest of the electronics chain.
Valerio Re, Massimo Manghisoni Università di Bergamo and INFN, Pavia, Italy Jim Hoff, Abderrezak Mekkaoui, Raymond Yarema Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
1 ME1/1 OTMB Production Readiness Review: Schedule and Budget Darien Wood Northeastern University For the ME1/1 Electronics Project.
Digital CFEB (an Update) B. Bylsma, EMU at CMS Week, March 16, Ben Bylsma The Ohio State University.
RPC Upscope Meeting Jay Hauser 05 Feb 20101/11 Overview of the CSC Phase I Upgrade plans ME4/2 upgrade: 72 new large chambers for high-luminosity triggering.
Calibration of the gain and measurement of the noise for the apv25 electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, C.Gu, K. Saenboonruang From INFN Italy: E. Cisbani,
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Power Supply Status George Ganetis Power Supply Status ASAC Review October 22-23, 2009.
16722 Mo: data acquisition150+1 data acquisition.
Dick Loveless Upgrade report 12 Oct EMU Upgrade Report Dick Loveless University of Wisconsin 12 October 2012.
Task List  Group management plan  Background studies  Link budget: optical/electrical  Build, test learning Rx board  Order components for transceiver.
2/June/2009LHCb Upgrade1 Single ended ADC Differential ADC –Convert single ended signal to differential (use AD8138 amp) –ASIC differential output ADC.
CSC Ops/DPG meeting, 05-Oct-2011 Hauser1 ALCT boards for ME4/2 etc.
Stan Durkin CMS Upgrade Week 1 A Digital Pipelined Cathode Front End Board (DCFEB) Stan Durkin The Ohio State University.
R&D status of the very front end ASIC Tilecal week (7 October 2011) François Vazeille Jacques Lecoq, Nicolas Pillet, Laurent Royer and Irakli Minashvili.
GMM, 05-Jul-2015 Jay Hauser Another look at CSC ME3/1, ME4/1 descoping 1  Recall descoping scenarios for 235 and 200 MChF:  Tiziano:
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: ICECAL_V3 Mezzanine Board, initial developments BE-BI-BL Jose Luis Sirvent Blasco 2 Jose.
Enhancement Presentation Carlos Abellan Barcelona September, 9th 2009.
MADEIRA Valencia report V. Stankova, C. Lacasta, V. Linhart Ljubljana meeting February 2009.
OTMB Development and Upgrade Plan for LS2
DCFEB Production for LS2
Electronic Devices Ninth Edition Floyd Chapter 14.
Design of a polyvalent robust isolated input channel
Quiz: Determining a SAR ADC’s Linear Range when using Operational Amplifiers TIPL 4101 TI Precision Labs – ADCs Created by Art Kay.
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
Calorimeter Mu2e Development electronics Front-end Review
Quiz: Driving a SAR ADC with a Fully Differential Amplifier TIPL 4103 TI Precision Labs – ADCs Created by Art Kay.
BI-day 2014, The SEM-grid renovation project Michel Duraffourg
Analog FE circuitry simulation
The Ohio State University
EI205 Lecture 13 Dianguang Ma Fall 2008.
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
Functional diagram of the ASD
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
BPMs in the new Dump Line
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
High-Voltage Supply Requirements Review
Calorimeter Upgrade Meeting
ALCT Production, Cable Tests, and TMB Status
Jason Gilmore Vadim Khotilovich Alexei Safonov Indara Suarez
Functional diagram of the ASD
P Fritschel LSC Meeting LLO, 22 March 2005
RPC Front End Electronics
SLHC CSC Electronics Upgrade Spearheaded by OSU CMS Group
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
The QUIET ADC Implementation
Verify chip performance
Common-Mode Voltage Input common-mode voltage is the most important specification when selecting a direct current sensing solution. It is defined as the.
Presentation transcript:

ME1/1 Electronics Upgrade S. Durkin Ohio State Mar. 2 , 2010 1

Digital CFEB – Designed for the SLHC Deal with possible ME1/1 Rate Issues Replace Conventional ADC and SCA storage with Flash ADC and Digital Storage New System Deadtimeless, Removes rate worries Similar cost to old system Fairly Radical Idea – Couldn’t build 5 Years Ago 2

ME1/1 Linked to ME4/2 Upgrade? New ME4/2 chambers need boards. Propose 514 new cards ME1/1 Old cards to populate ME4/2 Upgrade ME1/1 Handles highest particle flux Most important for momentum resolution. Removes ganged strips in ME1/1a DCFEBs were designed for SLHC Luminosity at SLHC unfortunately years away. A 1:1 swap with little immediate improvement and risks involved Don’t know rates yet First do no harm… 3

Digital CFEB part a Large Electronic System ME1/1 Electronics Upgrade 514 DCFEBs OSU 0.5 FTE 72 DMBs 72 TMB (d.c.)TAMU+ULCA 1.0FTE 72 LVDB (+more power) 72 LVMB 1028 Cables (default skewclear) LVDB 2010 R&D Funding Build Roughly 1/6 of Present CMS Cathode System in 18-24 Months Definitely Aggressive, Possible? Not with present manpower Engineers need >18 months to design and build preproduction board, and mass produce production boards (radiation tests…) Time has to be allocated to test boards as system 4

Digital CFEB R&D Board Designed to study linearity, noise, data transmission(there will be issues): - Coupling single ended Buckeye Amp to bipolar flash SCAs - Fiber output versus Skewclear output Noise on Analog-Digital boards can be problems - use old PC boards analog isolation Have started schematic and PC board layout Could have board in R&D board 4 months if no interruptions… Perform linearity tests, noise tests, and then Radiation testing in a beam 5

How long did present CFEB take to produce? CFEB 2 R&D boards, 2 preproduction boards 1997-2000 Test beams, Radiation tests (SEU rates, Total Dosage) CFEB production & testing October 2001-July 2003 2 Engineers/physicists , 2 Technicians, 1 Student this time we expect to only need 1 R&D board DCFEB Amplifier PC board noise protection copied from CFEB PC CFEB production & testing faster with 1/5 number of boards 6

Conclusion Schedule set by LHC shutdown not by physics, R&D, or manpower With additional engineer could produce R&D prototype by mid-summer Manpower needs to be found to design and build other boards and cables Time and physicists need to be found for board radiation tests as well as testing the resulting prototype boards as a system Risks: Nearly Impossible Schedule to Meet We are willing to attempt it (with additional manpower) Must assure ME1/1 new electronics as good as old electronics Cannot rush board and system tests 7

Backup Slides 8

First Step – Choose ADC ADC choice drives subsequent design considerations Interface between pre-amp and ADC Voltage/Power requirements Could impact LVDB design ADC choices:(8 ch, 12 bit, 20-65 MSPS, Serial LVDS output) MAX1437 (Maxim) 1.8V supply, 1.4Vpp range ADC12EU050 (National) 1.2V supply, 2.1Vpp range AD9222 (Analog Devices) 1.8V supply, 2Vpp range ADS5281 (Texas Instr.) 3.3V analog, 1.8V digital, 2Vpp range 9

Issues with ADCs None are suitable drop-in replacements for SCA/ADC All have differential inputs Limits on common mode Have internal input bias network Pre-Amp Single ended output Limited range of baseline level Designed to drive small capacitive load Pre-Amp/ADC Interface Mnfr. suggest transformer coupling (not an option for us) Amplifier to generate differential signal (requires 96 amplifiers) Direct couple single ended signal (common mode consequences) (level shifting/scaling) AC couple single ended signal (no level shifting, but still have biasing to consider) 10

Evaluation Boards Purchased Evaluation Boards for ADS5281 and AD9222 Basic Setup: Input Circuitry ADC + - DeSer Logic Analyzer Identify constraints/operation limits of ADC Direct Coupling Concerns Common Mode Data Sheet: Vcm = 1.5±0.05V How far from nominal? Baseline Level Range Digital output range is 2V But is linear range of common mode 2V? AC Coupling Concerns Same as direct coupling No worries with pre-amp baseline level But need to bias positive input 11

Constraints (ADS5281) ADC Constraints: Pre-Amp Constraints: Scaling: Vcm -600mV < (IN+ + IN-)/2 < Vcm +300mV (1.8Vpp on IN+) (IN- -1V) < IN+ < (IN-+1V) (ADC output range) Pre-Amp Constraints: Baseline Level Currently 1.8V Max ~2.0V Min ~1.2V (maybe 1.0V) Drive Capability Small (few mA at best) Scaling: Scale down input Add digital gain on output Resistor divider 1.2k Vcm 1.2k 12

Digitize Amplifier Pulses Connect CFEB to Evaluation Board: 50ns samples 13